OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Butte Silverbow Study Commission Meeting - January 26, 2026

Council of Commissioners & CommitteesMonday, January 26, 2026
BodyButte Silver Bow, Montana
SessionCouncil of Commissioners & Committees
DateMonday, January 26, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:03:53

Transcript — Verbatim
2:02

I would have I would have got full about that in the beginning.

3:26

Okay, I'll call the January 26th study commission meeting to order.

3:32

If we could have um we have Lori Casey, Cindy Purdue Dolan, Ben Thielen maybe late, uh Matt Steppen, myself, Danihy, Chad Silk, Cindy Shaw, and Mary McCormick.

3:45

Can we have our Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer, please?

4:21

All right, thank you.

4:22

I know we're loading a um PowerPoint, or we're waiting to get that done.

4:26

So I'm gonna just um make a couple of comments for the good of the order before we get that PowerPoint loaded.

4:33

Um tonight we do have our public comment section, and we welcome that comment.

4:38

We will not be able to engage back and forth with you in deliberations.

4:41

We will be making deliberations as a group tonight.

4:44

Um the other item that I wanted to speak to was really our um our our calendar of events and our schedule, because there's been some um discussion about you know what what is happening when and when our final decisions are coming.

5:01

And this process that we're in right now is still to form the preliminary report.

5:06

It is to help us look at what are the most important issues that are rising to the top that our community wants to hear about.

5:12

And then we will start that process of adopting that report by the end of February.

5:18

So the subgroup that's working on the report was working today.

5:22

We will have a report for the commission to be looking at in the next couple of weeks with all the things that we have heard about so far.

5:29

We will get that edited and ready to be presented to the public by the end of February.

5:34

Um and we'll adopt that for that preliminary report at that time.

5:38

And our our weeks might be a little bit flexible in regards to some of the work that we're that's ongoing right now.

5:45

Um in March, uh end of February into March, we will continue to have another set of public listening sessions.

5:50

So we'll go back out to public to hear from them about that preliminary report and what will come forward or what the public would like to see come forward to a ballot or ballot questions.

6:02

Then the second public hearing to gather citizen response to our tentative report would be at the end of March, and then moving into between March and July, where we adopt our final report, we will shape up and vote on those things that are going to go to ballot, and then those ballot questions will be affirmed by this this commission.

6:21

So that work between March and July isn't spelled out in everything that's happening every month, but we will be working on um getting those ballot questions ready and adopting a final report.

6:32

Um there will not be another public hearing between the um March and July time frame between the adoption of the prior to adoption of the final report.

6:41

So that's our process for everybody to kind of recall and for our audience members to understand.

6:48

It may be that things that we have think that we're thinking about right now in the tentative report do not go forward to ballot because this commission might decide that we need to focus our our public's attention on certain issues, or we may find out that we're truly limited to three, and that's all we can do, and we're still kind of working through that with uh county attorney and Ruth right now.

7:10

So um just be patient with the process and understand that it will unfold in the timely manner that we've agreed to.

7:16

All right, our is our our presentation is ready, yes.

7:20

Okay, nope, not yet.

7:22

Almost though.

7:22

I just wanted to make sure that you were ready to go.

7:26

All right.

7:27

Um so with that, um, we have public comment for any item on the agenda.

7:38

Okay, how about public comment and anything not on the agenda but within the jurisdiction of the study commission?

7:47

All right, moving on.

7:49

Um, approval of the minutes meeting held January 12th, 2026.

7:55

Ms.

7:55

McCormick.

7:57

I just had one comment that it's not any big deal, but on um page two under item six.

8:08

When you have the points, and there's the um the commission's work is focused on structure structural changes, including, and then there's two subpoints under that, and it's the review of the number and compares composition of commissions.

8:26

I I think that commissions needs to be changed to council of commissioners.

8:34

Okay.

8:39

Any further discussion, Ms.

8:40

Shaw?

8:42

Thank you, Madam Chair.

8:43

Uh, at this time, after we had Mary's uh correction, I would move to approve the minutes from the January 5th meeting with the amendment.

8:53

Is there a second?

8:54

I have a second from Dolan.

8:56

All those in favor?

8:58

Aye.

8:59

Any opposed?

9:00

Say nay.

9:01

Motion carries, thank you.

9:04

All right, moving on.

9:06

Um correspondence and our study commission update.

9:10

Any correspondence that has come in to date, Shana, anything?

9:14

Okay.

9:15

And I didn't receive any in my inbox either.

9:23

Ms.

