Good morning.

Welcome to the January 21st meeting of the uh Clark County Commission in our zoning capacity.

Uh we're gonna call this meeting to order.

The first item on the agenda is public comment.

Anyone wishing to speak on an item that is on today's agenda can come forward at this time.

Uh note that items four through nineteen are expected to be for routine action, which means that they will not have their own standalone public hearing.

Seeing no one here for public comment, we will move to the approval of the agenda.

Good morning, commissioners.

The second item is the approval of the agenda after considering any additions or deletions of items.

Staff has the following requests which may require renotification fees in accordance with Title 30.

Hold to the February 4th, 2026 zoning meeting, item 22, VS 250819.

Item 23, WS 250820, item 26, WS 250461.

Hold to the February 18th, 2026 zoning meeting item 36, ZC 25076.

Item 37, UC 25077, and hold no date item 20, ET twenty-five four hundred one one oh for ZC 042507.

The above public hearing items are going to be opened as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the dates is previously stated.

With these deletions, which are items 20, 22, 23, 26, 36, and 37.

The agenda stands ready for your approval.

Uh with the deletions written to the record, I'm overproof of the agenda.

Commissioner McCurdy has a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Next to the routine action items, which consists of items four through 19.

These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item.

Item six ET 254132 for UC 220557.

Change the comprehensive planning time to commence from two to four years.

It sits just off of Boulder Highway.

We are requesting a first extension of time to add a consumption lounge and staff and town board recommended approval.

Thank you very much.

If that completes your presentation, this is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on item 21 can come forward at this time.

Seeing no one, I'll turn it over to Commissioner Sagerbloom.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um, this is a mandatory hearing because of the the way we deal with cannabis, but truthfully, there's been no opposition, so I'd move to approve.

There's a motion for approval on item 21.

Please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Next are companion items 24 and 25.

Item 24, WC 25400-127 for SDR 250269.

Waivers of conditions of a sign design review requiring trees to be planted south of freestanding sign to screen chase lighting from residential development to the south in conjunction with the previously approved cannabis establishment retail store on 0.9 acres and a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Warm Springs Road and east of Haven Street within Enterprise.

Item 25, SDR 250829 sign design review to modify residential adjacency standards for signage in conjunction with the previously approved cannabis establishment retail store on.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chairman, Commissioners.

My name's Bob Gronauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive.

I'm here representing Randy Black Sr.

on these two matters that are before you.

Just to give you a little bit of uh background here.

Um a few months ago I was here representing uh Randy Black Sr.

On his uh marijuana establishment here.

We're coming in with some signage, and the signage was approved.

Um, however, there's some clarifications uh from that approval that I the reason why I'm here today uh that I want to go ahead and lay out on the record.

Uh first of all, with respect to the sign.

Let me explain to you the sign that's existing on the property, and it's uh it's right here as I'm showing you on the overhead.

We have the sign that is about 25 feet in height, and then in this area here, you can see on the side here which this is would be facing north and south on the property are chaser lights.

Um in regards to working with some of the neighbors in the area uh that live down in this subdivision located here on the map that I'm showing you that uh these items uh before you so we could address some concerns.

Um, number one is landscaping along the south property line.

Uh, what we are proposing today is to put in a minimum of seven 36-inch box African sumac trees that will go along the property line in this area to the south.

What that will do is that will add to the already trees that are existing there.

There's trees that are existing there today that are pine trees that are about 20 feet on center.

So, what that does is that will intensify the landscaping that would be located down here.

Because when I was here before you on the item when the sign was approved up in this area, we had the sign was approved to put some trees up adjacent to the signage there to help screen the chase lighting that we've be facing north and south.

Um, is that doesn't has not done a good enough screening job, is a reason why we're adding this as a condition that we're before you today.

Also, with the chase lighting, it's not allowed to be on 24-7.

Um we are asking um to have the chase lighting to be approved and in operation with the exception of the hours between 10 p.m.

and 6.30 a.m.

Um so that would uh once again the chase lighting, which would be running to the north in the south, which is along the sign here in this area here, that would not be in operation from 10 p.m.

to 630 a.m.

Um seven days a week.

And then the last thing that I want to put on the record as part of putting the trees in, it's my understanding that uh we were not going to be allowed to have illumination of the sign in the chasers working until we put those trees in.

