We're gonna get the meeting started.

We're gonna call it to order.

It's a meeting for planning commission for Clark County Tuesday, May 5th.

If you wouldn't mind, please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.

And roll call, please.

Chair Frazier.

Here.

Vice Chair Mohica.

Present.

Commissioner Stone is excused.

Commissioner Kirk.

Here.

Commissioner Kalarski.

Here.

Commissioner Brady.

Here.

Commissioner Roitman.

In attendance.

Mr.

Chair, we have a quorum.

All right, Commissioner Stone is excused.

All right.

So first I first item of uh business is public comments.

It's a part of our meeting per Nevada revised statutes where anyone from the public can come down.

You can speak on any item.

Um the commission cannot vote or act on it, but you're more than welcome to make a public comment.

Now it's time to do that.

Okay.

All right.

No public comments, then we will move on to the next item of business.

Thank you.

All right.

The next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda after any additions, holds or deletions.

At this time, staff has the following requests.

Hold the following no date specific per the applicant.

Item number twelve, UC twenty-six-015 six.

Hold the following to the May 19th, 2026 Planning Commission meeting and the corresponding Board of County Commissioners meeting to June 17, 2026 per the applicant.

Item number 21, PA 267010.

Item 22 ZC 260137.

Item number 23 WS 260138 in item number 24 TM 265033 for the applicant's information.

Additional re-notification fees may be required in accordance with Title 30 for items held or deleted, or if there are any modifications to the original application.

This is for items twelve, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, and twenty-four.

If there are no requests by the planning commission or any members of the app of the public, the agenda stands ready for your approval.

Can I get a motion for approval of the agenda?

Mr.

Chair, I make a motion to approve the agenda as presented.

Holding item number twelve with no date and holding items 21, 22, 23, and 24 to the June 17th planning commission meeting.

Thank you very much.

I think we want to hear item number twelve tonight, actually.

The applicants here, and I believe they're ready to present that.

Okay, so so we're so the motion will be motion would be then to approve the agenda, hold only holding items twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, and twenty-four to be heard on June seventeenth.

All right, and we're gonna hear number twelve on its order.

So the motion on the floor.

Okay, so that would be the main May nineteenth planning commission meeting and the June seventeen.

That's correct.

All right, very good.

approve the agenda hold only holding items 21 22 23 and 24 to be heard on june 17th all right and we're gonna hear number 12 in its order so the motion on the floor sorry it's gonna be the uh may 19th PC okay so that would be the main May 19th planning commission meeting and the June 17 board of county commissioners that's correct all right very good motion on the floor cast your vote our motion passes next item the next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes the plenary the planning commission briefing and regular meeting minutes from April 7th 2026 are ready for approval all right um get a motion for approval of the minutes motion to approve the minutes as presented all right motion on four cast your vote I'm sorry but my machine is black so I'll have to vote say say yes raise your hand yeah all right motion that way there you go motion passes next item I vote aye just a quick quick announcement uh before we move on for the audience's information items on tonight's agenda are final action unless appealed to the board of county commissioners or otherwise denounced all appeals must be filed in writing to the comprehensive planning department by 5 p.m on Wednesday May 13 2026 and any appeals from tonight's meeting will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday June 3rd 2026 at 9 a.m in these chambers for Title 30 an agreed person may appeal an item and an aggrieved person includes the applicant someone who attended this meeting in person or through an authorized representative or someone who has submitted comments in writing which may include a postcard or letter members in the audience must complete the meeting sign-in sheet found near the dais to confirm their attendance at this meeting mail notices of appealed applications will be sent to the property owners within the same notification radius as the original application and to those listed on the meeting sign in sheet additionally any person may call the comprehensive planning department at 702 455 4314 or go to the county's meeting agenda web page and review the meeting notice of final action to find out if any items have been appealed next on the agenda is are the routine action items which consist of items number four through ten these items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item if there are no objections the public hearing is now open in the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.

Thank you staff all right so this is a time where we're going to vote on the routine action items and those are items four through number 10 and that will be in one vote so we're gonna approve all of those items in one vote so if anyone in the audience has an issue or would like to hear one of those items separately now's the time to come down and ask that that item be removed from the routine action items all right seeing no one coming down to remove those at those numbers we will um entertain a motion for the approval of the routine action items motion to approve routine action items four through ten motion on the floor cast your vote motion passes thank you next item number 12 11 all right and that is final action unless appealed the next item on the agenda is item number 11 item number 11 is UC 266-0142 holdover use permit for proposed banquet facility in conjunction with an existing commercial center on a portion of 1.74 acres in a CG commercial general zone generally located south of Tropicana Avenue and east of Doonville Street within Spring Valley all right there's an applicant in the audience for number 11 oh yeah come on down right so um tell so name and address for the record and tell us about your application my name is Rebecca Mahan oh so so either there's either a handheld mic referring you or one my name is Rebecca Mahan I am the owner of Wow Party decor the address is 5785 West Tropicana Avenue I'm requesting an approval for a small reservation only event space designed for intimate gatherings such as baby showers birthdays and family celebrations this is not a night club or a bar or a public entertainment venue we only we don't allow walk-ins ticket events or outdoor gatherings all events are prescheduled and take place fully inside the space our maximum occupancy is limited to 60 guests and events are short in duration typically two to four hours we are committed to being respectful to neighbors we do not use outdoor music we do not allow loadering outside and we ensure guests live in order in orderly manner additionally the shopping center has more more than sufficient parking within 99 available spaces which provid

Our maximum occupancy is limited to 60 guests.

