June 1, 2026 Planning Committee and Common Council Meeting: Transfer Station, Resolutions, and Public Comment
June 1, 2026 Planning Committee and Common Council Meeting: Transfer Station, Resolutions, and Public Comment
The evening began with the Planning, Economic Development, and Land Use Committee meeting where members received a detailed presentation on the Rap Road Transfer Station environmental review, followed by a Common Council meeting that considered several resolutions, appointments, and extensive public comment regarding housing conditions at Thurlow Terrace.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of minutes from the May 18, 2026 Common Council meeting passed unanimously.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Thurlow Terrace tenants and advocates (multiple speakers including Mae Saunders, Herman Johnson, Liz Sanchez, Douglas Gilliam, Jerry Murphy, Kirsten Fuller, and representatives from United Tenants of Albany and Capitol District DSA) described severe issues at the senior apartment complex: drug dealing and use, theft by staff with master keys, lack of heat, mice and roach infestations, and disrespectful management. They urged the council to demand good-faith negotiations and accountability from ownership.
- Kenyon Ryan (United Tenants) spoke in support of the REST Act resolution to ease rent stabilization opt-in for municipalities, and opposed a proposed Kenwood data center.
- Tolani Elumari (NAACP) announced two community events: the Freedom Luncheon on June 7, 2026, and a Men’s Health Awareness series beginning June 16, 2026.
- Audrey Lambert complained about a street renaming process, alleging a conflict of interest and rude treatment by a council member.
- Richard Johnson spoke generally about high rents and poor maintenance.
- Torseen Fuller proposed a city program to train young basketball officials, citing a national shortage and an unreturned proposal to the Department of Recreation.
Discussion Items
- Planning Committee – Rap Road Transfer Station (Resolution 3952-26R): Nicholas Ward Willis (special counsel) and CHA consultants Chris Einstein and Jason Gorman presented findings of the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR). The proposed 26,000 sq ft transfer station on 3.4 acres at Rap Road would receive 500 tons per day of residential waste from Albany and associated communities, replacing the landfill that reaches capacity in fall 2027. Studies concluded no significant adverse impacts on land use (the last residential parcel adjacent to the landfill), threatened/endangered species (pine bush habitat absent on site; DEC concurred), cultural resources (encapsulation of a small archaeological site), noise/odors (enclosed building), traffic (maximum 95 vehicles/day, same intersection as landfill), and health/safety. The committee voted unanimously to refer the resolution with a positive recommendation.
- Common Council – Data Center Discussion: Councilmembers noted that a proposed Kenwood data center would require rezoning and use changes, both considered very unlikely. A statement or resolution to reassure the public was discussed.
- Common Council – Housing Conditions: Councilmembers Anani and Johnson pledged to investigate Thurlow Terrace, with Anani announcing plans for legislation requiring cameras in buildings with 30+ units and security guards in buildings with 50+ units, and a resolution calling for good-faith negotiations.
Key Outcomes
- Resolution 3952-26R (Transfer Station: lead agency and negative declaration) passed 15-0.
- Resolution 51-61-26R (Caribbean American Heritage Month) passed unanimously.
- Resolution 53-61-26R (Gun Violence Awareness Day and Month) passed unanimously.
- Resolution 52-61-26R (LGBTQ+ Pride Month) passed unanimously.
- Resolution 58-61-26R (Support for the REST Act) passed 14-0 (one absent).
- Resolution 57-61-26R (Water Board financing amendment for dam improvements) passed 15-0.
- Appointment of Lillian Garland to the Community Police Review Board passed 15-0 after being taken out of order.
- Resolution 54-61-26R (Appointment of Lillian Garland) – passed as above.
- Local Law K of 2026 (Open data policy) was introduced and referred to the Law, Buildings, and Codes Committee.
- Resolution 55-61-26R (Reappointment to PEG Access Board) introduced and referred to Planning.
- Resolution 56-61-26R (City Court judges for warrantless seizures) introduced and held.
