Thu, Jan 22, 2026·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

East Noble Citizen Advisory Council Meeting Summary (2026-01-22)

Discussion Breakdown

Public Safety53%
Transportation Safety8%
Active Transportation8%
Technology and Innovation8%
Procedural7%
Engineering And Infrastructure6%
Community Engagement4%
Environmental Protection3%
Economic Development2%
Water And Wastewater Management1%

Summary

East Noble Citizen Advisory Council Meeting (2026-01-22)

The Council opened the year with agency updates (Sheriff, CHP, Fire), progress reports on wildfire mitigation and downtown wayfinding, a Public Works update on making Main Street more pedestrian-friendly, and a major presentation on emergency notification options for Sunol/Kilcare areas. The group also reviewed 2025 accomplishments, discussed scheduling conflicts with Zone 7 flood meetings, and approved prior minutes.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Supervisor David Haubert (speaking out of order) wished the Council a happy new year, welcomed new member Ian, and highlighted the "jam-packed agenda" (law enforcement, fire safety, pedestrian-friendly downtown opportunities, and 2025 year-in-review).
  • Residents/Council participants raised traffic safety concerns about speeding and risky passing behavior on Kilcare Road and Foothill Road, and concerns about signal timing/queuing at Main St/84 during commute hours.
  • During the emergency notification discussion:
    • One speaker suggested exploring Jack Dorsey’s “BitChat” concept as a potential mesh-like option (noting Bluetooth range limitations).
    • Multiple speakers emphasized the need for redundancy and cautioned against large capital investments that could become obsolete as satellite-to-phone services expand.
    • A question was raised about whether emergency systems could affect homeowners insurance (no clear linkage was identified in discussion).

Discussion Items

  • Law Enforcement (Alameda County Sheriff’s Office) monthly update (Sgt. Petrini)

    • Reported 65 calls for service since the last meeting (November) with nothing of major note.
    • Deputies conducted 60 proactive stops and 128 patrol/business checks.
    • Council members/community raised concerns about speeding on Kilcare Road, especially related to school-related traffic; the Sheriff’s Office indicated they could try targeted enforcement (“hide out” to catch speeders).
  • California Highway Patrol update

    • CHP described staffing shortages (officers out due to injury and parental leave) and reduced ability to focus on county road enforcement in the short term.
    • CHP committed to bringing the Kilcare Road school rush issue up again and coordinating with the Sheriff.
    • Discussion included an observation that there appear to be fewer crashes at the 680/84 interchange, possibly due to two lanes continuing from northbound 680 to 84, improving freeway flow.
    • Multiple speakers requested Caltrans review signal timing at/near Main St and 84, specifically during commute hours (morning and afternoon), rather than mid-day checks.
  • Fire/EMS update (ACFD Chief Terra)

    • Reported 54 calls for service since November; 91% were EMS-related.
    • Noted one dumpster fire; otherwise relatively quiet.

Fire Safety / Wildfire Mitigation (Kilcare Road)

  • Diablo Fire Safe Council representative reported on a Cal Fire grant modification funding defensible space work along Kilcare Road:
    • Funding covers 10 days of an arborist crew (five-person crew) with chipper/hopper/equipment.
    • Work will start at the top of Kilcare Road and proceed downward, focusing on dead branches and clearance for emergency vehicles and evacuation.
    • This is separate from a planned ACFD shaded fuel break project on Kilcare Road expected to begin around March (timing discussed; some tree work was stated to begin in February).

Downtown Revitalization: Wayfinding Sign Prototype

  • The Downtown Revitalization Work Group reported the first prototype wayfinding sign is nearing implementation, delayed by unincorporated-area procurement steps (Board approval, Public Works requirements, PO/invoicing).
  • The prototype is intended specifically for community feedback before producing additional signs.
  • Proposed location: across from the former Bosco’s near the small parking area by the park.
  • The group discussed choosing which destinations/landmarks to list on the prototype.

Making Main Street More Pedestrian-Friendly (Public Works – Amber Lowe)

  • Public Works is pursuing an RFP/contract to update the County Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan (required every five years), with an expected Board approval in February.
  • The consultant scope includes working with unincorporated communities (MACs/CACs) to prioritize sidewalk and bike projects; the consultant is expected to begin outreach by summer.
  • Speed survey results (Main St & Bond St) (May 27–29):
    • The 85th percentile speed was stated as roughly 23–27/28 mph.
    • A small number of outliers were noted in the 35–40 mph range.
  • Foothill Road speed limit/ETS work:
    • Public Works is initiating a new engineering and traffic survey (ETS) to confirm speed limits on Foothill Road from B Street to mile marker 6.7 (near Pleasanton Ridge Park area), because an older 25 mph ordinance lacks a current ETS support needed for enforcement.
  • Pedestrian routing/crosswalk concerns:
    • The Council discussed train-event pedestrian movements between the train station and businesses (Casa Bella/Bosco’s/Country Store).
    • Public Works expressed concern about creating conflict points near the island/driveway area and suggested a more formal crosswalk approach could be safer, while also considering temporary markings or other interim measures.
  • Missing street lights near Bosco’s:
    • Public Works agreed to research the history and feasibility of reinstalling/repairing lights (including whether power is available and whether there may be spare poles from the 2012 project).