And events are short in duration.

Typically two to four hours.

We do not use outdoor music.

We do not allow loadering outside, and we ensure guests live in order in orderly manner.

Additionally, the shopping center has more than sufficient parking within 99 available spaces, which prevents any overflow into the surrounding residential area.

Nearby users already includes restaurants and hookah lounge with much later hours in which generates significantly more activity than our business.

Nearby residents.

I would I respectfully ask for your approval.

All right, thank you very much.

All right, so we're gonna open this application up for a public hearing.

Anyone in the audience want to speak on this item?

Now's the time to come down and speak on it.

All right, seeing no one coming down to speak on this item, we're gonna close the public hearing and I'll open it up to the commissioners for questions and comments.

I I just want to know why you didn't show up at town board.

I'm gonna be real frank and honest with you.

Because you need to show up.

I understand.

I haven't got any information about it.

This is the only email I got.

You were told this meeting.

When when you first did your application, I know you were given a sheet because every applicant is given a sheet that shows the dates that you need to show up.

So uh I don't know why you didn't show up.

It to me it's important that that you show up.

Okay.

So I'm I'm not certain how I feel on this project.

I think it's a good project, but uh you need to show up.

Maybe you want to go to Royman and you it's his.

Okay, so uh so vice chair.

Yeah, I I agree.

You one time is an excuse.

Three times is unacceptable.

So I am not gonna support this because three times you have not shown up to town board.

And I'm sure you've I'm sure staff have you been in touch with the applicant?

Uh as far as as far as I'm aware, yes, and they're given uh a meeting information sheet that'll list out the uh town board and the um so she's been informed of these town meetings.

Yeah, it's unacceptable.

I will not approve this.

Commissioner Roitman.

Uh I tend to agree.

I tend to agree with the my fellow commissioners that I think we've we've each time this has come before us, it's been a couple times now that we've held it.

Um you haven't appeared for those times either, right?

This was on the agenda a couple times, staff, and we kept on holding it.

Is that right?

I believe uh it was on um the agenda about a month ago when you held the held it there for the for them to be able to go back.

Was that the first time I held it?

That was the first time, yes.

Um I'm not gonna approve it.

Um right now I'm between either a denial or a denial with prejudice.

I guess theoretically I could hold it one more time for town board.

Right, staff.

And then if you don't show up to that town board, then we will deny with prejudice.

That that is something you could do, yes.

Anyone have any big problem with that?

All right, it's acceptable to me.

Yeah.

Okay.

Uh so if you do not go to this next town board, or you do not show up to the next meeting, then we will deny with prejudice.

And from what I understand, it'll be a year until you can apply after that, and then it'll take probably another five or six months for you to be back in front of us.

So you must go to the next town board.

And when the town board comes here, I'm gonna think about what they have to say.

This is not all right.

So uh with that, I'll motion for UC 260142.

Uh motion to or I guess do I need to motion or just hold it?

Uh yeah, we would so uh don't leave yet because you need to hear this.

Okay.

Yeah, don't walk away, please.

I from speaking with staff.

I think we can if you want to do the next town board, we could probably get them on is five 526.

Let me ask you one thing.

Because we've held it a couple times now.

Will that will there be additional notices or anything else like that?

Uh not yet.

No.

Okay.

All right, yeah.

Then that that's what I want to do.

Okay.

Yeah.

So it'd be it would uh I'm sorry.

I just I just want to make sure she writes down the dates of when she needs to be at the town board and this board.

Mr.

Chairman, I think the applicant is fully aware.

I don't think she needs to be casting it in public.

She knows she needs to go to the meetings.

Let's move on.

Let Commissioner Roy make the motion.

Let's vote.

Okay, what's the date that I need to 526 town board and six two P uh PC.

Motion to hold to the oh I just lost it again.

526 Town Board, June 6th, uh June 2nd Planning Commission.

June 2nd Planning Commission, so you can tie it the 526 town board.

Thank you, everyone.

All right.

So there's a motion on the floor to hold.

Get with staff if you have any questions.

Cast your vote.

That motion passes for a hold.

Good luck.

Next item.

The next item is item number 12.

Item number 12 is UC 26-0156.

Use permits for the following one, a museum and two office has a primary use, waiver of development standards to reduce parking design review for a proposed museum in conjunction with an existing office slash warehouse and mini warehouse complex on 5.16 acres in an IL industrialized zone, generally located south of Hacienda Avenue and west of Cameron Street within Paradise.

Tell us about your application.

Good evening, Commissioners and the Chairman.

My name is Damon Hardy, H A R D Y.

I'm at 633 House Blend Lane, Henderson, Nevada, 89052.

I'm here with the applicant, Sherry Goldstrom.

4565 Raven Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Thank you.

Thank you very much.

I'm here on behalf of the applicant Sherry Goldman with nostalgia Street Rodz, who is present here with me today.

It's made up of several offices, office warehouse, lease spaces, vehicle maintenance, as well as many warehouses.

And they, as far as their business goes, they were very instrumental on the demolition of the dunes as well as the hacienda, as well as the uh Riviera.

And they and they also um had a trucking company who hauled off all this debris.

And also they had pre-engineered for demolition.

So they've been a pillar of the community.

Also, they've amassed a huge over 60 years memorabilia with vehicles and uh memorabilia uh throughout the throughout Las Vegas and throughout this um community.

