Madam Chair Golarski.

Vice Chair Frazier.

Here.

Commissioner Stone.

Here.

Commissioner Kirk.

Here.

Commissioner Mujica.

Present.

Commissioner Gibson.

Excuse.

Commissioner Boytman.

Present.

Madam Chair, we have a quorum.

Thank you.

I think the next item on our list is a Pledge of Allegiance.

If you ever want everyone would stand and join in.

It's a horse.

Okay, this is the first of two public comments.

If uh anybody has anything to say.

We will we can pull it off.

If you want to talk about something that's on non-routine, we will hear that separately.

We cannot take any action at any time.

Before we I do want to make one public comment.

And excuse me, I'm catching my breath.

Um, I want to say thank you to all our staff and those that aren't here.

So if you can express, I believe I'm speaking on behalf of the of the board.

Uh our thanks for job well done this year, and best wishes for whichever holiday you celebrate, whether it be Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Christmas, whatever you celebrate.

Please have a joyous season.

Be safe.

Looking forward to seeing some of you.

Or some of you next year.

Some of you will see a lot more of.

So that's all I want to say.

I don't know.

Nobody else.

Then I will close public comment.

And I will ask uh staff to go.

Oh, to continue.

Thank you, madam chair.

Good evening, Madam Chair, and honorable members of the Clark County Planning Commission.

The next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda after any additions, holds, or deletions at this time.

Staff requests the following.

Hold the following to the January 6, 2026 Planning Commission meeting per the applicant's representative item 24, PA 25, 7049, item 25, ZC 250767, item 26, VS 250768, and item 27, WS 250769.

For the public's confirmation, the corresponding Board of County Commissioners meeting date will change from January 21st, 2026 to February 4, 2026 for the items that I just mentioned.

Hold the following to the January 20th, 2026 Planning Commission meeting per the applicant's representative item number eight, UC 250668.

Applicant is advised that re-notification fees are required.

Item number 14, UC 250761.

For the applicant's information, additional renotification fees may be required in accordance with Title 30 for items held or deleted, or if there are modifications to the original application, the above public hearing items are going to be open as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the date previously stated.

These are for items 8, 14, 24, 25, 26, and 27.

If there are no requests by the planning commission or any members of the public, the agenda stands ready for your approval.

Okay.

Do we have anyone in the audience that would like to hold or delete an item?

What about from the board?

Any members?

No.

Then we're ready for a motion.

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I move that we approve the agenda as read in by staff.

We have a motion for approval of the agenda.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

The next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes.

The planning commission briefing and regular meeting minutes from November 4th, 2025.

And from November 18th, 2025 are ready for approval.

Do I have a motion for approval of the minutes?

Yes, ma'am.

Um Madam Chair, move for approval of the meeting minutes.

We have a motion on the floor for approval.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

For the audience's information, items on tonight's agenda are final action unless appeal to the Board of County Commissioners or otherwise announced.

All appeals must be filed in writing to the comprehensive planning department by 5 o'clock p.m.

on Wednesday, December 24th, 2025.

And any appeals from tonight's meeting will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, January 21st, 2026 at 9 o'clock a.m.

in these chambers.

Per title 30, an aggrieved person may appeal an item.

An agreed person includes the applicant, someone who attended this meeting in person or through an authorized representative, or someone who has submitted comments in writing, which may include a postcard or letter.

Members in the audience must complete the meeting sign-in sheet found near the dais to confirm their attendance at this meeting.

Mailed notices of appeal deplications will be sent to the property owners within the same notification radius as the original application and to those listed on the meeting sign-in sheet.

Additionally, any person may call the comprehensive planning department at 702-455-4314, or go to the county's meeting agenda webpage and review the meeting notice of final action to find out if any items have been appealed.

Next are the routine action items, which consist of items number four through twelve, except those items that were previously deleted.

These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item.

If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.

Okay, this is the time where we are going to do one motion, one vote for items four through twelve holding items eight.

If there is anyone that does not agree with staff's approval, or they would up or they oppose it and they would like for this item to be pulled from the agenda and heard separately.

You need to come down now, please.

Seeing none and mark, I think I'm a little late, but I did want the applicant for number eight to go back to town board.

So if you can make that thank you, madam chair.

We'll coordinate with agenda processing to ensure the applicant goes back to the town board for item eight UC 25068, which would be the January 13th, 2026 Paradise Town Advisory Board meeting.

Thank you.

So with that in mind, one motion, one vote.

Do I have a motion?

Yes, madam chair.

So I move for approval of the routine action items.

Um holding number eight.

Um there's the motion.

We have a motion on the floor for approval of routine action items.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Thank you and have a wonderful holiday.

This is final action unless appealed, except for items 11 and 12, which will be forwarded.

The board of county commissioners meeting for final action on January 21st, 2026 at 9 o'clock a.m.

Unless otherwise announced.

The next item on the agenda is item 13.

Use permits for the following one banquet facility and two live entertainment in conjunction with an existing shopping center on 1.86 acres in a CG commercial general zone within the airport environs, A60 overlay, generally located west of Rainbow Boulevard and north of Aquindo Road within Spring Valley.

Background is described within your agenda.

Staff has received three cards in protest.

The Spring Valley Town Advisory Board recommends denial, and staff recommends denial.

Good evening.

Name and address for the record, please.

Matthew Stafford, Nevada, bar number 12101.

Apparently have to represent that.

I'm just a terrible salsa dancer.

And this is a dance academy.

Um we're trying to build a community.

Um apparently the first person who did this had had the wrong group license.

We don't have enough.

You need to stay, you need to stay by the mic because we have to have a lot to even teach enough kids how to dance.

We need to have that group three license.

On top of that, we're here for the SUP license, right?

So you get a bunch of lessons for salsa, you gotta dance somewhere, right?

And so I'm coming at this to the commission.

We know there's some concerns.

We think the walls already soundproofed to the max.

Um this community downstairs.

I know Commissioner You had brought this up and the chairwoman, I'm sorry.

Um it's a karate studio, no one's there at night.

Um if you take salsa lessons, you need a place to sell.

And it doesn't need to be at the casino all the time.

It doesn't need to be at the club.

And we're trying to build that out.

It's important for the commissioner's district that we build a lot of jobs.

Uh and this group's doing a lot.

Um, we put our SUP in, we understand the concerns.

We're not gonna throw a rock festival there, right?

