Thu, Nov 20, 2025·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Alameda County Public Protection Committee – State of the Jail Hearing (2025-11-20)

Discussion Breakdown

Public Safety38%
Mental Health Awareness26%
Public Health Services12%
Workforce Development7%
Healthcare Services6%
Engineering And Infrastructure3%
Community Engagement3%
Homelessness2%
Technology and Innovation1%
Arts And Culture1%
Environmental Protection1%

Summary

Alameda County Public Protection Committee – State of the Jail Hearing (2025-11-20)

The committee held its annual “State of the Jail” hearing focused on Santa Rita Jail population trends, conditions and compliance (Consent Decree and Title 15), programming and reentry, and Adult Forensic Behavioral Health (AFBH) therapeutic services. Presentations highlighted a sustained post‑COVID reduction in bookings and average daily population, a jail population dominated by violent-felony charges, ongoing facility upgrades, and reported progress in suicide prevention and out-of-cell programming. Public commenters broadly praised the increased transparency and programming, while urging deeper data integration (especially behavioral health), clearer recidivism definitions, and fixes to recurring nutrition/food-service findings.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Richard Spiegelman (Interfaith Coalition for Justice in Our Jails)
    • Expressed appreciation and support for the county and Sheriff’s Office providing detailed jail data.
    • Asked for community input into future research questions.
    • Urged incorporating behavioral health/healthcare data into future reports to understand links between jail trends and behavioral health needs.
    • Suggested serious program evaluation and asked whether program participation/outcomes could be reflected in future analyses.
    • Later raised concerns that the nutrition report looked worse than last year, and asked who is responsible for implementing improvements.
    • Asked for an update on the Mazars health services audit status.
    • Asked whether Medicaid cuts could affect CalAIM implementation.
  • Alice Fellard (psychiatrist)
    • Expressed concern that jails function as de facto hospitals and noted lack of privacy when people are seen “in handcuffs,” while acknowledging staff behavior appeared professional.
  • Terry Dunn (Interfaith Coalition for Justice in Our Jails)
    • Supported the analysis and asked how the Sheriff’s Office will continue data collection/analysis and who will maintain it.
    • Expressed concern about a persistently high recidivism rate and urged focus on mentorship, including mentors with lived experience.
  • Alison Monroe (FASME)
    • Requested data breakouts for people at Santa Rita who are incompetent to stand trial (IST) and asked about waiting times for transfer to state hospital (e.g., Napa).
  • Brian Bloom (Chair, Alameda County Mental Health Advisory Board)
    • Urged a more precise definition of recidivism (e.g., reconviction/reoffense) and cautioned that “return to jail” can include returns for warrants or procedural reasons.
  • Mickey Duxberry
    • Praised culture change and programming; emphasized trauma histories among incarcerated people.
    • Expressed support for more mentorship and urged training that helps deputies examine narratives about criminality and redemption.
  • Remote commenter “Lonnie”
    • Asked whether housing assistance (via CalAIM) is sufficient and how the county coordinates with housing systems.
    • Questioned whether new outdoor recreation areas resemble “cages” and asked about access to larger outdoor field space.
  • Myrna Schwartz (Interfaith Coalition; MHAP Care First Committee)
    • Supported AFBH progress; asked about communication pathways to treatment courts/behavioral health court referrals.
    • Asked what proportion of the EASE/IST-related program participants transitioned to community-based treatment vs. state hospitals.
  • Cari (Restore Oakland; MHAB Care First/Jails Last)
    • Acknowledged progress (including no recent suicides) but stated a position that jail is not an appropriate place for people with mental health/substance use issues.
    • Encouraged prioritizing community-based care and diversion.
    • Expressed a position urging the county to end contracts with Wellpath.