Um they currently for the last 17 years have ran a museum open to the public that they're able to present and show off their artifacts and their collectibles so the family could benefit that as well as the community.

Um we recently um presented the reason why I wanted to present uh we wanted to hold this item was because we're trying to get with our architect to revise our site plan in order to adhere to the town board uh conditions.

Uh the town board uh approved it with some conditions, and we'll go through some of the conditions tonight that we're really to accept and go forward with that.

The first requirement uh that the query parking spaces that they were short 17 spaces.

We're willing to on the west parking lot, as you see right here.

We uh there's a vast area there we're able to we can restrict and add additional 20 to 40 parking stalls if need be to meet the requirements for the parking right in this location right here.

Um also the some of the conditions also were that we are supposed to provide safety around the outside display, which is located right here.

There's basically 17 um spaces that are uh instrumental, they have trucks that are inoperable, they're stationary, they're only for display.

And if you'd like I could show you an example, we have stanchions around them currently for the public to look at.

These are the vehicles that were used in the hauling of the material from the the imploded dunes and the material that was used uh that was um that was removed from the properties at that time of the implosion.

So there's some trucks there.

We'll show you a couple examples of the stanchions.

Again, in the last 17 years, we haven't had any problem with any safety or anybody being injured.

Nobody climbs on these vehicles.

And please note also that every these uh they go by appointment only uh at this museum, and they're all guided, they're all personally guided throughout the buildings and to this outdoor display.

They're all personally guided throughout the buildings and to this outdoor display.

So there's no wandering or open viewing of any of the memorabilia in this property.

Those are some of the conditions we're willing to adhere to.

We also spoke with one of the planners recently, and they mentioned that there's on-site pedestrian.

Yeah, but they have conditions now for on-site pedestrian access.

And some of the conditions are either changing the pavement material, pattern or color, but not painting, but not be able to paint the marks on the floor, or use decorative bollards, or raise medians with landscaping, or stamped or stained concrete.

Currently, this property is paved with asphalt, and there's also um valley gutters that are throughout the property.

And we prefer to just paint the pedestrian accesses from one building to the next to meet those standards, but however, in the new Title 30, we're not allowed to do that.

So that was one of the reasons why we wanted to hold over this application due to the fact that we're trying to come up with some different solutions as to provide uh the requirements needed to provide safety for the pedestrians.

So I'm here on your behalf, if you'd please allow us the opportunity to continue to go forward with this museum and be able to benefit the community.

And um and just want to do it right to make sure we have all the permits uh necessary in order to go ahead and do that.

So I have I'm up for suggestions or questions that you may have at this point.

All right, thank you very much.

Um I will open the application up for a public hearing.

Anyone in the audience would like to just the time when anyone anyone audience like to come down and speak on this item now's time to do so.

All right, seeing no one coming down for to speak on it, I will close the public hearing and I'll open it up to our commissioners for comments.

I'll start with Commissioner Kowarski.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

I was at the town board when when uh this application was presented.

I know that the uh town board members really liked the project, they just had concerns about the outside and and the safety concerns for people not just being able to walk all around or get into the equipment.

So if you can comply with whatever safety measures we can get staff to help us get along with, and I can surely surely work, you know, have you continue to work with staff?

I can surely uh support this this application.

Absolutely.

Yes, absolutely.

All right, Commissioner Vice Chair Mohiko.

I I would like to add to that.

Um and I'm I'd like to know what the options are for safety.

Do we have any suggestions?

Is anybody working with them on what to do?

We we we take pedestrian safety very seriously, and you can tell us all day that nobody jumps on those trucks and nobody's gonna get near them, but you don't have eyes behind the back of your head, and you're not there.

Uh so you can't guarantee that.

So I would like to see something, some type of barrier safety.

May we maybe ask with stanches and or like I said, they're all publicly uh guided uh with uh with a guide in into every property of this in the area of this property.

Um like I said, nobody's ever climbed on these trucks during the uh do we have any suggestions?

Please, we're open for suggestions.

Um as he stated Title 30, Title 30 does require that you have some sort of um pedestrian walkway from the building to parking spaces such as that, so that you know like something that could be done that would be that would meet Title 30 requirements.

Will you allow us to go ahead and use paint to identify those areas?

Uh that it does need to be uh Title 30 would require that it be a different texture, a different something.

So Title 30 specifies what the options are?

Yeah, my suggestion would be for you to work within Title 30 and work with the planner.

All right, thank you.

Um I would just say for the record that um I'm satisfied with what the applicant had presented.

Um and following town board, town board uh recommended approval items.

I I could I could support the application.

Uh turn it over to Commissioner Workman for staff.

So do you mind putting up your map again?

Thank you.

That is good, thank you.

So can uh okay, so in the staff briefing, it says we want adequate safety measures, right?

And it says designated walkways, protective barriers, and improved circulate methods or something for circulation and conflict points.

So is the concern that when they are uh let me ask you a question actually before I get to stuff.

The the main museum is that can you point to where like if you're gonna be walking out some tourists, some patrons, where are they gonna walk out from and where are they gonna walk to?

Okay.

They start here.

Yep.

And they walk here.

Yep.

And we walk them along the building, and then we walk them down here to this area.

Yep.

And then we walk them back to this area.

Got it.

And there you have kind of like some rope things in front of the um the trucks.

Yes.

And when you say no one climbs on them, do people enter into them?

No.

I'm sorry.

Do they do they enter into the trucks?

No.

The trucks, the four.

They just look at them.

They just look at them.

They they don't go near them, they they don't touch them, they don't do anything, and they're interoperable also.