This is gonna be pretty kick butt.

And cool things like that where people have a good raucous time, but the neighborhood shouldn't be affected.

We think physically we can prove all that stuff up.

I know there was a technical issue um in the application.

I think that's obviously not in that this is just a group that's trying to build what we call Las Vegas, right?

We have kids.

I don't know.

I don't know.

There's 50 kids that take a lesson there.

There's a lot of parents that love to salsa dance.

Um, and they're getting warnings because they're having events, and they want to do it right.

And so we're looking for the right way to do this.

Um, unfortunately, uh I'm getting emotional because it wasn't my friend.

Passed away.

One of the main owners passed away recently, and so we're here to sort of figure this out with you all and build something for Las Vegas.

And so on a commission.

Here we are.

And so we'd like to hear what you guys want to feed back.

But we are here to represent something that's positive for the community, but it's appropriate for the space.

Name and address for the record.

Larry Sanchez, uh Engineer of Record uh 7844 Soringbrook Street.

Um, here on behalf of the um owners of Latin Blends.

Um representing them at the town board, just a couple of things that were brought to the attention was um specific uh event center.

Uh my plans showed suite 207 for the record.

Um, and the event center is not to be taken place in classrooms or anywhere else within two oh suite 206, 207, and 208, which is what comprises uh Latin blends.

Uh the specific uh location of the event center, which is what we're applying for for the SUP, is for the event center.

And then the second part was um concerns with soundproofing.

Uh currently the building is a two-story building made out of 12-inch CMU block, solid grouted.

Um Clark County regulates um uh the sound transmission class of anywhere from 35 to 40 uh decibels, and so this building is more uh soundproof, if you will, at uh at a 12-inch block.

So the noise reduction should be retained within the existing building.

Uh before it used to be a yoga studio, so um the the floor is made up of uh thick wood laminates, so as far as any vibration or again any noise traveling outside of suite 207, it should be adequate for any sort of sound damp dampening.

Okay.

Um that was what's brought up at the town board, which is why we got denied, and you know, I basically said, okay, we need to come here to hopefully uh get the blessing from planning commission.

Okay.

So that concludes your presentation.

Unless you have other questions.

Well, we may we'll turn that over to the board when the time comes.

This is a public hearing.

Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak to this item?

Seeing none, then I will close public hearing and I will turn it over to the board to see if anybody has any questions on this.

Commissioner Frazier.

Uh, yeah, just a couple of questions.

Maybe first one's for staff.

I know we've had applications like this in front of us before where um there were what's this called things that we normally don't really track.

Is there something that the applicant can provide, like a soundproofing study of uh of a space?

Is that something that we would request or even look at?

I hear what you're saying.

I think excuse me.

No, no, no.

Sir, sir.

So we're talking to staff.

I think this is staff or no, no, no, that's okay.

Mr.

Vice Chairman uh Steph typically does not uh request uh any noise attenuation studies from the applicant as they're required to adhere to the site and environment environmental standards established within Title 30 and not to exceed uh certain decibel levels.

Is there required to adhere to the site and environment environmental standards established within Title 30 and not to exceed uh certain decibel levels?

Um members of the commission are aware the live entertainment use permit is requested as the live entertainment that's conducted inside of the premises may be discernible to parties standing outside of the building.

Thank you.

I think the only other comment I have is I I get to support the application as long as we have like a review period on it.

And I have some questions.

Do you have a picture by chance of the actual building?

Yeah, it's very familiar.

It's right by the same.

What I'm con what I'm concerned about particularly is how much room is there between the back of the building and the perimeter wall.

Sure.

Is there landscaping?

No, let me finish, okay?

Is there landscaping in between there?

Is are there windows, are there doors on the back?

No, put it up so you can see it.

So the most immediate residential area would be behind the parking lot, which is what I would call three rows of parking, and a high exterior wall, although there's part of it not completely.

Um if I'm looking to my left to this picture's left, that's the residential.

There's a higher serial wall.

But as you can see, we're kind of in the top right here.

And as I said, one, two or three rows of uh normal parking lot are the in between.

And which is your building.

Okay, and where is your where where is the studio located in that building?

What portion of it?

Okay, so it's this back this back portion.

Yeah.

Okay.

For the record, it's about a good 40 to 45 feet away from the face of the building to the face of the block wall.

Right.

And there's an office actually in between that too.

That is not that space or where it would be the other property or offices between that and the next floors before you get to the questions.

Thank you.

Anyone else?

Seeing none, I will turn this over now to Commissioner Whitman.

Yeah, thanks.

So you said suite 207's where the banquet hall is gonna be.

And so that building that we're looking at right now with the cross hatch.

You mind putting your phone?

Click it, the the light keeps on going off.

So where is suite 207 there?

Let me transfer it over to the uh floor plan.

Yeah, I still can't see it.

It's a little small.

Okay.

Okay.

Suite 207 is the event center where they would do cultural events, uh socials, um, for the dance uh members of the of the dance community.

This is not meant to be a nightclub.

This is not gonna be 24-7 hookah bars or whatever.

This is just again to celebrate uh whatever birthdays or whatever they have.

All right.

Do you want to can you light that up again and then go back to the bigger portion?

Can you go back up to the one that shows the parking lot, please?

So where on that is suite 207, is it?

I see.

So it doesn't occupy the whole part, so it doesn't be clear that office is part of it.

Right.

I wouldn't say they wouldn't have events though in the other.

Yes.

Um we're here to specify that the event center is suite 207, which is about 15 uh 100 square feet.

And was that the technical issue that you referenced in the application?

That was what I understand from the town board.

Yes, that's that's why it got denied because it wasn't um I uh I agree with my fellow commissioner that we could do this with uh year review period.

Is that work for you, Commissioner Fraser?

And Commissioner Boy, can I just ask one more question?

Because I see where they say that live entertainment uh may be discernible from outside of the building, but they also say hours of operation will be Monday to Sunday until 2 a.m.

I don't know.

I have a little bit of concern for the 2 a.m.

during what we would consider a normal work week.

So if you can just okay, I think Thursday through normal night life times.

I don't think they're looking for a Monday night by any means.

Well, that's fine, but I but but if we don't specify, then so that so that's the only reason I was bringing it up, and we'll just leave it up to Commissioner Whiteman.

The main function of Latin Blends is a dance studio to take classes.

