Back at a future meeting.

There are two opportunities for public comment during this meeting.

And it's important to understand the difference.

The first public comment period takes place at the beginning of the meeting.

This public comment is only for items that are listed on today's agenda.

Comments during this time must relate to a specific agenda item.

If you wish to speak about a particular agenda item, you may comment at the beginning of the meeting.

Or you may wait to see if that item is discussed later and includes an opportunity for public comment when the item is being considered.

Some routine items may be approved together as part of what is called the consent agenda.

If you do not agree with a staff recommendation for one of these items, you must request that that item be removed before the board takes action.

If it is not removed, it may be approved early in the meeting as part of a single vote.

Items that are not routine are considered one at a time and may include an opportunity for public comment before the board votes.

When it's time to speak, please come forward.

There are three microphones available, including a handheld microphone if you have documents you would like to show.

If you wish to show a document, an overhead camera may be used at the direction of the board chair.

Please do not display documents that contain personal or sensitive information.

When speaking, please talk directly into the microphone, clearly and at a steady volume.

This helps ensure your comments are heard and recorded as part of the public record.

Speakers are required to state their name, spell their last name, and state their address.

At the end of the meeting, there is a second public comment period.

This final public comment is for items not listed on the agenda.

No action may be taken on those comments at that time.

All public comments are limited to three minutes unless otherwise announced by the chair at the beginning of the meeting.

During all public comment periods, board members may listen but are not allowed to respond.

Thank you for being here and for taking the time to participate in your local government.

Welcome to the February 18th uh zoning meeting of the Clark County Commission.

Good morning, Director Riel.

Uh the first items on the agenda are public comment.

Anyone wishing to speak about an item on the agenda, please come forward at this time.

Items after 15, so 16 through 32 will have their own public hearings.

I'm so loud, do I need a microphone?

You do.

Hello.

I'm here in regards to the state your name for the record.

Madeline Lewis.

Birth date, Social Security, anything else.

You got it.

Okay.

I'm here in regards to the property that is on Lynn Lane that's gone for rezoning.

Can you identify the agenda item?

Oh my god.

Just says number six here.

Okay.

Okay.

Uh, Commissioner Kirkpatrick has offered to take it off of the routine agenda so we can have a hearing on it if you'd like.

So I'm not allowed to state what I want.

Um you can, but you'll have another opportunity if you because I miss I've been to every meeting so far and I missed the last one.

So I guess it's I think that's a generous offer for the commissioner to take it off of the routine agenda so you can have a full hearing on it.

Okay.

It'll just be in two minutes.

Thank you.

And then just confirming that's items six through nine.

Is that okay?

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning.

My name is Tom Shelton.

I live at 5920 West Patrick Lane.

I'm here to speak on items 10, 11, and 12.

I might as well address them all at once.

Yeah.

Those items are also, those are in my district.

I'm willing to pull it.

We've gotten a couple cards on those today.

Oh.

So 10 through 12 will also be pulled.

Okay, then may I just say that it was a most pleasant morning driving in today?

The town was scrubbed clean by the rain.

We had that beautiful collar of snow around the mountains.

Very good.

And the uh hockey team plays at 1210.

We'll try to be out by then.

I was 10, 11, 12 also.

Seeing no one else wishing to speak, we will close the public hearing.

Director Riel.

The second item is the approval of the agenda after considering any additions or deletions of items.

Staff has the following requests, which may require renotification fees in accordance with Title 30.

Hold to the March 18th, 2026 zoning meeting, item 25, ZC 250776, and item 26, UC 250777.

The above public hearing items are going to be opened as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the dates is previously stated.

With these deletions, which are items 25 and 26, the agenda stands ready for your approval.

With the corrections written to the record, our move approval of the agenda.

Thank you.

Please cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Next on the agenda is the approval of the minutes.

The minutes of the January 21st, 2026 zoning meeting are ready for your approval.

I move approval of our minutes.

There's a motion, please cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Next are the routine action items, which consists of items four through 15, except items six through 12 will be polled and heard separately.

These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item.

Additionally, staff has the following requests.

Item five, UC 250890, waiver of development standards number one was withdrawn.

And then item 15, ORD 26, 9000.

In section six of the ordinance under Title 30, Section 30408.

Delete the proposed language under E22, which requires private streets and certain easements to end in a radius cul-de-sac.

If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for your approval.

With the corrections written to the record, our remove approval routine action items.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Next are companion items six through nine.

Item six, PA 2570050.

Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from ranch estate neighborhood to compact neighborhood on 2.5 acres.

Generally located east of Lynn Lane and north of Lake Mead Boulevard within Sunrise Manor.

Item 7, ZC250790.

Zone change to reclassify 2.5 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone.

Generally located east of Lynn Lane and north of Lake Mead Boulevard within Sunrise Manor.

Item 8, WS 250791.

Waivers of Development Standards for the following.

Generally located north of Lake Mead Boulevard and east of Lynn Lane within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chair, Commissioners.

Mark Mulhall, M U L H A L L 1980 Festival Plaza Drive.

On behalf of the applicant, I'm here with my colleague Bob Gronauer as well.

We first want to thank staff for their recommendation of approval.

We appreciate town board's recommendation of approval as well, as well as planning commission's recommendation of approval and being on the consent agenda here today.

We are coming forward with a plan amendment for compact neighborhood.

We're developing 20 lots on the two and a half acres, which comes out to density of around eight dwelling units per acre.

So the development is more in line with a mid-intensity suburban neighborhood.

But if there's some discrepancies in terms of how the acreage calculates out, it's more appropriate to go with the compact neighborhood.

But really, the development is more of the mid-intensity suburban neighborhood style.

Currently in the area, there's compact neighborhood designations there to the south of the site, the east of the site, and the southwest of the site.

The developer LGI Homes has also developed in the area at Lakemead and Dolly.

This will be a fairly similar product.

The development there to the east as well has a density of 13.6 dwelling units per acre.

We'll come in with RS 3.

At the site.

Currently with the detached sidewalks, that'll reduce some of the visual impact.

We've also worked with Commissioner Kirkpatrick with the neighbors and through this process.

Um as well as lot one.

And so here's an example of the single-story product.

Here's an example of the two-story product.

And then additionally, just to cover all the bases and discuss all the applications, there's a couple waivers on this application, and that has to do with retaining wall in order to develop the site and then the curb radius.

There's going to be fairly minimal traffic.

We're happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

If you could just state your full name for the record.

Can I ask that you leave the site plan up there so they can where the homes are, please.

Hi, Madeline Lewis.

What else did you want?

That's it.

Good morning.

Okay, I am don't want this to be honest with you.

I'm not a professional at speaking or anything.

I'm just coming from the heart and the neighborhood.

Been there for over 60 years.