Uh my client has already ordered those trees, and hopefully sometime next week we'll be put installing those trees for insulation uh that I'm proposing here today.

So I do believe that's an additional condition that we are not gonna be having the sign to be illuminated and the chasing lights until we get those African sumac trees planted.

And as I said for the record, just talking to them this morning, the trees are ordered, and we're hoping for next week for insulation.

So with that being said, we're gonna still continue to work with the neighbors.

Um if there's any other issues that come up uh with the operation of the business and the lighting in the area, uh, but these are the things that we've done in working with your staff in the commissioner and his office, along with the neighbors here.

So I believe those three conditions added to both of these applications.

Hopefully, you can move forward in addressing those issues.

Thank you very much.

If that completes your presentation, this is a public hearing on items 24 and 25.

Anyone wishing to speak can come forward at this time.

Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing.

You read in the three uh conditions that were my intention to add to this application.

Um Director Real, you've got those conditions.

I do.

Can I just get clarification on the one that talks about uh the chase lighting not being active between the hours of 10 p.m.

and 6 30 a.m.

because I also heard not in operation.

So does that mean that those chase lights will be static or those chase lights will be off?

They will be off from the hours of 10 p.m.

to 6 30 a.m.

Sorry.

Any other clarification needed no, thank you.

Thank you.

Move for approval of item 24 and 25 with the additional three conditions read into the record.

That motion carries.

Thank you and have a good day.

Thank you.

Next companion items 27 through 32.

Item 27, WS 250782 waivers and development standards for the following.

Eliminate the drainage study and waive full off site improvements in conjunction with the proposed minor subdivision.

Um 5.16 acres in a CG commercial general zone.

Generally located south of Richmond Avenue and west of Endsworth Street within Enterprise.

Item 28, PA 2570048, plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from entertainment mixed use to compact neighborhood on 5.16 acres, generally located south of Richmond Avenue and west of Endsworth Street within Enterprise.

Item 29, ZC 250763.

Zone change to reclassify a 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres from a CG commercial general zone to an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmore Avenue and west of Insworth Street within Enterprise.

Item 30 VS 250765, vacant and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County, located between Richmar Avenue and Silverado Ranch Boulevard and Endsworth Street and the I 15 freeway within Enterprise.

Item 31 WS 250764 waivers at VOM standards for the following.

Eliminate setback to a non-depressed freeway, eliminate street landscaping, and eliminate and reduce landscape buffering and screening.

Design review for a proposed single family residential development on a 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres and an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmar Avenue and west of ENSWorth Street within Enterprise.

And then item 32, TM25500 186.

Tentative map consisting of 48 single family residential lots and common lots on a 5.03 acre portion of 5.16 acres and an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located south of Richmore Avenue and west of Ensworth Street within Enterprise.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chair Commissioners.

My name is Tony Sless, address 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant.

So you can see from the aerial, our site is highlighted in yellow.

It is located on the southwest corner of Richmar and Endsworth, and it's bordered by I-15 to the west.

As I go through my presentation, I'm going to take some of the things out of order.

I'll address item 27 last.

I think it'll make most sense after you hear the rest of the present the first part of the presentation.

So really be broken into three parts.

The first will be a master plan amendment and zone change we have.

Second part, the design review and related waivers, and then finally item 27, which is a little bit unique on some mapping requests that we're asking for.

So first master plan amendment.

The site is currently planned entertainment mixed use.

But you can see the uses around us are residential.

We have RM18 immediately to the east and to the southeast.

We have RM50, RM32, so more higher density type residential uses, which compact neighborhood would allow up to 18 units to the acre, which would be consistent with uh what is immediately to the east of us and obviously even less dense that's what than what's south to us.

We have the corresponding zone change to R2.

Um, and that would allow uh single family residential developments on kind of compact lots, which would be comparable to what is immediately to the east of us.

We appreciate staff's recommendation of approval on both of those applications the master plan amendment and zone change, as well as uh planning commissions.

Uh, the next portion is the design review.

As you can see right here from our site plan again, just to orient you, we have Richmar to the north.

We have Endsworth that is running to the east of us, and then the I-15 and the ramp onto the I-15 to the west.

We are proposing 48 single family residential homes.

Uh there will be 30 homes located in the cul-de-sac here with access off of Richmar, and then we have 18 homes that are gonna front directly onto Endsworth.

