Wed, Dec 10, 2025·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Unincorporated Services Committee & MACs Special Meeting on Budget Input Pilot (2025-12-10)

Discussion Breakdown

Community Engagement72%
Fiscal Sustainability8%
Engineering And Infrastructure5%
Procedural3%
Transportation Safety2%
Public Engagement2%
Mental Health Awareness2%
Active Transportation2%
Economic Development2%
Public Health Services2%

Summary

Unincorporated Services Committee & MACs Special Meeting on Budget Input Pilot (2025-12-10)

The Unincorporated Services Committee (Supervisors Miley and Tam) convened a special joint session with multiple Municipal Advisory Councils (MACs) and the Sunol Citizens Advisory Council to hear the Budget Justice Coalition’s report on a 2025 pilot “unincorporated communities budget input process.” The meeting focused on resident-identified service priorities (e.g., code enforcement, public works/infrastructure, traffic safety, emergency preparedness) and debated how to formalize a recurring budget/service-input structure—alongside broader proposals such as an “Office of Unincorporated Communities,” improved transparency, and stronger cross-agency accountability.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Yesenia Lopez (volunteer; via SLAM involvement): Supported creating an Office of Unincorporated Communities and a formal budget input process; emphasized safety impacts from heavy traffic, noise, and unsafe driving.
  • Jimena Bugarin (resident): Supported culturally/linguistically respectful services; urged improved training so residents feel understood and welcomed.
  • Ashley Acosta (student): Supported office and budget input; raised traffic safety as a primary concern and linked unsafe conditions to neighborhood desirability.
  • Ashley Godoy (resident): Appreciated county investments (community centers, youth programs, libraries) but urged equitable distribution of improvements.
  • Oscar Gonzalez (resident; referenced Cherryland): Described neighborhood conditions as neglected (cracked sidewalks, illegal dumping, run-down streets).
  • Santos (resident): Emphasized emergency preparedness (floods, wildfires) and need for accessible information and resources.
  • Brooklyn (public health professional; works in unincorporated areas): Supported formal budget input; framed civic engagement as a social determinant of health; asked for equity comparable to city budget-input processes.
  • Ton Wynn (resident): Urged prioritizing traffic safety investments near schools, bus stops, playgrounds.
  • Aidan (resident): Supported a central, multilingual communications hub for services/forms/updates.
  • Raymond (resident/worker in unincorporated area): Called for timely code enforcement with follow-up and communication back to residents.
  • Delilah (works in unincorporated area): Said residents want respectful customer service and not to be treated as a burden.
  • Rosemary Vasquez (Ashland; “bleed Cherryland”): Warned against “waiting for people to come”; urged outreach where families already are, with interpretation; argued new structures could enhance service.
  • Keith Barrows (resident; involved since ELI governance): Encouraged community organizations to engage through MACs; stressed more engagement is needed.
  • Halden Morgan (Alameda County Housing Provider Resource Center): Reported residents feel they pay taxes without return on investment; urged bringing in more community voices.
  • Dale Silva (Fairview resident): Supported an office to translate community priorities into budget items and provide a consistent “institutional anchor” beyond any single supervisor.
  • Caller “Kelly” (remote): Criticized “website portal” as insufficient; suggested formal service units (CSAs/CSDs), separate fund accounting, MAC budget authority, service level agreements/metrics, and scorecards.
  • Bob Clore (Fairview resident): Criticized a prior workshop format where public comment came only at the end; requested earlier public input.
  • Teresita De Jesus (Ashland resident; Padres Guerreros/Seniors in Action; Ashland Community Association treasurer): Supported office and budget input; highlighted illegal dumping and lack of clarity/accountability after complaints; emphasized need for standardized communication and tracking.
  • Linda Tangren (Castro Valley): Opposed the presented document as “the answer”; urged defining “transparency” and diagnosing root causes of service-delivery failures.
  • Nancy Refaldiza (remote): Supported office and budget input; emphasized the importance of public works (roads, sidewalks, lighting, drainage) and environmental impacts.
  • Brenda Clark (Fairview): Echoed concerns about MAC agenda structure; wanted public comment earlier so the public is heard before council deliberation.
  • Maria Gonzalez (Cherryland; remote, Spanish): Requested public lighting on Western Boulevard; also referenced chronic dumping.
  • Aida Sizova (Wilma Chan Family Resource Center program manager): Supported creating an office and a budget for it.
  • Matthias (remote): Urged adoption of recommendations; argued unincorporated communities seek fairness, access, and accountability.
  • Henry “Hank” Levy (County Treasurer-Tax Collector): Spoke as a department head listening in; endorsed improving government ethos/“yes we can” customer service; invited direct contact for issues.
  • Rex (remote): Requested a clear “owner” for cross-agency issues so residents aren’t bounced among departments.

