Good morning.

Welcome to the April 22nd continuation of the Clark County Commission meeting.

Good morning, Miss Amberman.

Good morning, Commissioners.

Uh first item is the um first item is public comment.

Thank you.

This is the first time set aside for public comment.

Anyone wishing to speak on an item that is on today's agenda, please come forward at this time.

Items 16 through 52 are non-routine and will be heard separately.

Please state your name for the record and which item you're here speaking on.

Yes.

Good morning.

My name is Margaret Ann Coleman, C O L E M A N.

Um pleased to address you today concerning putting me on the agenda to release my fulfillment settlement to be the re recovery controller, trustee president, and owner to take care of my necessary needs to get better.

My qualifications is what I'm speaking up on today as well, as far as public comments.

I am a 12th grade diploma graduate.

14 years of uh education.

I didn't hear an item you're speaking on, so if you want to wrap up comments number one.

That's not uh the the items you can speak on are after item four.

Excuse me.

You can speak on items that are on the agenda, items four through fifty-two.

Well, um mainly uh I'm really speaking upon my living arrangements here.

We'll ask you then to we'll ask you to sit tight.

Uh and you can come speak at the end of today's meeting on anything you'd like.

Anyone else wishing to speak uh during the first time set aside for public comment?

Please come forward.

Seeing no one will close the public comment period and uh turn it over to Ms.

Hammerman.

Next item is the approval of the agenda after considering any additions or deletions of items.

Commissioners staff has the following request that may require renotification fees in accordance with title 30.

Hold to the May 6, 2026 zoning meeting, item 10, WS 260113.

Item 20, VS 26 0134, item 21, UC 26-0133.

Item 22, WS 25-0882.

Item number 25, WS 26-0114.

Hold to the May 20th, 2026 zoning meeting.

Item 16, UC 26-0063.

The above public hearing items are going to be opened as a public key uh public hearing and immediately recessed until the dates as previously stated.

With these deletions, which are 10, 16, 20, 21, 22, and 25.

The agenda stands ready for your approval.

Mr.

Chair, I'll move approval the agenda.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval of the agenda.

Please cast your vote.

The motion passes.

The minutes of the March 18th, 2026 zoning meeting are ready for approval.

Move approval.

Motion for approval, please cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Next are the routine action items, which consist of items four through 15.

These items may be considered together, and in one motion are subject to the conditions listed for each agenda item.

If there are no objections, if there are no objections, the public hearing is now open, and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.

Move approval of our routine action items.

Motion for approval on items four through 15, please cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Next are items 17 through 19, which can be heard together.

17 as VS 26-0120.

Vacant and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County located between Copavia Avenue and Warm Springs Road and between Rville Street and Roger Street.

And a portion of right away being Capavia Avenue within located between Arville Street and Roger Street, and a portion of right-of-way being Arville Street located between Kapavia Avenue and Warm Springs Road within Enterprise.

Item 18, WS 26-0121.

Waivers of Development Standards for the following one reduce setbacks and two wave full offsite improvements.

Design review for proposed single family residential subdivision on 4.02 acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within the neighborhood protection RMP overlay, generally located between located south of Capavia Avenue and west of Rville Street within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chair.

Commissioners, my name is Tony Sless, address 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant Pulti Homes.

As you can see from the aerial, the site is located on the northwest corner of Warm Springs in Arville, highlighted in yellow, is a little over four acres.

Um and we are coming in with a single family development.

Um this is a former Department of Aviation parcel that uh Pulti won in the latest auction, and they are coming in developing a little under two units to the acre consistent with the RMP that it is in.

As you can see right here is our proposed site plan.

Again, warm springs to the south, Arville on the east.

Here is the uh eight lots that we're proposing.

You can see a couple of them with the flag shape lots in the back, and then we have the four uh that are fronting along our ville in this location here.

Um we do have a couple of waivers with respect to this application.

Um, the first, and this is um I think the third time you guys have seen this waiver.

This request is that Pulti on their front on their single story homes.

Um there is a portion where it does exceed 50 percent of the front and in pe encroaches in that 10 foot setback.

Um, this board uh has been uh very consistent with uh applying a condition that no more than 50 percent of our homes can impede on that uh set back.

We'd respectfully request that that condition be uh continued on this application.

Um the second uh waiver we have is with respect to our off-sites.

Um is uh whoops.

I don't have the pardon me.

Is with respect to our off-sites.

Um we are providing full off-site improvements along Kappa Villa and Rville here.

The only thing we're asking to waive is the street lights in this portion.

Uh uh Rville as it goes north, does dead in at the 215.

We want to protect the dark skies that are out here in the RMP.

So we are providing, like I said, full off-site improvements for our village and Kappa Via.

The waiver is actually more specific to the street lights only.

Um however, there is a condition requiring us to provide the conduit and the poll uh for the polls, which we are uh which we do agree to.

