OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Carson City Board of Supervisors and Board of Health Meeting - September 3, 2026

Board of SupervisorsThursday, September 3, 2026
BodyCarson City, Nevada
SessionBoard of Supervisors
DateThursday, September 3, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:23:23

Transcript — Verbatim
3:42

Board of Supervisors to Order.

3:44

Mr.

3:44

Hone, may I have a roll call, please?

3:46

Good morning, Stacey Supervisor Jones.

3:49

Supervisor White.

3:50

Supervisor Horton, Supervisor Shitty.

3:53

Mayor Pagwell.

3:54

You have your quirk.

3:55

Thank you so much.

3:55

We're now on to agenda item three, which is our invocation, and I think uh Pastor Louie is here to uh enlighten us this morning.

4:19

Lord, I pray for our supervisors.

4:21

Give them discernment in making just and wise decisions.

4:25

May their discussions be fruitful, their actions just, and hearts be aligned with your will.

4:39

And what does the Lord require of you?

4:41

But to do justice and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.

5:01

In Jesus' wonderful name.

5:03

Amen.

5:04

Thank you so much.

5:05

Ms.

5:05

Adams, would you do us the honor of leading the pledge?

5:14

And to the Republic or which is nation under God and divisible with liberty and justice for all.

5:23

Thank you so much.

5:25

Okay, we're now on to our opening public comment.

5:29

Um those requesting to speak at the beginning of the meeting.

5:33

I have uh Raymond LaBer signed up first.

5:38

Good morning.

5:50

I'm Raymond LaRochelle from Carson City.

5:53

I'm here today to speak in opposition to the proposed acquisition of a new city hall.

5:58

Uh that's neither appropriate nor something that the people of Carson City can afford.

6:04

Proposal comes about because the city clerk's organization needs to move out of the courthouse to make room for uh third justice schools.

6:15

There are plenty of properties available around the city that could satisfy the city clerk requirements without resorting to a huge expense of a new city hall.

6:23

We do not need 45,000 square feet structure and pocket structures, the house city services.

6:29

That figure is almost double what is currently utilized by city employees.

6:32

It appears that you want to find a way to justify this over size structure because that's what HMAF wants to build.

6:39

Are there detailed plans available for this building?

6:42

If so, why haven't they been shared with the public?

6:45

What are you trying to hide?

6:46

The city manager has stated that ground bigger could occur as early as March 2027.

6:52

How can you construction began without detailed plans?

6:55

Are we buying a pig and a poke?

6:57

This build this building include fiber optic wiring throughout.

7:01

If you tend to have telephone service are better.

7:11

This number is a bit of a sham and hides the true cost of this triple and that lease because it does not include the property tax utilities, maintenance, and snow removal costs, which the city would be on the hook for.

7:22

What about the cost of moving all city employees into this new structure?

7:26

That isn't cheap.

7:31

Damn it.

7:35

Commercial moves are even more expensive than moving households.

7:38

Who's gonna pay for that?

7:39

The tooth ferry.

7:41

This proposed city hall includes an auditorium.

7:44

It's uh some sort of justification for the increase in square footage.

7:47

But we don't need a new auditorium.

7:49

We have a perfectly good one right here in this building.

7:52

This proposal sales steals money from the redevelopment funds to partially fund this new city hall.

7:58

We desperately need redevelopment funds to spur new commercial development and increase the tax base.

8:02

Using redevelopment funds for a new city hall is just dumb and dirt.

8:05

It's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

8:08

As further evidence of the short-sighted thinking of this proposal, uh, is the proposed sale of the existing city hall to the state.

8:16

How much does the state pay in taxes to the city?

8:18

How about zero?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Comment████████████████████████24%
Public Health███████████████████████23%
Real Estate Acquisition████████████12%
Procedural████████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████7%
Public Engagement██████6%
Financial Management█████5%
Communication███3%
Public Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Carson City Board of Supervisors and Board of Health Meeting - September 3, 2026

The Carson City Board of Supervisors and Board of Health met on Thursday, September 3, 2026, beginning at 8:30 a.m. at the Community Center. The Board of Supervisors considered several major agenda items, including a resolution authorizing a lease-purchase agreement for a new City Hall (up to $30 million), the second reading of an ordinance repealing the 2012 Nugget Project ordinance, and a proposal from Adams CC Development LLC for a parking garage. The Board of Health received presentations on substance use prevention coalition plans, health officer and department activities, the 2025-2026 influenza season, and environmental health activities. All action items on the Board of Supervisors agenda passed with 4-1 votes, with Supervisor White dissenting on each.