Those homes will match exactly the homes that are already built and constructed across the street, and we essentially match lot for lot right there across.

So they have 17 homes on the other side that are fronting Endsworth.

The reason we have one more 18 is because our property is slightly uh longer right here, so we have an additional home right here, but we are meeting uh we are matching lot for lot, otherwise, our lot sizes are very comparable and similar to what's across the street.

We are providing two story homes that is a mixture of one and two story homes in this area.

We do have a couple of waivers that are associated with this.

Um the first is with respect to a wall right here, the highway wall, the freeway frontage wall.

Um, we are asking to not build that, and the reason being is that right now between N DOT and Bright Line, they're under various contracts throughout this area and developing this corridor as the station will be just to the north of us, and it is N DOT and Bright Line that are taking the lead on the construction of this.

In fact, if you just saw in the paper this weekend, there was a lot of commentary about the status of construction and things moving along and contracts being awarded.

And to our knowledge, we are one of those contracts in here, but we do have confirming correspondence from N DOT that they are taking the lead on that wall.

So there will be a buffer wall there.

It's just that uh N DOT will be taking the lead, and we appreciate staff's understanding of that and their recommendation of approval on that issue.

We are also let me show you this.

Um this probably is a better exhibit to show you.

This is the sound wall I was talking about right here that will be built but built by NDOT.

We are also building a screen wall on the back side.

So the neighbors will have will have two walls there.

We're gonna build a nine-foot wall, it'll be a three-foot retaining wall on top of a six-foot screen wall.

One of our waivers, it relates back to here as well with respect to landscaping.

Um, because we are in a residential uh district, we are required to do back landscaping back here.

However, that landscaping will not be visible from the right-of-way.

There will be a sound wall, there's a drainage channel here.

Um, we have our own nine-foot tall wall, so we don't think an additional landscape uh right there is needed, and we appreciate planning commission's support on that.

One of our other waivers we do have is with respect to the um design of Endsworth.

We are providing detached sidewalks along Richmar.

We're providing detached sidewalks along Endsworth.

However, what we're doing along Endsworth, and hopefully, this exhibit will help demonstrate that is that because Endsworth, as I mentioned, is gonna the homes will be front loaded, that'll be our front yard.

What we're proposing is to construct the uh our half street improvement of Endsworth, curb gutter, our five-foot landscape strip, then a five-foot sidewalk, and then behind the sidewalk, we would start our drive, our private property or front yard.

So, what we're asking to waive is actually that second five-foot behind the sidewalk there, but we don't think it's needed because it would be redundant with our front setback there and the landscaping that we're gonna provide in our front yard.

So we are providing detached sidewalk along Endsworth.

It'll be five feet of the landscape strip, five feet sidewalk, and then behind the sidewalk, we'll be starting the private property with our front yard landscaping.

Um, one of the conditions we would like to add is that we really didn't have much or any landscaping in the front five feet adjacent to Endsworth.

Um, so I do have a proposed condition that we did send to uh planning, and uh I think we've worked out the language to read uh applicant to provide low spreading plants and rocks in the five-foot wide landscape strip between N words Nworth Street and Sidewalk as required by Title 30.04.01 D.

And that um, like I said, has been provided to planning.

Um we have a tentative map um as well that uh essentially matches the site plan I showed you.

Um and then finally, let me to wrap this all up.

As I mentioned, uh item 27.

This is a bit of a unique property in that you can see right here, there is this lot right here that is going to be held out.

It is not going to be part of our zone change or master plan amendment.

It will remain commercial.

Reason being is there is an existing billboard on the site that will be retained by the current owner.

So we are designing around that, and in order for the mapping to work for residential to be mapped residential and to keep the commercial, we have to take a few things out of order in the mapping process, and that is what item 27 addresses is that waiver.

It says we're waiving off sites.

Um we're not, as you can see.

We are actually putting in all the all the off-sites, it's just timing as to when those off sites go in, and there are obviously uh restrictions as to how far we're gonna be able to get in development uh before you know those maps before we can proceed with construction.

So we appreciate working with public works and public works is supporting that condition of approval.

Um with that, we agree to all the other conditions, including the additional conditions that planning commission put on about providing notice to our putting in disclosure statements about the billboard as well as the bright line train in there.