We are building a really strong Hispanic community there.

People are coming together, neighbors are working together.

Putting this in is not only going to put a big stress on the infrastructure of our utilities, water, sewer.

You know, you took our recs in our way and built a new one, Bob Price, but didn't put a pool in for the kids.

You know, it's the nearest pool is four and a half miles away.

But doing this is going to not only endanger our police and firefighters.

If there's a fire or an emergency, you get a fire truck in there, you get a police car in there, you get an M paramedics in there.

Where are they going to go if something happens?

Something goes south.

They're blocked, they're trapped.

That's not a that's a safety concern.

The other one is that to my understanding, they want to put all these houses on here.

You get a house on there, the price is going to be unattainable in about three meetings back.

He stated that the houses were going to go for 450,000 on top of an HOA.

Who's going to be able to do that?

You don't even have a backyard to have a garden.

You don't have a backyard for two dogs.

Your front yard is taken by the three feet of easement.

It's all rocks.

There's no trees.

They want to put bushes in.

You're creating another desert, a heat thing.

You know, these people that live on the street, if you go back and research police calls, none.

These neighbors work together.

They have a community that they watch each other.

You know, and they work with each other.

You do this, you're creating more stress for our police department.

The major thing that we have in our area right now, this that's bringing it down because one of the board people said, Oh, it needs to be brought up because it's kind of run down.

It's ran down because we couldn't have trees because of the water issues.

You know, it just but now that we're becoming a stronger Hispanic community.

Go and drive around there.

Look at the houses.

Look at how they're working on them.

Look at the neighbors, how they're helping each other.

Uh it you're creating more stress for the police department as far as crimes.

This it's not attainable for a family.

400 they have houses they've built up on top of the mountain, like going to the back gate of the Air Force base.

They have more calls there with Metro.

It's crime ridden.

And we have all these master communities that I know somebody stated, oh, the Air Force would want to buy in that area.

No, the Air Force is going out to North Town.

They're buying out there.

This property was made for a family.

How can a family come in?

I tried to buy the property.

I called the real estate agents.

Thank you very much.

Well, I mean, see, three minutes is not enough time for us to state what they would not even talk about.

That's all the time you get this morning, but thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak?

Please come forward at this time.

Thank you.

Hi, my name's Christina Papian.

Um, just like my mom said, uh, I grew up in the neighborhood.

As far as traffic and that where he said it's minimal traffic, that's a lie.

If you go over there off of Lake Mead, we have nonstop traffic up and down the roads.

Go into the neighborhoods.

You don't see sidewalks or anything else that's in uh attainable for people that are walking or anything else, and plus there's a lot of farm animals.

There's a bird sanctuary, not even um, I think two doors down from where this development's gonna be.

So it's an it's endangering the lives of the livestock, and putting in multi-properties like this, you know, people are losing their ranch lands, and it just it I understand development and everything, and everything has to, you know, grow.

But basically, the ranch lands in Vegas are being taken away.

So, where are all these animals supposed to go and how safe is it for them?

It's making an and making it an unattainable um environment.

And like I said, the people that live in this neighborhood, they can't afford all these, you know, the constructions and everything else.

It just brings more headaches for everybody.

So I don't know.

Uh I know with the past um meetings and everything else, we had a whole lot more people there.

A lot more people were voicing their opinions, and it just seemed like the board just didn't want to listen.

So uh with the approvals and everything else, I know it's about money.

I know it's about oh, you guys want to do all these new developments and everything else, but for this neighborhood and this area, it really does need to stay the same way.

Thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak?

Please come forward at this time.

Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing.

Uh, Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Uh thank you, Mr.

Chair, and I I do want to um address some of the neighbors' concerns.

Uh so one uh I did do the project uh by Shadow Rock Park, and we get very few calls for service.

I'm pretty active in that area.

Uh whether people agree or disagree, I'm at Bob Price more than most.

Uh, but at the same time, and I'm also very friendly towards rural areas, and uh we have turned down close to 30 projects in this in this particular space between Lake Mead and this site from duplexes.

We've turned down, we've said they're not compatible with the neighborhood.

We've turned down commercial because it wasn't there was like a family dollar at one time because a neighbor said they didn't want that.

Um so we do, although it says compact neighborhood, we we're gonna limit it right so that it doesn't become more than the 20 lots as shown on your plan.

There is landscaping, so we've not allowed for any waivers of landscaping because we you gotta have the trees, you've got to have all those other things.

Um we understand the uh wall height, why you need the waiver on that because of the way the infill is um we also understand the waiver on the radius for the turnaround be and so public works and I have um talked about what that looks like.

We have also talked with fire and with Metro, and it is not a drain on the current system over there.

Um so we understand that um sometimes people just don't like, but we like this project.

It's more of a single story uh the dolly product that's in Commissioner McCurdy's district.

It's a uh entry-level home, and yes, that community is coming together.

We have Cinco de Mayo over there, it's about 10,000 people that come.

We have our pancake breakfast, which is in a couple of weeks.

So we too tried to bring in quite frankly.

Um the park was uh built before I got there, the community center.

So I had nothing to do with the pool situation, but we did finish out the park, and it is one of our cleanest, most used parks on the east side in particular.

So this is just another asset that schools over there are underutilized.

Uh we work with the schools all the time, so they have less than 300 kids.

This will bring more kids to help keep those schools open.

So we're prepared to make a motion for approval with the conditions as listed.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Next are companion items 10 through 12.

Item 10, ZC250715, holdover zone change three, classified 2.12 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to a CG commercial general zone.

Generally located east of Jones Boulevard and north of El Quendo Road within Spring Valley.

Item 11, VS 250717, holdover, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County, located between Jones Boulevard and Bronco Street and Al Quindo Road and Quail Avenue within Spring Valley.

And then item 12, UC 250716 holdover use permit for a vehicle paint and body shop.

Design review for a proposed paint and body shop and accessory structure on 2.12 acres in a CG commercial general zone within the airport environments, A60 overlay.

Generally located west of Jones Boulevard and north of El Quindo Road within Spring Valley.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning.

David Brown, 520 South 4th Street on behalf of the applicant.

With me from the applicant is vegan and Metrop Kachikin.

They are the proposed owners for this business.

They actually have been in the collision repair business for decades.

This would be their first opportunity to actually own the land to be their own landlord.

So this is a very a big opportunity for them.

As you can see, the the buildings as proposed are you know quite frankly, beautiful for this type of business.

The applicant has gone through great lengths to make it as appealing as possible and to fit with the neighborhood with the other office buildings.

The primary building is the one to the east, which is right off Jones.

That is where all the auto repair work will occur.

It has been placed as far away from the neighbors as possible.

The second building, which is to the west, is only for storage.

