Tue, Nov 18, 2025·Belmont, California·City Council

Measure I Advisory Committee Meeting Summary (2025-11-18)

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure62%
Procedural20%
Fiscal Sustainability16%
Disability Rights2%

Summary

Measure I Advisory Committee Meeting (2025-11-18)

The Measure I Advisory Committee met to review the FY 2024–25 Measure I audit results and the status of Measure I-funded street/pavement improvements. Staff presented the audited financials (including revenues, expenditures, and fund balance changes), an update on pavement condition and the five-year paving plan, and a draft annual report for transmittal to City Council.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were received or presented.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved minutes from the June 9, 2025 meeting (roll-call vote: 2–0; Tupo absent).

Discussion Items

  • FY 2024–25 Measure I audit results and fund status (staff presentation):

    • Staff reported the audit was completed the prior Friday and received an unmodified opinion (highest/cleanest audit opinion).
    • Staff explained the audited fund balance trend, noting the most recent fund balance dropped because more street projects were delivered/spent during the fiscal year.
    • Reported FY 2024–25 figures included: beginning balance (noted on slide), about $4.5M total revenues, including about $2.4M sales tax, about $3.3M in capital improvement expenditures, and an ending fund balance of about $3.6M, described as committed/restricted for street and storm drainage capital projects as directed by Council.
  • Public Works status report on Measure I activities (pavement/PCI and plan):

    • Public Works reported current citywide PCI of 71, and projected an increase of about 3 points with completion of the 2025 pavement project.
    • Staff described street selection criteria as including PCI condition plus complaints and accidents caused by bad pavement conditions.
    • Five-year pavement plan highlights included: 2.6 centerline miles in 2025 (with four streets remaining: Middle, Monte Cresta, Coronet, Pullman) and 1.2 centerline miles planned for 2026 (in design; advertising late winter/early spring; construction summer 2026). Staff noted 2029 shows higher centerline miles due to a planned slurry seal project, described as more cost-attractive.
    • Staff stated the 2025 project cost was less than anticipated and remaining funds would go toward construction of the 2026 pavement project.
    • Staff emphasized paving projects also include ADA and concrete work and described curb ramp costs as ranging from $25,000 to $120,000 per curb ramp.
  • Street funding recap / forecast:

    • Staff noted Measure I is one of multiple funding sources for streets (also cited: RMRA, Measure W, Street Improvement Fund/Measure A).
    • Staff forecasted roughly $13M in Measure I revenue over the next five years and planned roughly $10M in Measure I expenditures in the current five-year CIP (FY 2026–30).
  • Committee Q&A / clarifications:

    • In response to a question on remaining duration, staff stated Measure I was authorized for 30 years beginning in 2017, implying about 21 years of revenue left.
    • Staff described pavement work as continuous and explained the strategy of investing to raise PCI to a level where maintaining it becomes more efficient (potentially reducing future heavy-maintenance needs).
    • Staff clarified the expenditure numbers are on an accrual basis (including work performed but processed later), describing the $3.3M as bills paid plus work accrued up to the fiscal year end.
    • On construction cost trends, staff anticipated costs would be slightly up, tracking neighboring cities and concrete costs, and hoped increases would be insignificant.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the FY 2024–25 draft annual report for Measure I with an amendment to change the report signer (to replace the absent member’s name with Patrick’s name) for transmittal to City Council at the Nov. 26 regular meeting (roll-call vote reported as 4–0).
  • Discussed scheduling the next committee meeting in Spring 2026, to include a budget forecast update, Public Works update on the Measure I capital program, and chair assignment/rotation (informational; no vote reported).

Meeting Transcript

Measure I committee meeting. I guess shall we start off with the call to order? Do we do a roll call right now? We do it right. Can we do a roll call? Yes. Committee member Girovich? Present. Call. Present. Sure. And absent today is um committee member Tupo. Right. Um looks like next section is public comments. Um, you have public comments to take note of. Um that received. Okay. Um any agenda amendments. Uh next up, we have a consent business. Um, consider routine and to be acted by one motion. Um do we have a motion to approve the minutes from June 9th. I'll move the community. I think 2025. Okay. We need a second from the detail. Okay. So, microscopes. Okay. Um, committee member Germit. Aye. And portfolio. Aye. Okay. Okay. Uh next up we have other business. The first item on under that is the FY 2024 and 25 um results and status report. Okay, thank you, Fred Chairman. Uh so uh we have the meeting today to go over the fiscal year 2024-25 audit results for measure I. And then next to me is our senior engineer Hojana. Uh she's going to um uh uh give a presentation on uh the measure I related uh capco improvements. So uh we can with that we can start. No worries. Uh so this is uh I put this slide on every time just because we only meet twice a year and this is a reminder to the advisory committee. The duties of the committee, which is to review and evaluate the measure I annual reports in general scope of associated audit work, uh that uh we give reasonable assurance that the money is being properly spent on and reported on. So uh today we'll go over those results. Um okay, so uh this is the bar graph showing where measure I audited fund balance has been. Uh you can see that uh inception was in a fiscal year 2016 to 17 when we started collecting on measure I in April of 2017, and then through the years that's how the fund balance uh looked like year over year. Now you're seeing uh that it's uh built up over the past uh three years or so, and then this latest fiscal year uh we saw that the fund balance has dropped. That only means that uh we were able to deliver projects right that we're spending the fund balance on a street improvements because all of measure I uh uh funds as council uh has continued to direct is towards street improvements. So it just means that during this most recent fiscal year, uh public works has been uh able to deliver on more projects.