So they're open Monday through Fridays or with private lessons.

The event center is not to be, you know, it's usually gonna be on the weekends when the parking spaces are that's why we need the higher group license apart from the special use premise because we have dance classes in more than two.

I don't know if that yeah, please separately and apart.

Okay.

Yeah.

Commissioner Mohica.

Okay.

First, I'm gonna ask you for a huge favor.

Please do not talk unless we ask you a question because you're confusing things, and the both of you talking at the same time.

I couldn't understand what was going on.

Um one thing we need to make very clear, and this is not a question yet.

I will say it's a question if it's a question.

Um I would like one of you, one at a time, not the two of you talking at the same time to make clear is you got really emotional talking about children and kids and learning how to dance and all that.

Well, children don't dance till 2 a.m.

in the morning.

Okay.

So we need to clarify that.

And and we need to put it in, and I'm going to look to staff and my fellow commissioner Reutman to make this very clear when making the motion if we are gonna move forward and approve this.

We need to know what hours is this going to be a club event center, and in what days, and then what hours and what days is it for people to learn how to dance and the children aspect of it.

Did I make myself clear?

Both of you?

Yeah, okay.

Thank you.

So I don't absolutely I didn't mean to mix the two.

Um I would say I would assume till seven o'clock Sunday through Thursday, Friday would be your normal dance hours in terms of an event.

It's gonna be later, it's nine o'clock.

There's a clear delineation.

I I I don't want to speak for the business without uh speaking here.

Hello.

Um, I'm gonna recognize you because we did close public here, Alan.

Yeah, I'm gonna recognize you and tell you that you can speak, but you just need to address the issues that the commissioner has spoken about.

And I was just Oh, and I need your name and address Camille Twassen, uh 150 North Smart Way prompt 89060.

And so to address the question, uh the kids' classes are typically from after school 12 noon because we have homeschool until after school.

Usually they're over by about by 8 p.m.

And then for the events, it's typically on the weekends, and so that would be typically salsa socials actually end around one to two a.m.

which is why we put 2 a.m.

And they tend to happen Fridays and Saturdays.

Uh we were just opening it up perhaps to somebody who may want to throw a birthday party or something within the community.

But ideally, yes.

So that would be Friday, Saturday, and Sunday for the night hours for the night hours upon events, bookings, yes.

Commissioner Frazier.

Yeah, so so just um I guess I'm just gonna give my thoughts about the application as it relates to hours of operation.

Um partly why that's why I asked for a review period.

So I I'm kind of I'm kinda okay giving the applic applicant what they're asking for, and then we can if there's issues, we can deal with it when they come back before us.

But I don't know what neighbors want to be Monday through Friday up till two o'clock if they decide to do that.

Uh Commissioner Whiteman, this is your area.

Yeah, I mean, I tend to agree with Commissioner Frazier.

I'm okay with the application as is.

I think a review period is appropriate.

Um we don't have any neighbors here tonight, you know.

I it sound it looks to me.

I looked at the building on Google Maps.

I mean, this is a commercial building, so it sounds like there's a hookah bar downstairs that's open till midnight.

It looks like there's a restaurant there that's open till midnight.

So I'm okay with the application as is.

If you end up not being a good neighbor, if it ends up being raucous parties that are disturbing the residents behind you, then we're all gonna have to look at this at a year and may have to make another decision.

So, you know, I do suggest that um we make sure that it is soundproofed.

If you do hear from your neighbors and there are ways to mitigate that, do that.

Um, and again, make sure there aren't people goofing off and being loud in the parking lot at all hours of the evening.

Um, but again, this is my understanding is that this commercial building was there long before the neighbors were, and that before that was even the uh residential area.

So I imagine um, you know, that's kind of where they decided to move.

So I'm okay with that.

I'll um please.

Commissioner Mojica.

I'm sorry, I still have a problem with this because in the applicants uh it's in the justification, it says uh Monday to Sunday events occurring till 2 a.m.

We we can't have it.

Um they just said it's Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.

So that needs to be clarified.

Okay.

Uh how do you guys feel about limiting this to midnight Monday through Wednesday and Thursday through Sunday?

We can have it till 2 a.m.

That hold up the process of or if or can we just adjust that?

I'm okay.

We're gonna adjust that right now.

Yes, I'm okay with that.

Does that work?

Yes.

Okay.

I think we're trying to be broad.

Uh I tend to agree, but I you know, I do respect the opinion of my fellow commissioners here.

So if we think that is a good compromise, then that works for me.

If that works for everyone else.

Yep.

Okay, great.

So we will motion to approve with the hours of operation ending.

Did I say 10 or 11?

Just now.

Oh, 12?

Okay.

Okay.

Ending at two Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and two on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, with a year review.

Um, and a strong suggestion that we make sure that this is soundproofed and that we act as good neighbors.

Um, Commissioner Sari, if I may.

Uh we have a um condition for commencement within two years.

Uh, should we amend that to match the first condition then?

Yes, I would.

Okay, we're gonna amend that to uh basically Libida one year.

To commence and review.

Yes.

Perfect.

Does that work for everyone?

Okay, we have a motion on the floor for approval with the hours.

Uh as a condition.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

This is final action unless appealed.

Good luck.

I have a lot of salsa parties.

Next on your agenda is item 15, UC 2570 use permits for the file in one campground, two caretaker unit with waivers development standards to reduce setbacks and to design review for a campground facility on 2.09 acres and an RS-80 residential single family 80 zone within the Red Rock Overlay, generally located north of State Route 160 and west of Forrester Street within Red Rock background is described within your agenda.

Staff has received four cards and protests.

The Red Rock Citizens Advisory Council recommends approval subject to fouling low lighting restrictions.

Staff recommends approval of the use permit and denial of the waiver development standards and design review.

Name and address for the record, please.

Good evening, Jennifer Lazovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here tonight on behalf of the applicant.

This is a blow-up location of where the property is located.

It is as you're going westbound on Blue Diamond Highway.

Uh you'd be going over, staying on State Route 160 on your way to Perump.

State Route 159 is kind of over in this area where you would cut over to go through Red Rock and go to the town of Blue Diamond.

The site is privately owned.

It sits right here in yellow, but it is surrounded.

Um everything in green is owned by the BLM and within the conservation area.

This map kind of gives you a little better indication of where that State Route 159 is.

And then again, here's State Route 160 or Blue Diamond, and that's the location of the property.