There will be no vehicle work done of any kind in that building.

It's there just as storage and to protect the neighbors from seeing the role the two roll-up doors.

Again, the applicant reduced it to two roll-up doors to make it as appeasing for the neighbors as possible.

The only access to this building, as you can see, would be right off of Jones.

There is a decorative block wall all across the property.

There will be no private street or side street access on a quindo.

You can only enter an exit off of Jones.

They actually exceed the landscaping requirement on three of the sides.

You know, in a minute, I know you're gonna hear from a couple neighbors that don't like it because they think it's industrial, it's not, it's commercial.

They also think there's some concerns with health and safety.

It's a very regulated business.

The health department checks regularly to make sure they're doing everything compliant.

Uh, this is not an intense use.

There it's a low volume business.

Most of the cars that come there are there for days on an average day, and like I said, they've been in this business for decades.

They have 10 to 15 vehicles that come onto the property.

When a car comes there, it's usually on the property for at least a week.

Uh, it's hard to imagine a less intense use that could be used on this property.

Uh in another effort to be good neighbors, we did have a neighborhood meeting, uh, regardless of the support or lack of support from the few individuals here today.

The applicant has agreed to a number of conditions that I would read into the record.

I know they've already been provided to the neighbors as well as to county staff.

The first condition is business and repair hours would be limited to Monday to Friday, 8 a.m.

to 5 30 p.m.

All number two, all work to be performed within the easternmost building.

Number three, design limited to two roll-up doors on easternmost building.

Number four, roll-up door to remain closed unless the vehicle is being moved in or out of the building.

Number five, vehicles shall be parked within buildings during non-business hours.

Number six, applicant is aware the operations must comply with 30.04.07D, the noise residential adjacency standards.

Number seven, applicant is advised.

Operations are subject to Clark County Department of Environmental and Sustainability Division of Air Quality Standards and Reporting Requirements.

Staff recommends approval and hope to have your approval as well.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on items 10, 11, and 12, please come forward at this time.

Good morning.

Tom Shelton, 5920, West Patrick Lane.

Earlier I refer referred to the uniqueness and beauty of our valley.

This is a fairly unique and quite beautiful neighborhood.

An auto body shop does not fit.

To this point, that's kind of worked on the peripheries.

It hasn't worked so well.

They're not they're not anything new, and the fact that they indeed uh sought us out and took our input.

We appreciated that.

We still have not received the material data safety sheets for the products that will be used and stored on this.

We haven't received the specs for the air filtration systems that will be used.

And so at this point, this protective collar looks a little bit more like a shrinking noose.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Morning.

Gary Covene, 5835 South Bronco Street.

I I just wanted to second everything that one of my neighbors said and also bring up that it's more than a couple neighbors.

Uh we emailed a letter.

Hopefully uh you guys got it.

It's 15 neighbors that surround this this building that have great concerns about it.

And really the bottom line is that an auto body shop just doesn't fit in this neighborhood.

Um they're actually talking about closing the street if they approve this, uh, which just goes to show how intrusive the whole thing actually is.

And what I would actually just leave it if respectfully, if it was your neighborhood, a beautiful neighborhood, and all your neighbors are against it, or at least 99% of them.

Would you approve it in your neighborhood?

Would you approve an auto body shop going next to your house?

Because no matter how they paint it, it's an auto body shop.

And it's gonna open up the whole area for for similar types of businesses where really this was meant to be just office buildings surrounding what is a beautiful neighborhood.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Bob McGee, M C G E.

I love you.

5845 South Bronco.

I'm 350 feet away from this body shop.

Um I just I want to reiterate what everyone's saying.

I think that the the whole the whole neighborhood, the whole block is all medical and office community, and this kind of changes everything.

Once we put that in, it's gonna change the whole block and ruin the neighborhood, the perspective of the neighborhood.

It's gonna change it into a uh Highlander, a valley view.

It's gonna just it it just doesn't belong where it's at.

Um, I've talked to just about every neighbor other than I think three that I wasn't able to talk to, and all of them but one oppose it.

So and that's everybody within a thousand yards or a thousand feet of that property.

So that's my piece.

Thank you.

Anyone wishing anyone else wishing to speak on items 10 through 12, please come forward at this time?

Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing.

Uh Mr.

Brown, if you can come back forward.

Uh one point of clarification.

There was mentioned in public comment closing the road.

That we're just closing our access to the road so it won't impact the road.

The road is as it always has been, just uh customers won't be able to cut through the neighborhood.

That's a good thing.

Yes.

Okay.

Um part of the challenge that I have here is that whether we have a philosophical agreement or disagreement about this being industrial or commercial, in our code, it it is commercial.

Um that is why it's on the routine action agenda and why it has some staff support.

Um so I would just point to that fact.

As far as the precedent issue, I think there are a whole lot of conditions that have been read into the record, some of which are frankly highly unusual, um, particularly those related to uh our environment and sustainability office, but it has time and again come up in the neighborhood discussions, and so I do think there's value to those conditions.

Um through seven that uh Mr.

Brown read into the record.

Uh and I think those conditions are what protect against uh other development off of Jones.

Um and then lastly, I would just say that I I do think that this is in addition to it being commercial, uh, this was thoughtfully designed with a whole lot of neighborhood input.

Uh I absolutely agree.

There are others who couldn't be here today who I've spoken with both on the phone and in person about this project.

Not everybody agrees with it, but to the point of there being one individual who does support it in the neighborhood, that's the property owner that abuds this property almost entirely.

Uh and so I do think that's significant that there is support coming from uh that property owner.

Um so with the conditions that had been read into the record, uh I am prepared to move for approval of items 10, 11, and 12.

I also want to uh thank planning staff I know has been working last night and this morning to try to get some answers to some of the neighborhood questions.

There might be a couple still out there that we need to get.

I know a lot of correspondence happened this morning.

Um we'll get you all work to get anybody who's concerned in this area, the answers that they're entitled to.

None of those would change my view uh and my intention to move for approval.

Ms.

Real, you have a yeah.

Uh Commissioner, I just have one clarification.

So one of the conditions is uh written or was read into the record as singular, it says roll-up door to remain closed since there's multiple doors.

I'd like to make the door plural to say roll-up doors.

Yep.

That's the understanding is there's two of them.

Yes, that's the intent.

Good.

Okay, with that uh correction, my motion is for approval of items 10 through 12 with the conditions read into the record.

The motion passes.

Thank you.

Next is item 16, SDR 250899.

Sign design reviews for the following.

Allow electronic message unit video, reduce the separation between freestanding signs, increase the area of a proposed freestanding sign, and proposed signage in conjunction with an existing office building and many warehouse complex on two point two one acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Sahara Avenue and west of Monte Cristo Way within Spring Valley.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Uh Michael LeBlue, 5119 South Cameron Street.