Okay, thank you.

So for staff, would temporary like those uh what do you call those things you have in front of the trucks?

Stentions?

Extensions.

Staff would temporary stenchions that were placed, because I'm in my mind, we kind of have a designated walkway here, and then maybe it's just along the if you could move the your photo for a moment, please, ma'am.

If we had some stenchions that when we are giving tours, kind of just I mean, are we are we concerned that people are gonna walk into the empty parking lot?

I'm I I'm a little concerned that our recommendations are requirements here, may be a little overkill.

And so I'm trying to get an idea of what are what is the safe because if Stone, if Commissioner Stone was here, he would be reminding me that our main purpose is safety.

So I agree with the other comments that we want to be safe here.

But what are we asking for?

Yeah, I think the I think the issue that staff had is that this is ultimately and primarily uh an industrial uh use of a property.

So you have mini warehouse, you have office warehouse.

Oh, it's the idea that people are walking around in an area that you know may have larger vehicles, cargo, that sort of thing.

And so I think that that's where the issue is.

Okay, let me let me ask you one more question.

So this so you see where the we see where the parking stripes are, and then we see where the the cars are.

This building here to your right, yep, that long building.

That is part of the museum.

Yes, that is all the museum, and the only this is the only right here where my finger is going.

This is uh all of our tenants, and nobody ever gets cargo there.

Nobody gets it's it's literally just foot traffic.

So for staff, let I'm not saying I'm gonna require this, but if we did require that temporary stenchions get placed from this, this is like the east building.

If there was a a temporary extension that was placed that with like some signage or something that made sure that people were aware that they're not supposed to be approaching the industrial buildings to the west, and that really they're just supposed to kind of walk down the pathway and then walk around the cars and then walk past and stay within this, and maybe some paint as well, maybe some paint on the ground and some temporary extensions.

Would that make us feel better about the as opposed to like what the otherwise we're talking about, like special pavement for texture or some kind of ballard?

I think that that would be a little bit of overkill personally.

Um I think so.

I would say that Title 30 requires that there be some sort of formal walkway, not just a temporary extension, but uh uh if they're able to put paint on that, put paint, say that they're gonna put paint down with a temporary plan, that's something that we could could work with.

How do you guys feel about some paint on the walkway?

And then when visitors are there, you put some temporary extensions.

It'll be it'll be like the red carpet, I think.

The red the red trucking carpet is a little bit.

I feel that feel good about that.

We've got you.

Yes, 100%.

And that's really the way we treat our guests.

We we never leave a guest unattended.

We walk with them the whole entire way.

So the red carpet thing would be just what they're getting now.

Well, I I look forward to uh jumping on that red carpet one day.

So and some signage?

Of course.

Cool.

Uh Commissioner Wrigman, I would just offer that if you wanted to also you could do maybe a two-year review period so they can come back forwards if you're you guys can come see us again in two years?

We'd love to.

Okay.

We'd like to invite you all also to come see the museum.

Yes, we will.

I I I looked at the photos online after we had our chat the other day, and I think it looks very cool.

So I I'm definitely gonna be a lot of history there.

It's gonna be good.

If any everyone else is good, then all right, I'd like to motion to approve with uh Commissioner Roydman.

Commissioner, real quick, if you can just make sure when you're making this motion to include to include the condition for uh a painted walkway.

That's what I'm gonna do.

Okay, perfect.

I'm gonna do the striping the striping for the parking.

Wait, do we did we land on how many parking spots we're gonna have?

What do you guys think?

We can put 30, 40.

Right now we're we're we're 17 short according to the plan.

Okay, so um 30?

Yeah, 30 parking spots striped parking spots, a painted pathway with temporary stenctions and signage when folks are being guided.

They have to be guided, and I think that hits both us and town board.

I motion to approve with those conditions.

Two year extensions and the two year uh review period.

Thank you.

Team effort up here, guys.

Sorry, one more.

Sorry, Chris.

Yes get it down here.

30 parking spots.

Striped.

Painted walkway.

Signage.

Signage and stentions when visitors are present.

Those can be temporary, but up when they're present.

Escorted visitors at all times to your review.

Have I missed anything?

No.

Okay.

And with those conditions, I motion to approve use.

I'm so sorry.

Uh can I do you have uh do you have an idea of where you want that pathway to go from?

I I I think I think the path, I will leave it up.

Yes, I think we just want at least one line that goes north to south.

That right make sure we're all in agreement here.

And then so like it'll be like a reverse L, like kind of comes down and separates the industrial building, comes however across the side of this building that goes north to south on the eastern part of the what's of the here, you know, right?

The property, and then goes kind of like however many feet from the stenchions that are already on the display.

So they are kind of walking out, walking down, walking over, walking back.

I know they're gonna have to watch this video.

Got it.

I want to make sure we do it correctly.

Do I need it looks gonna look like I'm dancing up here, right?

Uh do we have everything we need?

Yes.

I think we should be good now.

Yep.

Thanks.

Uh motion to approve UC260156, subject to the conditions.

Uh that I think are now clear.

All right.

So there's a motion on the floor, cast your vote.

Commissioner Majica, yes.

My computer's restored.

All right, that motion carries.

Good luck.

We thank you all very much.

Thank you for your time.

Thank you so much.

All right, that is final action unless appealed.

Our next item will be item number 13, WS26-0147.

Waiver of development standards to reduce setbacks in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.21 acres in an RS5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located south of Grossmont Avenue and west of Ospistian Way within Sunrise Manor.