So we'd ask that you carry on those two additional conditions from planning commission.

With that, I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on items 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32.

Anyone wishing to speak can come forward at this time.

Okay, we'll close the public hearing.

Uh thank you, Mr.

Celeste, for your presentation.

Um lengthy, but I think it's important to put all that on the record.

Uh you referenced a couple conditions, which my motion will be inclusive of with the low spreading plants and rocks and the five-foot wide landscape strip between Endsworth and the sidewalk.

Uh, also a condition that there be waivers for or uh notifications in the sales agreement for both uh the future train alignment and the existing billboard that's already on that site.

And we agree to those additional conditions.

Thank you.

Uh, if there's nothing else, I move for approval of 20 of items 27 through 32.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Next is item 33, WS 250821 waiver of development standards to waveful offsite improvements being street lights in conjunction with the previously approved single family residential development on five acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within the neighborhood protection RP overlay.

Generally located north of Craig Road and west of Benita Vista Street within Lone Mountain.

Good morning.

Uh good uh good morning.

Uh I uh Michael Bradshaw, Toll Brothers, 1140 North Town Center Drive, uh suite 250.

I see that your placard now says chair.

Congratulations.

Uh, two weeks ago I did not.

Uh so we now can I clearly identify you, sir.

Anyways, we do have an issue.

It's a it's more of a housekeeping issue for this particular project, commissioners.

Uh we applied for this back uh some seven, eight, nine months ago, proceeded forward.

Uh it was then brought to our attention that there were uh two signals or two street lights that uh had uh presented themselves.

Uh we were requested back some time ago uh by planning to actually have those removed.

Uh some reason the representative just didn't get it backed planning, uh got Bunny de Vista did got Bonita Vista in Grand Canyon, but just not Riley.

So what we're looking for is the uh reduction or the removal, everything else uh will be the same.

Uh the uh conditions will remain as suggested by staff, and we certainly appreciate your uh time today.

And would be more than happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing on item 33.

Anyone wishing to speak can come forward at this time.

Seeing none, Commissioner Becker.

Yes, this is uh just somewhat of a routine atom.

Uh Antonio, did you want to add anything to the conditions?

Uh thank you, Commissioner.

I think the only thing uh it's already a condition because we are doing sidewalk on that street that the conduit and pull boxes be added.

Uh so later on, if we do decide to install the street lights, that we don't have to rip up sidewalk panels.

Okay, and and that's already in the record.

Yeah.

Yes, ma'am.

Okay.

Okay, with that I would uh move for approval.

There's a motion for approval of item 33.

Please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Very much.

Next companion items 34 and 35.

Item 34, ZC 250771.

Holdover zone change through classified 0.31 acres from a CP commercial professional zone to a CG commercial general zone.

Generally located east of Arden Street and south of Charleston Boulevard within Sunrise Manor.

Item 35, WS 250772.

Holdover waivers of development standards for the following eliminate and reduce street landscaping and alternative driveway geometrics.

Design review for a proposed vehicle sales facility on 0.83 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Charleston Boulevard and east of Arden Street within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chair, Commissioners Nathan Taylor, 8414 at West Farm Road representing the applicant today.

I'll try to be brief.

I'd like to first uh thank Commissioner Sugarbloom and his staff uh for all the time that we put into this project.

Um there was a lot involved, and it took us uh almost a year to get to where we are here today.

Um I would like to, before I forget to uh since they're companion items, um, read into the record that we are withdrawing waiver number one and waiver number two of item number 35.

And staff has recommended approval of our zone change.

Uh, the one thing that we did agree to that I wanted to make sure we read into the record is that all ingress and egress will be off of Charleston.

There will be no traffic going on to Nevada.

And with that said, we just ask for your approval, and I'm here to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on items 34 and 35.

Anyone wishing to speak can come forward at this time.

Seeing none, Commissioner Sagerbloom.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um, and thank you, Nathan, and thanks to the applicants.

Just want to brag about the applicants.

I just met them and realize they're from East Las Vegas.

They're young, uh aggressive, maybe not aggressive, but but entrepreneurs who are doing this uh taking a vacant site that's been a real problem with homelessness.

Uh, they're gonna make it nice.

This is an invitation only, so not gonna be a lot of people coming just to look at the cars.

Um, and so and as long as Antonio's okay with the throat depth, then I think we're good.