First uh item is the uh um site plan showing the there's a freestanding sign there now that we're removing to uh put in this new freestanding sign.

Um 36 foot tall um pylon sign with a message unit.

Um the height meets code, it's the uh uh message unit that's a little over that is requiring the waiver.

Very good.

There's nothing further.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on item 16?

Please come forward.

Good morning.

Please state your name for the record.

Good morning.

My name is Jorge Peraza.

I live at 7392 Laredo Street.

That is directly behind the public storage property on the residential site.

The applicant is requesting approval for a video capable electronic message unit, uh, reduced separation between freestanding signs and an increased signed area.

The site already has a documented history of excessive lighting impact on adjacent homes because of that history.

Because of that history, approving a video screen and larger sandwich without condition will create a real risk of additional glare and nine time nuisance.

If the request is approved, I request a clear enforcement enforced conditions.

I'm asking for compatibility with the neighborhood and measure measurable protections to prevent further lighting spill into homes.

Thank you for your consideration.

Thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak on item 16?

Seeing none, I'll close the public clearing.

Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Can you speak to the neighbors' concern with regards to hours of operation and uh brightness?

Yes, the um uh all message units come with uh demers so that they dim the amount of nits from 10 to 6 um at night.

So at night they dim down so they're not as bright.

Um this also is more orientated towards um east-west.

So uh the neighborhood behind it is is actually on the side of the sign where it's not the actual messaging is not facing the residential, it's more facing east and west.

Okay.

Um is there in terms of a condition with regards to the dimming at night?

Is that something we can add on there?

We can add it, it's already a condition because it's subject to residential adjacency.

But if you want to add it so it's on there uh as part of the approval, it can be added.

Okay.

All right.

Um I would normally, as we talked before, I would normally consider this large of a sign.

However, across the street on Sahara, which is in the city of Las Vegas' boundaries.

Similarly, a doctor um already has an existing sign that's uh the same same size, so it makes it a little bit uh difficult to be in a position to disapprove of something that is literally the same across the street.

So um with that, I'm going ahead and for move for approval of agenda item number 16 with an additional condition uh which you have uh noticed here today in requiring uh compliance residential adjacency standards uh regarding the dimming of the sign in the evening hours.

Is that sufficiently clear, Sammy?

Yes.

Okay, all right.

That's my motion.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Thank you.

Appreciate it.

And then Commissioner, did you still want to trail item 17?

Okay.

So next is item 17, UC 250870, holdover use permit for a recreational or entertainment facility, not limited to indoor only recreation.

We have our development standards for full off-site improvements and design review for a recreational or entertainment facility in conjunction with the resort hotel being the South Point on 1118.07 acres in a CR commercial resort zone, generally located south of Silverado Ranch Boulevard and west of Las Vegas Boulevard South within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chairman, Commissioner Stephanie Grownauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive.

Here on behalf of the applicant, the property that's before you is the existing South Point Hotel and Casino.

Um that property owner also owns property further to the south.

You can see separated by another development.

We're here today with a use permit to allow for recreation facility on the property, which is basically the temporary events that all other casinos do all over the valley.

This portion of the property is not part of the gaming enterprise district, and so it's different than other hotel casinos, but um they would like to use this property for temporary events and this use permit would allow them the flexibility to continue to do so.

We very much appreciate staff's recommendation of approval on that.

We had asked for a waiver of the offsites along Las Vegas Boulevard and um requested a waiver in talking with public works.

We understand there is a development coming further to the south of this property that will have the full off sites going in.

So I'd like to propose a condition in conjunction with that waiver where we would add at least the paving curb and gutter on this west side of the property when this development to the south comes in.

That way the full roadway width is there and the drainage is taken care of.

The condition would read Las Vegas Boulevard Street paving curb and gutter to be completed between pile and frias along the east boundary of the property, together with a parallel detached asphalt walking path on the property, contemporaneous with or before completion of Las Vegas Boulevard street paving improvements on the west side of Las Vegas Boulevard between Frias and Cactus to the south.

This this condition would allow for that full street improvement and then obviously the drainage to be taken care of on a temporary basis when this parcel is actually developed.

Obviously, the full street improvements would come at that time.

So with that added condition, we'd ask for your approval.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

We're on item 17.

Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing.

Uh with that condition of the uh curb gutter uh and detached asphalt path.

I'm prepared to move for approval of item 17.

And sorry, just for clarification, that replaced the condition, the current public works condition.

Yes.

Thank you.

Thank you.

The motion passes.

Thank you very much.

I just briefly, I said this last night, but I do want to thank Sammy Real.

I know this is her last meeting on behalf of our whole firm.

We really really respect and appreciate her professionalism over the years and just want to thank her for everything she's done.

Thank you.

Next are companion items 18 through 20.

Item 18, VS 250811.

Holdover, vacant abandoned easements of interest of Clark County, located between Arville Street and Shrill Street Alignment and Pebble Road and Raven Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 19, UC 250809, holdover amended use permits for the following stables, which is no longer needed, and increase the number of large livestock in conjunction with an existing single family residence on.81 acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within the neighborhood protection RP and Airport Environs 860 overlays.

Generally located east of Arville Street and south of Pebble Road within Enterprise.

Item 20, UC 250810, holdover amended use permits for the following, a stable, increase large livestock, which is no longer needed, and increase accessory living quarter square footage, which is also no longer needed.

Waivers of development standards for the following, reduce parking, eliminate buffering and screening, eliminate parking lot landscaping, modify residential adjacency standards, waifal off site improvements, reduce driveway throat depth, and allow a non-commercial curb return driveway.

Design review for a proposed stable in conjunction with the proposed single family residence on 1.25 acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within the neighborhood protection RP and airport environments 860 overlay, generally located south of Pebble Road and east of Arville Street within Enterprise.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Morning, Commissioners.

My name is Brandon Clark.

This is Cody Clark.

We are the property owners of the agenda items 18, 19, and 20.

This was actually presented to you two weeks ago by our architect who unfortunately was unable to be here.

So we will be presenting today.

I will do my best.

If you have any questions or if I have the wrong terminology, please correct me or ask.

Everything was shown.

There was one item on here that Justin, Commissioner Justin Jones asked to meet with us about individually to get a better understanding of our project and what we're trying to achieve.

And we were able to meet with him last week.

Everything else on agenda of items 18, 19, and 20 does come with support of our town board, as well as I believe the support of Justin Jones as we reviewed the entire project with him this week.

Last week, sorry.

Happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Seeing none, we'll close the public hearing.

Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Mr.

Pozian, have you chance to look this over yet?

Thank you, Commissioner.

This is my first time I'm seeing this.

Uh it's real.