The application before you tonight has a couple of components.

One component of it is a use permit for the code refers to it as a campground, but these would be rental cabins, and I will show you what they look like in a minute.

This is the site plan.

Uh the site plan shows one entrance coming in off of Blue Diamond.

There will be a small area that will be paved.

We have to do that for air quality reasons, but it's not like we're paving the entire site.

The idea with this site is to very much take advantage and and highlight the um surrounding area.

So the area where my finger is will be will remain natural terrain.

It might be re-vegetated with some other uh native plants.

Then in orange are the buildings that we're asking to be where people would stay.

We have 17 cabins.

They kind of run in this area right here, and then over here we'll have an on-site manager that will live on site.

We'll also have what we call a common area building.

The common area building could sell some light sundries, some snacks, coffee, things like that.

We do have a water tank if there was any need for fire or emergencies.

That water tank sits right here.

And then we have like a covered common area where you could sit under there, have uh lunch, have maybe dinner before um the sun sets and enjoy the views.

These kinds of uh these concepts are around in other right near other national parks.

This is right outside of Zion, and um this gives you a feel for what that looks like.

There's also another one, another um one of these concepts called Escalante.

Uh this is also in Utah, and the concept for our project looks like this.

So it has that darker bronze look.

We are obviously using um the windows towards the views of Red Rock, and in this particular elevation, this shows you the wood accents that are also going to be part of the cabin.

Um back to the site plan, we had a couple of waivers, and it was only it was not for the entire site, it was just for the cabins that sit kind of right in this corner.

So if you remember from that aerial, there's a significant wash that goes through this property.

Some of that wash um kind of comes onto our site.

You can see it in the aerial, and then it goes beyond.

So that's why you don't see structures in that area, but we do meet the setback for a number of the structures.

But in this area where we're allowed to build all the way to our property line, we have the waiver waiver.

Um the first waiver is to reduce the setback to the rear, which would be up here, and then the second waiver is to reduce the side setback for really cabin number 17 is our pinch point.

It should be 15 feet, and we're at five feet.

So again, the waivers are not for the entire uh site, the entire development, it's just for the area where we've got these cabins right in the corner.

As I mentioned, and if you recall that other map, which shows the amount of green surrounding us.

We don't have other structures that we would be backing up to or imposing upon uh with these waivers for the setbacks.

So we would ask you to take that into consideration.

And then finally, I appreciate the long conversations that we had at Red Rock Town Board.

It was a pretty full room.

Um we had a lot of feedback just from people in the general community, not necessarily right adjacent to this.

And when uh that hearing was over, they did recommend approval.

But we did agree in listening to some of the comments that came from uh the people that were in the room to two additional conditions, and that would be number one to add a condition that says all lighting will be low level and soft yellow to minimize brightness, and the second condition would be only smokeless fire pits will be allowed.

So with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

See none, and I will close public hearing, and I will turn this over to the board.

Anyone have any questions?

Town board was concerned about fire hydrants.

And I think fire department mentioned them.

Well, we have that's why we have this, and I pointed it out.

Um we have this fire tank on site, or five, I'm sorry, not fire tank.

We have this water tank on site uh right here.

So that's how we address that comment.

And obviously, we have to do whatever fire says in working with them.

Okay, so you are working with them, and they are on the uh on the plants and everything else.

Yes, okay.

Thank you.

Commissioner Mohik.

Oh, Commissioner Vice Chair.

I was just want to say um thank you, appreciate the the presentation.

Love the project, can't wait to stay in one.

Commissioner Mohica.

Um, yeah, I really appreciate you working with the tamboard, and um those two conditions are very important.

The the low lighting and the uh propane rather than smoke.

So um motion to and me too.

I can't wait to stay in one, so uh motion to approve UC25070 with the two added conditions.

Staff, should I repeat them or do you have them?

We have the uh conditions, Commissioner Mohica, but it would be best to repeat those for the public record, please.

Okay.

So the first one is low level yellow lighting in the parking lot.

And the second one is smokeless fire pits using propane.

Could I amend slightly condition number one?

It was a little broader.

We had had all lighting, all lighting low level and soft yellow to minimize brightness.

That way we could catch, you know, if it was something on the building or something like that, it would all be low level and that soft yellow.

Okay, thank you.

Okay, we have a motion on the floor.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Thank you.

Happy New Year.

See you next year.

This is final action, unless appeal to text is item 16 holdover waivers development standards for the following.

Number one, eliminate and reduce setbacks, two, reduce building separation, and three, increase hardscape area within the front and side yards in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.14 acres in an RS 5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located east of minor way and south of Olive Street within Sunrise Manor.

Background is described within your agenda.

Sunrise Manor Town Advisory Board recommends denial.

Staff recommends approval of waiver development standards number one C in denial of waiver development standards number one A, number one B, number two, and number three.

Hi, good evening.

My name is Ruby Cisneros.

This is my father, Ruben Cisneros.

We reside in 1514 minor way.

Um and we're here in regards to the built carport in the front of the home.

Um and also the I believe it was to reduce the heartscape and apologize.

The building separation between the carport and the front of the home.

Um that carport was a gift from my father.

It was given to him over 10 years actually for one of his friends.

Um it's been it was it was a gift, so he was unsure that he needed a permit or if he was breaking any laws like that because it was gifted to him, and uh, he apologizes for that.

Also, the hardscape around the air of the home, it's greater than um it should be, but he bought the home that way, so he didn't realize it was um he needed a permit either because it was bought with the home.

Okay, does that conclude your presentation?

Yeah, okay.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak to this item?

Say none, I will close public hearing and see if the commissioners, any of the commissioners have any questions, Commissioner Frazier.

Uh thank you, madam chair.

I I you know we have these type of applications that come before us frequently, and and we do look at them on a case-by-case basis.

And I think my fellow commissioners would agree that you know, when whenever someone comes up and there's a bunch of neighbors um here to to speak about an opposition, we we take that into account.

And you know, seeing none, I I mean I can support the application uh for the existing structure.

Um, they still have some things they have, hoops they have to jump through, they still have to get it, you know, permitted and et cetera.

And and so, and I'm okay with the hardscape because of the older community it is, and and that's kind of like what goes on in this area.

So I can support the application.

Okay, anyone else?

Commissioner Reutman.

I agree, I can support the application.

Okay.

