Tue, Jan 27, 2026·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Alameda County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — January 27, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Public Safety74%
Procedural5%
Racial Equity5%
Healthcare Services4%
Public Health Services3%
Homelessness2%
Public Engagement2%
Affordable Housing1%
Mental Health Awareness1%
Pending Litigation1%
Personnel Matters1%
Environmental Protection1%

Summary

Alameda County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — January 27, 2026

The Board convened for a regular meeting that included early public comment on several agenda items, approval of prior minutes, a closed-session settlement report-out, proclamations recognizing Human Trafficking Prevention Month and Alameda Alliance for Health’s 30th anniversary, and multiple administrative approvals and first-read ordinances. The major substantive policy action was Item 51, where the Board unanimously adopted directives to develop an immigration enforcement response plan and to implement “ICE-free zones” (restrictions on use of county-owned/controlled property for federal civil immigration enforcement operations), following extensive public testimony and board deliberation.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Buffalo Sojourn (items 3A, 12E, 19): Commended honoring of Nellie Wong; raised concerns about “slippage” from low-income to “affordable” funding and urged correcting “in locum tenants” practices from pandemic-era actions (position: concern/critique).
  • Joe Hawkins, CEO/Co-founder, Oakland LGBTQ Community Center (items 8, 10): Urged immediate release of “Ending the HIV Epidemic” funds; stated that in their clinics “100% of the new HIV infections…were black males, young black men” and warned against delays (position: strong support for immediate fund release).
  • Holly Calhoun, Senior Director of Programs, Project Open Hand (item 10): Supported releasing federally allocated Ending the HIV Epidemic funds; requested transparency to avoid future administrative delays and noted a stated deadline of February 28 to avoid returning funds (position: support; urgency).

Consent Calendar

  • Approved Consent Calendar Items 52–55 (unanimous).

Discussion Items

Closed Session Report-Out

  • County Counsel reported the Board confirmed settlement in Lee v. Alameda County Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (Case RG 2109 3232) for $60,000 to plaintiff; vote reported as supervisors Miley, Halbert, Tam, Marquez, Fortunato Bas voting yes (with Supervisor Miley previously noted as excused from the meeting’s opening roll call).

Proclamations & Commendations (1:00 p.m. Set Matters)

  • Item 49: Proclaimed January 2026 as National Human Trafficking Prevention Month

    • Supervisor Tam presented the proclamation, describing trafficking as a grave human rights violation and noting disparate impacts on marginalized communities.
    • District Attorney Ursula Jones Dixon described office efforts, prevention messaging, and regional coordination; stated the office served 261 trafficking survivors in 2025, with 142 receiving services for the first time, made 188 referrals, and assisted 117 with victim compensation; warned major 2026 sporting events (Super Bowl, March Madness/NCAA, FIFA World Cup) increase risk.
    • Public testimony:
      • Rose McCarr, Founder/CEO Justice At Last: Thanked the Board; emphasized trafficking will continue beyond major events; offered to meet regarding survivor legal needs (position: support).
      • Tim Drew (East Bay DSA): Supported proclamation; shared personal family impact; urged follow-through with policies including ethical investment criteria (position: support + request for additional action).
    • Supervisor Fortunato Bas invited public to a youth-led human trafficking town hall.
  • Item 50: Commendation for Alameda Alliance for Health (30 years)

    • Supervisor Tam highlighted Alliance growth and services; noted addition of a new dual-eligible plan effective Jan. 1, 2026.
    • Matthew Woodrow (CEO) stated Alliance now serves 400,000+ members (about “one out of every four” county residents).
    • Alliance leadership (Rebecca Gephardt, Dr. Donna White Carey, and others) expressed appreciation and emphasized work on social determinants of health and expanded coverage (positions: gratitude; commitment to continued partnership).