I'm trying to review it as it's uh sitting in front of us, but I just can't see that.

Sorry.

Can we trail this for a minute and maybe you can talk to them real fast?

Otherwise, I'll have to hold it just so we can make sure.

Here's a copy for you if you'd like.

Okay.

You can trail to the call that sure.

You can bring back.

All right.

So sit down for a minute.

We'll we'll try and pull back up.

Items 18 through 20 will be trailed to the end of the meeting, which will bring us to item 21.

Use permit to allow a cannabis establishment retail store in conjunction with an existing shopping center on 2.19 acres in a CG commercial general zone located north of Warm Springs Road and west of Durango Drive within Spring Valley.

Good morning, Commissioners.

Nancy Amundsen, 520 South Fourth Street, Las Vegas.

I'm here representing Mint Nevada.

They currently have a retail store on the southeast corner of Post and Rainbow when they would like to move it over to the site.

This site is northwest of the corner of Durango and Warm Springs.

There used to be a Carls Jr.

there.

The Carls Jr.

has closed and it's an empty building.

They would like to go into that site and utilize the building.

As you can see, there are they're not moving anything, they're not changing anything.

They want to go into the building, and they want to make the building a little different in color tone than the Carls Junior is.

Thank you.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing on item 21.

When anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

Seeing no one, we'll close the public hearing.

Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um, this has been recommended for approval by staff.

Obviously, we have our uh standard provision that requires all cannabis establishments to be um on the uh public hearing agenda.

Uh I think it's an improvement to the shopping center, and so I'll move for approval agenda item number 21.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you so much.

Next is item 22, WS250461.

Holdover waivers and development standards for the following.

Reduce setbacks, eliminate building separation, and modified driveway geometrics in conjunction with an existing single family residence on.14 acres in an RS5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located south of Silver Falls Avenue and west of Silver View Street within Paradise.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Jeremy Nelson, 1481, Silver Falls.

I'm here to present the uh lean to on the right side of my home.

Um here to the left.

So everything in green and blue is support.

Purple right here is my home.

So everything green, blue support, and red is no support.

And that red is two streets north on uh Cordeo Bay in a different subdivision.

Here would be the full floor plan of the uh lean two.

There'd be the heist the height of the front.

There's the rear of the building with the heights.

And here are the other smaller buildings that are on the agenda also.

Um plastic movable buildings.

Another one.

And here would be the inside.

And here are some examples of some other lean twos in our subdivision that are built right on the uh wall.

Here's some more examples.

And here's some more examples.

And that is all I have.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

We're on item 22.

Seeing no one, I will close the public hearing.

Okay.

Uh so we're we are here today because this was done without appropriate uh permission from the county.

Uh the couple facts that I think you pointed out well are that your neighbors who directly face this do support it, and I've seen the documentation to that.

Uh if you brought it today, we'll ask you.

So I'm gonna ask you to submit that to the clerk on your right.

Um, but I do think that's important for the record.

Um I I also think it's important that many of your neighbors do have similar structures.

You provided evidence of that, and we've seen it.

Um, however, it clearly does not match the aesthetic of the bit of your existing property.

Uh, and my condition will include a requirement that that be uh rectified.

And so I'll look to Director Real for some clarification on this condition, but essentially I'd like the exterior to match the stucco and paint of the existing building.

Um is that enough of clear enough?

Yeah, we could yeah, we can add that condition, no problem.

Okay, and then I also want to point out that while you're here for permission from the planning department in our zoning capacity, uh, that doesn't do anything to alleviate you from the building requirements.

So when you leave here, you'll still have the responsibility to get all the appropriate permissions from the building department uh and satisfy them.

I know that'll my approval will be conditional of an installation of a firewall, uh, but that is also uh in the building department's requirements.

You're aware of that and understand that.

Yes.

And then Sammy, is there a default uh period of time that he would have to come into compliance?

So we typically condition projects that um are a result of a CC pro violation for one year to complete the building permit and inspection process.

So we want to make sure that we include the inspection process in that as well.

Um if they if applicants are diligent in the processing of their permits and address all of the building and fires requirements, they can typically typically get that done.

If you'd like to grant more time, you're welcome to do that as well.

It's one year I think is sufficient.

This has already been going on a fairly long period of time.

Uh I assume that works for you.

That'll work.

Okay.

Then if there's I'd be able to extend it if I needed to, right?

If something wasn't okay.

So if there's nothing further, I will move for approval of item 22 with the two additional conditions.

Please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And who do I give these two?

Next to companion items 23 and 24.

Item 23, WS 2507, sorry, 0879.

Waivers of Development Standards for the following.

Eliminate street landscaping, increase retaining wall height, increase accessory structure height, and eliminate fall-off site improvements.

Design review for proposed single family residential development on 4.28 acres and an RS10 residential single family 10 zone, generally located east of Topaz Street and south of Oletta Avenue within Paradise.

Item 24, TM25500, 214, tentative map consisting of 10 single family residential lots and common lots on 4.28 acres in an RS10 residential single family 10 zone, generally located east of Topaz Street and south of Oletta Avenue within Paradise.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Jennifer Lazovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here this morning on behalf of the applicant.

The site is located just north of Serene Avenue on Oletta and Topaz.

Uh interestingly, this site is master plan for up to five units to the acre, which would allow for 20 lots.

It was previously approved uh for 15 lots, and we're before you today for 10 lots.

These are 10 single family uh residential lots.

They are all gonna be single story homes.

We will have one private street that comes off of Topaz Street that accesses all of the lots.

Um we do have some waivers uh that are indicated in the staff report.

These are designed to try to stay with the character of what we see in the broader area with similar density to this site.

This site with the 10 lots comes in at just over two um units per acre, about 2.3 units to the acre, and with other projects that are around that kind of lower density, there aren't typically full off sites on Topaz or Alita.

After the uh town board meeting, we did do a voluntary neighborhood meeting.

A couple of residents came, um, and we've been closely working with some other neighbors in the area, and so I do have some additional conditions that I'd like to read in.

Uh these conditions have been previously provided to planning and public works.

All homes to be single story, maximum of 10 residential lots, the maximum height of any structure on lot eight and nine to be twenty feet, no casitas are permitted on lot eight and nine, no detached RV garages are permitted on lot eight and nine.

The minimum rear setback, the minimum rear yard setback on lot eight and nine to be twenty-eight feet, the minimum side setback on the west side of lot eight to be 40 feet, 44 feet, the minimum side setback on the east side of lot nine to be 44 feet, front setback to all homes to be a minimum of 20 feet.

Coach lighting is required on the front elevation of each lot.

And then finally, if allowed by Clark County, provide paved access over the proposed sanitary sewer line in Alita Avenue adjacent to APNs 177-24-202-001 and 002 to the point of connection in McLeod Drive.

