Special Budget Meeting of the Metropolitan Council – December 9, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Special Budget Meeting of the Metropolitan Council – December 9, 2025
The Metropolitan Council of Baton Rouge met on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, in a special budget meeting to adopt the final 2026 current expense and capital budget and to consider several professional service contract renewals. The meeting included public comment, council discussion, and votes on eight agenda items.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Robert Joyner, a resident of East Baton Rouge Parish (Hickory Ridge, St. George area), raised concerns about the budget. He questioned the allocation of $1.2 million from the Entergy franchise fee renewal to council operational budgets, calling it a 74% increase in council spending. He also noted that the council had approved contracts valued at up to $195 million with private consultants and contractors from January to October 2025, plus $4 million in settlements. He argued that public works staffing has declined significantly (from over 1,000 permanent employees years ago to about half now, with Maintenance dropping from over 400 to 196), and expressed concern that essential services are being outsourced to contractors. He asked for justification for these contracts before cutting permanent city employees.
Discussion Items
- Item 1 – 2026 Budget Adoption: Councilman Dunn responded to Joyner’s comments, explaining that the franchise fee (for the unincorporated area) was newly implemented in the renewed agreement after prior years had no fee. The fee generated $4.6 million in revenue, exceeding the projected $3.5 million. The council allocated $500,000 to the District Attorney's office, $500,000 to 19th Judicial District Court, $250,000 to BRPD, $250,000 to the Parish Attorney, $250,000 to the Public Defender, $200,000 to Baton Rouge, $1.2 million to council members (approximately $105,000 each), and $300,000 to the administration. Councilwoman Cole echoed Dunn’s remarks and also mentioned the constable’s office, stating her desire to restore it. Councilwoman Adams introduced a substitute motion to approve the budget with amendments, listing specific transfers from council district budgets to various agencies (e.g., District 1 to juvenile court and parish attorney; District 2 to public defender; District 3 to district court, family court, DA, registrar, coroner; District 4 to DA; District 5 to public defender and juvenile court; District 6 to public defender; District 7 to drainage, development, maintenance, buildings and grounds; District 8 to DA and public defender; District 9 to DA and public defender; District 11 to drainage maintenance, parish attorney, juvenile court; District 12 to juvenile court). Additionally, $50,000 originally for the Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank was transferred to the East Baton Rouge Parish Truancy Assessment Incorporated.
- Item 8 – Stress Testing Contract: A public commenter asked about the purpose of diagnostic stress testing services. The Human Resources Director clarified that these services are provided for the Baton Rouge Fire Department. Councilman Moak noted that the cancer screenings and other services were instituted by legislation passed last year.
Key Outcomes
- Item 1: A substitute motion to approve the 2026 budget with the amendments read by Councilwoman Adams was passed. A roll call vote was taken: Councilman Goday (yes), Councilman Moak (yes), Councilman Dunn Jr. (yes), Councilwoman Adams (yes), Councilman Hearst (yes), Councilman Rocka (yes), Councilman Knoll (yes), Councilman Hudson (yes), Councilwoman Emirosa (yes), Councilwoman Colman (yes), Councilman Kenny (yes), Councilwoman Harris (yes). The motion carried.
- Item 2: Motion by Councilman Moak, seconded by Councilman Hudson, to adopt the revised 2026 pay plan for employees (effective December 27, 2025) carried with no opposition.
- Item 3: Motion by Councilwoman Adams, seconded by Councilman Kenney, to fix the number of employees (effective December 27, 2025) carried with no opposition.
- Item 4: Motion by Councilman Hudson, seconded by Councilman Hearst, to renew the contract with Convenient Care LLC (total $1,050,830) for fire department medical services carried.
- Item 5: Motion by Councilwoman Adams, seconded by Councilman Hudson, to renew the contract with Franciscan Health and Wellness Services Inc. ($360,000) carried.
