Student Safety and Wellness Advisory Committee Meeting - December 19, 2025
Student Safety and Wellness Advisory Committee Meeting - December 19, 2025
The Student Safety and Wellness Advisory Committee (SISWAC) met on December 19, 2025, to receive a report from the Modern Facilities and Resources Work Group and to continue reviewing and consolidating recommendations for the committee's final report. The meeting focused on school safety, staff training, mental health resources, and the student code of conduct.
Discussion Items
Report from Modern Facilities and Resources Work Group
- Sergeant Wolford presented findings from a meeting with Larry Titus and Shashita Wall. Key concerns included: the IGen Tech camera system platform, staffing needs for safety advocates and SROs (with understanding of nationwide recruitment challenges), a desire for a full-time IT technician dedicated to safety and facilities to handle firmware, licensing, and repairs, and a dedicated operating and capital budget for school safety. The group also discussed the need for a dedicated security budget to cover unforeseen costs like software updates, data storage, and training, especially for weapons detection systems. A two-year state study on weapons detection systems is underway, with phase one complete. Sergeant Wolford noted that Calvert County is being proactive in evaluating vendors for such systems. The committee chair emphasized that technology alone is insufficient and that dedicated staffing and a dedicated safety budget are critical. Safety advocates reported that there are no substitutes, leaving schools uncovered when advocates are out, and that elementary schools currently have no safety advocates, while middle and high schools have one or two respectively. The work group suggested an additional safety advocate per high school and middle school as a minimum.
Review of Final Report Recommendations
- The committee reviewed consolidated recommendations, focusing on the following categories:
Mental Health Visibility and Accessibility
- Recommendation: By July 1, 2027, the Local Behavioral Health Authority (LBHA)/Health Department, in coordination with CCPS Student Services, will release a comprehensive community-aligned mental health and wellness implementation plan. The plan will identify priority needs, define roles, provide a phased timeline, and include evaluation measures. Specific goals include destigmatizing mental health services, creating a district-level communication strategy using student-friendly language, and ensuring regular visibility of supportive staff. The committee agreed the language is broad enough to allow flexibility.
School Climate and Community Building
- Recommendation: CCPS should implement a district-wide evidence-based bullying prevention program with fidelity. Components include comprehensive staff training, integration of restorative practices, clear implementation expectations, and use of data to monitor effectiveness. The committee discussed the need for urgency (targeting progress by the next school year) and potential barriers such as limited professional learning days. Suggestions included phasing the recommendation and inviting the superintendent to discuss current programs. The committee decided to refine the recommendation further.
Communication and Transparency
- Recommendation: Create a dedicated district-wide communications role for student safety and wellness. Establish a student-led social media communications team at each school, overseen by school administration, with a district-wide branding guide. The district should have access to school accounts for emergencies. The committee supported this as a way to improve consistent messaging and proactive communication.
Code of Conduct Revision
- Recommendation: By July 1, 2027, CCPS will complete a comprehensive review and revision of the student code of conduct. Key goals include: creating developmentally appropriate versions (elementary, middle, high school) by 2029, implementing a district-wide communication strategy, and establishing clear guidelines for consistent enforcement. The committee agreed to soften mandatory language ("will") to "recommends" and to allow the school system to determine the process. The committee emphasized this is a top priority, noting that the current code is inconsistently enforced.
Bullying Policy
- The committee consolidated a duplicate recommendation on bullying into the previous bullying prevention recommendation, adding language for a clearly defined policy specific to bullying, harassment, and intimidation, in alignment with Maryland law.
Centralized Resource Hub
- Recommendation: Develop a centralized digital hub for families, students, and staff to access student supports, safety information, and mental health services. Include a decision flow chart for common scenarios. The hub should be overseen by the Office of Student Services in collaboration with communications staff and community partners.
