Denton City Council Meeting - March 3, 2026
Denton City Council Meeting - March 3, 2026
The Denton City Council met on March 3, 2026, from 4:00 p.m. to 8:10 p.m., with a recess for a closed session from 4:15 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. The council addressed a range of items including property disposition, a rooftop restaurant addition, water infrastructure contracts, and election agreements. The meeting included public comments on multiple topics and concluded with council member announcements.
Consent Calendar
- The consent agenda was approved unanimously with item E (educational experience agreement with TWU) pulled for a separate vote and passed 4-0 with one recusal.
- Item E: Ordinance authorizing an educational experience agreement between the city and Texas Women's University for use of the Denton Senior Center. Approved.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Unhoused services: A speaker criticized the city's shelter system, citing a pit count of 690 homeless individuals and a shelter capacity of 120, alleging mistreatment by providers.
- Public Art Committee: Jennifer Lane, chair of the Public Art Committee, defended the committee's work, expressed concern over a news article criticizing the committee, and requested reconsideration of the city's ban on Zoom attendance for board and commission meetings.
- ADU Ordinance: Dana Zoltner urged the council to require same architectural design for accessory dwelling units to prevent out-of-character structures, proposing one of three design criteria be mandatory.
- Landlord-Tenant Dispute: Manuel Villarreal requested an ordinance requiring landlords to provide itemized charge details upon request, citing alleged bad faith by his property manager.
- Rooftop Restaurant: Multiple speakers (James Sawyer, James Van Pelt, Grace Smith, Dylan Clark, Clay Dodd, Christiana) expressed support for the proposed rooftop restaurant at 101 S Locust Street, citing economic benefits, increased dining options, and enhanced square vitality. Bobby Baldwin voiced concerns about compatibility, parking, accessibility, and cumulative impact.
Discussion Items
- Surplus Property Disposition: Deanna Cody, Deputy Director for Real Estate, presented criteria for identifying surplus properties and seven properties recommended for sealed-bid sale. Estimated revenue range: $1–2 million. Council discussed marketing (e.g., signage vs. newspaper), reserve prices, and timing. Councilmembers expressed general support, with Councilmember Beck requesting additional information on one property. Direction given to proceed with staff recommendations.
- Certificate of Design Consistency – 101 S Locust Street: A proposal to add a one-story with mezzanine rooftop restaurant on the east side of the Wells Fargo building. Staff recommended approval, citing compliance with Denton Square District standards. Applicant presentations highlighted design, economic benefits, and accessibility via elevators. After public hearing, council voted 4-1 to approve (Councilmember Beck dissenting).
- Special Use Permit – Outdoor Storage: For an existing concrete batch plant accessory use at Lattimore Industrial Park. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. No public comments. Approved 5-0.
- Historic Tax Exemption – 3316 Roseland Drive: Partial tax exemption for a local historic landmark due to septic system replacement. Approved 5-0.
- Interlocal Agreement – Ponder Farms MUD: City to contribute $2,261,202 for oversizing a water line (total project $8.6 million) to serve future wholesale connection to the Town of Ponder. Approved 5-0.
- Pecan Creek Water Reclamation Plant Expansion: Construction manager at risk contract with Sun Construction for GMP #1 ($63,025,437.10) and total not-to-exceed $92,321,565. Project includes 30 MGD membrane bioreactor facility. Approved 5-0.
- Joint Election Agreement – May 2026 Election: Contract with Denton County for general and special elections for council places and mayor. Staff presented two options: Option 1 with locations as published and Option 2 adding Green Valley Baptist Church (sole available site in District 2). Council selected Option 1, citing cost and limited availability. Approved 5-0.
Key Outcomes
- Approved surplus property criteria and sealed-bid sale process; staff to report back in 4–6 months.
- Approved certificate of design consistency for rooftop restaurant at 101 S Locust Street (vote 4-1).
- Approved special use permit for outdoor storage at Lattimore Industrial Park (5-0).
- Approved historic tax exemption for 3316 Roseland Drive (5-0).
- Approved interlocal agreement with Ponder Farms MUD for water line oversizing (5-0).
- Approved CMAR contract for Pecan Creek WRP expansion (5-0).
- Approved joint election agreement with Option 1 polling locations (5-0).
- Referred to staff: Councilmember Beck requested exploring additional early voting sites for future elections.