Regular Calendar: Mass Motion Items and Key Notes

  • Item 15 was continued to February 10, 2026.
  • A broad mass motion approving numerous items (2–13, 16–28, 30–33, 36–48, etc.) passed unanimously, with discussion highlights:
    • Item 9 (MHSA Trust Fund balance report): Supervisor Marquez asked whether the stated $21.5 million in prevention and early intervention dollars could be allocated to programs facing cuts; Interim AC Health Director Annika Chowdhury said MHSA planning is multi-year and offered to bring more detail as part of budget updates (position: informational/commitment to provide detail).
    • Item 42 (Emergency management MOU/Operational Area Emergency Management Organization): Supervisor Miley emphasized importance of disaster preparedness and resource-sharing; Sheriff Sanchez supported the framework and noted staffing improvements help catch up on planning (positions: strong support).
    • Item 2 (Sunflower Hill food services for people with intellectual/developmental disabilities): President Halbert praised SSA support for food services for a vulnerable population (position: support).

Recusal / Separate Vote

  • Item 14: Supervisor Miley recused (as president of United Seniors; stated no compensation) and left the room; Item 14 approved by remaining members.

Ordinances (First Readings Introduced)

  • Item 29: Introduced ordinance repealing/replacing Administrative Code Chapter 4.38 on green building practices for county-funded projects.
  • Item 34: Introduced ordinance approving July 2025–July 2028 MOU with Union of American Physicians and Dentists (Units 18 & 24) and related salary ordinance amendments.
  • Item 35: Introduced ordinance amending MOU with Alameda County Management Employees Association (General Government Unit) and related salary ordinance amendments.

Item 51 (3:30 p.m. Set Matter): Immigration Enforcement Response Planning & “ICE-Free Zones”

  • Sponsor/Presentation: Supervisor Fortunato Bas (with ACT “Alameda County Together for All” ad hoc committee context; co-chaired with Supervisor Marquez).
  • Key proposal components:
    • Direct County Administrator to develop a comprehensive immigration enforcement response plan including unified training, reporting/communication protocols, scenario planning/exercises; convene public safety agencies and coordinate with AC Health Equity Office and County Administrator’s Office of Equity; engage partners (e.g., Alameda Health System, labor organizations).
    • Adopt an “ICE-free zones” resolution prohibiting use of county-owned/controlled properties for federal civil immigration enforcement activities, including staging areas, processing locations, or operations bases, and direct implementation and reporting.
  • Language access: Supervisor Fortunato Bas apologized for initial lack of full Spanish interpretation setup; meeting paused to enable Spanish interpretation for remote attendees and improved in-room access.

Public Comments & Testimony (Item 51)

  • Broad support from faith leaders, labor representatives, legal/immigrant rights organizations, community members, and healthcare providers.
  • Common positions expressed:
    • Speakers urged adoption without delay and described ICE as acting unlawfully and causing fear/trauma.
    • Many urged the County to also oppose reopening/repurposing FCI Dublin for immigration detention (position: opposition to detention facility use).
    • Multiple speakers requested stronger enforcement/operational details, including what local law enforcement would do during ICE actions.
    • Healthcare speakers warned that ICE presence on/near hospital grounds deters care (position: support for protections to preserve access to healthcare).
    • Several speakers urged the County to address data/privacy concerns (position: concern about digital privacy and data sharing).
  • Notable opposition:
    • One caller (“elephant in the room,” candidate for Oakland mayor) argued sanctuary policies are unconstitutional and expressed support for President Trump (position: opposition to ICE-free zones/sanctuary approach).

Board Deliberation (Item 51)

  • President Halbert expressed opposition to unlawful detentions and use of force; supported coordination and messaging but raised concerns about false perceptions that “ICE-free zones” are completely safe and about avoiding unrest or unlawful confrontations.
  • Supervisor Tam supported the recommendations; asked how the policy affects federal arrests on county property. Sheriff Sanchez and County Counsel clarified that public-access areas differ from restricted areas, and the policy focuses on preventing commandeering/operational use (e.g., staging/processing), not necessarily preventing arrests in public spaces.
  • County Counsel stated the policy is modeled on Santa Clara County and is intended to prohibit county property from being used for staging/processing/operations; acknowledged that policies provide options but cannot guarantee compliance by an unlawful actor.
  • Supervisor Miley supported the proposals, citing oath/Constitutional concerns, but emphasized he did not want county deputies in a confrontation or “shootout” with ICE (position: support with caution).
  • Sheriff Sanchez reiterated commitment to enforcing state law; emphasized respectful language about immigrants; stated willingness (with support to maintain essential services) to move away from accepting SCAAP funding after careful consideration (position: commitment to explore ending SCAAP funding; not part of Item 51).

