Wed, Dec 10, 2025·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Alameda County Ad Hoc Reparations Committee Update Meeting (2025-12-10)

Discussion Breakdown

Community Engagement66%
Fiscal Sustainability14%
Racial Equity12%
Procedural5%
Personnel Matters3%

Summary

Alameda County Ad Hoc Reparations Committee Update Meeting (2025-12-10)

The Ad Hoc Committee on Reparations (Supervisors Elisa Márquez and Nate Miley) received progress updates from the Alameda County Reparations Commission and its consultants on the consolidated workplan, listening sessions, budget status, early survey findings, communications efforts, and upcoming events. Supervisors expressed strong encouragement to maintain momentum, discussed adding “pop-up” engagement events (including in Hayward and justice-system settings), and emphasized filling current commission vacancies to meet the June 30 report timeline.

Discussion Items

  • Commission work plan update (Chair Deborah Gore; ECC/Exceptional Community Connections)

    • Project structure: Commission consolidated from 11 subcommittees to 3: (1) Admin & Budget, (2) Listening Sessions, (3) Data/Research/Action Plan Report.
    • Four “pillars of focus” guiding engagement and data collection: (1) experience of harm/inequity, (2) community assets/resiliency, (3) reparative needs/priorities, (4) future vision.
    • ECC status (Letitia Henderson): Commission is in a multi-phase implementation approach; reported “steady progress” since August facilitation began.
    • Engagement progress: 4 of 6 planned listening sessions completed; reported 175+ total attendees; 10+ community organizations willing to partner.
    • Report development: A very rough draft outline exists; work continues to align harms analysis with the California State Task Force framework and UN five principles; target delivery remains by June 30.
  • Listening sessions and “pop-up” events (Commission/committee discussion)

    • Supervisor Márquez stated interest in hosting a Hayward event (suggested venues included Hayward Library, Glad Tidings Church, and Pumi) and wanted it to be additive rather than disrupting the existing timeline.
    • Chair Gore stated the commission has flexibility to add “pop-ups” beyond the 6 official sessions now that a standardized “run of show” exists (slide deck, note taker, videographer).
    • Potential topical/population pop-ups discussed:
      • Youth voice (noted limited youth attendance at a prior event).
      • Business community pop-up at Henry J. Kaiser Center in partnership with the Oakland Chamber and Urban League.
      • Formerly incarcerated / criminal justice pop-up led by Commissioner Jesse Burleson.
      • Supervisor Márquez asked about a Santa Rita Jail session; staff/commission noted discussions and potential coordination (including with probation/JJC).
    • Supervisors and commission leaders highlighted supportive features at sessions—free food, childcare, and a therapist—as removing barriers and supporting trauma-informed participation.
  • Budget and administration update (Vice Chair Larry McClendon)

    • Reported total commission budget of $500,000.
    • Reported $155,038 billed to date and a remaining balance of $344,961 planned to be spent down before the fiscal year end.
    • High-level spending categories included:
      • Technical support ($73,886)
      • Promotion (just under $10,000)
      • Food/refreshments (a little over $5,000)
      • Transcripts/note-taking (emphasized as needed to capture community words “verbatim as much as possible”)
      • Website (noted higher-than-expected cost due to internal registration/data stewardship rather than using third-party tools)
      • Photo/video documentation
      • Facilitator, venue (noted many partners discounted/donated)
      • Therapist support
    • Next spending priorities discussed: remaining district sessions, expanded pop-ups, increased social media promotion (including advertising childcare/food), outreach in unincorporated areas (including potential stipends), survey/data processing, and report design/branding.
    • Supervisor Márquez requested re-sending the flyer for remaining sessions and the survey link for inclusion in social media and a newsletter.
    • Supervisor Miley suggested outreach to NAACP chapters (including WCP/North County and South County) and encouraged exploring media placements.
  • Early survey results and themes (Informing Change; Chair Gore)

    • Reported 86 surveys collected, with 45+ from the Taylor Memorial (West Oakland) session.
    • “How people heard about events”: most commonly another organization and family/friends (word of mouth); social media was described as newer and expected to grow.
    • Items respondents most “strongly supported” (blue category): scholarships/grants and direct compensation (both described as in the “98th percentile”); also increased funding in county programs.
    • Respondents also indicated support for public acknowledgement/apology (noted as interesting because the county has done this, but respondents “didn’t know that,” suggesting an education gap), plus memorial/commemoration.
    • Open-ended topics recurring across sessions: tax relief/incentives, housing and land (linked in discussion to redlining and eminent domain), policy/systemic equity and training for policymakers, education/health services (including mental health), outreach to schools/colleges, and interest in lineage tracing (connected in discussion to recent state actions).
    • Location suggestions included Hayward and using more community “third spaces” (parks, community sites).
  • Communications, partnerships, and upcoming events

    • Digital presence reported across website, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram; website includes direct event registration to keep data “owned and stewarded” by the commission/county.
    • Upcoming media/event items:
      • “Talk of the Town” segment on reparations scheduled for Dec. 17 (10:00 a.m.) with Dave Clark, featuring participation including Paul Cobb (Oakland Post).
      • Kwanzaa-related programming tied to Ujima (economic unity day), and continued listening sessions into January.
    • Supervisor Miley proposed exploring collaboration with the Mormon Temple for genealogy/ancestry resources, and recommended pursuing coverage/ads or a series of stories in the Oakland Post.

