Wed, May 13, 2026·Alameda County, California·Board of Supervisors

Eden Area MAC Meeting Summary – May 13, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Fiscal Sustainability28%
Community Engagement10%
Engineering And Infrastructure8%
Public Engagement7%
Land Use Planning6%
Public Safety5%
Alcohol and Beverage Licensing4%
Unincorporated Area Services4%
Affordable Housing4%
Procedural4%
Traffic Safety3%
Technology and Innovation3%
Procurement and Contracting3%
Arts And Culture2%
Economic Development2%
Fireworks Regulation1%
Environmental Protection1%
Homelessness1%
Healthcare Services1%
Youth Programs1%
Language Access1%
Library Services1%

Summary

Eden Area Municipal Advisory Council Meeting – May 13, 2026

The Eden Area MAC met on May 13, 2026, to consider a conditional use permit for a T-Mobile cell tower, receive a detailed county budget presentation with departmental updates, and hear public comments on fireworks enforcement, a liquor store appeal, and budget transparency. The council approved the minutes and the CUP recommendation, and engaged department heads on service delivery and budget concerns.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the minutes from April 14, 2026, by unanimous vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ashley (homeowner): Expressed full support for increased fireworks enforcement, visible law enforcement patrolling, and an anonymous reporting system to reduce risks from professional-grade explosives. Noted the Board of Supervisors passed the first reading of a fireworks ordinance that day.
  • Chuck Meadows (Fairview resident): Opposed the alcohol conditional use permit on 14th Street (appealed to Board of Supervisors), arguing it would add a liquor store in an area already saturated with such outlets. Stated a church shares a common wall with the proposed location, which should require denial.
  • Tyler Dragoni (former MAC member): Joined the opposition, citing disregard for the environmental justice element and failure to notify the predominantly Spanish-speaking church in English.
  • Diane Castleberry (AC Transit): Announced that the AC Transit Board will consider service reductions of over 16% and loss of up to 300 jobs due to a $200 million deficit beginning in 2028, with potential effects in June 2027. Urged the council to help publicize the June 10 meeting.
  • Multiple community speakers (SLAM members): Called for greater transparency in county budget reporting, earlier release of meeting materials, and more detailed data specific to unincorporated areas. Emphasized that residents need accessible information to meaningfully participate.

Discussion Items

  • Conditional Use Permit (PLN2025-00152): Staff recommended approval of a CUP to allow continued operation of a T-Mobile telecommunications facility at 16520 Wortley Drive (M2 heavy industrial zone), previously permitted in 2012 but expired in May 2023. The site, set back over a football field from the street, has three antennas and a small equipment area. Council members noted the permit had expired three years prior and questioned the process. Planning staff indicated an ordinance is being considered to fine carriers for expired permits. The council voted 7-0 to recommend approval to the Board of Zoning Adjustments.
  • County Budget Update: Melanie Atendito (County Administrator's Office) presented the budget development process, highlighting a $91.4 million funding gap for FY 2026-27, partly offset by $93.4 million in retirement savings. Department heads from Community Development Agency, Public Works, Sheriff, Fire, and Library provided overviews of services, capital projects (including fire station construction and Measure X), and challenges such as illegal dumping and unfunded capital needs. Council members asked about ERAF losses ($760 million shifted to the state), revenue trends, and potential service impacts. The final proposed budget will be presented May 28.
  • Subcommittee Reports: The Economic Development Subcommittee (Taylor, Warren, Elizabeth) has not met recently but will review the final draft of the economic development strategic plan soon. The Bayfair BART Transit Subcommittee (Warren) reported ongoing outreach with BART, county, and San Leandro. The Inclusionary Zoning/Affordable Housing Subcommittee (Warren, Taylor) held an initial meeting and anticipates a year-and-a-half process before an ordinance goes to the board.

Key Outcomes

  • CUP Approved: The council voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the T-Mobile telecom CUP, with conditions attached in the draft resolution.
  • Budget Update Received: The council received the county budget presentation and will monitor the proposed budget release on May 28 for potential service impacts to unincorporated areas.
  • Request for Future Presentations: Council members requested that Public Works provide a dedicated presentation on flood control and the Mobile Citizen app, and that all department heads return at least annually.
  • Chair Announcement: Chair Whitler reminded the council that her term ends next month; members should consider nominations for chair and vice chair.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, let me um call this meeting to order. It's um pretty much right six o'clock. Trying to looking at my 601. So can you take the roll, please? Councilmember Taylor Assid Nielsen. Here. Councilmember Ray Maramahoko. Yes. Councilmember Menonrol. President. Councilmember Elizabeth Stanley, excuse. Councilmember Warren Cushman. Councilmember Diane Leitler. Here. We have a quorum. Okay, thank you. Um can we all stand for a pledge of allegiance, please? I pledge allegiance. Under uh visible delivery, and this is for all. All right, at this time we will be open for um public announcements or comments from the public. Speakers. Yes. Let's start with a joke. Thank you. Good afternoon. My name is Achelke, and I'm a homeowner in San Lorenzo. And I'm here to see how we can keep our neighborhoods safer during the 4th of July celebrations. There's been a significant increase and the usage of professional grade, explosives, and fireworks. And while this may seem like harmless fun, they pose fire risk and cause both physical and mental harm. These illegal fireworks are incredibly stressful for pets, the elderly, and people dealing with PTSD. Last year in my neighborhood, they went on well after 12 a.m. So I think it would be beneficial to everyone if we not only had increased public awareness about the dangers, but also more visible law enforcement regularly patrolling these areas. And I would also like the council to support the Sheriff's Office efforts to enforce the fireworks and social host ordinance. Last year I know they were working really hard to keep us safe, but more needs to be done. And I'd like to know how the residents can help and how we can further support them. Lastly, residents do need a way to anonymously report illegal fireworks activity violations to avoid potential ill will among residents and neighbors. Sorry, really quick. The Board of Supervisors today did pass the first reading of the fireworks ordinance. Chuck Meadows. Good evening, members of the board. My name is Chuck Meadows. I'm here to actually resurrect an issue that came before you way back when regarding an alcohol uh conditional use permit on 14th Street. This matter was voted 7-0 by this board against granting a permit. It was appealed to the Board of Zoning Adjustments where it was approved 5-0, and is now going to the Board of Supervisors this Thursday. So at 10 o'clock this Thursday, it's the first item on the regular agenda. There will be public comments, and we're hoping that this time we can get some people that live in near proximity to the actual location. And he brought up the fact that no one in the immediate area registered a single complaint or objection to introducing I can't remember, it's the fourth or fifth liquor store within a less than a mile radius of that location. Tyler Dragoni, an ex member of this board has circulated some documents, and I've not been able to verify it independently, but apparently there is a church that shares a common wall with the proposed location. Now if that is true, then the application should be denied just on that fact alone. There, but there are other factors including the damage to the potential community from having yet another liquor store.