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes approved (Jan. 20, 2026) by roll call vote.
  • Closed session settlement report-out: Lee case settled for $60,000.
  • Consent Calendar Items 52–55: Approved unanimously.
  • Item 15: Continued to Feb. 10, 2026.
  • Mass motion items: Approved unanimously.
  • Item 14: Approved with Supervisor Miley recused.
  • Ordinances (Items 29, 34, 35): First readings waived and ordinances introduced.
  • Item 51: Adopted unanimously (Marquez, Tam, Miley, Fortunato Bas, Halbert all Aye) directing development of an immigration enforcement response plan and implementing county property restrictions (“ICE-free zones”), with status updates to the ACT ad hoc committee.
  • Adjournments in memory of: Nellie Wong, Keith Porter, Renee Good, and Alex Preedy.

Meeting Transcript

Recording in progress. Good morning, everyone. I'd like to call our meeting to order today. Tuesday, January 27th, a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Can I have a roll call, please, to establish our quorum? Supervisor Marquez present. Supervisor Tam present. Supervisor Miley excused. Supervisor Fortunato Bas. Present. President Halbert. Present. We have a quorum. Thank you very much. Our next item is to rise if you can and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge allegiance. Our next item is supervisors' remarks. I'll recognize Supervisor Tam. Thank you, President Halbert. I wanted to uh take this opportunity to note that we should close the meeting today in honor of Nellie Wong. She is a stalwart in Oakland, Chinatown, which is one of the oldest Chinatowns in the United States, and she was a social justice advocate, a poet, an author, an artist from the first generations of Chinese Americans that are born here. And she passed away on January 2nd at the age of 91. She her last book was nothing like freedom. So hopefully we can honor her memory. Thank you. We will, and please remind me to do so. Supervisor Marquez. Thank you. Um I'm gonna have more detailed comments later, um, during our set matter, item 51, specifically to uh what happened this past weekend, but also just want to ask, I'm sure others would feel uh the need to also adjourn this meeting in memory of Alex Predi. Um, and also just wanted to thank AC Health, all the volunteers, local leaders, volunteers, everyone that came out for the point in time count last Thursday. Um many of us were up at 4 a.m. in the morning. We were assigned to a specific census track, and I know we all had different experiences throughout this county, but just really want to uplift the tremendous work we're doing to implement the home together plan and with the support of Measure W. So hopefully we'll get that data in the summer and it will show that the investments are paying off, but just really wanted to thank everyone for um stepping in and volunteering. Thank you. Very well, and uh thank you. You'll remind me as well at the end of the meeting. Okay, very good. Supervisor Fortunato Bass. Uh thank you. Thank you, Supervisors Tam and Marquez, for those adjournments. Um, I would like to add since we haven't yet also adjourning in memory of Renee Good and Keith Porter, and also I don't see um our AC health interim director in the room at the moment, but also wanted to thank AC Health and everyone who helped to organize the point in time count last week. Um, myself and one of my staff were able to volunteer, and it was a tremendous, tremendous volunteer operation. Um the goal was to recruit a thousand volunteers, and there were about 1,300 people who registered. So I was just really pleased to see that uh level of interest in the community. Uh there's our AC Health Interim Director. I'm just thanking you and your team, interim director um Chowdhury, for the incredible work on the point in time count. Um I too am looking forward to the results to help inform not only our funding but also our program and strategies. Uh, one thing I wanted to highlight because I was out in West Oakland is that there's often a lot of talk about whether people who are unhoused are coming in from other counties or other cities, and uh the handful of people I talked to were actually born and raised here in Alameda County. Two of them um born and raised in Oakland, unhoused in Oakland and last house, literally a few blocks from where I talked to them, and one of them was a Hayward uh resident born and raised, but now in Oakland.