- Item 6: Motion by Councilwoman Amarosa, seconded by Councilwoman Adams, to renew the contract with Health Remed LLC ($100,000) carried.
- Item 7: Motion by Councilwoman Adams, seconded by Councilman Hudson, to renew the contract with Hub International ($225,000) carried; Councilwoman Raca abstained.
- Item 8: Motion by Councilwoman Adams, seconded by Councilwoman Amarosa, to renew the contract with Our Lady of the Lake Physician Group ($60,000) carried.
The meeting was adjourned after the vote on Item 8.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome everybody to the special budget meeting of the Metropolitan Council this Tuesday, December 9th, 2025. We'll call the meeting order. Ashley, do we have a quorum? We have a quorum. All right, everybody, please sign the approof of notice that should be coming around of the meeting. Item number one amending preliminary current expense budget and capital budget of the City of Baton Rouge Parish of East Baton Rouge for year 2026 submitted by the Mayor President and adopting final current expense budget and capital budget of the City of Baton Rouge Parish of East Baton Rouge for the year 2026 by the Mayor President deferred on November 12, 2025. Anyone wishing to speak on this item? I have a Robert Joyner. 6037 Hickory Ridge. Mr. John Thank you, sir. Robert Joyner, 6037 Hickory Ridge Boulevard. I'm a resident of East Baton Rouge Parish. Uh a couple things that I would like some clarification on with the adoption of this budget. First, uh there's been a lot of talk in these budget meetings about changes to some of the proposals for the budget, specifically the constable that was asked to be cut, a lot of promises, decisions were be made. I just want to make sure that the actual budget that's being voted on today is what was previously put in the public notice over a month ago. My second item is there was a uh at the end of last year, entergy review renewed their franchise agreement uh with city parish, which generated an additional 1.2 million dollars in revenue for the city parish. Uh that revenue has been allocated as of earlier this year to all of the city council's operations budget. It's about a hundred thousand dollars for each council member's operation budget additional. Uh it's about a 74% increase in the council's budget for 2026. Um I would ask for justification on each of those operation budgets of why they're putting put to the operations of the city council while we're talking about cutting the public works department's uh ability to provide the services that are needed by the by the residents. Um as of January of this year to October of this year, the butt the council has approved contracts for up to one 195 million dollars with private consultants and contractors and another four million dollars in settlements for medical bills and recs. Um I would like some some confidence that all of those contracts have been looked through to see that they are all essential to be cutting the city parish employees positions filled or non-filled. These is we used to have about two times as many public works employees, you know, 10-15 years ago now as we do. We over a thousand public works employees that used to be permanent employees of the city parish. That's almost half. The Department of Maintenance used to have over 400 employees, now they have 196 with the proposed 2026 budget. Um all this does this the services we need are not going away. The uh the services that need to be provided by the permanent employees are not going away. All this leads to is, and we're getting more and more infrastructure to take care of every year. All this leads to is more and more contracts for services for staff augmentations of permanent contractors that are put in place while city parish employees are being cut. I would like to know that all of those contracts that are put in place every year and and new contracts that are put in place are seen as necessary to the operations of the public works department before any public works employees get cut. At least to your disenfranchising basically the the city parish civil servants that come here and work for less money than they could get in a private firm. You're putting money into the pockets of these contract company owners that pay their employees employees still a little bit amount of money. It's not right in my opinion for the working class people that make this parish 10th round. Thank you for your time. Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak on this item? See, now we'll go to council. Councilman Hudson. Excuse me. Council members, you should have received one email comment in opposition to item one. Motion to approve uh the budget as uh proposed. Second. We have a motion to approve the budget uh as presented, second by council councilman Hudson, second by councilwoman Coleman. Councilwoman Adams. I have a substitute motion. Um I'd like to make a motion that we approve the budget as written with the following amendments. Um and just a moment of privilege. I just want to say thank you to everyone who participated in the council budget hearings.
openpublica.com