Consent Calendar

  • 7.a: Approved correction of personal property tax errors and refund of $338.91.
  • 8.a: Approved an interlocal contract with the State of Nevada for Mental Health Court case management, no cost to the city, retroactive July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028.
  • 9.a: Approved the financial report on fund condition and receipts/expenditures through August 21, 2026.
  • 10.a: Approved an interlocal agreement with Western Nevada College for nursing clinical education at CCHHS, effective September 15, 2026 through June 30, 2031, no monetary compensation.
  • 11.a: Approved an amendment to the GOED interlocal contract extending library career services to September 30, 2027, with an additional $594,288 in funding, no local match, new total not to exceed $2,066,316.
  • 12.a: Approved purchase authority for 15 vehicles for FY2027 totaling $1,472,861.30 via joinder contracts.
  • 12.b: Approved purchase authority for a TANA landfill compactor totaling $1,379,567 via joinder contract.
  • All consent items were approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Opening Public Comment (Board of Supervisors): Multiple speakers opposed the proposed City Hall and parking garage, citing high costs, lack of transparency, inadequate public input, and the need for a public vote. Specific concerns included the $30 million lease-purchase (estimated $55-64 million total with interest), the use of redevelopment funds, the lack of a detailed plan, and the perceived rush to decision before a holiday weekend. Speakers also criticized the use of Flock cameras and called for a ballot measure. A few speakers, including Garrett LePier, supported the project, arguing that new construction was cheaper than renovation and that the city faces a legal deadline to relocate the clerk-recorder.
  • Public Comment on Item 14A: Speakers reiterated opposition, questioning the legality of funding sources, the higher cost of lease-purchase versus other financing options, and the lack of a comprehensive comparison of alternatives.
  • Public Comment on Item 15A: Speakers urged the board to keep or rewrite the ordinance requiring a public vote on the Nugget Project, arguing the current proposal is essentially the same project.
  • Public Comment on Item 15B: Speakers questioned the public benefit of the parking garage, citing adequate existing parking and the risk of subsidizing private development. Some noted the garage would be built a year before the City Hall and asked who would benefit.
  • Final Public Comment (Board of Supervisors): Speakers expressed disappointment with the 4-1 voting pattern and called for more transparency and public involvement.
  • Board of Health Public Comment: Denny French raised concerns about food insecurity, hygiene services, and the needs of the unhoused population.