So I'd make a motion to approve.

Thank you so much.

And thank you guys for coming to East Las Vegas.

There's a motion for approval of 3435.

Uh I assume that's reflective of the withdrawal of waivers one and two.

Correct.

And then can I clarify?

Do we want to add the condition um as proposed to say that all ingress and egress will be from Charleston Boulevard?

Yes.

Okay.

Please cast your votes on item 34 and 35.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you, Commissioners.

Have a good day.

I look forward to you moving to East Las Vegas too.

Thank you.

Next companion items 38 through 40.

Item 38, ZC250812, zone change through classify 1.25 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone.

Generally located east of Rville Street and north of Richmar within Enterprise.

Item 39 VS 250813, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Serene Avenue and Richmond Avenue and between Arville Street and Henson Street within Enterprise.

And then item 40, UC 250814.

Use permits for the following outdoor storage and display and a caretaker unit.

Waiver of development standards to increase retaining wall height.

Design reviews for the following.

Proposed outdoor storage and display and a proposed office with caretaker unit on 1.25 acres in an IP industrial park zone within the airport environments, AE60 overlay.

Generally located east of Arville Street and north of Richmar Avenue with an enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Chairman.

Commissioners, Melissa Uri, 1055 Whitney Ranch Drive, Suite 210 here on behalf of the applicant.

So we do have a zone change.

We are requesting to go from RS20 to IP.

The master plan in this area is a business employment which does anticipate light industrial, small-scale commercial and service industrial, which is also being requested with our companion items for the office and outdoor storage.

We do have the vacation.

It's to vacate patent easements.

I'm sorry, I think the screen is lagging a little bit behind you.

Victor, if you could update, thank you very much.

Okay.

So we do have vacation of patent easements here that's going to be mostly in the north and on the east side, a small portion on the south side of the project.

Those were previous right-of-way patent easements that are going to be vacated that are no longer going to be needed.

And I'm gonna orient this.

There we go.

So as you can see, the site here is for an office in outdoor storage.

The use is a landscape and made service company, so they offer both services.

They have their building here located by the corner, and then here it's a little difficult to see, but this all along here will be covered parking.

So employees are able to park here closer to the building, and then they'll have parking in the back for their fleet vehicles.

Their fleet vehicles are essentially trucks with utility trailers that are branded with the company.

So typically they are parked with the utility trailers attached.

However, they do have a couple of spare utility trailers that they do keep.

And the reason we have such a wide courtyard within this area is that we did need to have the a designated separation between the intersection and where the driveway could be, which is what forced this courtyard to be quite so large.

But it does allow them in the center here.

It kind of looks like it could be a water feature.

It's not, it's landscaping, but it allows for the utility trailers to still circulate on site.

We are offering the correct amount of landscaping, and we do have here the first floor is all gonna be for the business.

The second floor only will be for the small caretakers unit, and that's because they're open Monday through Friday, 9 to 5.

So in the evenings and on the weekends when they don't have people present and they do have their fleet vehicles, they have someone to not only maintain the site, but also to keep an eye on those vehicles.

So that is one of our use permits.

And the other for the outdoor storage, given the size of the courtyard and the space, the outdoor storage exceeds the size of the building, so we are asking for the outdoor storage as well.

The building is gonna have a Spanish hacienda style, so it is gonna be very decorative on the side.

It's um this right here is actually the inside.

So if you're in the courtyard looking at the building, you see this.

When you're actually on Rishmar looking up toward north to the building, you would see this side.

This is the view you would have from Arville Street.

So they do have the gate, the gate would be open during business hours.

And then again, if you're inside the courtyard looking towards Arville, then this is what you would see for the covered parking.

And then on the north and on the east section, you would have a deck a 10 foot high decorative block wall.

And we do have a waiver with this request.

And as you can see, the topography of the site slopes down from the right-of-way, particularly right here in the southeast corner of the site.

So, well, the majority of the site will have anywhere from a one to a three-foot retaining wall for this section right here, and just a small piece right here, we'll have up to a four-foot retaining wall.

So we are requesting a waiver to allow up to the four feet on the retaining wall.

However, the screen wall above it will vary so that at no point on the outside of the site will you see anything more than a 10-foot wall.

So where we have four feet of retaining wall, we'll only have six feet of screen wall on top of it, so that it's always a 10-foot maximum.