The second um off the second waiver is along Warm Springs.

We are the this is part of the county improvement project.

The offsites are going in.

It'll be um the detached sidewalk with uh five feet of landscaping, a seven foot wide sidewalk, and then we are providing an additional ten feet of landscaping behind it.

It's just because we are not providing the actual infrastructure there.

It's technically a waiver, but as you can see from our cross sections, it is definitely going in.

So we appreciate uh staff's review of this and their recommendation of uh we agree with all their if approved conditions and more than happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on items 17 through 19?

Anyone wishing to speak on items 17 through 19, please come forward.

Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing.

Um I think I heard you also offer a condition related to lots six and eight.

We can agree to one story there as well.

Thank you.

Excellent.

Is that clear for the record?

Okay.

Uh so I'm uh prepared to move for approval of items 17, 18, and 19 with the additional condition limiting lots eight, six, and eight per plans to single story uh and the uh condition of 50 percent uh limitation on the setback waiver uh applied.

Motion passes.

Thank you.

Next item is item 23 WS 26-0004.

Holdover amended waivers of development standards for the following.

One reduced street landscaping, previously notified as eliminate street landscaping, two increase fence and wall height, three allow attached sidewalks, four wave off site improvements for street lights, previously notified as sidewalk and street lights, and five alternative driveway geometrics in conjunction with an existing warehouse and outdoor storage yard on 4.25 acres and an IP industrial park zone and an IL industrial light zone within the airport environments AE65, AE 70, and APC2 overlay, generally located north of Carey Avenue and west of Lamont Street within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Marissa Furman, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here this morning on behalf of the applicant.

We are on the northeast corner of Carrie in Lamont at about four and a half acres.

The site is currently planned business employment and it's split zoned IP in IL.

The site is surrounded by various outdoor storage auto related services to the north and west.

To the east is a lows, to the south is a U.S.

Postal Office building.

Um the applicant here has operated this site for over 40 years as an outdoor storage uh facility.

Um they uh have uh operated for a while, and it had come to their attention just recently through a business licensing for their tenant that there were some things that were not up to code due to some uh uh expired applications in the past.

So the application before you this morning uh seeks to get the code or the site uh up to code and to fix some things uh on site and in the area.

Turning to the site plan.

So we'll have carry to the south and Lamont to the east.

Um currently today there are two existing driveways.

The applicant will close the driveway that would have been otherwise shown here and leave uh the existing driveway uh here off of CARY.

Um there's another access point off of Lamont that will be new and hopefully approved and constructed after this application.

So as you can see, there are um permanent and temporary structures on site.

The bulk of the site is used for outdoor storage of construction materials, um, equipment, vehicles, things like that.

Um so it the operation will stay as is.

Um we do have a few waivers that I will go through.

We have waivers for reduced landscaping off of Carey and Lamont.

Um there's currently no landscaping there today.

The applicant will uh install three feet of decorative rock landscaping with boulders along both Carrie Avenue and Lamont.

We have waivers for detached sidewalk along Carry Avenue.

There's an existing attached sidewalk that will remain.

We have a waiver for detached sidewalk along Lamont.

Um currently there's no sidewalk here today.

The applicant will install a five-foot sidewalk in front of that three feet of decorative uh landscaping, decorative rock landscaping.

We also have a waiver for increased fence height.

We have uh 13 feet along Lamont and 11 feet along uh the northern property line where 10 feet is permitted.

This is a slight increase, um, and if anything, the uh increase in height will provide an added uh security and screening benefit to the site.

Next, we have um currently there was a waiver for uh waiving uh the off-site improvements, including street lights along Lamont.

We will be withdrawing that waiver as the applicant will be installing street lights along Lamont.

Next, uh we have a waiver for reduced driveway width for both uh the existing driveway on carry and Lamont at 32 feet where 36 feet uh is required.

However, both of those driveways will be updated to uh the curb return radii standard as required by public works.

Next, we have um excuse me.

We also have a waiver for reduced uh departure distance that we will be withdrawing.

Um, as I mentioned earlier, the driveway that uh will be closed along carry in this area now allows us to have uh the adequate departure distance of 194, where 190 is required.

So um that is waiver number four, five B and five C to be withdrawn, and then we will still need waiver 5A for the reduced driveway width.

Um with that, um, I will conclude my presentation and answer any questions.

Thank you very much.

Anyone uh this is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

Seeing no one, uh, Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Uh thank you, uh Mr.

Chair.

Um, so I can support the waiver of the trees because it's super windy over there, and um they will be broken the first week that they're there.

But um, if you're gonna do um the rock and the boulders to kind of stop people from leaving all their garbage there, I I expect that it'll be maintained on a regular basis.

I don't want it to just one and done because we know what that looks like.

Um, so I'll be paying attention to let the owner know.

