Unincorporated Services Committee Meeting Summary - June 25, 2026
Unincorporated Services Committee Meeting Summary - June 25, 2026
This meeting of the Unincorporated Services Committee, chaired by Supervisor Miley, addressed two informational items: the Fiscal Year 26-27 Proposed Budget and the Sheriff's Office Real Time Information Center (RTIC) contract. Public comment covered proposed budget transparency, RTIC technology concerns and support, and non-agendized topics including extra utility fees, a community garden, and airport development. No votes were taken, but directives were given for follow-up.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Budget Item: Ladidoa Salazar (Eden Voice) praised increased transparency but requested earlier community input and more demographic data. Anna Raschizo (Resources for Community Development) thanked staff and suggested holding budget presentations in the fall. Diane (call-in) asked whether state/federal aid offsets mandated programs. Lana Cross (San Lorenzo homeowner) requested a geographic breakout of spending.
- RTIC Item: Keith Barrows (San Lorenzo) noted previous opposition came from outside the unincorporated area and urged approval. Dan Devini asked Supervisor Miley to champion the contract. Randy Wagi voiced full support. Lana (call-in) expressed concern about drone surveillance and asked about tracking transparency. Diane (San Lorenzo) supported the technology as a necessary tool.
- Non-Agendized Items: Kristen Hackett (Eden Voice) reported that 84% of residents surveyed are paying new extra fees for garbage, water, and sewer (RUBS), causing displacement pressure; asked for an ordinance to ban such fees. Lindsay Lay echoed the same issue. Carmelita Lopez, Miguel de Leon (translated), and Sandy Frost (Empowering Families in Ashland) asked for continued stewardship of a community garden (La Huerta) on land near Fire Station 24. Lesbia Marones read testimony from Marta, a retiree with a disability, describing a $200/month extra fee and risk of eviction. Keith Barrows suggested that speakers identify their city of residence. Lana (San Lorenzo) requested help informing the community about Hayward Airport/SkyWest expansion plans. Randy Waggie noted illegal dumping on railroad property and suggested cameras. Nika (Liberty Town Homes resident) described unfair utility charges of over $500/month and asked for their removal.
Discussion Items
- Fiscal Year 26-27 Proposed Budget: Melanie Atendito (County Administrator's Office) presented a balanced $6.7 billion all-funds budget ($4.3 billion general fund), closing an initial $185 million gap through $93.4 million in one-time pension savings and $91.4 million in departmental adjustments. She highlighted 65% reliance on state/federal revenue, structural funding challenges, and unincorporated area investments including $70 million for roads, $65 million for fire protection, and $37 million for sheriff patrol. Measure W Essential County Services Fund allocates $151 million, with 30% benefiting unincorporated areas. Supervisor Miley noted improvements in transparency and governance, affirmed multiple engagement channels (MACs, budget work group), and emphasized that cities have more revenue-raising ability. He directed continued enhancement of the unincorporated special budget section.
- Sheriff's Office Real Time Information Center (RTIC): A Sheriff's Office Sergeant presented a request for an 18-month bridge contract (to be voted on by the Board of Supervisors June 30) to maintain existing technology: Flock automated license plate readers, pan-tilt-zoom cameras, and drone first responder program (Raven), all integrated into a single platform. Case studies from the past two months showed successful resolution of an attempted kidnapping, a shooting of a 14-year-old, and recovery of stolen county vehicles. The contract includes data privacy protections (no federal sharing, no national data lookups, transparency portal). The Sergeant noted that all other Alameda County jurisdictions have this technology and unincorporated areas would be left without coverage if not renewed. Supervisor Miley expressed strong support, citing public safety benefits and safeguards, and pledged to champion the contract.
Key Outcomes
- Budget: No action taken by the committee. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to adopt the FY 26-27 budget on June 26 (as referenced in the transcript). The CAO will continue to enhance the unincorporated budget section and may present follow-up information to the MACs.
- RTIC Contract: No action taken by the committee. The contract will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on June 30. Supervisor Miley stated he would vote in favor.
- Non-Agendized Items: Supervisor Miley directed that an informational report on extra utility fees (RUBS/junk fees) be agendized for the next Unincorporated Services Committee meeting on July 24. He noted he would work with the Empowering Families in Ashland group regarding the community garden lot but provided no immediate commitment. He acknowledged the airport issue is in Supervisor Tam's district and suggested it could be agendized by her office.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, good evening, everyone. I like to call the unincorporated service committee meeting for June 24th order. Clerk take the role. Supervisor TAM, excuse Supervisor Milan. Can we have instructions, both the translation instructions and then instructions for participants? Claudia. Yes, miss. Welcome everyone. We will be providing interpretation at today's session. I will be making this announcement in English and in Spanish. Bienvenidos. We invite everyone to please select English if you have limited Spanish proficiency. This way you will be able to hear the interpreters from Spanish to English. If you're on a computer at the bottom, you will see a globe that says interpretation. You can go ahead and put a check mark on your preferred language. If you're on your cell phone or tablet, you can locate the three dots. You can tap them lightly and put a check mark on your preferred language and be sure to click done in order to activate and begin the interpretation. Thank you very much. Back to you. And for remote participation, follow the teleconferencing guidelines, post it at www.acgo.org, and use the raise your hand function. Thank you. All right. So good evening. Sorry, running a little behind. Got caught in traffic coming out of Oakland this evening. So everything on our agenda tonight is informational. And which is good because we just have one representative from the committee here. So our first informational item is um the budget update. Thank you, Supervisor. Um good evening, everyone. Melanie Atendito from the County Administrator's Office here to provide an update on the fiscal year 26-27 proposed budget. Um the board is in uh did conduct uh budget hearings and deliberations this week. So um for folks that were tuned into that process, a lot of this content will look quite familiar. Um so just a brief overview of what I'm covering this evening. I'll start as always with an economic update as well as uh state and federal updates. Uh we'll then move to a little bit of county 101, um, talk about the county's responsibilities, uh, a little bit about the difference and differences between counties and city structures, uh, as well as county financing and uh really stress the point about how uh limited our revenue raising ability is. Um I'll then move to move on to summarize the fiscal year 26-27 proposed budgets, um, do some highlights on uh the unincorporated area investments as well as some enhancements we have continued to make to the unincorporated special budget, uh, and then close with pending factors and looking ahead. So in terms of the economic outlook and state and federal updates, um really the top lines here that you're seeing um in this press coverage center around the technology sector trends remaining mixed. Uh there's continued investment in AI uh all while workforce reductions continue to happen. So this is a reflection of productivity gains but ongoing labor market disruption. Economic uncertainty persists due to federal policy changes, market volatility, concerns about the federal debt, and the potential for renewed inflationary pressures. A lot of economists have highlighted that we have what is referred to as K-shaped economic growth. This is a reference to higher income households benefiting from asset appreciation while many lower and middle income residents face affordability challenges and labor market pressures. Federal immigration policies and demographic trends, including lower birth rates and housing constraints, are affecting labor force participation and contributing to slower economic growth in the state. And the state's unemployment rate remains elevated. I think California is now tied with two other states at the top of the list in terms of its unemployment rate at about 5%. That's above the national rate of 4.3%, while the counties Alameda County fares somewhat better at 4.1%. Though we have noted in previous presentations that East Bay employment in particular continues to lag regional trends. So cost pressures remain significant, particularly in labor, health care, construction, and contracted services, despite inflation moderating a bit. These conditions underscore the need for continued fiscal discipline to sustain core services while maintaining long-term stability.
openpublica.com