9:24

Dolan.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Government Structure████████████████████████████████████████40%
Fire Services█████████████████████████████████████37%
Procedural██████████10%
Personnel Matters███3%
Pending Litigation███3%
Budget Equity Analysis███3%
Community Engagement██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Butte Silverbow Study Commission Meeting - January 26, 2026

The January 26, 2026, Study Commission meeting convened to establish timelines for the preliminary report and advance deliberations on governance structure changes, specifically focusing on the Coroner's Office and Fire Services. The commission discussed the process for gathering public feedback, reviewing working group findings, and determining which proposals may advance to a ballot initiative in November 2026.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: Approved the minutes from the January 12, 2026 meeting with a requested amendment correcting the phrase "commissions" to "council of commissioners" on page two. The motion to approve the corrected minutes (originally referring to the January 5th meeting in the transcript, but contextually the January 12th) carried unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Fire Advisory Discrepancy: Commissioners discussed a letter received from the Fire Advisory Committee on January 13, 2026. Ms. Dolan noted that volunteer board members expressed dissension, stating the letter was sent without their agreement or draft approval, lacked a date or letterhead, and was initiated solely by the chair. Ms. Shaw suggested drafting a rebuttal to address the issue formally.
  • Budget Transparency Arguments: Commissioner Silk argued that facts regarding budget allocation were being misrepresented, stating that an average of $253,000 had been spent on volunteers over the last four years for maintenance and PPE, countering the claim that the Director of Fire Services currently spends money unilaterally without filtering.

Discussion Items

Timeline and Process Confirmation

The Chair clarified the commission's schedule: the preliminary report will be adopted by the end of February; public listening sessions regarding the report will occur in late February and March; a final report and ballot questions will be shaped between March and July. The Chair noted there will be no public hearing between the March and July adoption of the final report.

Coroner Working Group Update

  • Proposed Options: The working group presented three options: (1) Keep the Coroner as a separate elected department with potential charter language reinforcing state law qualifications/accreditation; (2) Place the Coroner under the Sheriff as an employee; (3) Merge the roles into a Sheriff-Coroner position.
  • Commission Positions:
    • Support for Status Quo: Commissioners McCormick, Steppen, Denehy, and Dolan expressed support for Option 1 (keeping the Coroner as an elected position). Commissioner McCormick emphasized trust in the electorate to choose candidates with proper qualifications.
    • County Attorney Input: County Attorney Ruth confirmed that state law already mandates qualifications and continuing education, making charter additions redundant for the elected office. She noted that while the charter could include these, it is not necessary.
    • Recommendation: The commission agreed to keep the Coroner as an elected position (status quo) but recommended that the Council of Commissioners consider strengthening the administrative framework through ordinances rather than charter amendments.

Fire Services Working Group Update

The working group presented three options for ballot consideration regarding fire governance:

  • Option 1: Remove Volunteers from Charter.

    • Description: Volunteers become independent under state law, managing their own districts and funding. Assets and land ownership would be resolved through mutual aid and independent mechanisms.
    • Positions:
      • Voluntary Support: Ms. Dolan reported that volunteer leadership is "100% behind the removal of the volunteers from the charter" and understands the requirements, including the likelihood of needing to form special tax districts.
      • Fiscal Concerns: Commissioners Silk and Denehy raised concerns about the "heavy lift" of creating independent tax districts, the potential dissolution of smaller departments, and the risk of double taxation, though County Attorney Ruth clarified that services provided are distinct, potentially avoiding double taxation issues under current case law.
      • Litigation Risk: Commissioners Steppen and Ruth noted that litigation remains a risk regardless of the path, particularly regarding asset division.
  • Option 2: Unified Volunteer Fire Department.

    • Description: Creation of a single volunteer fire department in the charter, potentially consolidating districts.
    • Positions: County Attorney Ruth and Commissioner Steppen indicated this is legally complex and likely invalid if it implies two chiefs (one for volunteers, one for career). Ms. Dolan reported volunteers are not interested in this option, preferring autonomy or status quo.
  • Option 3: Affirm Director Authority + Volunteer Coordinator.

    • Description: Retain volunteers in the charter but affirm the Director of Fire Services' authority and create a "Volunteer Fire Coordinator" (a volunteer selected by the ranks) as a liaison.
    • Positions:
      • Status Quo Concerns: Ms. Dolan and Ms. Casey expressed skepticism, noting this may not solve underlying authority disputes and could be viewed as "status quo" with a minor title change.
      • Budget Clarity: Commissioner Casey suggested separating budget line items for volunteer divisions to improve transparency, which Commissioner Silk rebutted with data showing significant historical spending on volunteers.
  • General Deliberation: A debate ensued regarding the commission's role in defining specific costs and district boundaries for voters versus leaving those questions for the public process. Commissioner Silk advocated for Option 3 or a system where the Council of Commissioners retains flexibility through ordinances, expressing frustration that a group of volunteers opposes a structure voted on 30 years ago. Commissioner Steppen emphasized that public education on these complex issues is a prerequisite for ballot questions.

