OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Chattanooga Pension Fund Status Briefing for City Council - March 24, 2026

City Council & City BoardsTuesday, March 24, 2026
BodyChattanooga, Tennessee
SessionCity Council & City Boards
DateTuesday, March 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:11:54

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

About 2018, I'm thinking.

0:02

Yeah, that sounds about something like that.

0:05

So we've gone through a lot of changes in that amount of time.

0:08

But I thought it might be helpful just to do a kind of a high level look at how the pension fund works.

0:14

When I report a couple times a year, I bring the actual numbers and we'll do that again shortly because we're right in the middle of our valuation for last year.

0:22

But I thought it might be helpful just to give you a quick overview if it's not familiar to you.

0:26

The Chattanooga Pension Fund was founded in 1949, so it goes back quite a long ways.

0:42

In addition to myself as city council appointee, and and Weston Porter as the mayor's appointee with a staff of about two and a half employees.

0:57

Myself and the other members is basically oversight of the fund.

1:00

You know, there are certain regulations and laws we have to comply with, in addition to setting uh direction for the investments of the fund.

1:09

Uh it's part of our job to hire and supervise the actuary who does the work on the fund.

1:14

And we do that.

1:15

We also have an outside investment consulting firm that actually does most of the research and recommendations, and then we approve and move forward from there.

1:24

So I don't think this is going to be real news for anybody, but the difference between a pension fund and uh say a 401k, uh, those are called defined contribution plans.

1:37

You put money into your 401k, you invest it.

1:40

It's entirely up to you to do it during your lifetime and to save up enough to retire on, as opposed to a traditional pension or defined benefit plan, which is what the city has and what I know the city also has a 403B and 457, I think.

1:56

But with a defined pension, a defined benefit plan, the the retiree's salary is based on some percentage formula of their last however many working years.

2:08

And it's up to the fund and the employer to fund it and invest it such that that obligation is met in their retirement.

2:16

So you can see over the years that dotted line is the progression of people who have pension funds.

2:24

This is the left-hand scale is the percentage of workers who have a plan at all.

2:28

Once upon a time, there were more pensions than 401ks.

2:32

Uh that's certainly not true today.

2:34

As you can see, that the light blue line at the top is 80% of people who have a plan at all have a defined contribution plan, a 401k type plan.

2:43

The retirement plans that are pension funds, only about 20%.

2:47

As you can see from this graph, that top dotted line is public administration.

2:52

That would be municipality, state, local governments, and police and fire.

2:56

So that's predominantly where we still see pension funds.

3:00

And the primary reason for that is first responders on average have lower life expectancies, as you can imagine, because they're exposed to more hazards.

3:11

They have typically a shorter working lifetime within their uh professions.

3:17

A lot of times they'll go get a second job after retirement, but the theory here was they have less time to save up.

3:23

401ks are more difficult for them to amass enough assets.

3:27

I can work 40 or 45 years, but uh typical uh firefighter police 25 to 30.

3:34

And of course, because of the physical demands, especially in the fire, they're less likely to be able to work the same duration of employment.

3:41

Now, you know, over time that's changing as we get better equipment, safety improves, and so forth.

3:46

So I was I was gonna ask, I think I think that is changing.

3:50

Is there any data that shows what the difference between life expectancy now?

3:57

Let's say for someone who's actively employed now, right, versus even like 20 years ago.

4:03

Because I know one of the things that we've done, I think that should make a difference anyway, is we've we've started furnishing second set of turnout gear.

4:14

Yep, exactly.

4:15

And there's a lot of I guess uh I'm not trying to say preventative medicines now.

4:25

You know, we've got the we've got the health clinic down here, yeah.

4:29

Right, that they go through the physical every year.

4:31

Absolutely.

4:32

And they look for certain things, early detection, things like that.

4:35

So we're much more aware of it, more heightened and more response to in terms of equipment, so forth.

4:41

So, you know, one of my thoughts is one of the challenges to this defined benefit is the fact that I think the data would probably show that firefighters are now living longer.

4:53

I know we certainly have now for the first time, right?

4:57

More firefighters on the pension.