Thank you, staff.

Um, name and address for the record and tell us about your application.

Good evening.

My name is Christian Rivas.

I'm the owner of 5573 Grossman Avenue.

Las Vegas Nevada 9110.

I'm here today to request an approval for a rear yard um setback variance.

First of all, um I want to knowledge that I build the structure without going through the proper process, permit process.

I understand it was my mistake, and I take full responsibility of it.

Um this structure was not built for rental or business purposes.

Um it was intended to provide a place for my loss to leave.

So the main issue here is that one corner, like you can see here.

One corner of the casita.

Is located at three feet one inch from the rear property line where five feet is required.

However, um this only affects a very small portion of the structure due to the irregular shape of the lot.

As you move away from the corner, do you have uh 168 um setback increases?

Uh the patio the right here.

Extend one foot from the popular line.

However, the structural post are within compliance distance.

I have spoken already with the neighbors and they have no objections to the structure as it currently exists.

I also have a letter from the neighbor that is close to this patio that he's fine to just keep it like that.

Just to mention this when I buy the house.

Just to mention this, when I buy the house, uh this patio wasn't reviewed built, so I mean I'm responsible for it right now, but it was like that when I buy the house.

Um I request I respectfully request approval for the structure to remain's built.

I am committed to compliant with all other requirements working with the county to resolve properly.

Um I truly want to do right the things right.

I'm here to correct my mistakes and move forward in compliance.

I respectfully are asked for your score your consideration.

All right, thank you very much.

So I'm gonna open this application up for a public hearing.

Anyone in the audience like to come down and speak on this item.

Seeing knowing one coming down, we're going to close the public hearing, and I will um turn it over to commissioners for questions, comments.

Okay, all right.

Umika, yes.

I just have a simple question.

Do you you said you spoke with the neighbor?

Did they give you a letter?

Yes.

Do you can you please present it to us?

Give it to staff so we can look.

Can you put it on the and that's the immediate neighbor, right?

Yes.

Yeah, if it looks good to you, it looks good to us.

I was not gonna do that.

So that's I guess that's the sounds right there.

Now maybe that's let's just do it.

All right, do you have a photo of what the patio looks like now?

I have a buddy uh photo on my phone and that's perfect.

And just put it on if it looks good to you, we can see it.

Well, this one here.

Oh, I suppose the poses we can just do.

Okay, um, so no other questions.

I'll turn it over to Commissioner Kalarski.

I can support the application.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um I'm okay with it.

Uh the the post as far.

I don't to this day I still don't know.

Do we go by the eve or do we go by the post?

That you know, uh, because that's two different numbers, and it could be a difference between whether or not it meets setback or whether or not it doesn't.

So I think we need to somehow maybe look at code or something and make a decision on what we're gonna use, what we're not gonna use.

I don't know.

Um just throwing that out.

But I can support this.

I can see that the Eve on the patio, that was the one that I was most concerned about.

That that uh wouldn't go on to the neighbors.

The again it's it's the tip.

You're you're talking just that that tip on both both of the uh the project.

So I'm gonna move to approve WS26-0147 with staffs if approved conditions, and that means you have one year to get the permits, get it inspected.

All right, the motion on the floor, cast your vote.

Commissioner Mohica, yes.

All right, the motion carries.

Good luck.

Thank you.

That is final action unless appealed.

Item number 14 is WS26-0154 waiver of development standards to reduce the setback in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.22 acres in an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone within the airport environs, AE65 overlay, generally located south of Twinkle Star Drive and west of Walnut Road within Sunrise Manor.

So applicant in the audience for on item number 14.

All right, let's hold it and we'll we'll um well I won't say that.

Um we'll hold it.

I'll hold it for one session, and then if you guys could reach out to the applicant.

All right.

So that would be May 19th.

Eight, I'm sorry.

Do you want to uh two weeks or one month?

Two weeks.

Two weeks, so May 19th.

May 19th, okay.

So I'll put a motion on the floor to hold WS 260154 to the May 19th planning commission and staff will reach out to the applicant.

Thank you.

Motion on the floor, cast your vote.

The motion carries.

Next item.

The next item is item number 15, WS26-0160, waiver of development standards to increase the wall height in conjunction with an existing single-family residence on 1.64 acres in an RS 5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located south of Spanish Gate Drive and west of Butler National Drive within Spring Valley.

Yes, sir.

Name and address for the record.

Tell us about your application.

My name is Chris Christoph.

I'm with H H Consulting, 2510 West Horizon Ridge Parkway.

Henderson Nevada 89052.

And I'm here on behalf of the uh owner of the property.

We drew the plans for him.

Um structural engineering firm, and we're helping him get this approved something that he started without permits, and he was caught in the process, and now we're trying to uh make it right.

Um this is the property.

Let's see if we can see and the intent the the owner has is just raising his uh property walls at the front of the property and part of the sides of the property and the back.

So um people are not looking into his property.

Uh currently the walls at the front are very short, they're about four feet tall, and people can walk, they walk their animals, their dogs, and they're just standing looking into his property.

So the intent here is just to kind of block view into his personal private space.

Um in the back, however, it's um wrought iron, so we're just increasing the rot iron height since HOA does not allow any uh solid walls in the back.

And this um elevations here show the front of the property as is proposed.

The back of the property rot iron gets increased, and then these are the side walls.

Um east and west of the property.

Okay, all right, thank you very much.

Or um does that conclude your presentation?