Key Outcomes

  • Timeline Adherence: The commission reaffirmed its schedule to deliver a preliminary report by the end of February.
  • Coroner Decision: The commission determined not to recommend charter changes for the Coroner's office, agreeing to support the status quo (elected position) and defer recommendations on strengthening the role to the Council of Commissioners via ordinance.
  • Fire Services Next Steps: The commission adjourned without selecting specific ballot measures.
    • Commissioner Denehy and Silk recommended holding off for one week to review a new memo from the volunteers and digest the complex data.
    • The group will schedule follow-up discussions to clarify the specific implications of Option 1 (volunteer independence) and Option 3 (Coordinator role) before finalizing which options (including status quo) will be included in the preliminary report.
  • Correspondence: The letter from the Fire Advisory Committee and the volunteer memo received on January 13 will be attached to this week's minutes.

Meeting Transcript

I would have I would have got full about that in the beginning. Okay, I'll call the January 26th study commission meeting to order. If we could have um we have Lori Casey, Cindy Purdue Dolan, Ben Thielen maybe late, uh Matt Steppen, myself, Danihy, Chad Silk, Cindy Shaw, and Mary McCormick. Can we have our Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer, please? All right, thank you. I know we're loading a um PowerPoint, or we're waiting to get that done. So I'm gonna just um make a couple of comments for the good of the order before we get that PowerPoint loaded. Um tonight we do have our public comment section, and we welcome that comment. We will not be able to engage back and forth with you in deliberations. We will be making deliberations as a group tonight. Um the other item that I wanted to speak to was really our um our our calendar of events and our schedule, because there's been some um discussion about you know what what is happening when and when our final decisions are coming. And this process that we're in right now is still to form the preliminary report. It is to help us look at what are the most important issues that are rising to the top that our community wants to hear about. And then we will start that process of adopting that report by the end of February. So the subgroup that's working on the report was working today. We will have a report for the commission to be looking at in the next couple of weeks with all the things that we have heard about so far. We will get that edited and ready to be presented to the public by the end of February. Um and we'll adopt that for that preliminary report at that time. And our our weeks might be a little bit flexible in regards to some of the work that we're that's ongoing right now. Um in March, uh end of February into March, we will continue to have another set of public listening sessions. So we'll go back out to public to hear from them about that preliminary report and what will come forward or what the public would like to see come forward to a ballot or ballot questions. Then the second public hearing to gather citizen response to our tentative report would be at the end of March, and then moving into between March and July, where we adopt our final report, we will shape up and vote on those things that are going to go to ballot, and then those ballot questions will be affirmed by this this commission. So that work between March and July isn't spelled out in everything that's happening every month, but we will be working on um getting those ballot questions ready and adopting a final report. Um there will not be another public hearing between the um March and July time frame between the adoption of the prior to adoption of the final report. So that's our process for everybody to kind of recall and for our audience members to understand. It may be that things that we have think that we're thinking about right now in the tentative report do not go forward to ballot because this commission might decide that we need to focus our our public's attention on certain issues, or we may find out that we're truly limited to three, and that's all we can do, and we're still kind of working through that with uh county attorney and Ruth right now. So um just be patient with the process and understand that it will unfold in the timely manner that we've agreed to. All right, our is our our presentation is ready, yes. Okay, nope, not yet. Almost though. I just wanted to make sure that you were ready to go. All right. Um so with that, um, we have public comment for any item on the agenda. Okay, how about public comment and anything not on the agenda but within the jurisdiction of the study commission? All right, moving on. Um, approval of the minutes meeting held January 12th, 2026. Ms. McCormick. I just had one comment that it's not any big deal, but on um page two under item six. When you have the points, and there's the um the commission's work is focused on structure structural changes, including, and then there's two subpoints under that, and it's the review of the number and compares composition of commissions. I I think that commissions needs to be changed to council of commissioners. Okay. Any further discussion, Ms. Shaw? Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh, at this time, after we had Mary's uh correction, I would move to approve the minutes from the January 5th meeting with the amendment. Is there a second? I have a second from Dolan. All those in favor? Aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com