The Carson City Board of Supervisors and Board of Health met on Thursday, September 3, 2026, beginning at 8:30 a.m. at the Community Center. The Board of Supervisors considered several major agenda items, including a resolution authorizing a lease-purchase agreement for a new City Hall (up to $30 million), the second reading of an ordinance repealing the 2012 Nugget Project ordinance, and a proposal from Adams CC Development LLC for a parking garage. The Board of Health received presentations on substance use prevention coalition plans, health officer and department activities, the 2025-2026 influenza season, and environmental health activities. All action items on the Board of Supervisors agenda passed with 4-1 votes, with Supervisor White dissenting on each.
Board of Supervisors to Order. Mr. Hone, may I have a roll call, please? Good morning, Stacey Supervisor Jones. Supervisor White. Supervisor Horton, Supervisor Shitty. Mayor Pagwell. You have your quirk. Thank you so much. We're now on to agenda item three, which is our invocation, and I think uh Pastor Louie is here to uh enlighten us this morning. Lord, I pray for our supervisors. Give them discernment in making just and wise decisions. May their discussions be fruitful, their actions just, and hearts be aligned with your will. And what does the Lord require of you? But to do justice and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. In Jesus' wonderful name. Amen. Thank you so much. Ms. Adams, would you do us the honor of leading the pledge? And to the Republic or which is nation under God and divisible with liberty and justice for all. Thank you so much. Okay, we're now on to our opening public comment. Um those requesting to speak at the beginning of the meeting. I have uh Raymond LaBer signed up first. Good morning. I'm Raymond LaRochelle from Carson City. I'm here today to speak in opposition to the proposed acquisition of a new city hall. Uh that's neither appropriate nor something that the people of Carson City can afford. Proposal comes about because the city clerk's organization needs to move out of the courthouse to make room for uh third justice schools. There are plenty of properties available around the city that could satisfy the city clerk requirements without resorting to a huge expense of a new city hall. We do not need 45,000 square feet structure and pocket structures, the house city services. That figure is almost double what is currently utilized by city employees. It appears that you want to find a way to justify this over size structure because that's what HMAF wants to build. Are there detailed plans available for this building? If so, why haven't they been shared with the public? What are you trying to hide? The city manager has stated that ground bigger could occur as early as March 2027. How can you construction began without detailed plans? Are we buying a pig and a poke? This build this building include fiber optic wiring throughout. If you tend to have telephone service are better. This number is a bit of a sham and hides the true cost of this triple and that lease because it does not include the property tax utilities, maintenance, and snow removal costs, which the city would be on the hook for. What about the cost of moving all city employees into this new structure? That isn't cheap. Damn it. Commercial moves are even more expensive than moving households. Who's gonna pay for that? The tooth ferry. This proposed city hall includes an auditorium.