Um, I can support support the 11 feet because it's no not many people are gonna notice the difference.

The attached sidewalk.

Um so thank you for putting in the street lights because it is dark over there, so we want it to stay there with the attached sidewalk.

Um, I just the only one that I want Joan to clarify with me.

I didn't support the driveway width.

I want you to do the right driveway width, but oh, thank you, Commissioner.

They still need to waiver for the driveway width because um the driveway on Carey Avenue has to be 57 50, excuse me, 56 feet wide and it's 52.

They have a conflict with the street lights, so we are okay with them reducing that driveway width because they are given us the distance from the intersection.

So it's only four feet though, right?

So all right.

Okay, with that, I would make a motion for approval for um item number 23.

Uh approving the waivers with the exception of withdrawing eight waivers four, five B, and five COVID.

There's a motion, please cast your vote.

Thank you.

And Maria said, just tell your client that we won't be offering any extension of times because they've never followed through.

So this is one one and done.

Okay.

Noted.

Thank you.

Next is item 24, WS 26-0106.

Waivers of development standards for the following one reduce access gate setback to reduce setback, three increased screen wall height, four, modify residential adjacency standards, five, eliminate street landscaping, six, eliminate buffering and screening, and seven wave full off sites in conjunction with an existing single-family residence on 0.77 acres in a CG commercial general zone within the airport environments at E65 overlay, generally located south of Cartier Avenue and West of Gateway Road within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Morning.

I'm uh Charles Stankowski, uh, the owner of the house.

Um I bought this house 32 years ago.

It came with the commercial zoning when I bought it.

Um, I'm assuming when they did the rural estates, they made some of the corner lots commercial in case they wanted to convert it in the future.

But I've lived in this house for 32 years and just asking for the waiver for all the commercial standards that they're they're asking, so it'll continue to fit into the neighborhood.

Thank you very much.

Uh this is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on item 24, please come forward at this time.

Seeing no one, we'll close the public hearing.

Commissioner McCurdy.

Uh thank you, and uh thank you, Charles, for you know, the meeting that you have with our team uh down at your property.

Uh, I understand you know that what you're going through, and uh certainly uh don't want to make you make all those changes, so we look to move approval of item 24 with the waiver development standards one through seven.

Thank you.

There's a motion for approval, please cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Thank you.

Next are items 26 through 30, which can be heard together.

Item 26, PA 25-7003.

Holdover plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from corridor mixed use to current compact neighborhood.

On 2.99 acres, generally located north of Blue Diamond Road and east of Park Street within Enterprise.

Item 27, ZC25-0552.

Holdover zone change to reclassify 2.99 acres from a CG commercial general zone to an RS2, residential single family two zone, generally located north of Blue Diamond Road and east of Park Street within Enterprise.

Item 28 VS 25 0553.

Holdover vacation abandoned easements of interest to Clark County, located between Park Street Alignment and Cabrera Cove Street and Raven Avenue and Blue Diamond Road within Enterprise.

Item 29, WS 25-0554.

Holdover waiver development standards to increase retaining wall height.

Design review for proposed single family residential development on 2.99 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located north of Blue Diamond Road and east of Park Street alignment within Enterprise.

Then item 30 TM 25 500 138 holdover tenant map consisting of 25 single family residential lots and common lots on 2.99 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located north of Blue Diamond Road and east of Park Street within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Commissioners.

My name is Susan Florian from Taney Engineering, 630 South Jones Boulevard, here on behalf of the applicant.

What we have here is a parcel located north of Blue Diamond and east of Park Street.

They range from 2,915 to 3,811 square feet with an average law of 3,154 square feet.

With that, I conclude my presentation.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Good morning.

Good morning, Commissioners.

Jenna Waltho.

9611 Raven Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89178 for the record.

I did send a few emails, but I didn't hear back.

So I wanted to get some clarification on our neighborhood's request for termination of Park Street.

In that email, I did provide documentation that park was vacated to the north at Pebble, which this board unanimously approved.

And that was approved due to the applicant working with us neighbors and the concerns for the safety of the neighborhood with the traffic.

So that was approved by this board.

So now I'm here looking at park to the south with the same concerns from the neighborhood.

And unfortunately for you, Commissioner Jones, I'm the only one willing and able to come down here and voice those concerns for my neighborhood.

So it's the same concerns.

You've already approved the termination of park to the north.

So all we're asking is termination to the south due to the safety concerns of people using Raven as a shortcut to cut the lights at Blue Diamond in Fort Apache.

We also have driveways that front on to Raven Avenue.

Now during the conversation of when you guys approve termination of park and pebble, there was no talk of connectivity.

Now that termination did not be approved by this board.

I would completely agree we would need to keep park open for connectivity.

But since we already have the prior approval where park is terminated at Pebble.

That's professionalism 10 out of 10.

So I appreciate that.

Thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak?