Discussion Items

  • Presentation — Budget Justice Coalition report (pilot process outcomes)

    • Claudia Albano (Deputy Chief of Staff, Supervisor Miley) framed the meeting as an opportunity to rebuild trust and improve service through meaningful recommendations.
    • Alina Farouk (Resources for Community Development) provided historical context: since 2004 (Eden Area Livability Initiative) residents have sought a structured budget input process; the 2025 pilot included six meetings and a community survey.
    • Dave Thompson (My Eden Voice) summarized top concerns from the survey (142 responses), including:
      • Enforcement of local codes/regulations (dumping, habitability, zoning)
      • Safer roadways for pedestrians/bikers
      • Public works priorities (road maintenance/infrastructure)
      • Emergency preparedness
      • Confusion about responsibility/ownership and where to go for help
    • Sandra Archuletta (La Familia) highlighted findings around appreciation of existing investments, and needs for accountability/follow-through, data transparency, community responsiveness, cross-agency leadership/ownership, and a communications hub.
    • Natalie Kim (Partnership for the Bay’s Future Fellow) presented recommendations on:
      • Strengthening a public service ethos (training, standards, evaluation)
      • Sustained investment in physical infrastructure
      • Empowering local governance so MAC/CAC input is meaningfully used
    • Albano grouped recommendations by short-, medium-, and long-term actions, emphasizing early steps like assigning a permanent webmaster to build out the unincorporated-area web hub, and connecting technology with training.
  • MAC and Supervisor deliberation (key themes and points of tension)

    • Supervisor Miley (Chair):
      • Emphasized MACs’ statutory advisory role and value; acknowledged long history of engagement (ELI, general plans, EJ element).
      • Expressed disappointment that pilot engagement numbers were small relative to unincorporated population.
      • Noted county budget constraints and that counties are not structured like cities; much of the $6B budget is mandated with limited discretion.
      • Described the Office of Unincorporated Communities as under exploration via a consultant; no decision made to create it.
    • Supervisor Tam:
      • Asked how long-standing calls for budget input since 2004 were addressed over time.
      • Supported working with the County Administrator and budget workgroup to improve unincorporated engagement.
    • County budget context — Melanie Atendito (Deputy County Administrator):
      • Explained “maintenance of effort” budgeting and persistent funding gaps; most county budget is state/federal mandated.
      • Noted public works’ general fund component is very small relative to its overall funding sources.
    • Castro Valley MAC perspectives (multiple speakers):
      • Asserted Castro Valley has relatively strong relationships with county departments; frustration centered on countywide board voting affecting unincorporated areas.
      • Raised concerns that the report felt not tailored to Castro Valley’s maturity and existing processes.
    • Fairview and Eden MAC perspectives:
      • Fairview speakers stressed long-standing civic organization and engagement; cited examples where MAC consensus was not adopted by the Board.
      • Eden-area speakers noted challenges with turnout and representation; some expressed concern that community organizations may be bypassing MAC structures.
    • Concerns raised across MAC members:
      • Lack of specificity (need for clearer logistics, timelines, root-cause analysis, and cost/complexity measures)
      • Need for better notice and scheduling for community participation (especially for working residents)
      • Desire for clearer follow-through mechanisms and cross-agency ownership
      • Mixed views on creating a new office (some saw it as needed coordination; others warned of bureaucracy)
    • Service delivery examples discussed:
      • Long-running D Street sidewalk project cited as an example of slow execution and unclear accountability.
      • Permitting/business process repeatedly cited as needing streamlining.
      • Code enforcement described as overly complaint-driven rather than proactive.

Key Outcomes

  • Public comment scope clarified: Because it was a special meeting, public comment was limited to the single agendized item.
  • Direction on the budget input process (Recommendation #1):
    • Supervisor Miley requested that Supervisors Tam and Halbert (Board budget workgroup) work with the County Administrator’s Office to review the proposed unincorporated budget input cycle (referenced as the “page 11” process), incorporate feedback, and report back to the Unincorporated Services Committee.
    • Miley emphasized the process should include MACs as the formal community advisory bodies.
  • Office of Unincorporated Communities (Recommendation #2):
    • Miley stated the Board has already approved funds for a consultant scoping study; no final decision has been made to create the office.
    • Miley indicated the consultant’s findings will return to the Board/committee for deliberation.
  • Referral/request for department responses (Recommendations #3–#12):
    • Miley proposed that key agencies/departments serving unincorporated areas (Library, Community Development Agency, Fire, Sheriff, Public Works) review Recommendations #3–#12 and report back to the Unincorporated Services Committee on what is feasible, underway, or needed.
  • Potential future governance discussion:
    • Miley suggested exploring whether some MACs could be given additional decision-making authority (e.g., BZA powers or area planning commission models), acknowledging staffing/capacity implications.
  • No votes recorded in transcript on adopting the report; the meeting ended with directives and referrals for follow-up reporting and process development.

Meeting Transcript

Alright, so good evening, everyone. Good evening, good evening, good evening. Buenas noches. Good evening. Buenas noches. Thank you. Thank you. Gracias. Gracias. I'd like to call this evening's order. Uh clerk uh take the roll call. Supervisor Tam. Present. Supervisor Miley. Present. Councilmember. Council Member Higgins. Here. Councilmember Philbin. Councilmember Rhodes. Councilmember Rhodes, excuse. Councilmember. Oh, sorry. I didn't hear you. Councilmember Englin. Councilmember Farmer, excuse. Councilmember Mulgrew. Present. Councilmember Moore. Rosen. Councilmember Thomas. Present. Councilmember Davini. Councilmember Fiebig, excuse. Councilmember Davis. Present. Councilmember Mota. Present. Councilmember Widler. Councilmember Cushman. Councilmember Stanley. Councilmember Marumajoko. Councilmember Asin Nielsen. Councilmember Rowell. Excused. Snow Citizens Advisory Council members. Jake Grange, Harrison Conant and Start are excused. Okay, so could we have um the clerk give directions for tonight's um participation and then also the of the um the interpretation by the translator? Anna, can you give instructions for Spanish interpretation? Yes, actually it's Mercedes.