Threat Assessment and Behavioral Data
- The committee discussed training on threat assessment procedures. Consensus was that administrators and counselors should be trained annually, but instructional staff should be informed about the process and early warning signs (not necessarily full training). The committee also recommended a centralized data system for behavioral incidents and a public-facing dashboard to track outcomes and promote transparency.
Student Support Services
- Recommendations include: increasing access to counseling and support services (both school-based and community), establishing a wellness/de-escalation space in each school (refined to "wellness space for student de-escalation"), reducing caseloads for counselors and social workers (with a goal of 10-20% reduction, but the committee found this vague and will refine), and enhancing staff mental health resources and communication about existing resources (such as EAP). The committee also discussed addressing staffing gaps for school psychologists, personnel workers, and safety advocates, especially at the elementary level.
Staff Training and Support
- Recommendation: Provide standardized de-escalation training (e.g., Life Space Crisis Intervention) for all staff, but the committee noted that LSCI may be too intensive for all staff and suggested focusing on awareness and applicable skills. Communication of existing staff wellness resources should be enhanced.
Youth Mentoring and Partnerships
- The committee suggested moving this recommendation into the resource hub and not as a standalone, but to highlight the need to strengthen youth mentoring and positive activity partnerships.
Future Meetings and Next Steps
- The committee agreed to meet in person in January 2026. Subgroups will work on refining specific recommendations (bullying, code of conduct, caseloads, threat assessment) between meetings. The chair requested a review of the code of conduct section regarding threats to staff, as raised by safety advocates.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were offered in person or virtually.
Key Outcomes
- The committee will continue to refine the final report recommendations, with an updated draft to be circulated before the next meeting.
- The Modern Facilities and Resources Work Group's report will be incorporated into the final recommendations.
- The committee will invite the superintendent and relevant staff (e.g., Suzanne McGann) to provide input on current programs and feasibility.
- The next full committee meeting is scheduled for January 2026, in person.
Meeting Transcript
Afternoon and thank you for uh being available today so that we might continue our work uh in addressing uh student wellness and safety activities uh we have um the agenda before you I will a quorum has been determined so um I I would ask that you would consider adding a Bank you ma'am uh to uh item number two well actually no under no new business uh I'd like for you to add a uh B about a uh a conversation regarding future meetings so with that in mind the agenda is before you as amended can I get a motion for approval so moved second second properly moved to second all favor please signify by saying aye are there any nays you have an option no the motion carries we are the doctor preparing uh to receive a report from the modern facilities and resources uh work group and so uh I have not seen Dino yet but he's uh he's just walked in he's just walked in Sergeant Wilford are you available to make this presentation uh there's Dino he's joining us because uh that meeting was on a two hour delay and I got three little ones so I was only on it for about 20 minutes okay um have a lot more to say than I will okay apologize we didn't late you're not you're good you're good a lot of the uh discussion the first half was what had been going on prior to this committee being uh established into the years of school safety oh let's see here how you brought it up uh one of their concerns was the uh I Gen Tech platform that they use for the camera system tying everything together um their understanding is that the county I guess paid for everything uh for the current facilities I'm not sure how many facilities they have in the plans for the future but there are one concern they had was the uh LEA funds would have to be utilized in that construction during that construction for all those that would have to be used for instead of the county funds being used their desires and concerns noted were staffing to support their mission um part of that dealt with uh additional SAs under the safety and security and while a desire for more SROs was noted they also understood the fact that law enforcement is having a recruitment issue across the nation and they understand while they might be able to get something in the future it's gonna probably take a while uh one of the desires big desires was a a full-time IT technician assigned to facilities and safety specific items um that being said issues related to access control any camera issues that come up and tech support um people forget passwords and things like that I imagine is what they're they're discussing there the IT took check would also be assigned a track and handle any firmware and software licensing is in play and um so that they know when it's coming ready to come up for renewal or new stuff is uh provided by the manufacturers and software firms that they uh updated stuff would be coming