OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda County Board Supervisors Joint Committee Special Meeting – April 13, 2026

Board of SupervisorsMonday, April 13, 2026
BodyAlameda County, California
SessionBoard of Supervisors
DateMonday, April 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:28:20
Transcript — Verbatim
0:10

Recording in progress.

0:18

Good morning and welcome to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors Special Meeting of the Joint Social Service and Health Committee meeting for Monday, April the 13th, 2026.

0:30

May have roll call, please.

0:32

Supervisor Portonado Bass present.

0:35

Supervisor Miley, excused, Supervisor Town.

0:39

Present.

0:39

We have a quorum.

0:41

Thank you very much.

0:43

We have two informational items.

0:45

This committee joint committee was formed to assess the impacts of HR1 in terms of our planning at the county.

0:54

So we'll start with the HR1 implementation and health pack recommendations.

0:59

Good morning, Dr.

1:01

Connen.

1:02

Good morning, supervisors.

1:10

Good morning, supervisors.

1:11

I'm Dr.

1:11

Kathleen Klan and I'm the medical director of Alameda County Health, and I'll be talking about recommendations for Alameda County Care Program Health PAC.

1:21

First, we will go through a little bit of history of the Health PAC.

1:26

We can go ahead to the next one.

1:29

A little bit of history of the Health PAC program, just uh especially for the public, but also as a reminder, um, go through the federal and state policy changes that are most relevant to uh budgeting and program recommendations for health pack, and then get into our actual recommendations for the upcoming year.

1:47

So, first, in terms of the background and history.

1:52

So, a little bit about the basics of what the Health PAC program is again as a review and for the public.

1:59

Um, so Health PAC is a low cost to the participants health access program for low-income adults uh with a who meet the federal poverty limit below 200% who are residents of Alameda County.

2:13

And uh an important eligibility factor is that they are not eligible for other kinds of insurance, whether public or private.

2:28

Uh, primarily because it only covers you for care within the contracted network.

2:34

So if you are elsewhere, if you're in San Francisco for work and you are in an accident, that care would not be covered.

2:40

So it is not portable because it's not insurance, and that definitely uh can be a problem for people.

2:46

The contracted network, uh, we're lucky enough to have a very able and extensive contracted network.

2:52

All of the federally qualified health centers in the county are part of that network, including Alameda Health System.

2:58

The system does uh specialty hospital emergency care as well as primary care and all the other federally qualified health centers do primary care.

3:08

It's important to remember that as part of their foundational uh funding and uh as in the nature of being a federally qualified health centers.

3:19

They also are required by their federal funding to have a fight, a sliding scale fee uh ability to serve low-income people, whether they're enrolled in insurance or health pack or not.

3:29

Next one.

3:31

In terms of the history of health pack, we have this program uh in part because of the section 17,000, part of the welfare and institution code in California.

3:43

Um, different states have different arrangements for how care of people who are not able to afford care is covered, but this is ours in the state of California.

3:51

Um into the late 70s, uh, the county met its obligation for this section 17,000 coverage of people who cannot afford care through uh contractual relationships with community clinics.

4:05

Um that people may remember that was called CMSP, standing for the County of Municipal Services Program, I think.

4:13

What was CMSP?

4:15

Um then uh in the run up to uh the Affordable Care Act, um, we were able to uh utilize federal funding that specifically supported uh formalizing uh what had been CMSP into a program that we then at that time named Health PAC was funded.

4:34

Uh some of that work of uh of organization was funded by the Bridge to Reform uh waiver that you can see described there.

4:42

Uh we were very successful as a result of leveraging that funding and had a great large number of people who had been in the indigent care program were able to get onto Medi-Cal through ACA.

5:00

Post-ACA, we included only the federally qualified health centers in the provider network primarily because they were able to leverage the PPS or prospective payment system to pull down additional federal and state funds.

5:09

So since 2014, since the ACA, only federally qualified health centers have been part of the network, including of course the hospital system.

5:38

Next one, in terms of enrollment, we peaked at 90,000 just before the implementation of ACA, then saw that large drop as many people transitioned.

5:49

And then the history of the program since then, beginning in especially in 2022, the state began to expand the criteria for enrollment in their state-funded program for people who were otherwise unable to participate in ACA.

6:07

So if you look at what that looked like graphically over the years, the next one.

7:15

So just a few milestones that so there was the peak and fall around the ACA.

7:24

The funding fell to the baseline of around 54 million.

7:28

Annual COLAS since then have brought us up to about 70.5 million, which is was in last year's budget.

7:39

Next one.

7:42

So what's coming then in terms of these changes?

7:45

Again, there will be things that you've seen before in these presentations, but as a reminder for the public.

7:50

Next one.