Um I was asking if you have artificial turf, and that does not constant constitute uh hardscape.

So when I went, the only hardscape cement-wise that took up a lot was this driveway that you're seeing.

To the right of that is uh artificial turf.

And I've got a picture on my phone if I need to upload that and send that to use for your files.

I can do that.

Um there aren't many of these, but there are some in the neighborhood.

I did I did some drive around.

Um leave it as is, but I think because it does stand out when that shade rips, get one that kind of matches your house.

Yeah.

Okay.

I don't want you to have to go through that expense now, but when that thing rips, because it will in time.

And so with that, I'm going to move to approve WS 25-0709.

With staff if approved conditions.

Thank you.

I appreciate your time.

Happy holidays.

Happy holidays.

Same to you.

Merry Christmas.

Feliz Navidad.

This is final action unless appealed.

Next on your agenda is item 17, WS250734.

Waiver development standards allow a six foot high non deck non-decorative fence within the front setback in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.98 acres.

And then RS5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located south of Viking Road and east of McLeod Drive within Paradise.

Background is described within your agenda.

Staff has received one card in support and eight cards in protest.

The Paradise Town Advisory Board recommends denial and staff recommends denial.

Is there an applicant for this item?

Okay.

If that's the case, then yes, sir.

I was just going to move that we hold the item and let staff get back to the applicant.

Just for further clarification purposes, Mr.

Vice Chairman, that'll be a hold uh till January 20th, 2026, Planning Commission meeting.

Do we need to open up public hearing first?

Not if you're going to hold it.

Not if we're going to hold no.

January.

Mr.

Vice Chairman, I apologize.

January 6th, 2026, Planning Commission meeting.

Thank you.

That would be my motion.

We have a motion on the floor.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes for a hold till January 6th.

Again, for the audience's information, this item will be held to the January 6th, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.

Next on your agenda are items 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23, which are companion items and can be heard together.

Item 18, WS 250782, waiver development standards for the following.

One, eliminate the drainage study, and two waive full offsite improvements in conjunction with a proposed minor subdivision on 5.16 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Richmond Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise.

Background is described within your agenda.

Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends approval subject to amending public works development review bullet point number one to read as follows.

Drainage study and compliance with future development and amending public works development review bullet point three to read as follows.

Full site improvements with future development staff recommends approval.

Item 19 PA 25 7048 plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from entertainment mixed use EEM to compact neighborhood CN on 5.16 acres.

Generally located south of Richmond Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise background is described within your agenda.

Staff received two cards in support and five cards in protest.

Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends approval.

Staff recommends adoption of the amendment and to direct the chair to sign a resolution adopting the amendment.

Item 20, ZC250763, zone change reclassify 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres from uh commercial general zone to a RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmar Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise background is described within your agenda.

Staff received two cards in support and five cards in protest.

Staff recommends approval.

Item 21, VS 250765, vacate and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County, located between Richmar Avenue and Silverado Ranch Boulevard and Ensworth Street and the I-15 freeway within Enterprise.

Background is described within your agenda.

Staff receive two cards in support and seven cards of protest.

The Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends approval.

Staff recommends approval.

Item 22, WS 250764, waivers of development standards for the following.

Eliminate setback to a non-depressed freeway to eliminate street landscaping and three.

Eliminate and reduce landscape buffering and screening with design review for proposed single family residential development on a 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres and an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmar Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise.

Background is described within your agenda.

Staff received one card in support and six cards in protest.

Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends approval of waiver development standards number one and number two and denial of development standards number three in the design review.

Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended adding the following condition to the comprehensive planning preliminary staff conditions.

Establish entry and exit on the southern end of the property.

Staff recommends approval of waiver of development standards number one in the design review and denial of development standards number two and three.

Item number 23 TM25 500 186 tentative map consisting of 48 single family residential lots and common lots on a 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmar Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise background is described within your agenda of the Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommends denial, staff recommends approval.

Name and address for the record, please.

Good evening, Madam Chair.

Uh Planning Commissioners, my name is Tony Sless address 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant.

So you can see from the aerial, the site is highlighted here in yellow.

It is just over five acres.

It is located on the east side of the I-15.

Richmar is its northern boundary.

Endsworth is its eastern boundary.

You can see just as you blow out a little bit more for orientation.

This is the South Point Hotel, Las Vegas Boulevard.

We are surrounded by residential development on all three sides, with the west side being I-15.

As indicated, we are requesting or proposing a single family residential development consisting of 48 lots.

First being a master plan amendment and zone change.

The second being the design review of those 48 homes and the site plan that it sits on.

And then finally, a little bit of a nuance.

There is, as I will point out, a billboard on this site.

So there is some mapping action that is required.

So that is actually what item 18 relates to, where it is characterized as an off as a waiver or deferral of offsites.

But as you will see, we are actually doing all the off-sites.

It's just a sequencing of events required for mapping of these uses.

So with that, let me get into first the master plan and zone change.

As you can see right here, our site is uh right here labeled site.

It is in red.

Red is entertainment mixed use, which would allow for up to resort hotel type uses.

As you can see, this whole corridor north of Silverado Ranch is generally single, is generally residential, a combination of multifamily and single family.

We are asking to amend this plan to compact neighborhood that would allow residential development with a maximum density of 18 units to the acre.

Our zone change request is from commercial general.

So the site is today commercial again, not a viable commercial site.

There is no direct access or frontage road from the I-15.

Any commercial traffic would have to come from Las Vegas Boulevard or Silver Rado Ranch and meander through the existing residential neighborhoods.

So commercial is not viable.

We are asking to go to residential suburban two or RS2, which is minimum 10,000 square foot lots.

We believe that is a compatible excuse me, minimum, yes, square footage of two, each lot being 2,000 square feet minimum.

I believe I may have misstated that.

Sorry.

So RS2, we believe it is compatible as you have RM18 right here, which allows 18 units to the acre.

It is single family residential here, although would allow multifamily development merely to the south.

You have a mixture of RM32 and RM50 developments, which are multifamily.

So we're coming in with an RS2, minimum 2,000 square foot lots.

Again, the maximum density would be 18 based on the master plan amendment.

But as I will show you on our site plan, our density works out to about nine and a half, which is very compatible to the development to the east of us.

We appreciate staff's review of that.

They do recommend approval of both the master plan amendment and the zone change, as did uh Enterprise Town Board.