Does that conclude your presentation?

It does.

Okay, thank you.

All right, so I'm gonna open the application now for a public hearing.

Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item now's the time to come down.

Um I leave this here.

You can if you if you like.

Um she might have her own her own stuff, own presentations.

Okay, all right.

Sounds good.

Thank you.

All right, so name and address for the record.

Hi, Cheryl Lastra, 8391 Plum Creek Court, Las Vegas, Nevada.

What is my eight nine one one three?

Um close enough.

Yeah, I've only lived there 30 years.

Um I am the only direct neighbor next to this project.

Uh I'm are we on the screen?

I'm probably let's see.

I'm right here.

I have this little wall right here.

Yeah.

So I came home a year and a half ago to people working on my wall.

They wouldn't stop.

I had to yell at them.

I had to threaten to call the police.

I finally had to take a mallet out and start hammering cinder block off my wall.

They finally stopped, yet they continued on to the master association wall.

They did probably half a football field, I would say, about 150 feet.

It would be this entire wall, whatever that is.

I don't even know.

Um I told them I need approval from the master association.

I need all kinds of other approvals.

I never got any approvals.

This is what my wall looked like before.

Pretty standard wall.

This is what my wall has looked like for one and a half years.

Now they have offered to like just fix it and put it and make it pretty.

I don't want that.

I want it done the right way.

I want it from step one to step two to step three.

I want all the walls tested.

These are 40-year-old walls.

They may not even be up to code.

They have to be fully tested, they have to be uh permitted, they have to be inspected, they need full approval from the ARC.

I'm not opposed to this.

If he wants to raise his walls and have all the privacy that he wants, he can have all the privacy that he wants.

Just don't do it at my expense and don't mess with my walls without asking me, and then call me and yell at me and tell me that I took him to the principal.

Well, I pay a lot of money every month to have a principal to take him to.

He told me that I don't like brown people.

My husband is fully brown.

He told me that I don't like rich people.

I've been living in a golf course community on the golf course for 30 years.

I'm doing just fine.

I don't have, you know, whatever this giant house that he has.

I'm doing okay.

And then he told me that I'm bipolar.

Oh, yeah.

Oh, it's lovely.

Um, I don't care if he builds his walls.

He can build his walls all he wants.

But I want it done the right way.

I've lived here for 50 years.

I've lived in my house for 30 years.

I lived the prior person who owned this, we never had an objection.

If something needed to be fixed, we both fixed it.

We both paid for it.

It was very amicable.

I would call her, she would call me, we would get it done together.

Like with all of my neighbors.

With it's beyond me that someone would so entitled as to go and do this to somebody else's property.

I would never do that to anybody with that.

And then not even apologize.

It's truly it's appalling, but honestly, I've lived here long enough.

If I wanted to oppose this, I could have made one phone call and you would have had a truckload of those cards in front of you saying oppose.

I don't want to oppose it.

I want it done the right way.

That's all I got to say.

Thank you very much, ma'am.

And and I and I think we're in we're he's in the process of getting that done for you.

He's actually a nice guy.

Yeah, okay, very good.

Name and address for the record, and then give us your comments, please.

Um Lisa Perry, this is um on behalf of the Spanish Trail Master Association, 7495 Mission Hills Drive.

I don't know if my comments made it to the commissioners here, if it did.

Okay, then I don't have to speak right.

No, we'd like to.

Okay.

Um so um on behalf of the Spanish Trail Master Board, uh, they do not oppose raising the wall, which the north facing wall is shared with the Master Association and this a portion of the east facing wall, um, provided that it is constructed in compliance with applicable codes and it's structurally sound.

Additionally, a revised application to our ARC committee would have to be submitted.

They are a separate entity from the Master Association, and they did not give an approval for the wall that's existing.

Um they did direct him to come and see if the county would give him any kind of variance to have an eight-foot wall when I believe the east wall was six feet and the front wall is four feet, um, that he just has to go back and resubmit an application uh with an updated design plan that addresses the deficiencies of the previously constructed east side wall and demonstrates compatibility with the adjacent properties.

That's all.

Thank you very much.

Appreciate it.

Um so um anyone else in the audience like to speak on this item.

All right, seeing no one else coming down.

I'm gonna close the public hearing.

We'll ask the applicant to come back up, and I will start on my right.

Commissioner Kalarski.

I know that we we cannot interfere with anything with HOA.

We have no no whatever the HOA says, that's what it is.

But I do know that we can give a waiver.

Um we can't tell you what what if if you say, you know, if we say yes, you can have a waiver, you can override whatever we say as it as the HOA because that's what the HOAs do, and we we you know we have no enforcement here.

So I I I can support that, but I also truly support the fact that before when when it's done, you have got to pay for everything on an inspection to ensure that it's it's done.

And I'm thinking that's in our what you call it, but uh all they're talking about is here uh within two years it'll expire.

So I I think I don't know if we can enforce an inspection, or if that has to be done with the entities within this the HOA.

No, the inspections would be done by the building department, I believe.

Correct.

Okay, so if that would make sure, because then at that point in time, if if it's there, they can inspect to ensure that it is properly done.

Uh it has been properly done.

And so um I guess with that part I could support it, but uh I'm gonna wait and see what my fellow commissioner I'm no you cannot speak, I'm sorry.

Um I'm gonna just see what my my fellow commissioners have got to say.

Uh thank you, Commissioner Klarski.

Uh I'm just for the board.

I mean, you know, he or the applicant, I'll say, has uh they still have to go to building apartment, they still have to get the wall inspected.