7:53

So the primary big changes are the federal changes in particular are expected to reduce the overall number of people who are able to enroll in Medi-Cal and ads make some maze, a maze, a difficult to navigate maze in front of the people who are still eligible.

8:13

So the HR1 changes, primary ones that will be have an impact on people's Medi-Cal eligibility.

8:22

We have already seen the re-implementation of the asset test.

8:26

So if you have things that you own even if you have no income, the asset test, asset test says you have to spend down assets that you have before you'll be eligible.

8:40

We will see in October of this year a revised definition of who among documented legal immigrants are eligible for these programs.

8:49

That's the change that in the definition of a qualified non-citizen.

8:54

And then beginning next year for all participants, whether or not you're an immigrant, the six-month redeterminations, so needing to reapply every six months instead of once a year, and then work requirements.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Health Services████████████████████████████████████████40%
Healthcare Services██████████████████████████26%
Homelessness█████████████████████21%
Budget Process█████5%
Land Use Planning███3%
Procedural1%
Data Collection1%
Fiscal Sustainability1%
Procurement and Contracting1%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda County Board of Supervisors Joint Social Service and Health Committee Special Meeting – April 13, 2026

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors held a special joint meeting of the Social Service and Health Committee on Monday, April 13, 2026, to receive updates on two informational items: the impacts of HR1 and state policy changes on the Health PAC program, and a new site opportunity guide for homeless housing. A quorum was present with Supervisors Portonado Bass and Town, while Supervisor Miley was excused.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Lily Kelly (La Clinica de la Rasa) strongly supported allocating $34 million in Measure W funds to increase Health PAC funding, citing imminent losses from Medi-Cal freezes and work requirements. She shared stories of patients suffering without coverage.
  • Lucy Hernandez (Bay Area Community Health) urged increased Health PAC funding, describing a mother who delayed care due to immigration fears and ended up in the emergency room.
  • Two Quark (Asian Health Services) supported the $34 million allocation, warning that 6,000 of their patients may lose coverage, causing $6 million annual losses and forcing service cuts and layoffs.
  • Andy Martinez Patterson (Community Health Center Network) noted the PPS penalty for FQHCs under capitation in Alameda County and supported the funding increase.
  • Hong Kong bin (patient of Asian Health Services) expressed personal support for Health PAC funding, emphasizing the value of culturally-linguistic care.
  • Tony Panetta (Alameda Health Consortium) testified in support of augmenting the Health PAC budget beyond maintenance of effort to offset HR1, Prop 1, and state instability.
  • Robert Phillips (Baywell Health) associated with support, noting that clinics have absorbed independent practices and that protecting the budget protects access.
  • Cyrus Martinez (Access Community Health) urged increased Health PAC funding over two years, highlighting the July 2026 state rate cuts for FQHCs serving immigrants.
  • Ella Schwartz (Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center) expressed appreciation for Health PAC and Measure W support, sharing a story of a 19-year-old diabetes patient helped by the program.
  • Dr. Harsha Ramchandani (Bay Area Community Health) strongly supported the $34 million allocation, recounting a gardener with an infected wound and a diabetic woman who avoided hospitalization due to timely care.

Discussion Items

HR1 Implementation and Health PAC Recommendations

Dr. Kathleen Klan, Medical Director of Alameda County Health, presented a detailed history of Health PAC, a low-cost health access program for low-income adults (below 200% FPL) not eligible for other insurance. Enrollment peaked at 90,000 before the ACA, dropped sharply after 2014, and now has 2,456 enrollees with a budget of $70.5 million (from county general fund). She outlined federal HR1 changes (asset tests, revised immigrant definitions, six-month redeterminations, work requirements) and state changes (enrollment freeze, monthly premiums, formulary cuts, dental coverage elimination) expected to cause tens of thousands to lose Medi-Cal. Recommendations: maintain current eligibility and scope of services, augment funding this year and next to mitigate provider financial challenges, and expand the provider network to two additional safety net clinics. Supervisors asked about state advocacy (data sharing and support for undocumented groups), sustainability of funding, and the impact of losing Prop 1 funds. Dr. Klan noted that the $70.5 million baseline has not shrunk with enrollment because clinics now provide more comprehensive, whole-person care. Staff clarified that a $20 million placeholder from Measure W Essential Services Fund had been discussed but final allocations are pending.