With respect to the design of the site, uh again, here is the five acres.

Is this Endsworth to the east?

This is Richmar.

Our 48 lots are right here.

As I mentioned, there is an existing billboard on the site, and that will remain.

It is located right here.

So this portion is actually not part of our development and not part of our previous request I just went through with the master plan and zone change.

That would remain commercial there.

Um this design right here, we have 18 homes right here, all fronting off Endsworth.

These driveways match up exactly with the existing development across the street from us on Endsworth.

All of these homes directly access Endsworth as well.

As you can see, we have watch matched lot line for lot line up and down Endsworth.

The balance of the development, the 30 homes will be accessed via Richmar in this location, right through here.

This is over here.

We are required to build a sound wall.

We are asking to waive that sound wall, and the reason both staff and ultimately enterprise town board did recommend approval is because right now there is an improvement project being coordinated with Bright Line West and N DOT in this location right here, and it is those parties end dot that are taking the lead on the development and design of that sound wall.

So if we were to put anything in, it would be immediately removed by N dot and replaced with their own sound wall.

So right here, this is the 15.

This is our east uh excuse me, west property line right here.

Right here is where the sound wall will go.

We will have a uh six-foot screen wall set on top of a uh three-foot tall retaining wall for nine feet, and then the sound wall will go right in this location.

So we do appreciate staff's recommendation of approval on that.

The second waiver is with respect to uh endsworth design.

Um, as I mentioned, we are doing uh complete and full off-site improvements, including our 30 feet of improvements along Endsworth, as well as part of that is gonna be a detached sidewalk.

We are doing five feet of landscaping.

So this is right here is on this side of the screen, is the uh proposed across section of Endsworth.

You can see the green right here will be right here.

Is the 30-foot development of Endsworth, which will include the curb uh curb gutter, five feet of landscaping, five feet of sidewalk.

What we are asking to wave is then an additional the second row of landscaping of five feet right here.

Essentially, what would you would see would be behind the sidewalk to the front would be 25 feet?

That would be a five additional five feet of landscaping, and then behind that five feet of landscaping would be our 20-foot front yard area or landscaping.

So we're asking to wave just the five feet of the required landscaping there and just have our property start right at the back of the sidewalk here, because that five feet of landscaping um is redundant in this area, and number two, it would have some hardship with respect to the setbacks not only with this, but on the second portion uh or another portion of the waiver, which is with respect to landscaping that is required along our West property line right here.

Um per code, we are supposed to have a 15-foot landscape buffer on our portion of the property here.

That would be ultimately behind the sound wall here, which would not be seen.

Um, in this area, also this is closer to the on-ramp for the 15 right here.

You can see this is Silverado Ranch, and you right here is the on-ramp.

So our site is actually depressed and below the on-ramp.

Um, so two things.

One, the ramp, it will be slightly above the property.

Number two, there will be a sound wall there.

So, really, there's going to be no visibility of any of that landscaping there.

Um, that 15 feet would have great impact on the property as well as it would, you know, we would basically lose 20 feet of developable site if we had to do the five feet on Endsworth and 15 feet on the back there.

So it does create quite a hardship.

Um, so those are the waivers uh with respect to that.

Um we do agree with all the conditions of approval which require traffic study and drainage, and then finally getting into the billboard.

Um, as you can see right here is the billboard, it will remain.

Um, that is app item 18.

18 is characterized as a waiver of the off-sites, but when you read into the staff report, it's really saying we're deferring them.

The reason being is because this property has to remain commercial, everything around it has to be residential.

So there's some mapping actions and sequence of events that need to occur.

So we need those maps to record, and in order to do that, we need the off-sites to technically be waived, and then at that point, the off-site improvements would be required, and we're gonna completely develop all that and public works and but mapping do recommend approval of that application as that enterprise town board.

Um, so with that, I'm more than happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak?

Then come on down.

Yeah, I'll need your name and address for the record, please.

Hi, I'm Mark Moore, 9570 Endsworth Street.

Um I've lived there for 18 years across from that field.

I oppose this.

Um I would prefer it to be commercial.

Um 48 homes is a lot of homes for a small little lot.

Um the traffic at Las Vegas Boulevard, and whether it be Gary or Richmar, uh, I'm not sure if you guys are familiar with that, but there has been some really bad accidents there.

People get impatient, they run the light, or they run the stop sign, they try to get out, people are behind them, tootin'.

It is uh a very treacherous uh endeavor uh even tonight when I came here.

So the traffic study I would prefer sooner than later.

Um it is it's lives we're talking about um very dangerous.

Uh so there's only one way in on his plan.

Um let's just take for instance a garbage truck uh in that small area, and uh let's say uh there was a fire or a medical emergency.

How would you get a fire truck in there?

And how would you get them out?

Uh it's uh, you know, UPS, FedEx, uh Amazon, school buses, anything could be in there at any given time.

And when uh emergencies happen, how would you get a fire truck or a broke down car?

How would you get it in and get it out?

It's a very tight proposal that he has on there.

Uh so uh the exit and the entrance is uh is a big concern.

Um right now he only has one entrance going in, and everybody has to share that going in and out.

So that would mean that you would go down to Richmar, all the way down Richmark to Las Vegas Boulevard, and uh you know, 48 homes, uh approximately two cars per home.

Yeah, we're looking at a hundred cars.

That's a lot of cars in a little area.

Um with traffic being the way it is.

Uh I I just I don't like that at all.

Um the other thing is his driveways.

Uh most people, let's say you had two cars and you have a work truck.

Where would that work truck go?

On the road.

Uh it seems like all of these waivers and uh are a lot to just to put a lot of homes in and make a lot of money.

Um I would prefer it to be residential or I mean uh commercial.

Um the billboard.

I'm not sure if you're familiar with that billboard, it's humongous.

And building homes around that.

Uh I don't know how people would even see the billboard with homes built right up to the highway.

Uh and the way his drawing is go ahead and continue.

Finish up.

Go ahead and finish up.

Oh, I'm sorry.

No, no, no.

I said go finish, okay.

Continue and finish.

So the billboard, it's humongous, and that is on the on-ramp coming on to I-15.

That's a very busy on-ramp, especially uh, I live there, I see the trucks, uh, the rodeo was here.

It's it's a lot of traffic on that.

Um, I don't know how many people would want to live around a billboard flashing all night.

