OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Arlington P&Z Commission Regular Session - April 15, 2026

Planning and Zoning CommissionWednesday, April 15, 2026
BodyArlington, Texas
SessionPlanning and Zoning Commission
DateWednesday, April 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:12:38

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

0:01

My name is Dr.

0:02

Ignacio Nunez.

0:03

I serve as chair of the Planning Zoning Commission for the City of Arlington.

0:06

I hereby call this regularly noticed meeting of the City of Arlington's Planning and Zoning Commission regular session to order for April the 15th.

0:15

At this time, I'll ask our administrator to read the speaker guidelines and general decorum for tonight's meeting.

0:23

We ask that the citizens and other visitors in attendance assist in preserving the order and decorum of this meeting and to provide for attendance at and participation in the meeting without fear of intimidation, threats, or hostility.

0:35

Any person making personal, profane, hostile, slanderous, or threatening remarks who uses vulgar or obscene language, who engages in any other actions that disturb or are calculated to disturb the meeting, or who becomes disruptive while addressing the planning and zoning commissioners or while attending the planning and zoning meeting may be removed from the council chambers.

0:53

All speakers shall address the commissioners and not the audience or city staff and shall not call out individually named members of city staff or the public.

1:01

For speakers tonight, when your name is called, please come to the microphone at the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record.

1:08

The applicant will be asked to speak first and will be given 10 minutes to make a presentation.

1:12

Speakers in support or opposition of the item will be given five minutes each to make their statements.

1:17

If there are many speakers for an item, each speaker will be given three minutes to make their statements.

1:22

The applicant will then be given five minutes for any rebuttal.

1:25

If multiple speakers plan to provide the same or similar comments, those speakers may, if they so desire, designate one or more individuals to provide public comment on behalf of the group.

1:35

A bell will signal the end of each speaker's time.

1:38

A consideration of other speakers, please conclude your comments promptly when you hear the bell.

1:42

We ask that you address your comments to the planning and zoning commissioners.

1:46

Thank you very much.

1:55

Were there any changes or corrections that were needed seeing none to have a motion to approve?

2:01

I do by Commissioner Maddox.

2:04

I have a second by Commissioner Greer.

2:06

Cast your vote, please.

2:15

Motion passes 8 to nothing with one abstention.

2:22

Next on the agenda, we have three zoning cases this evening.

2:26

The first one is PD 14 17, addressed at 2002 wind terrace.

2:33

This is application for approval of a planned development for residential and medium density, RM12 for a cottage community with a development plan on approximately 2.035 acres.

2:46

This time I'll call on staff to present its report on zoning case PD 14-17.

2:54

Good evening, Commissioners for the record.

2:57

Principal plan Kevin Charles, Principal Planner, Planning and Development Services.

3:01

This afternoon, we're looking at PD 25-17 wind terrace.

3:07

This is a request for a cottage community.

3:11

The site is approximately two point, the site is approximately two acres in size, addressed at 2002 wind terrace.

3:20

The current zoning of the property is residential single family 7.2.

3:25

And the request is plan development for residential medium density RM12 for cottage community use with a development plan.

3:37

So this is an aerial photograph of the site in its current configuration, highlighted in yellow.

3:43

As you can see, all of the properties to the north, the west, and the south are all zone RS 7.2 and fully developed.

4:03

The property to the east is uh PD for RMF 22.

4:09

Uh the site is developed uh in a similar manner as Cottage Communities.

4:14

However, when this particular site went through our zoning process, uh we did not have our cottage community standards in place.

4:23

Therefore, it was processed under a PD for RM22, uh, which is uh multi multifamily zoning.

4:34

These are aerial photographs of the site uh which show a general uh transition from its original configuration to where it is now.

4:45

Uh the general area of the subject property was largely undeveloped until single family homes were constructed in the early 1950s to the north of the site.

4:55

By 1964, uh many new homes were built south of the site.

5:01

The church to the west was built in in the 1980s.

5:05

In 2022, as I mentioned before, PD 22-16 was approved for RMF 22 development for 12 cottage style units.

5:16

The aerial images provide an overview of how the area evolved from the 1950s to the present.

5:30

Since we have had our ordinance in place.

5:51

Starting in the upper left-hand corner and moving clockwise.

6:17

Also, to access the property in the rear in the rear to access 2002.

6:22

There you can see the car ports and the front of some of the units.

6:36

And then the final photograph there is the rear of the existing church that's located directly west of the subject site.

6:46

So here we see the subject site layout.