One more thing that I wanted to point out is that um, as I mentioned, the site has been previously approved and actually graded for those 15 lots, and so there is a condition that we do a drainage study, and one of uh the neighbors, and we discussed this at the town board that our drainage study would be updated to reflect the fact that there are only 10 lots there today.

Um I don't know that I need a condition for that because we're already agreeing to a drainage study, but it is something that we discussed at the town board.

The other um thing I just wanted to point out on the condition, this was discussed at the town board.

The very last condition that says if approved by Clark County, we would do partial paving along OLEDA Avenue to McLeod.

We know that we're gonna bring up sewer.

Um the point of connection is right here at McLeod and Alita, and then it's gonna come west towards where our site is.

And so there had been an ask that we do some paving over that area, but you know, we just put if approved by the county, we'll have to work with public works and and maybe water rec as well to make sure that that's okay with them.

But um that's why we put a qualifier on that for if approved.

And outside of that, we've I the commit commissioner Gibson knows it's a very, very, very active neighborhood.

We have had uh countless conversations with some neighbors um about this project, and I think we have tried to address all of the concerns that are in our control to address.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time seeing no one, Commissioner Gibson.

There isn't an area in uh Clark County that I'm aware of that gets more attention than the Serene area.

Um what's interesting is I uh 12 years as mayor, I was on the other side of Serene, and they got the same kind of attention constantly.

Um I want to express my recognition, our recognition of the great work that you've done and your client has done.

Uh we could be looking at a 15-unit uh project here.

We could be looking at something greater than that.

And rather than fight all of those battles out of the pocket, you've come with a 10-unit development, which makes all the sense in the world to the folks around you.

And we appreciate that.

And given your history and the way that you um do business, this ought to be something that will work to a lay fear and uh settle people in the neighborhood.

Mr.

Popazian, do you have any uh comments or concerns uh relative to the conditions that have been enumerated or anything else?

I do, Commissioner, thank you.

Uh just two points.

Uh one is which uh I don't see on the plan, but they do have to provide paved legal access, so if they're coming in off of Serene and Topaz, they will have to pave that to their subdivision.

And to um Miss Lazovich's point about the paving over the sewer line, that is actually a requirement.

So if they are bringing in sewer from McLeod to the west, they will be required a minimum of 32 feet of paving uh along Olida Avenue.

Thank you.

Is that acceptable?

Uh Rick Byron signature homes the applicant on this.

Um there's a BLM parcel to the north there.

Uh we do have a 30-foot right-of-way that's existent along the southerly portion of the alignment.

I don't know that I can get the 32-foot.

I'll have to file for a patent on that, so I don't know if that can be conditioned on me filing for a BLM patent.

You will have to work with BLM to get a grant for him to be able to pave on that BLM property, correct?

All right.

So the the requirement would be you submit an application and you work to get the patent in order to be able to do the paving.

That's correct.

And grant.

My apologies.

Yes.

Granted.

Yeah.

Acceptable.

And all right, and you understand that's acceptable.

Yes, and then we have to provide the summary that we'll be improving it.

All right.

With that, thank you very much.

Um I move approval of items uh 24 and 25, or excuse me, 23 and 24.

Uh with the additional conditions as uh enumerated by Ms.

Lazovich and the uh comments uh by public works this morning.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Next companion items 27 and 28.

Item 27, ZC250873, zone change three classified 2.49 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IL industrial light zone.

Generally located east of Nellis Boulevard and south of Cheyenne Avenue within Sunrise Manor, and item 28, WS 250874, waivers and development standards for the following.

Eliminate street landscaping, eliminate buffering and screening, reduce access gate setbacks, increase parking, waifull off site improvements.

Design review for proposed office warehouse building within a proposed outdoor storage yard on 4.87 acres in an aisle industrial light zone within the airport environments AE80 and AP71, sorry, APZ1 overlay.

Generally located east of Nellis Boulevard and south of Cheyenne Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Um my name is Tammy LaRivier, L-A-R-I-V-I-E-R-E.

The address is 3120 North Nellis Boulevard.

Um my husband Eric Larivier and I operate and own Atlas Crane Inc.

He couldn't be here today.

Um he's stuck in the snowstorm in Tahoe, believe it or not.

Um but we are a mobile crane and rigging company.

Um he opened the business 25 years ago.

He's been in this location since 2013.

Um we're looking to build a new office and two-base shop on our property.

Um I do have our uh civil engineer Petcha Balova here and architect Pat Clank if there's specific questions, but we agree with staff um conditions.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing.

Uh anyone wishing to speak on items 27 and 28, please come forward.

Seeing none, Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Uh thank you.

Um Mr.

Chair, so uh I want to just be clear with Antonio on item 28, the five waivers.

So I my understanding is they no longer need waiver number three.

Is that correct?

They were able to adjust that turnout.

Commercial driveway.

Is that it?

No.

Okay.

Uh thank you, Commissioner.

Uh waiver standards number three is the reduce the access gate setback.

Yep.

Uh I've not seen any other plans that would suggest that they don't need it, but if they'd like to withdraw.

Let me move on to the other ones.

Maybe someone will come up with the uh so we um we've talked to the applicant, and I believe that you still agree that uh we do have an SID that is like seconds away, I hope.

Uh we should be getting ready to go out to bid on that.

So we would uh like waiver number one uh uh two and uh five to be uh waived uh or to be deferred until the SID comes through because it doesn't make any sense to put in landscaping and then us to rip it all out because we should be close.

We agree, Commissioner.

There is a condition that uh they are required to participate in the SID in this area.

And then uh we are fine with waiver number four on the uh uh parking spaces.

I just uh I just thought I had heard that we didn't need waiver number three.

I think at the town board they had indicated, or at some time maybe after the town board they had indicated that they were gonna withdraw waiver of development standards number three, because I have the same notes in my my file too.

Petula someone's got to come answer the question because otherwise we're gonna deny the waiver.

So someone's gonna.

I mean, we uh for Sammy and I to be on the same page without talking about it.

We must have got some mixed information.

Just to refresh my memory.

Which one is number three?

Number three is to reduce the access gate setbacks uh to forty-six feet where 50 feet is required.

Somebody would have we would have never made that.

My lady would have had to infer.

I'm sorry, maybe staff hasn't seen this one yet, but uh well that's a bigger problem.

So I hope you we don't go down that road.

That's completely our problem.

Um we have 50 feet um offset for the gates on ring lane measured from the right-of-way line.

So we don't need that waiver.

That's what we are looking for.

Okay.

Yes.

We're withdrawing that waiver.

Okay.

So back to my motion is to uh uh staff conditions and the conditions that I read into the record and uh withdraw of waiver number three, which is the 46 feet to 50 feet.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval on items 27 and 28.