Commission Composition / Staffing Needs

  • Chair Gore requested support to fill two open commission seats (noting workload and the importance of adding a younger/rising leader in the 20–30 age range).
  • Noted concern that one commissioner had only attended one meeting; emphasized need for active participation for the “last six months” push.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes or formal actions were taken; items were informational.
  • Supervisors expressed strong support for the commission’s progress and encouraged maintaining the June 30 reporting timeline, while noting the committee could consider additional time if requested.
  • Directional agreements / next steps:
    • Commission to continue planned listening sessions and expand pop-ups (including exploring Hayward and justice-system settings).
    • Staff/commission to provide updated flyers and survey links for supervisors’ outreach.
    • Committee and commission to schedule the next ad hoc update in March 2026 (a Wednesday at ~4:00 p.m. was discussed as preferred).
  • Public comment: None (no speakers in-person or online).

Meeting Transcript

Alright, so good afternoon, everyone. Call to order the ad hoc. Committee on reparations, clerk takes the role. Supervisor Marquez present. Supervisor Miley. Present. All right. So we have uh three items, three three informational items. And the first item is a commission work plan update. Uh good evening, and thank you for uh the ad hoc committee meeting. It's been a moment, so quite a bit of stuff to uh update you on, and we have a couple of guest speakers, so hopefully I can keep the agenda rolling for you. Let me uh ask. Uh so the agenda for uh today where we'll be doing the work plan, the operations and administration, and then uh we have an ask about the open seats, and then share our upcoming events in digital presence. So I wanted to share that when we first started the work, and I think last time we spoke to you, we had 11 subcommittees, and we have now consolidated down to these three. So we have an admin and budget, we have a listening session, and then we have our data research action plan report. So now we've we're really focused on the internet, um, on these three groups, and you can see um the intersection is what we're calling the pillars of focus, and I'll share with you those four pillars, but under the each subgroup, you can see um the work in general buckets, so like the admin and budget is doing our budget, but also websites, social media, and any sort of progress and movement, uh, and then the data research, we're doing the harms report and the narrative and actually the action plan report we owe you, and then listening session is allies and partnerships. So that's how the 11 committees came down to the three. These are our four pillars, which also center um the listening sessions, the surveys, and the data gathering. So these four are um split into how we are having the conversation with the community, so experience of harm and inequity, and there's a sample there, I don't have to read it to you. Um, and then the community assets and resiliency. So that's you know the trauma and the struggle, but then what are the the um positive and brilliant things our communities doing, and then the reparative needs and priorities, which obviously is part of the action plan, and then lastly, what's the vision in the future look like? So everything falls under these four ways of looking at the work. Um, and then our uh we have two consultants and uh doing project management is uh ECC, exceptional community communications that has been approved, and I would like to bring up um the CEO of CC. Hello, so it's been a lot of movement, a lot of activity. Um, we have a report. I don't know if yes, my name's okay Letitia Henderson, and I am the principal consultant with exceptional community connections, but we do love working with the community and communications, but ECC for short. So we've been working with our team of consultants. We've been working with the commission since August in the formal capacity as their facilitators and project managers, and what I can say just in summary without going through all the specifics, that this commission is making steady progress on the implementation plan that they identified in January at their planning retreat. And so the work that we our approach to the work has been situated across three phases. Um the first phase was the initial launching the project, and a lot of the work we spent time organizing their subcommittees. And as Chair Gore just mentioned previously, there were 11 subcommittees, and so we spent um the first phase just restructuring and looking at what is um a subcommittee structure that would support their workflow and implementation of their tasks, and so we have the three. And so phase one was really just working with the commissioners to ensure that they were assigned to a subcommittee that you know that they were interested in and that reflected their skills, experience, and interests. And then, of course, facilitating communication and dialogue between the three subcommittees and working with the co-chairs of each subcommittee to ensure that there's an agenda plan, they're clear around their task and goals for the month. And so to date, we are now in the second phase of the workflow, and that is just organizing the work, the work plan, the flow, managing and tracking their milestones, and also really drilling into the details around the report and their recommendations. And so to date, we have some of the milestones that have been accomplished between October and December. Awesome. Yes. So this is the work plan. Oh, yeah, I always say, they got me. I do. I say weird things like awesome sauce. So this is the robust work plan that we've been working on. So this was the plan that was identified back in January. And you see, there's a myriad of tasks and milestones. And so the work that we've been doing is ensuring that each of the subcommittees are clear on their tasks and that they of the in-between speed bumps or processes that need to be fulfilled, any gaps, that's where my team and I have gone to work as their technical assistants. And that's look like creating agendas to strategic thought planning to scooping collard greens into cups with aluminum foil to make sure that there is a to-go plan for the food following the listening sessions. But it's really a labor of love, and we're so honored to be supporting the commissioners in this way. So where we are now, we have the October milestones that have been completed. I can with full honesty and excitement say that each subcommittee has fulfilled their key task, up to about 80% of the task, which is amazing. This has been a very short time period to work through, but they've been working together collectively, and evidence of that is things like they have a website, there are listening sessions that are happening.