Discussion Items

  • 14.a – Resolution for Lease-Purchase Agreement (City Hall): Staff and bond counsel presented the resolution authorizing preparation of a lease-purchase agreement up to $30 million principal, with payments from all legally available funds. They explained this is an early authorization step; final approval would come later. The public hearing included extensive public comment. Board discussion focused on the funding source, flexibility of 'all legally available funds', and the process. Supervisor White expressed concerns about using redevelopment funds and the lack of detail. The motion to adopt Resolution 2026-R-23 passed 4-1.
  • 15.a – Second Reading of Bill 109 (Repeal Nugget Project Ordinance): The board considered an ordinance repealing CCMC 2.44.010, which required a public vote for the 2012 Nugget Project. Public comments urged the board to keep the ordinance or modify it to require a vote on the current City Hall project. Staff argued the ordinance is obsolete. Supervisor White opposed the repeal, stating the principle of public vote should remain. The motion to adopt Ordinance 2026-12 passed 4-1.
  • 15.b – Proposal for Parking Garage (Adams CC Development LLC): The board considered a proposal under NRS 338 for a public-private partnership to develop a parking garage. Staff outlined the plan for the city to purchase a number of parking spaces (estimated 180) for up to $8 million, with the remainder funded by the developer. The city would own the spaces but not the entire garage; a third party would operate it. Public comment was largely opposed. Board discussion included concerns about findings required under NRS 338.166, the identity of the applicant (a soon-to-be-formed nonprofit), and the lack of a parking study. Supervisor White could not make the required findings. The motion to approve the proposal and direct the city manager to prepare an agreement passed 4-1.
  • Board of Health Items (23.a – 23.e):
    • 23.a: Daria Singer, Executive Director of Partnership Douglas County, presented a plan to establish a substance use prevention coalition in Carson City, following the closure of Partnership Carson City. The coalition will conduct needs assessments, coordinate resources, and provide school-based prevention programs. No action taken.
    • 23.b: Health Officer Dr. Colleen Lyons reported on activities from April 1 to June 30, 2026, including concerns about Medicaid work requirements, overdose deaths, and the importance of local public health trust. No action taken.
    • 23.c: Director Jeanne Freeman reported on CCHHS activities, including staff certifications, clinic patient increases, and upcoming flu vaccination clinics. No action taken.
    • 23.d: Rachel Freshman, Epidemiology and Preparedness Manager, presented the 2025-2026 influenza season summary. Key statistics: Carson City saw elevated ILI activity peaking at 10.3 visits per 10,000 population in late December; 49 influenza-associated hospitalizations (down from 119 the prior season); nearly 60% of hospitalizations were adults 65+; fewer than 20% of hospitalized patients had received a flu vaccine; 10% of hospitalized patients died. Plans for the upcoming season include school-based vaccination clinics and public messaging. No action taken.
    • 23.e: Kandis Harvey, Environmental Health Manager, presented the 2025 annual report. The team conducted 1,443 inspections; food permits increased 80% since 2020; temporary food permits increased over 1,300% since 2021; septic system oversight covers nearly 1,800 properties. Successes included increased communication and training. No action taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously.
  • Item 14.a: Resolution 2026-R-23 authorizing lease-purchase agreement for City Hall (maximum $30 million principal) passed 4-1. The resolution directs the Clerk-Recorder to notify the Debt Management Commission and the City CFO to forward materials to the Department of Taxation.
  • Item 15.a: Ordinance 2026-12 on second reading, repealing CCMC 2.44.010 (Nugget Project ordinance), passed 4-1.
  • Item 15.b: Motion to approve the parking garage proposal from Adams CC Development LLC and direct the city manager to prepare necessary agreements passed 4-1.
  • Board of Health: Approved minutes of June 4, 2026. Received all presentations and reports as informational; no action items.

Meeting Transcript

Board of Supervisors to Order. Mr. Hone, may I have a roll call, please? Good morning, Stacey Supervisor Jones. Supervisor White. Supervisor Horton, Supervisor Shitty. Mayor Pagwell. You have your quirk. Thank you so much. We're now on to agenda item three, which is our invocation, and I think uh Pastor Louie is here to uh enlighten us this morning. Lord, I pray for our supervisors. Give them discernment in making just and wise decisions. May their discussions be fruitful, their actions just, and hearts be aligned with your will. And what does the Lord require of you? But to do justice and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. In Jesus' wonderful name. Amen. Thank you so much. Ms. Adams, would you do us the honor of leading the pledge? And to the Republic or which is nation under God and divisible with liberty and justice for all. Thank you so much. Okay, we're now on to our opening public comment. Um those requesting to speak at the beginning of the meeting. I have uh Raymond LaBer signed up first. Good morning. I'm Raymond LaRochelle from Carson City. I'm here today to speak in opposition to the proposed acquisition of a new city hall. Uh that's neither appropriate nor something that the people of Carson City can afford. Proposal comes about because the city clerk's organization needs to move out of the courthouse to make room for uh third justice schools. There are plenty of properties available around the city that could satisfy the city clerk requirements without resorting to a huge expense of a new city hall. We do not need 45,000 square feet structure and pocket structures, the house city services. That figure is almost double what is currently utilized by city employees. It appears that you want to find a way to justify this over size structure because that's what HMAF wants to build. Are there detailed plans available for this building? If so, why haven't they been shared with the public? What are you trying to hide? The city manager has stated that ground bigger could occur as early as March 2027. How can you construction began without detailed plans? Are we buying a pig and a poke? This build this building include fiber optic wiring throughout. If you tend to have telephone service are better. This number is a bit of a sham and hides the true cost of this triple and that lease because it does not include the property tax utilities, maintenance, and snow removal costs, which the city would be on the hook for. What about the cost of moving all city employees into this new structure? That isn't cheap. Damn it. Commercial moves are even more expensive than moving households. Who's gonna pay for that? The tooth ferry. This proposed city hall includes an auditorium.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com