- Resolution 59-61-26R (Reappointment to PEG Access Board) introduced and referred to Planning.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, we're gonna get started, everybody. Good evening, everybody, and welcome to the June 1st, 2026 Planning, Economic Development, and Land Use Committee meeting. My name is Deborah Zamer. I chair the committee. We are joined by committee members Tom Hoy, Arthur Lumpkin, Alfredo Ballorin, and Council members, Rachel Powell, and Jack Flynn. We're also joined by legislative staff, Carly Johnson, Brian Jimenez, Robert Wenner, and Commissioner Sergio Penunzio, Commissioner of DGS. Thank you for being here also for questions. We are the first thing. Did we have any public comment? Okay. No public comment. So we'll get right to the topic of our discussion, which is resolution 3952 26R from Councilmember Powell, a resolution of the Common Council declaring itself to be lead agency for the state environmental quality review of the Rap Road Transfer Station Project, declaring such action to be a type one action and making a negative declaration as to the environmental impact of such action. So, Councilmember Powell, would you like to speak on this and maybe introduce who we have to discuss it? Um, if that's within your peer view. Sure. Um, so uh I am the sponsor of this resolution as a landfill and the transfer station, um, the proposed transfer station would occur in the 12th ward, which is my district. Um, there was a very comprehensive report that I think was sent to all of you earlier related to environmental impact study that was done by CHA. Um, the RCHA partners are here to talk about that tonight and present their findings. Um, I've previously met with them. It's a very comprehensive report, so I hope committee members had an opportunity to take a look at it. Um, so I will um turn it over to all of you. Thank you for being here. Thank you, Councilmember Powell. Yes, please, would you mind introducing yourselves and where you're from and your relationship to this particular discussion? Absolutely, thank you. Good evening, chair members of the committee. My name is Nicholas Ward Willis. I'm an attorney with Keenan Bean, and our firm is being retained as special land use and environmental counsel to the corporation's council's office and to the city for the overview and um permitting of the transfer station at RAP Road. And with me tonight are Chris Einstein and Jason Gorman of CHA, who have been the long-term planning and engineering advisors to the city of Albany concerning the landfill and the planning for the closure of a landfill and then eventual construction and operation of a waste transfer station adjacent to the landfill. And as council member uh Powell mentioned, CHA and my office have been working with staff and with various um what are called interested and involved agencies, other um agencies who issue permits to prepare for the permitting of the uh transfer station. And so tonight we're going to go through and provide you with an overview of the examination of the potential environmental issues and what was done, what was examined, and our findings on that. And we're tonight asking the committee to refer to the full council, a resolution finding that there are no significant adverse environmental impacts from the construction of the transfer station adjacent to the existing landfill. And to uh reach that conclusion, CHA has undertaken a comprehensive study, as you have seen with the materials presented to you, over 500 pages of traffic analysis, review of the habitat, utilities, odor, noise, the full suite of environmental issues that New York State law requires mandates that this city council review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. And for that process to start, the city council declared itself a lead agency, and you took that step back in December when you told the other agencies, such as DEC, who would have to issue a permit for the transfer station to operate, that the city council felt it had the expertise, the skills, and the knowledge to act as the lead agency to review if there were any significant adverse environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the transfer station. So that resolution was adopted in December. Notice was sent to adjacent municipalities who are interested agencies, as well as a number of other involved and interested agencies. Some comments were received, but no one objected to the city council being the lead agency. We had previously provided DEC with a permit application, which they have been reviewing. DEC acquiesced and agreed that the city was in the best position to review the impacts from its construction and operation. And so since the declaration of its intent to be lead agency in January, the 30-day period has passed. No one has objected. So when you adopt this resolution tonight, you're declaring that you are the lead agency. You're taking that last step. That then allows you as a lead agency to make the determination of significance, which is binding upon all the other agencies because it would be pointless to have separate independent reviews. So your decisions are very important, and other agencies are relying upon it. And so tonight I'm going to ask Chris and Jason to walk us through what was done on the city's behalf to examine those potential significant environmental impacts. And I can assure you that the materials before you are very comprehensive and comply in every respect with DEC's regulations. And the next step, should you adopt a resolution tonight, will be a copy of a finding statement, will be published in the environmental notice bulletin, which is DEC's official publication, circulated to be involved in interested agencies, and particularly to DEC, so that DEC can declare the application for the transfer station permit to be complete, and then they'll then ask for any public comments on that permit application, and then hopefully they'll grant the permit, and then we can begin the uh permitting uh bidding up work and starting construction in the late fall or early winter of next year. So if there are no questions on the process, I'm then going to ask Chris and Jason to start us off on discussions of what was done with those examinations of the environmental topics. Uh I will start with an overview of the project itself, um the need for it, the transfer station design and the uh planned operations.
openpublica.com