Discussion Items

  • Jail Population Analysis (Wendy Ware, JFA Institute)

    • Reported that Alameda County’s resident population trend reversed to growth in 2024, including growth among males ages 15–34 (noted as an “at-risk” demographic proxy due to census groupings).
    • Reported a 2023 spike in UCR Part I crimes (violent and property) with declines in 2024 toward earlier levels; aggravated assault and motor vehicle theft remained elevated relative to pre‑2023.
    • Reported bookings rebounded modestly post‑COVID but remained lower than pre‑COVID, contributing to a gradual decline in average daily jail population through 2024 (2025 described as holding steady so far).
    • Characterized the “sitting” jail population as predominantly male (94%), with a high share held on felony charges and a large share held on violent felonies (including homicide as a major category).
    • Characterized “churn” (intake/release) as many short stays: in 2024, 58% of release events occurred within 3 days; misdemeanors averaged about 2.5 days.
    • Described “high utilizers”: release-event volume included repeat bookings, with about 20% of release events attributed to roughly 1,500 people (defined as 3+ releases in the year).
    • Discussed Prop 36: stated early data through June indicated minimal Prop 36 charging in Alameda, with no observed jail-population increase yet; recommended continued tracking.
    • Provided a jail population forecast projecting relative stability under baseline assumptions; offered an alternative Prop 36 scenario but did not recommend adopting it as the primary forecast at this time.
    • Presented a recidivism analysis defined as “return to jail after release” for 2021 and 2022 cohorts (about 48% and ~50% respectively), while cautioning that recidivism definitions vary and comparisons are difficult.
    • Reported that most returns occurred within 30 days to 6 months; also reported that longer jail stays correlated with higher return rates.
    • In Q&A, stated more data would be needed to identify why high utilizers return (e.g., housing, mental health), and noted behavioral health data matching is possible with appropriate access and safeguards.
  • Sheriff’s Office State of the Jail Update (Lt. Daniel Murphy, Alameda County Sheriff’s Office)

    • Reported progress under the Adult Forensic Behavioral Health consent decree (188 provisions), including 40 provisions no longer monitored (attributed to classification work).
    • Reported staffing gap of 194 deputies to meet consent decree requirements, with 61 expected to graduate within six months (18 in December; 43 in May) and a new academy starting in February.
    • Reported major facility projects: new outdoor recreation spaces; network infrastructure upgrades (including 900 cameras); conversion of spaces into confidential/educational rooms; “cell softening” for suicide prevention; and digital housing-unit upgrades.
    • Described the Michael Foley Operations Center conversion (repurposing a housing unit) to co-locate Sheriff’s Office and AFBH staff and support coordination and staff wellness.
    • Described planned deployment of Foresight Labs voluntary biometric monitoring for medically fragile individuals, withdrawal monitoring, and suicide-risk support.
    • Reported efforts to optimize structured out-of-cell time using a master calendar and the “Guardian 2.0” observation system (reported 98% compliance with observation checks).
    • Reported CalAIM funding of $5.6M supporting staffing, enrollment/case management, warm handoffs, and IT bridges; projected jail go-live of July 1, 2026, with an implementation guide due Dec. 31 (six months prior).
    • Identified major contractors/providers: Wellpath (medical), Aramark (food/commissary), ViaPath (technology/tablets/phones), Five Keys (education).
    • Reported training revamp for new deputies (orientation + BSCC core + on-the-job training), emphasizing de-escalation and mental health.
    • Reported use-of-force reductions of 21% each of the last two years; most incidents categorized as Category 1 (control holds/ground control with no injuries).
    • Described a 40-person Strategic Response Team trained in crisis communication and de-escalation; reported deployment outcomes including instances resolved with no force.
    • Reported “lives saved” interventions: 319 (July 2024–June 2025) including medical and self-harm interventions; reported 109 since July 2025 to date, including 12 Narcan deployments.
    • Highlighted reentry and programming: transition center (4,032 people served), multidisciplinary teams, reentry systems-of-care leadership, expanded education (18,281 class interactions; 108 classes/week), Juilliard composition program, entrepreneurship training, food-handler certification program, and the LiUNA 304 pre-apprenticeship (noting program continuation would be sought in future budgets).
    • Expressed the position that Santa Rita is becoming a “gold standard” and emphasized a “second chance” model.
  • Title 15 Inspection Report (Dr. Nicholas Moss, County Health Officer; Antonio Galar, Environmental Health)