Uh I don't know if it's been looked at or considered.

Um, there's a lot of there's a lot of a lot of lights come out of the bright, it's huge, it's a huge uh billboard.

Um so I think maybe he's forgotten about the entrance ramp.

He talks about the setback from I-15, but the entrance ramp is gonna run right along in those homes, and cars go blasting down that day and night.

Um I just I think the the main thing uh would be the entrance and the exit out of that would be a real concern of mine and the uh at Las Vegas Boulevard.

Uh the amount of accidents could possibly happen.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you.

Hi, my name is Diana Salazar, and I'm actually here to represent some of the neighbors that are in that area that weren't able to come.

And also um these people here were not did not um send in their form, so they have that with them tonight to also show their opposition.

But I think everything that Mark Moore just said um is pretty much what the neighborhood is feeling.

I mean, you basically have 48 lots in five acres.

I mean, just think about that.

Um, that's a lot of homes, and it's very close.

It's not safe.

I mean, it's there's not enough room um to give to move in and out, and it appears that they want to set back everything, so it's even less than what you guys um normally have in your development standards.

So I I think that the town board was very the enterprise was very good at pointing out the things that needed to be done and their denial for a few of these items, but obviously, you know, the drainage study needs to be done.

There needs to be full off sites, um, you know, install an extra um entry and exit in the southern end of the property.

Um, you know, um, I mean everything that they said were absolutely on on point to even make this project if it were to become commercial.

However, the neighborhood is an opposition of changing the zoning.

Thank you.

Yes, you just tell them whatever.

Uh just uh opposed.

I need your name and your address, please.

No, I need his name and his address too.

Anyone that speaks needs to give us their name and their address.

But the gentleman spoke, so he needs to do that too.

Oh, yeah.

I'm Gloria Magnol.

I'm staying with uh 9558, Instward Street, Las Vegas Nibanda.

It's nine one two three.

Okay.

Thank you, man.

Thank you.

You oppose okay.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Could could they just put their card?

Staff, could you get the card from the right there?

No, just give them to the gentleman.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Anyone else want to speak to this item?

Saying none, we'll have you come back, address some of the concerns.

I think you're upside down.

Why are you doing that?

Could you put your site plan back up for us?

Yes.

Uh okay, a couple things.

Uh, one, we are our front yard setback uh does comply, a minimum 20-foot driveway, so we don't have any setbacks with res with respect to that.

Um so parking can be on the two-car, two-car garage, two cars in the driveway, as well as these are you know, public right-of-ways and would have the same benefits as um the development across the street.

Uh, number two, with respect to the billboard, um, we're gonna be required, and we're happy to make this as an additional condition of approval to provide disclosures to the future home buyers that there is a billboard next to the premise, and there's the illumination of light and et cetera.

So that'll be in our disclosure documents that when we sell the property, happy to add that as a an additional condition if you're so inclined to approve this.

Um access to the site, there are multiple access points in uh from Las Vegas Boulevard to Richmar, Silverado Ranch down through Endsworth here.

18 all 18 of these homes are directly fronting onto Endsworth.

Richmar is accessed via uh the the Cold de Sac is accessed via Richmar.

This uh we have been working with fire department on this, and they have not expressed any objections or concerns with the design of our site.

Um so with that I'm happy to answer any additional questions you may have.

Okay, thank you.

Commissioner Stone.

Thank you, madam chair.

Uh question, uh Tony, can you talk about the uh uh open space and if it's uh programmable, if it's usable, or if it's just landscape, it looks like you've got a big area around the uh cul de sac area and maybe something at the uh the the entrance.

And I'm curious if the lots on the east side have accessibility to that space.

If you comment on that, that'd be helpful.

Yes, sir.

So right the we have all the perimeter landscaping that is along uh Endsworth and then a large area right here that is basically in front of this side-loaded home right here.

Um more passive, not quite really programmable.

However, we have about 10,000 square feet located at the bottom of the cul-de-sac here.

Again, more passive, but definitely programmable with the ability to do benches, uh shading, things of that nature.

So definitely in this area, we do have an easement right here.

That we have the sidewalk here and an easement right here that would lead back to this cul-de-sac for access back here to the so that open space is usable for all the residents.

This is this project.

Okay, that is correct.

Thanks.

Uh my concern when we were talking when you were briefing, was with that billboard.

And and you are gonna do the disclosure.

Okay, yeah.

I just looking at the the five lots that are to the south of that.

I was just concerned with the illumination that would be coming from that billboard because that's going to be going directly into their backyard.

And we know that the back of the homes are where people sleep.

And so I just don't want that going into bedrooms if I possibly can.

So however, you can mitigate that if we're going to approve this without any other conditions, and that would be up to the maker of the motion.

I would like to see that, but please, if you're gonna do that and you're gonna put in a disclosure, make sure that disclosure is at the front and not on page one hundred, because we know when people buy homes, there's a lot of paperwork involved.

Yes, fair enough.

By the time they get to page 30, they don't want to be reading anymore.

So that would just be my that was my major concern was looking at that billboard.

It's a good project, I guess.

Uh it matches up with what's across to the east, and that's the only reason why I somewhat support it, okay.

Anyone else?

Commissioner Kirk.

Thank you.

Uh thank you, madam chair.

Uh Tony, what are your average lot sizes?

You said uh I know it's oh or lot sizes, I'm sorry.

Yeah.

20 average.

We're well, we're we're uh our lot size range is 2700 to about 3600 average is probably 28 to it, it's less than 3,000 would be the average lot size.

Okay, but it far uh the zoning district of requesting is the RS2, which is the minimum of 2,000.

So we we exceeded all of them by quite a bit on that.

And that billboard, uh it's it is illuminated, is that right?

Correct, it'll have it has the uplighting, and you're visible from not LED or anything like that.

No, no, no.

It's uh changing it's an off-premise uh billboard, correct.

Okay.

Thank you.

Okay, anyone else?

Commissioner Fahr Vice Chair.

Yeah, thank you, Madam Chair.

I just I'll just say that I can support the application I submitted.

I'm it's a it's a very difficult piece to develop.

And I and I and I understand that you know there's a lot of waivers that are needed to make it work.

And um and it actually does make sense.

I I I agree that it it matches the density that's right across the street from it, um, and it's right up against the freeway.

And again, it's a very difficult piece.

I mean, I couldn't even see any commercial really going in here, so I'm good with the application.