Please come forward at this time.

If not, we'll close the public hearing.

Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Uh Ms.

Ferpazian, can you respond to the comments made by Miss Waldo with regards to park uh park?

Thank you, Commissioner.

We still have connectivity to Raven.

We have subdivisions on the west side of park.

We have subdivision on on Raven that will use park to exit to Blue Diamond or with this new subdivision, you will be able to use multiple streets should park go through to access subdivisions.

And really burdening less Ford Apache because if you don't have park going through the burden of Ford Apache will be great, not to mention people will be traveling through the subdivisions to get to this subdivision.

So we believe the connectivity of park is important, not to mention response time for emergency vehicles.

They'll have to go aroundabout way to get to this subdivision if park does not go through.

And just to be clear, there would there was an assertion that people going eastbound on Blue Diamond would cut through on park in order to get to Fort Apache.

There is a hard median on Blue Diamond that would prevent that, correct?

Yes, sir.

Okay.

With that, I'll go ahead and move for approval agenda items 26 through 30.

There's a motion for approval.

Please cast your vote.

I'm sorry, Commissioner.

Can I add a condition, please?

We've been working really hard on Blue Diamond with your office.

I'd like to add a condition to the applicant to coordinate with MDOT and Clark County Public Works for the off-site improvements along Blue Diamond Road, and they are aware of this condition.

Thank you.

Thank you, Commissioners.

Have a good day.

Next are items 31 through 34, which can be heard together.

Item 31 is PA 26-7001.

Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from Minnetensity suburban neighborhood to corridor mixed use on 0.85 acres, generally located east of Decatur Boulevard and south of Ford Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 32, ZC 26-0038.

Zone change to be class reclassified at 0.85 acres from an H2 General Highway frontage zone and an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to a CG commercial general zone, generally located east of Decatur Boulevard and south of Ford Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 33, VS 26-0037.

Vacate and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County, located between Decatur Boulevard and Cameron Street Alignment and Ford Avenue and Pebble Road, and a portion of the right of way being Decatur Boulevard, located between Ford Avenue and Pebble Road within Enterprise.

And item 34, UC 26-0039.

Use permit for outdoor dining, drinking, and cooking.

Waivers of development standards for the following one reduce setbacks, two reduce street landscaping, three to reduce buffering and screening, four modified residential adjacency standards, and five alternative driveway geometrics with a design review for proposed commercial building on 0.85 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located east of Decatur Boulevard and south of Ford Avenue within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning.

How is everyone?

Good.

Thank you.

Just state your name for the record, please.

Renee Roland with Momenti Engineers, 8360 West Sahara.

Last name is R-O-L-I-N.

Thank you.

Um, do you prefer?

Do I need to go through 3132 and 33 since I've either been adopted or approved?

Or is it relatively obvious?

I don't know.

Commissioner Jones.

Uh it's really the design to go over that I know public works is gonna have some issues with.

Correct.

Okay, so then going straight to 34.

Um here's a site plan, and I apologize for the red lines.

I just realized I grabbed the wrong one, but we have removed the parking here and here and put some back in there.

So we're still within our parking means.

Um we have a retail building of 7240 square feet, where we also want to have outdoor dining around this end of it, which is the south end.

Um we have added in um a large buffer of trees at the back side on the east side, just to block the current residential that could be built there in the future.

Currently, it's a dirt lot, and the same applies to what's at the south side.

But we've put buffering in for future purposes, should those become residences as it's currently zoned.

So we're asking for um a waiver of development standards to reduce the buffering and the screening.

Um, along Ford, we have an easement right here that obviously we can't plant within.

And we've met our site visibility zones and added as many trees and plants as we feel is possible.

But if you want to, we can crowd some more in if we need to, but we think it's sufficient to get us um looking great once we're built out.

The um driveway geometrics are kind of odd too because we have a shorter distance here based on what public works is looking for.

Um, but we did the one here along decatur so that you would not be able to make a left turn out of this.

Hopefully, mitigating some accidents.

Same with Ford, you would only have a right turn only out of there given how close it is.

So hopefully those can work with with what we're proposing.

And here's a look of the building if you haven't seen all of the uh files that have been sent in.

So basically that's it.

Um it's pretty standard.

It's nothing out of this world, but we do have some restrictions just given the size of the site and what we're trying to put onto the site given the corner lot.

So appreciate any questions.

That concludes your presentation.

This is a public hearing on items 31 through 34.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Seeing no one, Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Ms.

Proposian.

Thank you, Commissioner.

I haven't seen the plans she was shown yet.

It appears she's moved removed a couple of parking spaces.

Can I can I see that back, please?

It's in your files.

The site plan.

So I'm just gonna go with I'm gonna request that the applicant consider holding this item for two weeks.

We don't I don't design from the podium and do meet with you.

There's stuff that needs to be worked out with public work.