    • Reported the Title 15 inspection occurred April 15, 2025 with population 1,640.
    • Reported compliance met in medical and mental health sections, with recommendations including ongoing health services quality oversight (Section 1202) and improved syringe inventory tracking (Section 1216). Noted a slide error: no 2025 recommendation for first aid kits.
    • Noted ongoing interest in custody death review verification (Title 15 Section 1046), with two in-custody death reviews in the covered period and another carried forward; a March 2025 death review was not yet available at inspection time.
    • Reported nutrition-related noncompliance findings increased, covering food healthfulness/palatability, fruits/vegetables, menu substitutions, stored food, tray condition, portion consistency, and special medical diets; noted some persistent issues converted from prior-year recommendations into 2025 noncompliance findings.
    • Environmental Health reported generally compliant conditions with minor violations (e.g., missing tile in walk-in, leaking faucet, air-gap correction), and reported water samples negative for E. coli and coliform; a torn mattress was replaced during inspection.
  • Adult Forensic Behavioral Health (AFBH) Update (Juan Tai San, Director, Forensic Diversion and Reentry System of Care)

    • Reported AFBH expanded from a referral/crisis-triage model into a broader therapeutic model with assessment, leveling, therapeutic housing, crisis intervention, and reentry planning.
    • Reported that while the jail population decreased, the number of AFBH clients served increased by 1,500 unique individuals year-over-year.
    • Reported staffing status: about 75% filled with 115 FTE, with 24/7 coverage (including Telecare for overnight intake services and overnight psychiatry availability).
    • Reported universal mental health assessment for everyone booked into the jail (described as uncommon in other jurisdictions), including suicide/self-harm risk identification and expanded identification of intellectual/developmental disabilities with accommodation planning.
    • Reported therapeutic housing units expanded to five units with dedicated clinical teams, daily interdisciplinary huddles, and increased confidential space (including pod conversions).
    • Addressed privacy concerns: stated the majority of clients are not seen while cuffed, but some must be cuffed due to risk; described newly installed secure “programming chairs” to allow safer clinical engagement.
    • Reported growth in group programming (Telecare and Lifelong), and expanded medication-assisted treatment collaboration.
    • Reported the EASE program for people found incompetent to stand trial: 170 clients served to date; current caseload 11; stated individuals average 4–5 weeks from initiation to placement into Department of State Hospitals treatment.
    • Reported suicide prevention measures (daily rounds/huddles, integrated safety plans, monthly interdisciplinary meetings) and stated Santa Rita has had no recorded deaths by suicide in over two years.
    • Reported reentry planning begins within 72 hours of booking; expanded day-of-release coordination using daily release lists; and dedicated post-release follow-up for high-acuity clients.
    • Highlighted coordination with CARE Act Court screening/referrals and community partners including Roots Community Health Safe Landing and the Diversion Triage Center (Horizon Treatment Services) with transport support.
    • Identified next steps: continue hiring, expand confidential meeting space and therapeutic environments, and strengthen quality assurance/quality improvement and data to demonstrate consent decree “proof of practice.”

Key Outcomes

  • No votes/actions taken: All agenda items were informational.
  • Committee leadership stated time constraints could shorten public comment to one minute (implemented).
  • Sheriff Sanchez indicated interest in exploring ongoing analytics via an “AI group” and using Ware’s work as a data foundation; no commitment reported in-session to a continued contract, but interest in expanded analytics (including behavioral health and programming).
  • Chair (Supervisor Marquez) stated the committee will track Title 15/nutrition and related issues in monthly meetings with the Sheriff’s Office and will provide a public update on Mazars audit status.
  • Announced upcoming meetings:
    • Dec. 18: Joint Public Protection and Health Committee meeting on county violence prevention.
    • January (anticipated): Joint committee discussion on RFP/next steps for Santa Rita medical contract.
  • Noted future policy/finance concerns for follow-up: potential impacts from Medi-Cal/CalAIM/Prop 1 and broader funding pressures (raised as upcoming discussion topics).