- Next steps: Election agreement final costs to be provided after April 10, 2026; property sale updates via staff reports; rooftop restaurant to proceed with permitting.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome to this meeting of the Denton City Council. The time is 4 p.m. We have a quorum, so I'll call this meeting to order. First item on the agenda is citizen comments on consent agenda items. Do we have any comments? Seeing none, we'll move on to item number two requests for clarification on agenda items listed on the agenda for public hearing and individual consideration. We do have item E will be pulled for a separate vote on the consent agenda. Any other questions or seeing none? We'll move on to work session reports number three, item A, ID 25-2294. Receive a report, hold the discussion, and give staff direction regarding the use and potential disposal of real property tracts owned by the City of Denton. Good afternoon. Deanna Cody, Deputy Director for Real Estate. I'm lucky to be the only one, I guess, is first to provide the council with information on the city's property inventory, the criteria that staff use to identify unneeded or underutilized properties that could potentially be deemed surplus, and the methods of sale that are available to the city to dispose of any surplus real property. Secondly, staff will be requesting direction from the council on implementing the criteria to identify surplus property going forward and moving forward with the bid sale of the identified surplus properties. There is a closed meeting placeholder if desired for further property discussions later. So city the city has approximately 650 acres or tracts of land on 4700 acres in the city inventory. But also they include city facilities like City Hall, the Development Services Center, Parks and Recreation. And those are reflected by ownership in the charts. So last year staff received a consultant recommendation to incorporate a process to evaluate the city's real property assets to identify opportunities for either reuse, repurpose, or to sell some of the properties as surplus. Additionally, there was an opportunity that was this was an opportunity that was identified by the 2025 budget task force. Once implemented, it's it will be essential to continue a collaborative review with each operating department, and those efforts will be time to coincide with the city's annual budget process. The overall goal is to prevent long-term inactive or unprogrammed assets. And when a property no longer supports those initiatives, it's to develop or determine potential reuse opportunities. There we go. Staff has developed criteria to identify surplus property, including considering the physical characteristics of the properties, and whether or not these properties were previously listed for sale and did not sell, and if they were no longer needed for the project for which they were originally acquired. Staff then collaborated with the operating departments to gain their input on their current or identified future uses that may have been noted or not in a master plan. And we consulted with the finance department to identify any potential revenue restrictions based on the funding that was used to procure the properties. So once we've identified the properties, there are two methods that are available to the city to dispose of the surplus properties. The first is by sealed bid, which is an auction process, and second is by direct sale. For sealed bid sales or bid sales, the process includes advertising the properties for at least two consecutive weeks in the local newspaper. Bidders would submit a packet and move through the typical procurement process. And at closing of the bid, those bids would be compiled and presented to the council to either accept or reject the bid offers. For direct sales, the process may also include a public notice by advertising in the local paper. Now that we've looked at the proposed criteria to identify surplus property and the methods of sale that are available to the city to dispose of them. Here's a list of seven properties in the likely order of sale. You'll notice there's a star by the first property on the list, and that denotes that staff has received a license application to potentially use the property, but it is going through an evaluation process through staff, and that license would likely require a specific use permit and other board and commission approvals. Those if the city decided to move in that direction for the license, which they can do, and still move forward with the sale, the timing of the sale could potentially be impacted. And a close-up of the seven properties, which you each have also received a handout in the legal status report last week. And so again, I'll say if there were specific questions regarding any of the property, there is a closed meeting option that's available to us. So moving to staff recommendations, we recommend that we move forward with the stated criteria that's been identified to identify and sell surplus property, that we sell the currently identified surplus property by a sealed bid auction, potentially setting a minimum bid or reserve price, and provide the council. We will provide the council with uh periodic milestone updates as we move closer to a potential sale, and we will do that through either an informal staff report or through a legal status report. Ultimately, the staff will bring the result of the bids forward to the city council for consideration, and we anticipate doing that in about four to six months. If all of the properties were to sell based on staff's estimation, and that's if all of the properties were to sell, the sealed bid could result in between one and two million dollars in revenue. So finally, again, noting the staff's request for direction, it's direction to accept staff recommendations and proceed with the the process and criteria used to identify surplus property, and secondly, is to sell the properties that we have identified as surplus by the sealed bid process. And that is the end of the presentation. Thank you so much. Questions for staff, Councilmember Beck. Thank you, Mayor Pratim. Um if I understand the process correctly, you want direction now, or you want direction in closed. No, the direction would be given in open in open session.
openpublica.com