So I I'm happy to move for approval of of items uh 31 through 33 and hold 34, but I don't I don't really want to be designing from the podium right now.

So um okay.

All right, I'm gonna go move.

Yeah, I'm sorry.

Um the planning commission had a reduction in the zoning, but do you want to approve it as requested?

Um we'll just hold all of them and then we'll have a discussion about that.

Okay.

Uh I'll move forward uh to hold agenda items 31 through 34 and request that the applicant meet with my office as well as with uh with Ms.

Rupausian's office.

Is there anything different you want to see when we meet again?

Yes.

They'll tell us what that is.

What was that?

And they'll tell us what that is.

She's asking if there's anything.

We've already met twice.

I think you'd like to see the current whatever else you want to do.

Yes, we want to see the current plans, and if there are any comments back, then our planning staff can make those recommendations to you.

Okay, all right, great.

Thank you.

There's a motion to hold items 31 through 34.

Please cast your vote.

And just to clarify, that's till May 6th.

Until May 6.

The motion passes.

Next are items 35 through 40, which can be heard together.

35 is PA 26-7002.

Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from neighborhood commercial and C to compact neighborhood C N on 3.92 acres.

Generally located west of Maryland Parkway and south of Cactus Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 36, ZC 26-0043.

Sound change to reclassify 3.92 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone.

Generally located west of Maryland Parkway and south of Cactus Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 37, VS 26 F0044.

Vacate and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County, located between Radcliffe Street and Maryland Parkway, and Cactus Avenue and Levi Avenue.

A portion of right-of-way being Cactus Avenue between Radcliffe Street and Maryland Parkway, and a portion of right-of-way being Maryland Parkway located between Cactus Avenue and Levi Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 38, 20 V, excuse me, WS26-0045 waivers of development standards for the following.

One modified driveway geometrics.

Two increase number of dwelling units on private stub streets in conjunction with the proposed single family attached residential development on 3.92 acres and an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located south of Cactus Avenue and west of Maryland Parkway within Enterprise.

And an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located south of Cactus Avenue and West of Maryland Parkway within Enterprise.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning, Jennifer Lazovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here today on behalf of the applicant Beezer Homes.

The site is located on the corner of Cactus in Maryland.

The applicant is asking for a master plan, plan amendment change to compact neighborhood.

It's presently plan for neighborhood commercial, but as you can see in these orange areas, uh there are surrounding properties that are planned for commercial neighborhood, and staff is supporting that request.

The property right now is zoned RS20, but as the previous exhibit showed, it is master plan for commercial.

The applicant is asking for RM18 zoning, and I'll point out the other areas where there's RM18 zoning to the north of the site, and then as well as to the south of the site.

Staff is also recommending approval of that request.

This is a copy of the site plan.

What is proposed are 46 two-story townhomes with an entryway coming in off of Maryland Parkway.

All of these townhomes have uh driveways, those are full-length driveways with two-car garages.

In addition to that, um, we are providing additional guest parking spaces right here.

And then we have concentrated all of the open space in this corner.

Intentionally, we are having a functional turf area that isn't blocked, if you will, by trees, so that you can go out there, you can kick a soccer ball or throw a football.

And then in this area, we're gonna have a fenced-in dog area.

This portion of the property will have uh view fencing with trees that are on um trees and landscaping that are on both sides.

So, particularly at the end of the two stub streets, you will be able to see landscaping, uh, not only the landscaping that's on this side, but also the landscaping as you look through the fencing that um faces out towards cactus.

We have block walls as you come this way, but we uh do meet the site visibility zones to ensure that we're complying with code in those areas.

We appreciate a partial recommendation of approval from staff.

Um let me just show you those elevations.

Uh, this gives you an idea of the elevations.

The driveways that I mentioned on the previous exhibit, the front door is on the opposite side of that.

So when you come home or when you have visitors that come, if you're coming home and you want to pull into your driveway or garage, you can go into your house.

But if you're coming to the front door, uh the front of the elevations actually face towards these green belt open space areas, and that's where the front of the door faces too.

With that, I'd be happy to answer any questions.

Thank you.

This is a public comment period for items uh 35 through 40.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Seeing no one, I'll close the public comment period.

Um it is rare that we see this townhome product with entirely full-length driveways.

I'm grateful that the applicant worked hard and through a couple revisions got to this point.

Uh and also that open space, I think um will meet the need of the community.

So I'm appreciative of you working with us on those two things.

Um, and uh I would also echo what you sort of indicated that much of this is supported by staff, uh, much of this application.

So I'm uh happy to move for approval of items 35 through 40.

The motion passes.

Thank you.

Next items 41 through 44, which can be heard together.

Item 41 is PA26-7003.

Plan amendment to redesignate the land use category from business employment to neighborhood commercial on 9.55 acres, generally located east of Buffalo Drive and south of Sunset Road within Spring Valley.