Meeting Transcript

Progress. All right. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Alamity County Board of Supervisors Public Protection Committee meeting for Thursday, November 20th. Um, can we please start with a roll call? Supervisor Miley. Supervisor Marquez. Present. Thank you. And if the clerk could please provide instructions for their members to speak on items on the agenda, whether they're in person or remote. For in-person participation, the meeting site is open to the public. If you'd like to speak on an item, you can fill out a speaker's card in the front of the room and hand it to me. And for remote participation, you can use the raise your hand function, and we will have comment after each item. Yes, we will. Yes. Thank you. Thank you so much. Again, good morning, everyone. Welcome to the public protection committee's annual state of the jail hearing. This year's update is particularly meaningful as it reflects our continued investment in reimagining adult justice initiative spearheaded by the late Supervisor Richard Vae, whose vision and values I am honored to carry forward as the current chair. For current for context, RAJ initiative established 12 core elements that continue to guide the county's public safety work, emphasizing the need for ongoing data collection and analysis to better understand the drivers of Santa Rita Jail's population. In 2023, our board received the final RAJ report managed by our past probation chief and district two project manager Wendy Still. It is worth highlighting that several of the RAJ's recommendations align or overlap with the county's care first jails last initiative, especially around the importance of making data-driven decisions and informing program design. The RAJ report is available on my website, District 2 Alameda County CA.gov under stay informed drop-down menu. I am proud of Alameda County's consistent positive progress, including our ongoing work with Wendy Ware, who wears a who was a key, I apologize for that, who was a key force behind the RAJ initiative, and is with us here today to present an updated jail population analysis. This includes providing a deeper dive into arrests and booking trends, jail population characteristics characteristics, recidivism analysis, and pretrial opportunities. I applaud Sheriff Sanchez and her staff for continuing to fund Ms. Ware's critical research to better guide the county's investments towards rehabilitation and further support key culture shifts. Where there is more work ahead of us, the positive changes are visible. In fact, tomorrow I will have the opportunity to see firsthand this progress happening inside the jail facility. I'm very excited to attend the Labor's International Union of North America or Ailuna 304's seventh graduation at Santa Rita Jail. This transformational vocational program offered in partnership with the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, trains participants in construction skills and provide certificates that keep certificates that help secure living wage jobs after their release. These transformative milestones remind us that meaningful change is both possible and already underway, even as we continue pushing for deeper system transformation. Again, our progress is the result of our partnerships across all stakeholders, including justice stakeholders, especially those with lived experience, county agency leadership and their central department staff, and our community advocates. I am encouraged by our ongoing dialogue and deepening collaboration as evident by our presenters from AC Health, the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, so we may continue to build towards a more responsive and equitable public safety system. Thank you all for being here. I will also note that we do have to end this meeting shortly after 1 p.m. because Supervisor Miley and I have a special meeting at 1 30. So we will ask everyone to please keep their presentations concise and depending on how many speakers we may have to reduce public comment to one minute. So we will now start with our first item, which is an informational item. All the items on today's agenda are informational items. The first presenter I'd like to welcome and thank you so much for being here in person, Wendy Ware, president of the JFA Institute. Welcome, Wendy. And there should be PowerPoint presentations available online for everyone to review. And I believe your report has already been published and attached to our agenda. So welcome, Wendy. Thank you so much, and thank you for that wonderful introduction. I appreciate it. As you mentioned, I was part of the RAJ effort a couple of years ago, and all of the data that was incorporated in that report, we undertook this effort to update that data and look for emerging trends in the jail population. Just a bit of an introduction.