FY2027 Budget Workshop #2: Capital Investment Plan and Revenue Policy – March 23, 2026
FY2027 Budget Workshop #2: Capital Investment Plan and Revenue Policy – March 23, 2026
The Charlotte City Council held its second budget workshop for the FY2027 budget on March 23, 2026, from approximately 2:15 PM to 4:00 PM. The workshop focused on the capital investment plan (CIP), debt service fund, utilization of PAVE Act sales tax revenue, and funding priorities for mobility, housing, and facilities. Council members discussed organizational capacity, project readiness, and the trade-offs between property tax increases and service demands.
Discussion Items
-
PAVE Act Revenue and Mobility Model: City CFO Matt Hastett and Deputy Budget Director Hannah Bromberger presented a proposal to separate the municipal debt service fund into two models: one for mobility (transportation and neighborhood bonds) and one for housing and facilities. The PAVE Act sales tax (estimated $100M annually) would be allocated entirely to the mobility model, allowing up to $500 million in bonding capacity every two years. However, City Manager Marcus Jones cautioned that the city is not yet organizationally ready to deploy that level of funding, recommending a measured approach starting at $300 million for transportation and neighborhood bonds.
-
Organizational Capacity and Project Readiness: Council members emphasized the need for operational excellence and value stream mapping to identify gaps before adding staff. City Manager Jones noted that the city has a deficit in project delivery due to reallocation of staff to the CIA pilot program, and a project delivery office may be established in FY27. Council members highlighted the importance of avoiding overpromising and underdelivering, referencing past delays on projects like the Central Avenue shared-use path.
-
Housing Bond Priorities: Several council members expressed that the currently budgeted $50 million for housing bonds is insufficient. Councilmember Mayfield and others advocated for a range of $200–300 million, citing community needs and comparisons to other cities like Columbus, Ohio. Councilmember Watlington emphasized that funding should follow measurable outcomes and that homeownership should be prioritized over rentals. The mayor stressed the urgency of addressing homelessness and housing affordability.
-
Facilities and Public Safety: Councilmembers noted the need for funding for a helicopter hangar, a commercial burn building for fire training, an animal care adoption facility, and Gateway Station. Councilmember Anderson called for sustained momentum in public safety investments. City Manager Jones noted that facilities have been underfunded and that growth in expenses is outpacing revenue growth.
-
Revenue Constraints and Trade-offs: Councilmembers discussed the burden of multiple tax increases (county, city, insurance, sales tax) on residents. Councilmember Ashmira argued against a property tax increase at this time, while others supported exploring increases only if tied to clear priorities and demonstrated efficiency. City Manager Jones reminded the council that oversubscribing revenue to the CIP would reduce capacity for the general fund, which already faces a gap in FY27.
-
Other Topics: Councilmember Masour Arias requested an international affairs manager and support for immigrant communities. Councilmember Grant linked Gateway Station and the uptown transit station to broader mobility and development opportunities. Councilmember Driggs asked for detailed spreadsheets showing trade-offs between bond sizes and property tax implications.
Key Outcomes
- Direction to Staff: Staff will model a $400 million bond package ($300M for mobility, $100M for housing) as a baseline, while also exploring higher housing bond amounts (up to $250–300M) and corresponding revenue requirements. Council requested additional data on the fiscal impact of tax increment grants (TIGs), organizational capacity gaps, and the effect of different bond sizes on property tax rates.
- Next Steps: The budget committee will continue discussions, and staff will bring more detailed spreadsheets and options to a future workshop. The council expects to set final direction for the FY27 budget adoption in June 2026.
Meeting Transcript
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Great. Uh I wanted to note uh committee member Johnson would normally be here. Uh, she's at home with a family medical situation, so we wish her all the best, and she will get on board, I'm sure, with vigor. Uh, as soon as she's able. Okay. Um, so I have a couple of things. Thank you. Um, we're going to begin with our twenty FY twenty twenty-seventh budget workshop number two. So um, I want to say good afternoon to everyone. I hope everyone has been having a great day. Um, and I'm going to call to our second council budget workshop for the twenty twenty-seven budget development into order this meeting tonight today. As you all know, this is one of the most important and impactful pro policy items that we work on together each year in developing a plan to allocate city resources for our communities, alignment with our strategic priorities, and the need for our communities. So thank you everyone for joining us today. And with that, let's start by getting um our city manager, Marcus Jones to introduce the network that we're going to prepare to do. As you do know, this is a an FY27 calendar twenty-six will be a bond year. So there's a lot more work to put into this budget than what we did for the FY26 budget. Then we have a mobility investment outlook, which is really a continuation from our discussion at the annual strategy meeting. So, mayor, um, unless there's any other questions, I'll turn it over to budget and Hannah. All right, thank you. And then lastly, we'll discuss financial priorities as we head into FY 2027. So just as a quick reminder, the capital investment plan is really a communication tool. It's how we communicate with the community, what our plan is for the next five years in the capital expenditure space. So year one is adopted, that's locked in, the four out years are simply a plan. So you revisit them every year. The capital investment plan includes various kinds of projects, and each one of those projects is born out of studies, data, plans, and community feedback. The general capital investment plan is supported by general government revenues only, so primarily property tax and sales tax. So you saw this slide last time, and it's really just a reminder that there are two funds within the general capital investment plan. The one on the left is the pay as you go fund, PAYGO, and this is cash funding, and it's for projects and programs that aren't reoccurring or that aren't eligible for debt. It can also be pilot programs where we test things before we put them into our ongoing annual budget. And the important thing to remember about PAYGO is that the capacity is largely dependent on prior year general fund balance. So remember from the February budget workshop, Marie and Ethan talked a little bit about our year-end closeout from FY25. And there's only about 11,000 that's going to roll into PAYGO. And from the last few years, the average has been about 14 million. So that's quite a difference. So we're gonna set PAYGO aside, and the rest of the presentation is going to be focused on the block on the right, the municipal debt service fund. So this is how we pay principal and interest on our debt. We have different kinds of debt within the municipal debt service fund. Sometimes we take out COPS certificates of participation. This is primarily used for facilities. And then this is also where our general obligation bonds or our GO bonds are held. You'll remember that we have three types of bonds affordable housing, neighborhoods, and transportation, and these do require voter approval because they're backed by the full faith and credit of our property tax. So in the municipal debt service fund block, regardless of the funding mechanism, regardless of whether it's COPS or general obligation bonds, we usually talk to you about the capacity for this fund as one model. So that's one of the differentiating factors of what Matt is going to talk about in a little bit. So as we move on to talk exclusively about the municipal debt service fund, this graphic was in your February presentation. It just sort of sums it all up. We have our revenues on the left, they go into the municipal debt service fund. That fund is used to pay principal and interest on debt that we take out for our capital projects. So at our February budget workshop, I jumped to one specific section of the PAVE Act.
openpublica.com