Tue, Nov 18, 2025·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Alameda County Reparations Commission Meeting Summary (2025-11-18)

Discussion Breakdown

Community Engagement44%
Fiscal Sustainability19%
Procedural14%
Racial Equity11%
Public Engagement10%
Budget Equity Analysis2%

Summary

Alameda County Reparations Commission Meeting Summary (2025-11-18)

The Alameda County Reparations Commission met with a quorum, approved prior minutes, received an implementation/workplan update from its project management consultant (ECC), and focused heavily on logistics for the upcoming November community listening session. The Commission also reviewed budget tracking and flexibility to reallocate funds, discussed expanding outreach through supplemental/pop-up events (including potential virtual options), and approved a process and timeline for commissioners to develop draft action-plan recommendations using the State Reparations Task Force report as a structured “domain” tool.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public speakers.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved minutes for the October 8 meeting (with at least one abstention noted during roll call).

Discussion Items

  • Project management / implementation update (ECC)

    • ECC (Letitia) summarized progress by subcommittee against key tasks and milestones (completed September–October items and upcoming November tasks).
    • Admin & Budget / Communications updates (Commissioners)
      • Commissioner Varla(c) reported launch and growth of social media: now on LinkedIn (new), Facebook, and Instagram, including paid ads promoting listening sessions.
      • Commissioner Barry highlighted a significantly improved website, including a custom RSVP function and planned “social wall” integration.
      • Commissioners emphasized continuing improvements to listening session execution and outreach.
    • Community partnership form
      • Commissioner Hersken asked about the partnership commitments form; ECC stated a Google Form link exists and committed to sharing it and uploading to SharePoint.
  • November Listening Session logistics (Taylor Memorial Church / Delta Sigma Theta Berkeley Bay Area Chapter partnership)

    • Key constraint: food cannot be served in the sanctuary/chapel, requiring use of the fellowship hall.
    • Commissioners discussed whether to serve food before vs after the program, balancing:
      • disruption to program flow,
      • attendee hunger/expectations,
      • prior experience where attendees began eating during programming,
      • already-published start time (and avoiding mixed messaging).
    • Straw poll showed a majority preference to serve food at the end (around 3:00 PM), keeping the program start at 1:00 PM.
    • Later clarification (Commissioner Barry, after contacting chapter president Patrina):
      • Chapel setup access begins at 11:30 AM.
      • Caterer may enter at 12:45 PM.
      • Chapter president agreed serving food at the end was preferable.
  • Vendors and operational responsibilities (listening sessions)

    • Commissioners flagged a workflow gap: vendors require active commissioner follow-up (library staff and ECC are not default vendor managers).
    • Vice Chair McClendon offered to centralize vendor coordination once commissioners “hand off” negotiated scopes/rates.
    • Childcare: prior childcare vendor attended earlier session but had no children; commissioners discussed re-engaging and ensuring vendor payment paperwork is completed.
    • Mental health/therapist support: discussed uncertain availability and avoiding last-minute schedule disruptions for providers.
  • Supplemental / pop-up outreach events

    • Commission reaffirmed using a standard form/protocol to propose supplemental events with partners.
    • A potential listening session at Santa Rita Jail was explicitly discussed as fitting within this process.
    • A virtual listening session was raised (Commissioner Hersken) as an option to be discussed at a future meeting.
  • Budget variance report, tracking, and reallocation (Vice Chair McClendon)

    • Reported Board of Supervisors approved a $500,000 budget; commission originally itemized about $306,000 and has an unallocated remainder (described as a variance to “true up” to $500k).
    • As presented, an approximate remaining balance was reported as $397,405.17 (noted that some figures would be adjusted due to a same-day change to the food budget).
    • The Commission discussed:
      • using funds to increase outreach (“deeper touch points” countywide), including staffing/tablet surveying and recurring community events (e.g., First Fridays, Black Joy).
      • ability to move money between approved line items as needs change.
    • Transcription/note-taking cost controls:
      • Vice Chair McClendon described a prior note-taking invoice around $4,000 due to full verbatim transcription without scope guardrails; stated guardrails are now in place to prevent recurrence.
    • Swag/branding
      • Mockups presented for shirts/hats/canopies/table materials with QR codes.
      • Commissioners requested design adjustments (e.g., smaller QR code, also include the website URL).
      • Selling swag was raised (Commissioner Barry); Chair/leadership expressed caution due to potential tax/administrative complications.
  • Draft action-plan recommendations: tool and timeline (Informing Change reporting workflow)

    • The Commission emphasized the report should be an action report/action plan, not solely a “harms report.”
    • Commissioner Small presented a spreadsheet extracting State Reparations Task Force recommendations and identifying which appear within county authority.
    • Chair and members discussed mapping recommendations to the five reparations principles (e.g., restitution, compensation, non-repetition, satisfaction).
    • Commissioners discussed adding flexibility for items that don’t “fit neatly” (e.g., Commissioner Dones’ focus on taxpayer/county-budget impacts and dividends of reparative investments).

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes approved for October 8.
  • November listening session: Commission consensus via straw poll to serve food after the program (around 3:00 PM) and keep the 1:00 PM start.
  • Budget governance: Library staff confirmed the commission has authority to treat the budget as a working, flexible budget and reallocate between line items as needed.
  • Action-plan recommendation process approved (roll call vote):
    • Motion approved to post the recommendation tool/forms to SharePoint and have subcommittees review/comment the week of Dec 1–3.
    • Vote included multiple ayes, at least one abstention (Commissioner Small), and the motion carried.
  • Facility/logistics confirmation (reported): Chapel access for setup 11:30 AM; caterer access 12:45 PM; Delta chapter president supported serving food at the end.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to the uh November 12th reparations commission meeting. Okay. So I would like uh call the meeting to order. Roll call. Commissioner Brazil, excuse. Commissioner Barry. Commissioner Berlison excused. Commissioner Dones. Here. Commissioner Gardner. Here. Commissioner Gore. Here. Commissioner Hersken. Commissioner Knowles. Commissioner McClendon. Hmm. Commissioner Sass. Here. Commissioner Small. Here. Commissioner Triplett, excused. Commissioner Varla, excuse. We have a quorum. Thank you. Um I see Commissioner Gardner who's online. You have your hand up. Did you want to speak now? Or can I go through the agenda a bit more? I just wanted to let you know I was here. Yes. Thank you. I put my hand down. Okay. Now I'd like to move to any public comments. I have no speakers for public comment. Thank you. And now I'd like to go to approval of the minutes. If someone could make a motion to approve the October 8th minutes. Seconded by can they online? In the room. Okay. Okay. Seconded in the room by Herston. Thank you, Commissioner Dones. For approval of the minutes, Commissioner Barry. Commissioner Dones. Commissioner Gardner. Abstain. Commissioner Gore.