Um the reason for the outdoor storage is to allow for the fleet vehicles on there.

He is a landscaping business.

Occasionally he may have landscape materials, um, but they're typically only there for a few days.

Staff also asked that we reach out to the National Guard base, which is next door.

Um, one of the reasons they had recommended denial of that was based on the fact that we had not been able to hear from the base, but we weren't notified until December that we really needed to get really the Nevada Division of Lands approval for it.

So we did reach out to them and got their approval just in time for Christmas, that they do not have any issues with the with the proposed zone change, the outdoor storage or the building.

Um, and then just more recently, we did receive from the National Guard base across the street on Arville that they also have no issues with our zone change, any of the proposed uses or the building.

So I would respectfully ask staff, has given us a condition that if the outdoor storage would be approved, that it be limited to only the covered parking area, and I would request that that be removed that way.

If he should be able to expand his business in the future, he would have full use of that courtyard.

Um, whereas otherwise we'd have to come back and do other requests whereas this could be more administratively done.

And with that, happy to answer any of the questions.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on items 38, 39, and 40.

Anyone wishing to speak can come forward at this time.

Seeing none, Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um, thank you for the presentation.

I don't think this is the standard outdoor storage request they get with some ugly chainling fence.

Um, and I think it's a fairly reasonable request.

But um, Ms.

Real, are you okay with the idea of this project going forward with the removal of that condition?

If that's what the board of commissioners uh would like, yeah.

Okay.

All right, I'm gonna make a motion for approval agenda items 38, 39, and 40 with the removal of the uh condition relating to outdoor storage.

There's a motion for approval on items 38, 39, and 40.

Please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Commissioners, next is item 41, AG 269006.

Discuss whether to modify the Title 30 fee schedule and direct staff accordingly.

Uh Commissioners, when the rewrite of Title 30 was implemented, um, we had eliminated officially the H2 zoning district.

One could not uh propose a H2 zone since I think 2000.

And so we officially eliminate it from uh Title 30, and we had a two-year fee waiver for any applicants who had H2 that was gonna have to uh rezone that.

We've had about 40 applications in total, about 35 zone changes, five plan amendments.

Um the fee waivers so far have amounted to about 55,000 dollars.

Uh the request, uh the the request for the fee waiver at the time it was sunset on January 1st of this year, and so this is a ask of the county commissioners of whether or not you would like to extend that fee waiver either for another couple of years indefinitely, and if uh so directed, we'll come back with an ordinance.

Thank you, Director Real.

Um obviously open a conversation's my preference would be just to extend it indefinitely, and if it becomes an issue at a time, then a commission at that time can come and bring uh lift that indefinite extension uh since this is really our a result of our actions.

Can I ask you a question?

Um could we do have a lot of those people?

Um I didn't know that we had waived that fee, so they must learn it when they go down to file the application.

Is so we we inform applicants when we're reviewing their business licenses, their building permits, uh, or any other type of application that they would normally come in with, and we work with them.

Essentially, all they really need to do is just fill out the paperwork.

Uh we allow them to continue with the processing of their building permits or their business license, so long as the application is submitted, we don't want to hold them up.

Um and and the only fees that we're waiving are for those that we agree with or they agree with our uh determination on what that zoning and and in some cases what the master plan should be.

If they want to go to something that's we don't feel is compatible or consistent, then they're responsible for paying the fees for that rezone and or plan amendment.

Uh and I'm okay with doing it indefinite, but I I'd like to maybe work with you and staff in my district and kind of give them a nudge to do it sooner rather than later.

Because sometimes when you say indefinite, then they just wait and not and typically those are my homeless camps.

Yeah, I I think what I'd like to do is um obviously take you up on that, but then for any of the other commissioners who have their um some commissioners in their jurisdiction have large swaths of the H2.

If you remember, we recently did one for Commissioner Jones in his district, where we went through a rezone and plan amendment exercise uh for a portion along Blue Diamond that still had a lot of the H2.

So I'd like to go through that exercise with each of you uh in time in time, uh, but to hopefully eliminate the uh amount of parcels that we have out there with the H2 zoning.

Yeah, and I would just I fully support uh the indefinite extension.