They may just be they may be destructive testing.

There's there's a there's a lot of things they're gonna have to do in order to satisfy the building department.

Um so that piece I'm not worried about if we approve the application.

The piece that I am could not concerned about, but I'm going to say to the applicant, is um I expect that the neighbor's wall be as beautiful as she had it before.

So she shouldn't be looking at your mess on one side and the other side be beautiful, so her side needs to be beautiful, and you need to work with her on that.

That would be one of my conditions.

And I can support the application.

Oh, I'm sorry.

I'm sorry.

I lost track of what I'm supposed to be doing up here.

Commissioner Brady.

Yeah, I was actually just gonna say pretty much the same thing on that, so I could have probably turned it off.

But it was it is a little bit disappointing to see how they left it for her to be able to look at.

I mean uh seeing the pictures.

That's yeah, I I I'm not actually just really disappointed in that.

But I behind I I can support what you said as long as it passes all those uh um things and looks perfect for her side as much as it would on your side.

Um I think that's important.

All right, Commissioner Roigman.

So how much of this wall is already built?

Um partly built.

No.

How much of it is partly built then?

Um I'll say the east side of the wall from the proper the other property all the way to the corner here, and about 70 feet of the so is this came to us because of code enforcement?

Uh there was no code enforcement violation.

So but there, but there is a building permit in process.

Okay.

So but they started building without the building permit.

That's correct.

The the homeowner started building without building permit, and then uh he got in trouble, and that's when he contacted us.

You got in trouble because the HOA told him that you need a permit to go build a wall.

That's right.

And his neighbor started malleting that said wall as well.

Before before you before you make a motion, Commissioner Wait, I mean Commissioner Brady has one more question.

Yeah, go ahead, Commissioner Brady.

One quick question.

Um, are you doing this on Mr.

Parks' side of the wall also?

Um the house to the west.

Are you making it an eight-foot wall there as well?

Actually, we the wall will stop at this corner.

I think he's saying on the on the other side of the top of the other on the other side because it has like that wrought iron there.

Are you trying to go for both sides or just this side?

Uh the rot iron is gonna be only on this side.

Okay.

There is a there is a waiver for the to increase the wall on the west.

Okay.

It's all uh the plan is that all four sides of this property will have an increased wall, right?

Correct.

Okay.

So currently half of the front of the property is done, and the east wall, which is the bottom of your drawing, is done, and that's when the HOA came in and said you need permits, and the neighbor started throwing it getting upset with what you guys were doing, with good reason, because it does look awful.

Of course.

Um yeah, when this when when I first started looking at this, I didn't have a problem with it, but the manner in which it was done is very concerning.

And you know, I would think, especially in like frankly, with an HOA and people looking at this all the time, it would have been done differently.

Um I want to come up with some conditions here, guys, and because I did it so eloquently the last time, I probably will require uh group effort on this one as well.

So we want the wall, and to the neighbor's point, and I just will reiterate this is all going to be done safely.

Now that the building department is involved, that that's the whole point, right?

So that does not that does not need to be a condition.

That is a condition to every application.

On this one, we want the neighbor who we just spoke with, we want her wall fixed as soon as possible.

So the first condition is that that portion of the wall needs to be the first part of the wall that gets fixed.

Um, and it needs to be uniform at least with the way the wall was before.

Um part of the reason I'm allowing this is because the neighbor said they have no problem with raising the wall.

Otherwise, I might think about this differently.

Um that's the first condition.

It has to be uniform, it has to look as nice from her side as it does from the other side, and that needs to be completed within six months.

Um they can move on to the wall with VHOA.

That's on the the rest of the east side of the wall, I believe.

Oh okay, fine.

Um this is all conditioned, of course, on HOA approval, and this should not be for the record.

This should not be interpreted as a recommendation to the HOA, but merely permission for the HOA to make whatever decision they want to make in their discretion.

Um if the HOA does not approve the wall, then the condition is that the wall needs to be returned to its original wall within six months.

Am I missing any conditions here, guys?

I like it.

Like it?

Oh, you all like it?

Oh well.

I got I had so much practice on item number the last one.

Uh plan uh staff, are you okay with this?

Well, I know you're not okay with increasing the wall height, but otherwise, are you okay with my conditions?

All right.

Just just to clarify the second one.

If the wall the wall design is not approved by the HOA, that it needs to return to its original condition within six months.

Correct.

Okay, perfect.

All right, motion on the floor, cast your vote.

Motion carries.

Good luck.

That is final action unless appealed.

Our next item is item 16, which is companion with items number 17, 18, 19, and 20, uh, which can all be heard together.

Uh item number 16 is PA26-7000 seven holdover plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from neighborhood commercial NC to compact neighborhood CN on 2.05 acres, generally located south of Blue Diamond Road and west of Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Item number 17 is ZC26-0086.

Holdover zone change to reclassify 2.05 acres from an H2 General Highway frontage zone to an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone, generally located south of Blue Diamond Road and west of Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Item number 18 is VS 26-0087.

Hold over vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Blue Diamond Road and Spruce Bay Avenue alignment and Durango Drive and Cimarron Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Item number 19 is WS26-0088.

Holdover waivers of development standards for the following.

One, increase retaining wall height, two, reduce back of curb radius, and three, allow modified driveway design standards.

Design review for proposed single family residential development on 2.05 acres in an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone.

