The Carson City Library Board of Trustees convened on June 11, 2026 at 5:30 PM. Present were Chair Nichols, Trustee On Airs, Trustee Markle, and Trustee Spansville (quorum established). The primary agenda item was the annual performance evaluation and setting of objectives for Library Director Joey Holt. The board also approved minutes, received administrative reports, and discussed upcoming events.
It's 5 30. Let's start the Carson City Library Board of Trustees meeting. Can we start with um roll call, please? Chair Nichols. Present. Trustee on Airs. Present. Trustee Markle. Present. And Trustee Spansville. Present. We have a quorum. Thank you. Okay, item number three, public comment. The public is invited at this time to provide comment on any topic that relates to a matter over which this public body has supervision, control, or jurisdiction. Okay, no. Okay, item number four, approval of the minutes. Has everyone had an opportunity to look at the minutes? This is trustee Linairs. I move that we accept the minutes as they're written. I second. All in favor? Aye. All opposed. Motion passes. Okay, on to item number five for uh possible action. And this is the a discussion and possible action regarding an annual unclassified employee performance evaluation for the library director, Joey Holt. I do want to bring to the board's attention that we've already scored. Jeff has already scored, so we won't be discussing her performance per se. What we're going to be discussing is on page thirty-nine, we are going to discuss our objectives. Oh, is that last year's objective? I'm sorry, yes. Thank you. So the objective is to update the library policies and ensure they're consistent with the library's strategic plan and ensure those policies are accessible to the public from my point of view that seems like something we should keep. Is there any? Agreed. Agreed. And I think proposed objective two, as noted in the context, says that we all indicated that Director Holt made positive progress towards this objective, and the ex and expressed an expectation that this progress be continued. So I think that that's already been stated in the collected documents as a good priority, a good proposed objective. If something's going well, you don't want to stop it. You want to keep it going well. I think that my question would be. Looking at page 39, the language of the previous objective. Also number two said more day-to-day operations to deputy director to focus on admin duties. So my question to Director Holt is if you anticipate that that specific portion of more day to day to the deputy to focus on administrative duties and admin as an umbrella is still the case. Yeah, those little words salad. Yeah, no problem. So previously on page 39, number two, your previous objective said cross-train deputy director and hand off more day-to-day operations to deputy director to focus on admin duties. In the current proposed language, it doesn't have that addition of two focus on admin duties. And so I wanted to know if you anticipated that it would be more of that same kind of day-to-day operations handoff to focus on streamlining the administrative big picture.