5:00

More firefighters on the pension, I mean drawing as opposed to paying in.

5:04

Right here.

5:04

So you go back to 20, you're right, you're right on point.

5:07

Go back to 2015, that red circle there, you can see uh that that ratio 0.92.

5:14

So there were you know, there were more actives, which is the dark blue than retirees.

5:20

And now come out to 2024, and that pink line shows you that ratio.

5:24

So now there's a hundred and ten retirees for every hundred actives.

5:28

If you look at that far right-hand column, one point well, it's really almost one point one this year.

5:34

So you're exactly right.

5:35

There are more retirees than actives, and if you think about the analogy of Social Security.

5:41

1960 there were five workers paying in for every retiree, and today it's about two to one.

5:47

So it's the same reason that Social Security has financial challenges.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████████████████████████████83%
Personnel Matters████████15%
Public Safety2%
Summary of Proceedings

Chattanooga Pension Fund Status Briefing for City Council - March 24, 2026

City Council members received a detailed briefing from Chris, a trustee of the Chattanooga Pension Fund, on the fund's history, financial status, challenges, and outlook. The discussion covered the fund's defined benefit structure, investment performance, funded ratio, actuarial assumptions, the impact of recent pay raises, and the feasibility of converting to a defined contribution plan.

Discussion Items

  • Chris presented an overview: The Chattanooga Pension Fund was founded in 1949. It is a defined benefit pension for police and fire (sworn officers), distinct from the general city pension. The fund is overseen by a board including city council and mayoral appointees. The actuary and an investment consultant support the fund. The fund's assets are invested with a 65/35 stock/bond allocation, moving to more indexing and lower fees (now ~0.5% all-in, down from ~1%).
  • Funded status: As of the latest preliminary data (year-end 2025), the actuarial value of assets was $370 million, with total accrued liability of $622 million, resulting in an unfunded liability of $252 million and a funded ratio of approximately 59.5% (actuarial). Market value at year-end was $399 million, and as of March 2026 it is above $400 million, putting the funded ratio around 64% on a market basis. The goal is 80% funded, with a glide path to reach 70% by 2033 and 80% by 2039-2040 under current assumptions.
  • Historical performance: The fund lost 31% in 2008, which was worse than the average pension fund loss of ~22%. Subsequent investment in hedge funds underperformed, and it took a decade to unwind. The fund also lost in 2022 (both stocks and bonds). However, recent returns have been strong: 14.9% gross in 2025, placing in the top 29% of public pension funds. Five-year average returns are near the median.
  • Impact of pay raises: Recent large pay raises (e.g., 18% increase) directly increase the accrued liability, worsening the funded ratio in the short term. For example, a firefighter retiring with a $45,000 annual pension (18-year life expectancy) has a liability of $460,000; an 18% raise increases that to $570,000. Despite this, the city's consistent contributions have kept the fund on track. The two recent raises delayed the glide path by only about one year due to better-than-expected market returns.
  • City contributions: The city contributes roughly 35% of payroll (total contribution ~$26 million annually in 2025). This consists of the normal cost (what would be needed if fully funded, about $10 million) plus an amortization payment toward the unfunded liability (about $19 million). The city has always made at least the minimum recommended contribution. For the upcoming budget, a placeholder increase of ~6% is used, but the actual figure will come from the actuary in May or June 2026.
  • Conversion to a 401k: Council members asked about the feasibility of switching to a defined contribution plan. Chris explained that any transition would require making up the $252 million unfunded liability, plus compensating existing employees for their accrued benefits. This would be extremely costly and likely result in lower benefits for sworn officers. He emphasized the moral obligation to first responders, similar to veterans' benefits, given their shorter careers and higher disability risks. Other cities (e.g., Dallas, Chicago, Illinois) that underfunded pensions face severe crises.
  • Other reform options: Discussion of hybrids (e.g., adding 457 plans), capping pensionable pay (e.g., at captain rank), and restoring COLAs. Currently, COLAs are limited to a maximum of 3% but based on CPI; the fund pays 1.5% now, with restoration to full COLA at 80% funded. Some council members inquired about vesting: sworn officers vest after 10 years (general employees after 5 years).
  • The board has improved governance: Board member terms were extended to six years (staggered) to provide continuity. The board has productive discussions with the fire union regarding disability policies.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or resolutions were taken. The briefing was educational for the council, providing detailed understanding of the pension fund's finances and the importance of continued full funding.
  • Council members expressed support for the pension fund and the sworn officers, acknowledging the moral obligation and the need to maintain the defined benefit plan.
  • Chris committed to providing updated projections once the actuary completes the 2025 valuation (expected May/June 2026). The council will use that information for budget planning.
  • Council members highlighted the need to communicate to constituents that converting to a 401k would be costly and disadvantageous to first responders.