6:49

As you can see, the site has no public street frontage and will be accessed through an access easement.

6:57

The development proposes 13 one and two bedroom cottages.

7:02

The cottages shall range in size from 758 square foot one-bedroom unit to a two-bedroom unit that is approximately 1,500 square feet of floor area.

7:14

The UDC requires that cottage community developments with individually platted lots provide a minimum lot size of 2250 square feet.

7:24

The applicant is proposing eight lots of 2250 square feet, two lots of 2,000 square feet, and three lots of 2400 square feet.

7:33

The lots of 2,000 square feet represent a deviation from the requirements of the UDC and are called out.

8:05

Parking and landscaping.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Comprehensive Planning█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
Procedural██████9%
Affordable Housing█████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure███5%
Community Engagement███4%
Environmental Protection2%
Historic Preservation1%
Housing1%
Economic Development1%
Summary of Proceedings

Arlington Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Session - April 15, 2026

The Arlington Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at 5:43 PM in the City Hall Council Chamber. All nine commissioners were present: Chairperson Nunez, Commissioners Blake, Sumpter, Finley, Ware, Winkles, Greer, Carter, and Maddox. The commission considered three zoning cases: a cottage community, a townhouse development, and a mixed-use development. Two cases were continued to June 3, 2026, and one was approved with conditions.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes of the March 25, 2026 Regular Session were approved 8-0-1 (Commissioner Ware abstained) on a motion by Commissioner Maddox, seconded by Commissioner Greer.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • PD14-17 (2002 Wynn Terrace): No public testimony in addition to applicant and adjacent property owner. Wanda Everhart (opposition) expressed concern about two-story units overlooking her backyard and drainage. Linda Matthews (opposition) cited density, traffic, and drainage issues, requesting denial. The applicant, Tariq Khan (Foresight Group), and property owner Hamza Ishmael spoke in support, citing affordable housing and compatibility. The commission recommended a continuance; the applicant agreed.
  • PD25-21 (1013 North Mesquite Street): Speaker William Middleton (opposition) raised concerns about runoff, utilities, density, and monotony. The applicant, Jacob Scoggins (Architecture Underground), and owner Neu answered questions. Several commissioners noted the project was not fully baked. The applicant requested a continuance.
  • PD25-22 (1120 Debbie Lane and 8380 Glenn Day Drive): Several speakers appeared in support (cards non-speakers). No opposition speakers. Applicant Dixon Holman (Taylor Morrison) addressed concerns about monotony, tree preservation, and commercial integration. He stated the project could not be continued due to prior delays. No public testimony beyond the applicant.

Discussion Items

  • PD14-17 – 2002 Wynn Terrace (Cottage Community): Staff presented a request for a Planned Development (PD) for RM-12 on 2.035 acres for 13 cottage homes. Deviations included smaller lot sizes (2,000 sq ft vs. required 2,250 sq ft) and lack of covered parking. Staff recommended a mix of one- and two-story units, masonry fencing, and recycling plan. The applicant was amenable to conditions. Commissioners raised concerns about architectural quality, trash, parking, and readiness. Chairperson Nunez advised the applicant to seek a continuance. The applicant requested a continuance to June 3, 2026.
  • PD25-21 – 1013 North Mesquite Street (Townhouses): Request for PD for RM-12 on 0.924 acres for 10 townhouse units. Deviations included lot sizes (1,950–3,296 sq ft vs. 2,900 sq ft minimum), garage depth (9 ft vs. 20 ft), and garage width (80% of facade vs. 60% max). Staff recommended distinguishing elevations, adding pitched roofs, and moving the entry drive. Applicant proposed a pickleball court and pitched roofs. Commissioners questioned density, trash (20 bins), and short-term rental potential. The owner expressed intent for long-term rentals but wanted flexibility. The applicant requested a continuance to June 3, 2026.
  • PD25-22 – 1120 Debbie Lane and 8380 Glenn Day Drive (Mixed-Use): Request for PD for Community Commercial and RM-12 on 29.85 acres for 170 townhouse units and two commercial pads. Deviations: lot depths 82–90 ft vs. 100 ft, lot sizes 1,749–4,000+ sq ft vs. 2,900 sq ft, and garage width 80% of facade. Staff recommended traffic calming, pedestrian connectivity, and a mix of elevations. The applicant presented 39 color schemes and 4 floor plans. Commissioner Finley opposed due to proximity to gas well and lack of rendered elevations. Commissioner Sumpter supported with conditions. After debate, a motion to approve with conditions (including removal of non-protected trees for rear-entry units, pedestrian connectivity, community meeting, and $13,140 tree mitigation fee) passed 5-3.