Site Opportunity Guide and Site Assessment Tool for Homeless Use

Jennifer Pierce (Deputy Housing Director) and Selima Jones (Housing Finance Manager) presented a new guide and Excel-based tool developed with cities to evaluate publicly and privately owned sites for homeless housing. The tool addresses legal status, physical attributes, and timeline for use, and covers short-term (safe parking, community cabins), mid-term (navigation centers, motel conversions), and long-term (tiny home villages, commercial conversions) uses. Supervisor Fortunato Bass asked about the surplus property list (still being compiled) and the inclusion of amenities like storage and pet areas. Supervisor Tam noted that HAP funding requires a surplus property list and referenced a meeting with Senator Grayson about partnering with Caltrans and seeking state pilot funding for interim shelter with wraparound services. Staff confirmed past RFPs for capital costs and that a future rehab/acquisition RFP may be available.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken; both items were informational.
  • The Health PAC recommendation to maintain current eligibility and augment funding with Measure W funds (targeting $34 million over two years) was presented and discussed, with strong public and supervisor support. Final budget decisions are pending further workshops, including a Measure W Essential Services Fund work session scheduled for April 28, 2026.
  • The site opportunity guide and assessment tool were accepted as a resource to assist cities and the county in identifying sites for homeless uses. Staff will continue to compile the surplus property list and explore partnerships with the state, including potential pilot funding from Senator Grayson.

Meeting Transcript

Recording in progress. Good morning and welcome to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors Special Meeting of the Joint Social Service and Health Committee meeting for Monday, April the 13th, 2026. May have roll call, please. Supervisor Portonado Bass present. Supervisor Miley, excused, Supervisor Town. Present. We have a quorum. Thank you very much. We have two informational items. This committee joint committee was formed to assess the impacts of HR1 in terms of our planning at the county. So we'll start with the HR1 implementation and health pack recommendations. Good morning, Dr. Connen. Good morning, supervisors. Good morning, supervisors. I'm Dr. Kathleen Klan and I'm the medical director of Alameda County Health, and I'll be talking about recommendations for Alameda County Care Program Health PAC. First, we will go through a little bit of history of the Health PAC. We can go ahead to the next one. A little bit of history of the Health PAC program, just uh especially for the public, but also as a reminder, um, go through the federal and state policy changes that are most relevant to uh budgeting and program recommendations for health pack, and then get into our actual recommendations for the upcoming year. So, first, in terms of the background and history. So, a little bit about the basics of what the Health PAC program is again as a review and for the public. Um, so Health PAC is a low cost to the participants health access program for low-income adults uh with a who meet the federal poverty limit below 200% who are residents of Alameda County. And uh an important eligibility factor is that they are not eligible for other kinds of insurance, whether public or private. Uh, primarily because it only covers you for care within the contracted network. So if you are elsewhere, if you're in San Francisco for work and you are in an accident, that care would not be covered. So it is not portable because it's not insurance, and that definitely uh can be a problem for people. The contracted network, uh, we're lucky enough to have a very able and extensive contracted network. All of the federally qualified health centers in the county are part of that network, including Alameda Health System. The system does uh specialty hospital emergency care as well as primary care and all the other federally qualified health centers do primary care. It's important to remember that as part of their foundational uh funding and uh as in the nature of being a federally qualified health centers. They also are required by their federal funding to have a fight, a sliding scale fee uh ability to serve low-income people, whether they're enrolled in insurance or health pack or not. Next one. In terms of the history of health pack, we have this program uh in part because of the section 17,000, part of the welfare and institution code in California. Um, different states have different arrangements for how care of people who are not able to afford care is covered, but this is ours in the state of California. Um into the late 70s, uh, the county met its obligation for this section 17,000 coverage of people who cannot afford care through uh contractual relationships with community clinics. Um that people may remember that was called CMSP, standing for the County of Municipal Services Program, I think. What was CMSP? Um then uh in the run up to uh the Affordable Care Act, um, we were able to uh utilize federal funding that specifically supported uh formalizing uh what had been CMSP into a program that we then at that time named Health PAC was funded. Uh some of that work of uh of organization was funded by the Bridge to Reform uh waiver that you can see described there. Uh we were very successful as a result of leveraging that funding and had a great large number of people who had been in the indigent care program were able to get onto Medi-Cal through ACA. Post-ACA, we included only the federally qualified health centers in the provider network primarily because they were able to leverage the PPS or prospective payment system to pull down additional federal and state funds. So since 2014, since the ACA, only federally qualified health centers have been part of the network, including of course the hospital system. Next one, in terms of enrollment, we peaked at 90,000 just before the implementation of ACA, then saw that large drop as many people transitioned. And then the history of the program since then, beginning in especially in 2022, the state began to expand the criteria for enrollment in their state-funded program for people who were otherwise unable to participate in ACA. So if you look at what that looked like graphically over the years, the next one. So just a few milestones that so there was the peak and fall around the ACA. The funding fell to the baseline of around 54 million. Annual COLAS since then have brought us up to about 70.5 million, which is was in last year's budget. Next one.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com