to the county on a more timely fashion and that we would also recommend that the individual repairs and replaces sorry uh planning and budgeting for that is issues also as technology changes that individual will be more in tune with what's going on out there in in that field you could make recommendations so they could plan it for budget budgeting purposes um and they both indicated a dedicated budget both the operating and capital budgets um I can attest that when I reviewed the we reviewed the last five six years of budgets uh there was only one line item for capital in the capital improvements uh budget for school safety um this say it would they would have dedicated funding instead of trying to move funding around from different programs so they can find extra stuff and they could also assist with their budgeting needs for the future um and their planning needs for the future this would also on another note assist with trying to account for funds both LEA funds um state funds federal funds that come in and um public private partnerships that may come to play down in the future And they could also assist with their budgeting needs for the future and their planning needs for the future. This would also want another note, assist with trying to account for funds, both LEA funds, state funds, federal funds that come in, and public-private partnerships that may come to play down in the future. Yeah, you know, I hate to use the word, but transparency is a thing that a lot of people would like to, you know, be able to see where their funds are going to. So that was just the gist of the conversation we had with them. Okay. Any uh questions? I have a question. Yes. Who was it that you were meeting with? That's what I was just gonna ask. Uh Larry Titus and I Shishita Wall. I don't want to mess up remaining. Yeah, Shashita. Yes. Were they proposing that the full-time IT tech be an employee of IT or student services? They were well, actually, under I guess safety or facilities. Someone they would have access to right away, it would handle all that realm of security safety. Okay. I imagine they share IT whenever they can, whoever else, you know, in the whole system. We have an entire IT department. Yeah. So all the techs are there. Yeah. So I wasn't sure if that person would remain there at the direction of IT or just become integrated. That would be a local. I normally just have a big mouth. They just let look somebody assigned basically for that realm full-time. So when things crop up, I guess they have to come up more recently. Yeah. They would have somebody they can call right away to get it all done instead of being independent queue of things. You mentioned that they thought that this tech could also be uh responsible for tracking and handling firmware and software licensing. Did that come up because it has been a an issue in the past, or they were just brainstorming about some of them. Some of the duties for this person that way. The Gen Tech system, I know I think they used the Raptor system here in the county. I don't know if they're still staying with that and move away, but whatever the systems they're using, specifically for school safety, um, and we're fine this when we're doing the study now for the automatic weapons detection systems in the state. The software, firmware, you know, hardware, five maybe years. Right. Shelf life, and the new stuff comes out. Software is even faster than that sometimes. Yeah. So I guess it's it's something like you know, oh, I gotta worry about this thing now, you know, versus someone who can really keep track of things. I think it would be good too, also to have somebody that's that's the world they live in, the IT world, so we can utilize they have a lot of this raptor system can do a lot, yeah, but we're not utilizing it, or maybe we're just kind of in the learning portion of it of what all it can do before the and part of another thing was um the Wi-Fi boosters at some of the schools that have cell phone service are looking into that so that we can use some of the systems that we have more effectively. Um so we're utilizing all the tools within those systems. Um that was that was part of the conversation. Um I know they've had a few vendors out for metal detecting, uh, well, maybe not metal detecting, but webbing detecting. Um that way it's not catching every metal thing that you have on, but I know the boards had a few vendors over, so that's something they're looking into. Uh I know another concern that they had was um just the with the budgeting is to have a budget that would cover um when they need to replace the can't replace cameras and have someone to run the system and have you know uh there's all the costs, the initial cost goes into operating um budget, but then that doesn't carry on to keep the cameras up and running for repairs, um, you know, the vapor detectors when they need to have somebody come out, uh they need somebody to monitor all that stuff. So not only do they have the operating budget covers all that stuff, but that they were suggesting a secondary um security budget that would kind of encompass a lot of those uh unforeseen costs that come with a lot of this uh type of equipment, software updates, um, you know, where they hold the data storage and stuff like that. So one of the big things we're finding across state from our office, we're doing a weapons detection system study right now, two-year study.
openpublica.com