Anyone else saying none, I'm gonna turn this over to Commissioner Whitman.

I I'm sympathetic with the neighbors.

Um that you know, you have this lot next to you, and you don't necessarily want to see a bunch of houses going up there.

And you know, in my neighborhood, I might want a little bit more commercial as well.

Um, but when I look at the development to the east and in the area, I I gotta tell you, I think this matches it.

I don't think 48 lots, 48 houses is much different than what you have in the surrounding areas.

And again, I'm sympathetic that when you have more people move in, that there's more traffic.

Um, but that's what's happening throughout the valley, and that's what's happening to a lot of vacant parcels where people who moved in five years ago or 10 years ago or 20 years ago are saying, Man, I didn't I didn't I didn't imagine there was gonna be more neighbors here.

Um while we might want to have a gym or some fast food or something, um, I just don't think that's what's gonna happen here.

I agree with the chair that you know I probably wouldn't want to live next to that billboard.

Uh but with the uplighting, as you stated, this isn't you know some flashing casino sign, uh, and the disclosures, which I think is is very fair.

Um maybe also a disclosure about the train.

Yeah, we can add uh there's my understanding is bright line.

So to recap, bright line west and end on it is core are coordinating the sound wall through there.

So as far as where the exact route of the train is, I don't know, but we can absolutely include that as a disclosure that Bright Line West train is eventually sometime in the future.

Correct.

And then we can we can add that as well.

Yeah, and and and again to the neighbors, I don't think I don't want you to think that we're leaving you out to dry and gonna there's we're not taking care that there won't be more accidents or something like that.

Ideally, you know, this type of development and the traffic studies and all the things that go along with it, which I understand some of these conditions only have to do with sequencing, that these things will be done before the development is finished.

Is that right, public works?

That is correct.

So we we we are concerned about the safety, your safety and the safety of your new neighbors and all that stuff.

So those things will have to get done, and and hopefully that will improve some of the traffic issues that you're experiencing.

Um that being said, I do think maybe there were some conditions in here that kind of doubled up or maybe were asked for by public, I'm sorry, by town board because they were concerned about the sequencing.

I'm sorry, by town board because they were concerned about the sequencing.

My understanding is is just from a logistical standpoint, those concerns are a little bit misplaced.

So I'm not gonna require those town board conditions be made because my understanding from public works who are our professionals and experts here is that all those things will definitely be taken care of before there's any development.

And while everyone on this board knows that I love to make a deal, it's only worthwhile to make a deal if it makes sense, and just quite frankly, these don't make sense.

So my apologies to the town board, but I assure I've been assured uh from public works that every study that is required to ensure the safety of the neighbors will be taking place.

We will have a disclosure about this billboard, and we will have the disclosure about hopefully a train that we'll be getting sometime in the 40 years, sometime in the near to not so near future.

And so with that, I can make a motion with staff's conditions.

Excuse me, commissioner.

Uh you have to do the plan amendment first.

Okay, got it.

So first we'll start with a well.

Do I start with the waiver 18?

You can you can do 18 first, and then you can I start with 19 and then do 18 through?

Yes.

You can start with 19.

Okay, great.

So I'll make a motion first on item 19 PA2570048.

Okay, we have a motion for approval on the plan amendment.

Cast your vote.

Great.

And now I will make a motion on items 18, 20, 21, 22, and 23, uh, to approve again to the extent conditions for staff, but not those of the town board.

Okay, we have a motion for approval for items 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 with staff conditions.

And the additional conditions of the disclosures for both the billboard and and the train.

Yes, we agree to these.

And we agree to those two additional conditions.

Thank you.

Thank you, Chair.

Absolutely.

Cast your vote.

And motion passes.

Thanks, Mr.

Ton.

Thank you.

These items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for final action on January 21st, 2026 at 9 o'clock AM, unless otherwise announced next on your agenda, our public comments.

Thank you.

Just happy holidays to everyone.

Happy holidays to you.

Happy Hanukkah.

Happy Quanza.

Yes, this is now the second time for public comment.

You need to come down, I guess.

I don't think anyone wants to make public comment.

Do you want to make public comment?

This is our first of our last second of uh two public comment periods.

If anybody would like to come down and speak.

Yes, sir.

I apologize for coming in late.

My name is Randy Carlson.

Address P.O.

box 400125, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89140.

I'm a neighbor to Maverick, who was on the calendar for number item number 14.

They held the item, sir.

It's going to be came in late.

I came in.

I was you were on item 13 whenever it came in, and you skipped right over it.

So it was held until the 20th.

Item 14, Madam Chair, UC 250761 for Maverick will be held to the January 20th, 2026 planning commission meeting, sir.

Thank you so much.

And you're welcome.

Um the applicant representative.

Um works with that gentleman up in that left bar left corner.

If you need to talk to her, get with him, and he can probably put put you in touch with her.

Thank you so much.

Okay.

We have the brothers.

Name and address for the record, please.

Uh yes, Kenny Tobaugh, 5155, Blue Diamond Road, Suite 102, uh Las Vegas, Nevada, 89139.

Just wanted to come by and say happy holidays uh to the staff and to the commissioners uh for us.

This is our first year kind of seeing how all this works.

And we just appreciate everybody giving their full efforts on making decisions and finding those those happy mediums, at least for us, it's kind of cool to see from our perspective.

At least for us, it's kind of cool to see from our perspective.

So thank you for you.

Thank you.

Stephen?

Can I have my name is Steven Tobaugh?

I'm his brother.

Same 5155 Blue Diamond Road, Sweet 102, 89139.

Just echoing what he's saying.

We're very much appreciative of how you guys provide a public service, especially for us new citizens, I guess, that are new to this realm.

So couldn't be more grateful for that.

So same.

Happy holidays, Merry Christmas, and happy new year.

And I think Commissioner Mujica wants to say something to you.

Are you guys future developers?

Something tells me you guys are doing your homework.

It's just more educational.

It's more of something like for us to see like, oh, this is how everything works as far as decisions.

So when you start developing your land, you know what to do, right?

Oh, there you go.

Yes, yeah.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you very much.

Sir, would you like to say something?

No.

You're just like they were.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Close public hearing.

And then I will move to adjourn, and we will see everybody in the new year.

Staff, again, thank you.

There's nobody here to.

But thank you, thank you, thank you.

Appreciate it.