Belmont City Council Regular Meeting – July 14, 2026
Belmont City Council Regular Meeting – July 14, 2026
The Belmont City Council held a regular meeting on July 14, 2026, in the city council chambers. The meeting included a closed session for a public employee performance evaluation, approval of the consent calendar, a public hearing on a citizens initiative for a community center tax measure, a detailed update on the Harbor Industrial Area (HIA) Specific Plan, and a designation of a voting delegate for the League of California Cities conference. The city also remembered longtime community volunteer Judy King.
Consent Calendar
- The council approved the consent calendar as part of a single motion, which also served as the Belmont Fire Protection District meeting. Items included routine approvals, such as a parcel map for an SB9 urban lot split at Merrimar Terrace (the city's first SB9 split), a server replacement, approval of minutes, and grants for the police department. Councilmember Jordan recused herself from item 9i (SB9 lot split) due to living within 500 feet. The motion passed 5-0 for the fire district and 4-1 (with one recusal) for the city council consent items. Councilmember Pang Maganaris confirmed that a $500,000 transfer between two CRP developer projects was not additional funding.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Non-agenda public comments (Item 7): Giuliano Carlini urged the council to prioritize protected bike lanes over painted lanes, citing safety data and the need to reduce car dependency. He noted that 85–95% of the population will only ride on physically protected infrastructure.
- Consent calendar public comments: Leslie Wombach (Solutions for Supportive Homes) asked who would provide supportive services at the CRP projects and expressed support. Giuliano Carlini praised some recent bike improvements (e.g., a modal filter on Hiller and a bike box at South/Ralston) but criticized the new Class II door-zone bike lanes on 6th Street as more dangerous than a Class III facility.
- Item 11A (Community Center Tax Measure): Three speakers supported the citizens initiative. Alan Sarver reviewed the decade-long planning process and the preferred design placing the new building closer to Ralston Avenue. Sarah DeSell (secretary of Friends of the Belmont Community Center) noted that over 2,500 residents signed the petition and that some community members want clearer plans for ongoing operations and maintenance funding. Dr. Jim Howard reported a 65% support rate from door-to-door conversations and an 86% signature validation rate; he emphasized that a simple majority vote is fairer than a supermajority.
- Item 11B (HIA Specific Plan Update): Eight in-person speakers and several online participants testified. Concerns included the maximum building height of 155 feet (described as 13–15 stories adjacent to single-family homes), traffic impacts (especially on Harbor Boulevard and Ralston), privacy, light pollution, security of parking garages, and the desire for taller buildings on the south side of Harbor Boulevard. Some speakers appreciated the increased setbacks and design guidelines. Taylor (virtual) argued that 155 feet exceeds heights proven viable in other Bay Area biotech areas. Annie Chung requested taller trees and guaranteed closure of dead-end streets. Carolyn Shepherd urged the inclusion of permanent supportive housing for adults with disabilities. The council acknowledged that many Homeview residents could not attend due to summer travel.
Discussion Items
- Item 11A – Citizens Initiative Community Center Tax Measure: City Clerk Dana Higa presented the procedural action. The initiative petition was submitted June 3, 2026; San Mateo County certified 1,799 valid signatures (exceeding the 1,750 required). The council was asked to adopt a resolution to place the measure on the ballot for the November 2026 statewide general election. Councilmembers praised the volunteer effort and expressed excitement. A motion to approve the resolution passed 5-0. The council also designated Mayor Mates and Councilmember Pang Maganaris as a subcommittee to prepare a ballot argument if needed, passing 5-0.
- Item 11B – Harbor Industrial Area Specific Plan Update: Deputy Community Development Director Laura Russell presented. Key elements:
- Residential Transition Zones: On O'Neill Avenue and Cairn Road, the proposed setback from single-family homes increased from 25 to 35 feet, and the tallest building mass (up to 155 ft) was set back from 125 to 200 feet. The front 35-foot massing block was removed, and parking garages would be placed closer to the street as a buffer.
- Design Guidelines: High-quality materials, automatic light shades, downlit/shielded lighting, and screening of parking garages via art, landscaping, or architectural features. Examples from Sunnyvale and South San Francisco were shown.
- Master Plan Concept: A new discretionary path for larger sites in HIA 2 (currently no housing) to allow residential use alongside employment. This would require a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, planned development process, and a development agreement. Guardrails include a minimum parcel size, focus on employment uses, prohibition of state density bonus to avoid transition standards, and fiscal positivity.
- Community outreach: Mailings, flyers to mobile home park, emails, an interest list of ~150 people, and future Spanish translation and “ask me anything” sessions.