Please cast your vote.

And we'll stay in touch with you also on the SID.

It should be close, though.

The motion carries.

Thank you.

Next is item 29, ET 25400 129 for ZC230272.

Reconsideration of use permits, first extension of time for the following.

Sorry, vehicle, recreational vehicle, and watercraft storage facility.

Whatever's a development standards for the following.

Access local street, reduce parking, increase wall height, allow attached sidewalk, and allow modified driveway design standards and a design review for a mini warehouse with vehicle storage on 2.5 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located east of Jones Boulevard and south of O'Bannon Drive within the Spring Valley Planning Area.

Good morning.

Good morning, Commissioners.

Uh my name is Don Morgan.

I'm on behalf of the applicant.

Um we're just merely asking for an extension of our uh zoning approval.

Uh that was previously approved.

Okay, does that complete your presentation?

A moment at this point, yes.

Sure.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on item 29, please come forward at this time.

Seeing none, Commissioner Becker.

Uh again, this would be the opportunity to speak on item 29.

If you could just state your name for the record.

Canita Jones, 5645 Obanned Drive.

Y'all know me already.

Y'all should have got an email, so you know what I think.

And at this point, I think you're doing the best you can do for us.

I despise people who backstab communities.

They could have spoke to us.

Anybody could have spoke to us.

This has been approved three years ago.

Nobody knew.

We don't even understand how this happens.

And to dislike neighborhoods and have no respect for us.

If you could just direct your attention towards us.

Yeah, he can hear they can hear.

Um I'm glad y'all are gonna try and do something for us to keep them out of our neighborhood.

We need some teeth though, that if they're caught in a neighborhood, how we can go after them.

If y'all can figure something out, like when the car dealership's driving our neighborhood, that's like a 750 dollar fine.

I think if you guys could figure out something, they could have a sign out there saying stay out of these neighborhoods.

So you could all work on that.

Because it's just gonna be more destruction in our neighborhoods and more anger.

Anybody else?

So if that if that completes your comments, we can go one at a time.

Anyone else wishing to speak during public comment?

Please come forward again.

We're on item 29, which is a reconsideration.

Good morning.

Paul O'Bannon, 57 O'Bannon.

Right here in Las Vegas.

Um we just kind of found out that I guess this was approved three years ago to our knowing since we found out we went out and worked the area, as you know, because we were here prior, um, providing 30 residents with signatures to not have the access to Obann and Drive.

Um could you just hold I don't quite understand why we can't have the access in and out on Jones.

Um I've traversed that street for years, and every commercial professional building from Jones to Charleston has access in and out on Jones.

So why this is an exception, I don't know.

I know that we from what we understand there is an interior access on Jones.

Is that correct?

We're we're not allowed to do back and forth, but I'm sure it'll be addressed.

Um I understand why again, why there is an access to beyond Obannon, I don't know.

It is a residential community, it's completely residential, and um it's gonna cause more traffic concerns.

Um again, I understand it's already approved, so I'm just kinda letting you know my feelings of how it got approved that way, why uh everyone would approve to allow our community to be have access um with that amount of traffic.

It's gonna be a warehouse and manyware house and storage for boats and trailers and cycles and everything else.

But I do appreciate and I want to state before I leave that I do appreciate um Commissioner NAFT clarifying on item UC 250716, which is a local a property on Jones Boulevard that you appreciated, sir, and I thank you clarifying that that access that complex did not have accessibility to OQENDO.

Which is a street and a residential community, and that that was appreciated.

And and I would have thought we would have had the same for ours, but apparently we we're not going to.

So thank you.

Thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak on any item 29?

Please come forward.

Seeing none, we'll close the public hearing.

Commissioner Becker.

Uh yes.

I were you involved in the process.

Uh I believe it's 2023 when this was approved.

No, ma'am, I was not.

Okay.

Um, because I was just wondering why we do have the entrance and exit on O'Bannon.

Is that something?

I know that we've got conditions that we're going to be putting on it today, but uh is it something that go ahead.

Thank you, Commissioner.

Andrew Carson, 10831 Woodstream Court.

I, along with my siblings, are the owner of the property for my mother who passed away.

Uh, if I recall the reason they did it was because we're doing RV storage, the size of the vehicles.

The Department of Transportation agreed they couldn't do a ingress and egress off Jones, so they use the O'Bannon part.

We've been in the have this property for 60 years with my family.

I'm very, very understanding of the neighborhood.

We actually started this project more than three years ago.

We've talked with every neighbor.

In fact, I had another neighbor, Gary Friedman, who was here earlier, wanted to know what it was about.

We're just asking for an extension of time because we had waivers that had to be uh completed with Nevada power.

So long answered your short question.

I believe is because of the size of the vehicles.

And it was just a routine item.

All that we're doing today, just as I've explained to you, is are the neighbors.

We are just granting an extension of time on a project that was approved in 2023.

Um I I just wanted your voices to be heard.

I wanted you to be able to put on the record exactly your objection to it, because it seems that you didn't get notification before and weren't we're not able to.

Um thing that I am going to do today is uh I want you to work with public works.

We're gonna make this a condition that you redesign the driveway on Obannon to direct traffic to the west, which would direct them out of the neighborhood.

Uh and if we have anything else to add to that.

Commissioner, if you'd like, we can also add um for them to install signs on site to make sure it reads no right turns.

Yeah.

Is that is that good for everybody?

Yes, ma'am.

Okay, we're already getting it designed right now.

So all right.

Um with that, I will move to approve with those conditions.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval.

On item 29, please cast your vote.

That motion carries.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And uh if I could uh just for anybody who's here because we have a uh we had a scheduled redevelopment agency meeting set to begin at 10 o'clock.

That meeting will follow this meeting, which has just a few more items if anyone's here for that commissioners.

At this time, I'd ask if we can go back to the trailed items, items 18 through 20.

Welcome back.

Thank you.

We already did the public hearing, right?

Yep.

Um so we looked over the the plans that you proposed.

I think they're an improvement.

But because we don't uh you guys are new to the process, so you know I don't hold you to the same standard as I would um others who are involved, but uh we don't generally design from the dais.

And so um talking to Mr.

Pausian, we still have some concerns, but we think we can get there.

Uh so what I'm gonna uh propose today and I'll require you to come back one more time, but I just don't want to be designing from posium, particularly when you're uh your architect and engineer isn't here.

Um so there's no objection to items 18 and 19, uh Ms.

Real.

So I think we can go ahead and uh move for approval agenda items 18 and 19, but I ask you that you work with Ms.

Propozion and his team just to make sure that the design is fully submitted and is uh and works for for our public works team.

So then I would hold agenda item number 20 to the next meeting.

Does that make sense?

Yes.

Okay, does that work, Mr.