Item 42, ZC 26-0052.

Zone change to reclassify 9.55 acres from a CC zone to CG zone, generally located east of Buffalo Drive and south of Sunset Road within Spring Valley.

Item 43, VS 26-0053, vacant nevadent easements of interest to Clark County located between Buffalo Drive and Arroyo Spring Street, and Sunset Road and Rafa Rafael Rivera Way.

And a portion of right-away being Tioga Way, located between Sunset Road and Raphael Rivera Way within Spring Valley.

And item 44 WS 26-0054.

We reserve development standards for the following.

One eliminate street landscaping, two increase retaining wall height, and three allow attached sidewalks and four alternative driveway geometrics.

Design review for a vehicle sales facility on 9.67 acres and a CG commercial general zone within the airport environments, A E60 overlay, generally located east of Buffalo Drive and south of Sunset Road within Spring Valley.

Thank you.

Good morning.

Good morning, Mr.

Chairman and Commissioners.

My name is Bob Gronauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive.

I'm here representing the applicant on these applications.

First thing I'd like to do is get your attention to the overhead to the location of the property.

As you can see here highlighted in yellow, this is approximately uh 10 acres of property.

It is just on this side is Buffalo.

This is uh Raphael Revere Way, which is a frontage road.

If you're familiar, this is 215 in the Buffalo off ramp in this area.

Um if you're also familiar with this area, you'll know that this piece of property is sunk down significantly to the existing road in this area, which then creates some type of a constraint here where it's difficult to actually develop the property.

However, um, as I go through the presentation, I'll mention we've been working closely with Antonio and Jawan from Public Works and Sarah in the commissioner's office to make sure that we could get this project designed appropriately.

Um that being said, the property is currently master plan BE.

As staff said, is we're coming in to change that master plan to neighborhood commercial in this area.

Uh what we are proposing is for a sales service and delivery uh dealership.

It's for a Tesla dealership.

The property is currently zoned C C commercial core.

We're asking to zone that to CG.

Uh, based on the area's location.

Um, staff has uh agreed that this is compatible and harmonious to the surrounding areas and so as you can see here, we have a lot of industrial and commercial uses.

Uh this is where similar situated type of dealerships are located adjacent to the uh beltway and uh right on major arterial streets in this area.

So staff's recommending, as I mentioned, of the master plan amendment and also the zone change.

With respect to the waivers of development standards, uh waiver development standards one and two, staff is recommending approval of that.

And as I mentioned earlier, is the location of the property here.

It has a significant slope in this area.

Um we are actually providing it landscape on the bottom of the uh of the slopes in this area.

It's about eight feet wide down here.

We're also meeting the landscape requirements in our uh in our dealership lot here.

We have all the uh trees that are located where the cars would actually be uh located for sale.

Um, and also we're asking for retainer wall height.

Staff is recommending approval of that.

With respect to waiver development number three, we're withdrawing that.

Um that was for a detached sidewalk on Buffalo.

We've worked with public works on that to make sure we have our detached sidewalk up on Buffalo Drive in that area.

And again, I want to uh make a special thanks to Antonio and the public works department for working with us on that design up on Buffalo.

With respect to waiver development number four, uh, that is for the waiver development standards here for throat depth, our only access, ingress, and egress is on Tiogo Way coming into the property here.

Uh the site development plan review or design review that's before you is for a 60,000 square foot building.

Uh this is, as I already mentioned, this is for the sales service and delivery of vehicles for the dealership for Tesla.

Uh they also will be operating on a five-acre lot to the north here that was already just approved uh by the county at the planning commission for a robo taxi uh location here.

So if if anything, as you can understand here now and appreciate that this is going to be the dealership hub in southern Nevada at this location here with all these uh uses that are being proposed on the property.

Uh staff is recommending uh approval for the design review.

Uh the vacations, uh some of these are typical patent vacations that we're asking for uh and staff's recommending approval.

I do know I don't I believe we do not need the uh Buffalo vacation any longer because uh we've worked out the detached sidewalk um uh issue.

Uh but that being said, we'd ask you to um follow the staff's recommendations with the withdrawal of waiver development number three without prejudice, and I'm here to answer any questions that you may have.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on items 41 through 44.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing.

Um, Mr.

Papazian, can you just confirm that the Buffalo vacation is no longer needed?

Uh yes, sir, Commissioner, thank you.

Uh instead of the vacation, we would ask to uh add a condition to execute a license and maintenance agreement for non-standard improvements in the right-away.

Uh just in case we need this right away in the future.

It would be nice to just have it there just in case.

I don't think we do, but I don't think we do either.

But okay.

And then and then also if I could add one more condition, and the condition is because as you know, we have a project on Rafael Rivera Way.

I believe there's a pre-con May 10th, so rather than having the applicant construct the off site improvements and kind of piecemeal it, we asked them if it would be better to install it ourselves.