Meeting Transcript

About 2018, I'm thinking. Yeah, that sounds about something like that. So we've gone through a lot of changes in that amount of time. But I thought it might be helpful just to do a kind of a high level look at how the pension fund works. When I report a couple times a year, I bring the actual numbers and we'll do that again shortly because we're right in the middle of our valuation for last year. But I thought it might be helpful just to give you a quick overview if it's not familiar to you. The Chattanooga Pension Fund was founded in 1949, so it goes back quite a long ways. In addition to myself as city council appointee, and and Weston Porter as the mayor's appointee with a staff of about two and a half employees. Myself and the other members is basically oversight of the fund. You know, there are certain regulations and laws we have to comply with, in addition to setting uh direction for the investments of the fund. Uh it's part of our job to hire and supervise the actuary who does the work on the fund. And we do that. We also have an outside investment consulting firm that actually does most of the research and recommendations, and then we approve and move forward from there. So I don't think this is going to be real news for anybody, but the difference between a pension fund and uh say a 401k, uh, those are called defined contribution plans. You put money into your 401k, you invest it. It's entirely up to you to do it during your lifetime and to save up enough to retire on, as opposed to a traditional pension or defined benefit plan, which is what the city has and what I know the city also has a 403B and 457, I think. But with a defined pension, a defined benefit plan, the the retiree's salary is based on some percentage formula of their last however many working years. And it's up to the fund and the employer to fund it and invest it such that that obligation is met in their retirement. So you can see over the years that dotted line is the progression of people who have pension funds. This is the left-hand scale is the percentage of workers who have a plan at all. Once upon a time, there were more pensions than 401ks. Uh that's certainly not true today. As you can see, that the light blue line at the top is 80% of people who have a plan at all have a defined contribution plan, a 401k type plan. The retirement plans that are pension funds, only about 20%. As you can see from this graph, that top dotted line is public administration. That would be municipality, state, local governments, and police and fire. So that's predominantly where we still see pension funds. And the primary reason for that is first responders on average have lower life expectancies, as you can imagine, because they're exposed to more hazards. They have typically a shorter working lifetime within their uh professions. A lot of times they'll go get a second job after retirement, but the theory here was they have less time to save up. 401ks are more difficult for them to amass enough assets. I can work 40 or 45 years, but uh typical uh firefighter police 25 to 30. And of course, because of the physical demands, especially in the fire, they're less likely to be able to work the same duration of employment. Now, you know, over time that's changing as we get better equipment, safety improves, and so forth. So I was I was gonna ask, I think I think that is changing. Is there any data that shows what the difference between life expectancy now? Let's say for someone who's actively employed now, right, versus even like 20 years ago. Because I know one of the things that we've done, I think that should make a difference anyway, is we've we've started furnishing second set of turnout gear. Yep, exactly. And there's a lot of I guess uh I'm not trying to say preventative medicines now. You know, we've got the we've got the health clinic down here, yeah. Right, that they go through the physical every year. Absolutely. And they look for certain things, early detection, things like that. So we're much more aware of it, more heightened and more response to in terms of equipment, so forth. So, you know, one of my thoughts is one of the challenges to this defined benefit is the fact that I think the data would probably show that firefighters are now living longer. I know we certainly have now for the first time, right? More firefighters on the pension. More firefighters on the pension, I mean drawing as opposed to paying in. Right here.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com