- Staff request for feedback: (1) Are the residential transition heights, setbacks, and design guidelines ready to move forward? (2) Support for the master plan concept and its guardrails.
- Council Discussion: Councilmembers generally supported the staff direction. Councilmember Pang Maganaris clarified that the master plan would allow but not require residential; commercial uses remain primary. Councilmember Jordan asked about a cumulative residential cap; staff indicated they leaned against a hard cap but would analyze it if desired. Several councilmembers (McCune, Pang Maganaris, Mayor Mates) requested staff to return with analysis of a hard cap to prevent over-conversion to housing. Councilmember McCune noted the plan's focus on keeping discretion. The council agreed that the plan provides flexibility while maintaining control, as any bonus or master plan project requires council approval. They also asked for better annotation on maps for public understanding.
- Item 11C – Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Conference: Mayor Mates designated as voting delegate and City Manager Oskui as alternate for the September 23–25, 2026 annual conference in Anaheim. Motion passed 5-0.
Key Outcomes
- Consent calendar approved (5-0 fire district; 4-1 city council with one recusal).
- Community Center Tax Measure: Resolution adopted (5-0) to place the citizens initiative on the November 2026 ballot. Subcommittee appointed (Mayor Mates and Councilmember Pang Maganaris).
- HIA Specific Plan: Council provided clear feedback to proceed with drafting the full specific plan, including:
- Support for the revised residential transition heights (35-ft setback, 200-ft setback for tallest mass, removal of front 35-ft massing) and the proposed design guidelines.
- Support for the master plan concept with guardrails, but direction to analyze a hard cap on residential units to preserve the employment focus.
- Staff will return with a draft specific plan and draft environmental impact report in the next four to six months, along with further refined maps and analysis.
- Voting delegate designated (Mayor Mates, alternate City Manager Oskui; 5-0).
- Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned in memory of Judy King, a lifelong community volunteer.
Meeting Transcript
I think so. All right. This is the City of Belmont City Council regular meeting. Uh we are in the city council chambers. And uh we are called to order now. Can we please have roll call? I'll begin with a council member McCune. We have a closed session from six o'clock PM in room three sixty. Uh this is a public employee performance evaluation. So we'll go ahead and go to closed session now. Also, All right. We are back a little bit late from our closed session. Again, this is the uh City of Belmont City Council regular meeting as well as the City of Belmont Fire Protection District regular meeting. We were already in our agenda with the closed session. That's item three. And we are now moving uh to item three uh three. We're moving to item four, Pledge of Allegiance. Please rise if you're able. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, individual with liberty and justice for all. Right, thank you. Item five, report from closed session. Mr. City Attorney. Good evening, Madam Mayor. As you indicated, we did have a uh we are in the process of having a closed session tonight. We've recessed from the closed session. We'll continue uh later, so we have no action to report at this time. Okay, thank you very much. Uh that brings us to item six on our agenda, which is special presentations. We do not have anything on that uh item this evening. Item seven, public comments on items not on the agenda. This portion of the meeting is deserved for persons wishing to address the body on any city matter not on the agenda. Uh, the period for public comment is 15 minutes with a maximum of three minutes per speaker. If you would like to make a public comment, please uh just remember that members of the public may participate in person by Zoom or by phone. Uh in-person speakers should submit a speaker slip to the Kirk clerk, which is uh over there. Virtual participants may use the raise hand feature, and phone participants may press star nine to request to speak. And they are public comments are literally are generally limited to three minutes unless otherwise determined by the chair, and written comments may also be emailed to the city clerk before the item is heard. As a reminder, uh all speakers are expected to conduct themselves with civility and courtesy. Comments should be directed to the council and focused on individu issues, not individuals' personal attacks, profanity, disruptions, or audience outbursts will not be tolerated. The mayor may rule speakers out of order if comments are unrelated to the item or disruptive to the meeting, and anyone who will fully interrupts the proceedings may be removed so we can maintain respectful and welcoming environment for all participants. Those are their protocols that we uh need to follow for all public comment at our meeting today. Madam Clerk, do we have any public speakers for item seven? Yes, presently I have one speaker for this item, and that will be Giuliano Carlini. Good to see you. Lots been happening in the past few months with projects being started and completed. But we continually seem to shoot ourselves in the foot by doing things that are not going to most effectively make it practical for all road users to take the modes that are the safest and most effective. Cars are great. I own two, I regularly use them. In particular now that I've not been able to cycle while I'm recovering.
openpublica.com