They agreed, so I'd add a condition the applicant to coordinate a cost contribution to be determined by public works development review for the Beltway frontage project.

The applicant understands that.

Yes, we do.

We've had a lot of uh communications yesterday, and we're both on the same page.

Then I will move for approval of items 41 through 44 with waiver of development standard number three being withdrawn and the additional uh conditions from public works that were read into the record related to uh cost contribution.

That motion passes.

Thank you very much and have a good day.

Next are items 45 through and 46, which can be heard together.

45 is ZC 26-0025.

Holdover zone change to reclassify 0.46 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone.

Generally located east of Topaz Street and north of Dustin Avenue within Paradise.

Item 46, WS 26-0026.

Holdover waivers of development standards for the following one, allow attached sidewalk, two wave off site improvements for street lights, and three alternative driveway geometrics.

Design review for proposed office warehouse building on 0.46 acres and IP industrial park zone within the airport environments AE65 overlay, generally located north of Dustin Avenue and east of Topaz Street within Paradise.

Good morning.

Off of Topaz and Dustin.

Originally, we had submitted the original plan.

But we had some concerns with public works on trash, been location.

We revised the plan, adjusted the building to accommodate with public works, and then we just had a few.

Through our justification letter, we had a few waivers of development request.

Um you could just speak a little louder.

Oh sorry.

So we had a few waivers of request.

Uh one of the waivers was to attach sidewalks, which meets the standard of the area, other industrial parks, the rest of the industrial, because the rest of the area is turned industrial, and all the sidewalks are attached.

So we were requesting a waiver to meet the surrounding standard from separated sidewalk.

The other waiver development was to eliminate street lights.

Not on Toba, it says Topaz, but it was supposed to be Dustin Avenue.

There are street lights presently on Topaz.

There's street lights here and here on the Topaz by our property.

It was at this location.

We did put the streetlight on the current plan in case the waiver was not granted.

The waiver development for the 24-foot uh depth of throat.

Uh the standard, I believe, is 25 feet.

Um we got 24 feet, four inches.

So that waiver we requested and then waiver for the reduction from the corner of the property because the property is only so large.

So we moved it to the furthest point of the property and put the entrance on Topaz, which was the longer distance, the greater distance from the corner.

So I complete your presentation.

Yes, sir.

Thank you.

This is a public hearing.

Anyone wishing to speak on items 45 and 46?

Please come forward.

Seeing no one, Commissioner Gibson.

Thank you.

Mr.

Papazian, terms of the public works concerns.

Help us understand that those are addressed.

Addressed.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you.

Thanks for your work.

Reworking uh on the site.

I move approval of items 45 and 46.

Thank you very much.

Motion passes.

Next items 47 and 48, which can be heard together.

47 ZC 26-0130.

Zone change to reclassify a portion of 1.64 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone.

Generally located south of Cheyenne Avenue and east of Betty Lane within Sunrise Manor.

And item 48, UC 26-0131.

Use permits are the following trucks parking and staging and two outdoor storage and display.

Waivers of development standards for the following.

One modify residential adjacency standards, two eliminate buffering and screening, three, eliminate parking, four, eliminate street landscaping, five, eliminate throat depth, and six wave full off site improvements.

Design review for proposed truck parking and staging and outdoor storage and display on 1.64 acres in an IP industrial park zone within the airport environs AE80 and APZ1 overlay.

Generally located south of Cheyenne Avenue and east of Betty Lane within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Good morning, Chairman Commissioners Dave Turner 333 North Rancho Drive, uh representing the applicant.

Uh with the zone change, what we're asking for is a zone change from RS20 to IP.

It's just for this little sliver of little sliver of property here.

The balance of the site is already zoned IP, so I think that's pretty much an easy easy fix there.

Commissioner Kirkpatrick, thank you for meeting me yesterday.

I think we've addressed most of the concerns that you had.

I just wanted to bring the revised plan to you shown.

Uh we've provided a paved transition along Cheyenne to go into the future driveway here.

We've also moved the throat depth back to 25 feet as recommended and move the shack, the guard shack back.

We've also added that guard shack as we discussed.

Um we also will be putting a sign on the fence adjacent to the gate that uh basically for emergency um access so that people can get a hold of the owner.

Um other than that, I think we've addressed everything.

The adjacent property is zoned RS20, although it functions as an industrial site.

Um I've got a copy of that here.

So I I think we've addressed all your concerns.

If I missed anything, please let me know.

We ask for your approval.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on item 47 and 48.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward.

Seeing no one will close the public hearing.

Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Uh thank you, Mr.

Chairman, and thank you, Mr.

Turner.

You know, I've been working on this area for 11 years.

We're four people away from getting her done.

So thank you for agreeing.

So uh we will approve of the special use permit.