Emergency Notifications in Sunol (Fire Safety Group Presentation + OES)

  • Denise presented research on emergency notification options, emphasizing Sunol’s constraints: high fire hazard, limited cell coverage, multilingual and hearing-impaired residents, and visitors who may not be opted into alerts.
  • The group evaluated two vendors:
    • Genesis: presented as more oriented to larger communities and zone-based planning; a local siren test showed messaging was not intelligible beyond limited distances due to terrain.
    • HQE Safe: presented as attractive due to a low-frequency mesh network approach that does not rely on cellular; suggested options included in-home portable units (with language options and a vibrating wristband for hearing-impaired residents) and a network of poles/towers (an example map showed nine potential siren/coverage locations).
  • Findings/positions captured during discussion:
    • Presenters stated there is “no magic bullet” and that some level of resident participation would always be required.
    • Presenters stated sirens are primarily outdoor and may not wake residents indoors (especially with double-pane windows).
    • Cost concerns were highlighted, including an estimate of $100,000–$250,000 per siren (context: government contracting variability) and the challenge of securing funding.
  • Brent (Alameda County OES) provided system-wide context:
    • Noted Oakland (~25 sirens) and Berkeley (15 units; reported cost $1.97M for 15), and that systems are generally not networked across jurisdictions (activation is not shared).
    • Warned that vendors may be implicitly selling a broader platform shift (not just sirens) and that siren systems can be staff-time intensive and require ongoing maintenance/testing.
    • Recommended avoiding fragmented systems, aligning with countywide standards, and considering alternatives like improving cellular infrastructure (e.g., micro cell towers).
    • Suggested that rapidly evolving satellite-to-phone services could reduce the value of expensive bespoke infrastructure over a short horizon.

2025 Year-in-Review (Council accomplishments)

Key items reported included:

  • Continued progress on a septic feasibility study.
  • Advancement of prototype wayfinding signs.
  • Support for the school’s 100-year anniversary events.
  • Ongoing work on pedestrian issues related to berms along Sunol Boulevard/Sunol Road.
  • A bulky waste drop-off day.
  • Community engagement on fire safety (including a fire safety picnic and home hardening presentation).
  • Coordination and advocacy on fire/flood concerns with State Senator McNerney’s office; clarification that State OES funding channels typically run through recognized agencies rather than Sunol directly.
  • Support for designating Sunol-area creeks as a Priority Conservation Area (approved by MTC).
  • Evacuation route modeling work with UC Berkeley and UC Santa Cruz.
  • Negotiations that supported reopening the Pleasanton Ridge gate at the end of Kilcare Road.
  • Facilitating coordination between Niles Canyon Railway and the Sunol Business Guild for fundraising.
  • Advocacy to advance the PGE pipeline relocation enabling quarry revegetation; an additional benefit noted was enabling salmon movement upstream.
  • Ongoing flooding work and participation in Zone 7 flood meetings.

Key Outcomes

  • Direction/Follow-up: Council and OES agreed that exploring micro cell tower / improved cellular coverage should be pursued as a potential near-term/high-impact step; Chair requested a point of contact to follow up.
  • Scheduling: Council discussed moving CAC meeting dates to avoid conflicts with Zone 7 meetings; Chair to coordinate availability (noted that a planned February guest could not attend due to the conflict).
  • Minutes approved: October 15 minutes approved; McLean abstained (not present at that meeting).

Meeting Transcript

I think it's 6 30, so we can call the meeting to order. And um I can retire. Lila, do you want to read the directions? Sure. Yeah, I think uh, I know. Okay. And online via Zoom. For all participants, please state your name for the record prior to your comment. If you wish to speak on a matter not on the agenda, please wait until Chair de Grange calls for your public input on non-agenda item. Time limits are at the discretion of the chair and only matters within the jurisdiction of East Noble Citizen Advisory Council may be addressed. To notify the council you wish to speak, please listen closely to the following for in-person participants. Please fill out a speaker card and hand it to Chair DeGrange. Chair DeGrange will call your name and allow you to speak at the podium. On the clerk will call your name and allow you to unmute when it is your turn for dialed in participants. Please dial star nine to raise your hand. The clerk will allow you to unmute when it is your turn. No longer wishes to speak. Simply lower your hand or notify the council you no longer wish to speak when it is returned. Thank you. I see that David's hand is up, but let's do the roll call first. Councilmember Conan. Present. Council Member McLean. Present. Council Member Start. Chair De Green. Here. Yeah. Um David uh Supervisor Halbert, did you want to speak first before we start the meeting? That would be great if I could. Would that be all right with you? Okay. I just want to say happy new year to everyone and to welcome your newest member, Ian, who I'm excited to see serve. Thank you. Good to see you. Good to see everyone in Sinnol. You have a jam-packed agenda tonight. You've got updates from law enforcement, fire safety, pedestrian-friendly uh opportunities for the downtown area. Synol has a lot going on for it. I'm proud of everybody here tonight. I'm sorry I'm not with you in person, but uh representing my office. You have Kathy Kimberly and nobody better than her. And I'm also excited to see the year in review 2025, all the things that were accomplished in Sinnol. I wish you a great meeting, and we're going to have a great kickoff to the year 2026 and a great year this year. Thank you for letting me speak out of turn. I know you have a long agenda, so I'll be brief and just give the meeting back to Chair Connie DeGrange. Thank you all. Thank you very much. Okay. So we just look at you probably he is he introduced Kathy.