Pausan?

All right, then so the so my emotion will be to approve agenda items eighteen and nineteen and to hold to the next meeting agenda item number twenty.

And commissioners, just for clarification, the next meeting would be March 4th.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval of items 18 and 19 and to hold item 20th until the March 4th meeting.

Okay, please cast your vote.

Thank you.

Please have your architect reach out to pause you.

The motion carries.

Next are ordinances for introduction.

Uh item 30, ORD 25900725 is to introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a development agreement with TPG Core Acquisitions LLC for a multifamily residential development on 10.5 acres.

Item 31, ORD 25900814 is to introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of a development agreement with Forest Hill Family Trust and Sadry Fred TRS with uh for a vocational training facility and outdoor storage on 2.5 acres.

And then item 32, ORD 2690053 is to introduce an ordinance to amend the official zoning map reclassifying certain properties as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on December 3rd, 2025.

Commissioners, we ask that you set the public hearing for March 4th, 2026.

We'll set the public hearing for March 4th, 2026.

And this is the last time set aside for public comment.

Mr.

Chair, before you do public comment.

Do you mind if we say thank you to the other?

I don't.

We have yeah, uh, but if I could, um you want to do it after no, we're gonna do it right now.

Um but we would there was a bit of an argument over who could go first.

So uh I don't need to go.

Sager bloom asked first.

So Commissioner Sager Bloom.

Well, I was gonna have Director Real come up here, but if anyone wants to make comments beforehand, uh how you want to handle it, but why don't we do this?

We will Rob if it's all right, we'll we'll open uh the last public comment period.

If there is anyone else here wishing to speak on items related to the zoning agenda, please come forward at this time, identify your full name for the record.

And director real, you'll have to wait a few more minutes.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Commissioners, and thank you for being here today.

My name is Jennifer Castleoni.

I live at 5560 El Parque Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, on Miss Becker, Commissioner Becker's County Island.

There are some things happening on our county island that I have asked to have explained, and I'm getting no answers.

We had a piece of property that is owned RE, and that is two houses to an acre.

So basically, if you are one house, you were on a half acre.

This is gonna be a single family multi, like 38 houses.

How did this happen without us getting notice?

I've been begging for that question since July.

I would like to have an answer.

That's reasonable.

We're our rules don't allow us to answer your question at this time, but your comments are reflected in the record.

And if you're I would just recommend they stick around.

I would love to meet with you.

I haven't met you before.

We need to.

Yes, I would love to do things.

We'll look at what the issue is that you have, and I am I have not heard anything about this.

So here's a big issue at 5310 West Sahara.

I don't know who did this zoning.

But you have a vape shop in the shopping center, and right next door is the healthy kids' gym, and right next door to that is Dottie's.

That's gonna conclude my questions today.

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

Anyone else wishing to speak?

This is the final time set aside for public comment.

Seeing none, we will conclude public comment and turn it back over to Commissioner Sagerbloom.

And director Rial, if you can come up here for a few moments.

Sorry.

Yes, sorry, we're gonna show you off.

All right.

So anyway, um, I know we're all gonna say something, but uh since I started as the when I was the chair, you taught me everything I knew.

Um, and so I just want to thank you so much for that for what you've done for Clark County and just God speed.

But we just wanted to, on behalf of all the commissioners, want to make sure you you were uh a good send-off and uh don't forget us.

Uh thank you.

I Commissioner Sager Volume, we did such a great job.

I don't have much to add, but I do want to say uh Sammy and I kind of came in together uh in way back when I feel like uh but I want to wish you all the best in uh you know your Arizona and everything with your family.

Family always comes first for me, so I appreciate that that's important to you too.

And hope you'll stay in touch and come back and uh at least a wave when you pass the building.

But uh good luck to you and your family, and thank you for all that you've done.

And I think we've done some big things from Title 30 changes to some code changes, and uh I think the staff is um on a good track to go forward to do even more great things.

So thank you.

What do you want?

I I just want to say it's been uh great experience working with you over the last seven plus years, particularly the last couple of months as we've just been going through a lot of the uh work with the BLM.

Um Sammy's a problem solver, and we've tried to put in problem solvers in each of the agencies here, and uh so it's gonna be a big loss.

Um, but we know that there are great people that you've worked and worked with and and trained in planning and we're looking forward to it and wish you all the best.

Sammy, thank you so much for everything.

When I came over uh into the uh county commission, I dealt with a different kind of a code, and I expressed a lot of concern about how understandable and readable it was, and the great work that you've done on that code is just amazing.

Thank you so much.

And of course, we all understand the circumstances of life that lead us to make changes.

Um we wish you the very best and know that uh the way you do things, that things will work out awfully well for you and your family.

So Sammy, I just want to thank you for all the time that you've put in uh with me at my office and help me to better understand the things that we do as it relates to zoning.

Uh, but I wish you all the best uh with you and your family.

I know that uh you know abrupt changes don't happen often when they do, we have to be flexible uh with you know navigating those challenges or opportunities.

So I just thank you and uh look forward to what you're gonna do next, and know that you always have a home here at Clark County.

I think one of the unique things about the planning department is that your fingerprints will forever be here on our community.

The decisions that you've made throughout your career here at Clark County, whether that's the comprehensive rewrite of Title 30, which will for the long term impact the way that this community develops, whether it's your work on making housing more affordable, whether it's every corner from Bunkerville to Laughlin, uh, the impact that you've made in this jurisdiction will be felt well into the future.

And I just personally thank you for your always being honest with me and upfront, uh always telling me your viewpoint even when we don't always agree.

Uh and being recognized in this community as a professional, someone that can be trusted.

Uh this board clearly uh thanks you, appreciates you, and we certainly wish you all of the best uh in the years ahead, both in your career professionally and personally as well.

And if everybody who's here could join me in thanking and recognizing Director Sammy Real.

If you want.

I don't want to say anything, but I will.

Um, I first want to tell Kevin, thank you very much for trusting me.

Commissioners, thank you very much for also putting the vote behind the confidence that you have in me.

I can't thank you guys enough for one, not just working with you, but getting to know each of you personally.

I've really, really truly enjoyed it.

Um as I've said before, I've never left a job that I like, so this one's just a little different.

But um, know that you're in good hands.

Our department, our management team is fantastic.

You should be really proud of everybody who's there that comes to work every day with such pride and dedication, and they want to do the best that they can, put their best foot forward and work really hard to make you guys happy, to make your constituents happy, and to just bring together the county as a team.

So I want to thank each of you more than you know, and I appreciate everything that you've done, and thank you.

Let's see your own.

Oh, okay.

I'm trying to be crisp.

So this is this concludes our zoning hearing for today.

Uh we will take a 10-minute recess and reconvene uh for the redevelopment authority.