Uh what uh to allow truck parking and staging as long as a that there's a guard check there, two that you provide the on-site contact information on the outside of the fence so that we can see it on the outside, and we will approve the outdoor storage and display as long as um that there's no stacking of the con X boxes out higher than the fence line, and um two that no interoperable vehicles are allowed on the property for an extended period of time.

So, what we don't want to see is every it being a tow yard of broken down vehicles.

Uh so on the waivers, um I want to talk about waiver number three.

You agree to the additional seven parking spots.

So I want to make sure that's a good thing.

Yeah, I can I think we could withdraw number three.

Okay, withdraw number three.

Waiver number four, uh, we're gonna change the um definition to say applicant has uh agreed to alternative landscaping consistent with um the proposed SID standards, and so that way in the SID, it's gonna we factored in boulders and uh rock.

Uh so that'll be part of the big SID.

We're doing it all at once.

Um you're gonna uh work with on waiver number five.

That's been addressed, correct?

So I can withdraw that or just put it's a minimum of 25 feet.

He has meant the minimum, so he can't withdraw that waiver, Commissioner.

Withdraw waiver number five, and waiver number six will read that the applicant has agreed to participate in the upcoming SID and will continue to work with public works.

So that lets you get going.

That keeps us all on the uh same page, and I want to be clear which it's already in here that there's uh when we do the SID as well, there'll be security cameras, there'll be street lights, all of that and no green mesh, no matter what you do.

I I know that staff likes that, but I don't because it's graffitied and it's torn with all the wind.

So that would be my motion, unless you have something else you want.

Um, could we make sure to applicate uh provide us the revised plan so we can have them on file as well, please?

Yeah, absolutely.

Okay, right.

That's my motion.

There's a motion for items 47 and 48.

Please cast your vote.

The motion passes.

Thank you very much.

Have a great day.

Thank you.

Next is item 49 AG 26-900195.

Discuss whether to initiate a master plan amendment to the Clark County's trails map within the Clark County Master Plan and direct staff accordingly.

Um Commissioners, uh Commissioner Jones had requested that we take a look at the trails map to um add an alignment on wallapi between Gomer and Blue Diamond.

So uh we're looking for direction to make this change, and then if there's any other changes that you feel necessary, um, if we can update as well.

Thank you, Commissioner Jones.

Uh yeah, so this the specific part piece is uh part of the planned Vegas Valley Rim Trail.

So we're just trying to get ahead of things before development goes there and identify it as a good chunk of uh that rim trail that will connect to other areas and certainly open any other ideas on trails.

Can we see can we see a map of all the trails?

Oh I I asked for that a long time ago in the northwest to even the horse trails and all of that, so we see where they kind of go.

Yeah, sure.

I agree with Commissioner Jones.

I mean Henderson when we did the trail system out there.

We have a very extensive trail system.

It made all the difference in the world to get it done before development.

Anyone else?

You've got sufficient direction?

Thank you.

Uh next item item 50, AG 26-9004.

Discuss whether to initiate an amendment to the Clark County Master Plan to add a heat mitigation plan to update statistical information and exhibits, reorganize and streamland information, make corrections and clarification as needed, direct staff accordingly.

Uh last legislative session, AB96 was approved to um deal with heat mitigation, and all the jurisdictions have met together to come up with policies.

Uh, thankfully, we are pretty much in uh conformance with the policies.

We're just going to make uh minor change to sort of supplement what we have regarding cooling stations for in public places.

And then similar to what we did with Title 30 last time, we asked for direction, just common direction if we have minor changes and amendments we need to clarify as time comes on.

May I ask a question?

So, as we're talking about heat mitigation, do we need to look at um I've we know I was doing those housing committees, and one of the conversations that came up were the color schemes.

Now they're all going gray because they say that it um they're trying to meet the energy code, but in my mind, gray brings more heat.

So do we need to look at that as well going forward when we talk about these heat mitigation areas?

Sure.

I don't think it was part of these specific directions, but we can look into it.

Okay.

I mean, I just don't want to see all gray because I think that's heat itself.

Thank you.

Mr.

Chair.

I just want to note uh that commissioner uh Segerbloom is having a heat summit next week and working with SNS and RTC.

So I think it's a good opportunity to really raise profile of this, and glad that the county is actively involved.

And we'll address gray too.

You need anything further?

No.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And last or two ordinances for introduction, item 51, ORD 26-900 140.

Introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of development agreement with MEQ Cactus and Rainbow LLC for commercial shopping center on a portion of 5.5 acres.

And item 52, ORD 26-900-227.

Introduce an ordinance to amend the official zoning map reclassifying certain properties as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 4th, 2026, and February 18th, 2026.

Staff recommends that you set the public hearing for May 6th.

We will set the public hearing for May 6th.

Thank you.

Uh this is the final time set aside for public comment.

Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time.

Seeing no one, we will adjourn today's meeting.

Have a great day.