Key Outcomes

  • PD14-17 (2002 Wynn Terrace): Continued to June 3, 2026, by a unanimous 9-0 vote on a motion by Commissioner Blake, seconded by Commissioner Winkles.
  • PD25-21 (1013 North Mesquite Street): Continued to June 3, 2026, by a unanimous 9-0 vote on a motion by Commissioner Blake, seconded by Commissioner Winkles.
  • PD25-22 (1120 Debbie Lane and 8380 Glenn Day Drive): Approved with conditions by a 5-3 vote (Ayes: Chairperson Nunez, Commissioners Blake, Sumpter, Ware, Winkles; Nays: Commissioners Finley, Carter, Maddox). Conditions include: future development plan required for commercial tract; gasoline sales prohibited; common areas in X-lots maintained by HOA; removal of non-protected trees on west property line to allow additional rear-entry units; pedestrian connectivity to commercial tract; mixture of unit types and colors as presented; a community meeting before City Council; and a tree mitigation fee of $13,140.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Dr. Ignacio Nunez. I serve as chair of the Planning Zoning Commission for the City of Arlington. I hereby call this regularly noticed meeting of the City of Arlington's Planning and Zoning Commission regular session to order for April the 15th. At this time, I'll ask our administrator to read the speaker guidelines and general decorum for tonight's meeting. We ask that the citizens and other visitors in attendance assist in preserving the order and decorum of this meeting and to provide for attendance at and participation in the meeting without fear of intimidation, threats, or hostility. Any person making personal, profane, hostile, slanderous, or threatening remarks who uses vulgar or obscene language, who engages in any other actions that disturb or are calculated to disturb the meeting, or who becomes disruptive while addressing the planning and zoning commissioners or while attending the planning and zoning meeting may be removed from the council chambers. All speakers shall address the commissioners and not the audience or city staff and shall not call out individually named members of city staff or the public. For speakers tonight, when your name is called, please come to the microphone at the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. The applicant will be asked to speak first and will be given 10 minutes to make a presentation. Speakers in support or opposition of the item will be given five minutes each to make their statements. If there are many speakers for an item, each speaker will be given three minutes to make their statements. The applicant will then be given five minutes for any rebuttal. If multiple speakers plan to provide the same or similar comments, those speakers may, if they so desire, designate one or more individuals to provide public comment on behalf of the group. A bell will signal the end of each speaker's time. A consideration of other speakers, please conclude your comments promptly when you hear the bell. We ask that you address your comments to the planning and zoning commissioners. Thank you very much. Were there any changes or corrections that were needed seeing none to have a motion to approve? I do by Commissioner Maddox. I have a second by Commissioner Greer. Cast your vote, please. Motion passes 8 to nothing with one abstention. Next on the agenda, we have three zoning cases this evening. The first one is PD 14 17, addressed at 2002 wind terrace. This is application for approval of a planned development for residential and medium density, RM12 for a cottage community with a development plan on approximately 2.035 acres. This time I'll call on staff to present its report on zoning case PD 14-17. Good evening, Commissioners for the record. Principal plan Kevin Charles, Principal Planner, Planning and Development Services. This afternoon, we're looking at PD 25-17 wind terrace. This is a request for a cottage community. The site is approximately two point, the site is approximately two acres in size, addressed at 2002 wind terrace. The current zoning of the property is residential single family 7.2. And the request is plan development for residential medium density RM12 for cottage community use with a development plan. So this is an aerial photograph of the site in its current configuration, highlighted in yellow. As you can see, all of the properties to the north, the west, and the south are all zone RS 7.2 and fully developed. The property to the east is uh PD for RMF 22. Uh the site is developed uh in a similar manner as Cottage Communities. However, when this particular site went through our zoning process, uh we did not have our cottage community standards in place. Therefore, it was processed under a PD for RM22, uh, which is uh multi multifamily zoning. These are aerial photographs of the site uh which show a general uh transition from its original configuration to where it is now. Uh the general area of the subject property was largely undeveloped until single family homes were constructed in the early 1950s to the north of the site. By 1964, uh many new homes were built south of the site. The church to the west was built in in the 1980s. In 2022, as I mentioned before, PD 22-16 was approved for RMF 22 development for 12 cottage style units. The aerial images provide an overview of how the area evolved from the 1950s to the present. Since we have had our ordinance in place. Starting in the upper left-hand corner and moving clockwise. Also, to access the property in the rear in the rear to access 2002.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com