We we targeted blue diamond because there was a lot of H2 uh designation out there, and we didn't get 100% compliance, but we got uh pretty pretty good compliance out there, and I think there'll be some others there and other places where it makes a lot of sense to just be done with the H2 and get it to a uh you know a recognized uh overlay that we have right now.

Okay, thank you.

I have a lot on Boulder Highway, and I think I agree with everybody.

Great.

Seeing no opposition, then the direction would be to uh extend the fee waiver indefinitely.

Perfect.

Thank you.

Then next is item 42, AG 2690010.

Consider a request for reconsideration of ET 25400-129 for ZC 230727 and direct staff accordingly.

Commissioners, if you remember this item was approved on the routine action portion of the agenda at the last meeting.

Uh there were some opponents in the audience, and so um we're asking you to bring this item back for reconsideration so that we could have a public hearing and those opponents can uh have their their time at the dais.

And so we're asking you to bring this item back for reconsideration so that we could have a public hearing and those opponents can uh have their their time at the dias.

Thank you.

Commissioner Becker.

Um I'm not sure if I need to move for approval for this item.

The reconsideration does need to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners, and if it is approved, then we would bring it back for a public hearing on February 18th, 2026.

So I I would like to move for approval of item number 42.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Next are ordinances for introduction.

I have items 43 through 47.

Item 43, ORD 25900966 is to consider adoption of a development agreement with RLS Granite LLC for a single family attached residential development on 8.35 acres.

Item 44, ORD 25901027 is to consider adoption of a development agreement with 215 properties LLC, ad Pebble, LLC, and NALA properties LLC for a single family residential development on 23.1 acres.

Item 45 RD 25901028 is to consider adoption of an ordinance for a development agreement with 215 properties, LLC for single family residential development on 7.92 acres.

46 is ORD 25901037 is to consider adoption of a development agreement with KB Home Las Vegas Inc.

for a single family residential development on 7.4 acres.

And then item 47 or D 25901092 is to consider a ordinance to amend the official zoning map reclassifying certain properties as approved by the board of county commissioners on November 5th, 2025.

Commissioners, we ask that you set the public hearing for these ordinances for December 4th, 2026.

I said December 4th, 2026.

But I meant February 4th, 2026.

I see that's what threw me.

Thank you for catching me.

We'll set the hearing for February 24th, 2026.

And then this is the last time set aside for public comment.

February, excuse me.

For the record, it was February 4th, 2026.

I get it.

Good morning.

Good morning.

How long do I have for public comment?

Three minutes.

Three minutes.

Will Bradley 2700 Las Vegas Boulevard South 4105?

I rise before you with a compliment to begin with.

I've lived all over the country, uh, Orlando, South Carolina, Texas, and never have I've gotten cards like this concerning the thing that you held today on resorts world.

I love that you inform your citizens, us about what's going on in our neighborhoods.

Makes it easy to keep up with.

Obviously, was in favor.

I live on the strip, so I love noise.

Noise is economic development.

Uh anybody that complains about it, probably shouldn't be living on the strip.

So thank you for approving the resorts world thing today.

I also work part-time as a special assistant for Senator Kerry Book concerning HOA issues.

Uh she took the lead in the last legislature on BDRs concerning HOA reform.

It should it's not a parson issue, it shouldn't be a partisan issue.

So some of you have been legislators up in Carson City, and your probably biggest headache is HOAs, but half of your constituents live in HOAs.

And unfortunately, I've rise before you today letting you know HOAs are failing.

If you don't believe me, talk to the mayor of Henderson.

Their citizens are ponying up almost two million dollars in the last year to bail out HOAs that the state failed to uh properly enforce lack of reserve funds and other bad governance.

So I'm getting calls on uh at Senator Buck's office uh uh from HOAs all over the state asking for help because Nred is failing to enforce state law.

There's a difference between having a law and enforcing it, as you all know.

Um the good news is uh business and industry just stood up the joint task force, which uh participated in their last meeting.

They have another one coming up towards the end of February.

I'd encourage at least one of you to be on that meeting to comment on that meeting.

Umas start failing like they're doing in Henderson, all bets are off for these neighborhoods that you're approving because most of these approvals today are probably going to be HOA neighborhoods and they need better enforcement and better governance.

Um other than that, uh thank you again for your time.

Thank you very much.

Anyone else wishing to speak?

Seeing none, we will adjourn uh today's meeting.

Thank you.