And item number 20 is TM26-500025 holdover tenative map, consisting of 18 single family residential lots on 2.05 acres in an RS 3.3 residential, single family 3.3 zone, generally located south uh Blue Diamond Road and west of Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Please state your name and address for the record and tell us about your application.

Good evening, Liz Olsen, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant.

As staff noted, our project is a two-acre piece of property located along Blue Diamond.

We're located in between Durango and Buffalo.

As you can see, we are an infill piece of property.

We're surrounded by residential to the east and the south, as well as to the west.

We have apartments to the west and RS2 detached homes here.

The first portion of our application is a request for a plan amendment and a zone change.

The property is currently planned for commercial based on the infill uh portion of the property and surrounding surrounded by residential.

We don't believe that commercial is appropriate anymore on this property.

Um it would be too intense.

Uh when we had our neighborhood meeting, the neighbors that did come out agreed with that, and they were happy to hear that it would be residential if this were to be approved.

Uh the second portion here is a zone change request.

It's currently zoned H2, which as you know is no longer applicable under the code.

So we are requesting to go to RS 3.3.

RS 3.3 would be less intense than both of the surrounding uses, as you see here again, RS2 and multifamily.

Staff is recommending approval of both of our plan amendment and our zone change.

Our design review here, you can see we're requesting to do 18 lots, single family detached two-story homes.

Access is from Blue Diamond here, and we do have a hammerhead here.

Um the reason we have the hammerhead on this piece of property is simply because of the infill restricted property.

Um, it's very difficult to get a full cul-de-sac in here while still making the project viable.

The surrounding properties also have existing hammerheads or stub streets, so we believe that it is compatible with the neighborhood.

Um, working with public works and commissioner Mujica, we would like to request to withdraw waivers number two and number three A.

Those relate to lot 18 here.

So we have corrected our driveway location and our curb return radius.

So thankful to um Public Works for working on that with us.

Here for our elevations.

Our vacation is simply a uh patent easement request around the property.

Um, with that, happy to answer any questions and appreciate your time this evening.

Thank you very much.

We'll open the applications up for a public hearing.

Anyone in an audience like to speak on these items?

Now's time to come down.

Seeing no one, we will close the public hearing and I'll open up to commissioners for questions and comments.

Commissioner Brady.

Hi.

Um I just kind of want to mention just one thing on it.

Um, a couple things on it.

Um, first off is I am concerned about parking uh on this one.

Um I don't see any extra parking spots.

No, these are one car um one car garages.

Two car garage with two uh drive full driveways for two.

Oh, so these are the two car garage yes, correct.

Um my only concern was about is is the parking because there's no additional parking spots except on that home right in the center where you're gonna actually ask for um that curvature to be shorter, I believe is what it was.

If I I'm I'm going off of memory from when we did this briefing, but yeah, just mainly the parking.

Um I guess you're gonna have two parking spots in the driveway.

The separation in between the driveway.

Also, it's in the plans it didn't show any space in between.

Sure, may I?

Yes, absolutely.

So you're correct.

Um, we do meet code with parking because we do have the two garage uh spaces as well as the driveway spaces.

We've also alternated our driveways.

So what we've done is we've put each driveway close together that is next to each other, and then these two are then next to each other.

So then that way we have parking in between our lots here as well.

And these are private streets, so they can allow parking on the street if they wish to do so.

The only thing is I don't see any room on the street for parking except next to that center one.

Um right there, oh, down oh here.

Yeah, well, yeah, right across the street.

Oh, here, I'm sorry.

Yeah, yeah.

That's the only place I see for parking in that whole entire neighborhood.

Yeah, it's hard to tell because it is you know just a site plan, but there will be parking available in between each of these driveways because of how they're oriented together.

All right, then I'll I'll I'll back off a little bit except I'm the hammerhead thing, but I'm sure there'll be other people that'll talk about that.

Okay.

Um anyone, any other commissioners.

All right, I'll yeah, maybe not.

I will uh I'll turn it over to Commissioner Mariko.

Vice Chair.

Well, I appreciate the applicant uh working with with us with uh public works and myself and addressing some of the issues.

Um we did discuss the hammerhead, and my main concern and and I also talked to public works about it is is it safe for a fire truck?

And it is.

So I'm ready to uh make a motion.

So I will make a motion for the plan amendment.

And I just wanted to make another point.

Um the plan amendment was approved and allowing you to build 18 units per acre, which means you could have 36.

And you're only putting 18.

Oh, correct.

Yes, we are yes.

So let's keep that in mind too, so that creates more space as well.

So all right, so motion to approve PA 26707.

All right, motion on the floor, cast your vote.

The motion passes.

And then motion to approve Z26.

That's item number 17, 2600 eight six.

Uh commission.

I apologize for interrupting.

Um, I just like to make a comment for public works since the applicant is rewithdrawing waiver number two and waiver number three A for items number 19 and 20.

Public works would like to remove condition number three, law 18 to meet the minimum requirements for the back of curb radius and distance from the back of curb radius to the residential driveway, and condition number four, sidewalk to be constructed along Blue Diamond Road.

Thank you.

So motion to approve item number 17, Z Z two six zero zero eight six, item number eighteen, VS 260087.

Item number 19, WS26008.

Item number 20, TM265025 with public works removing condition number three and number four.

Thank you very much.

There's a motion on the floor.

Cast your vote.

Motion passes.

Good luck.

Thank you.

Those items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for final action on June 3rd, 2026 at 9 a.m.

unless otherwise denounced.

Uh items 21 through 24 were previously held.

So our next item will be item number 25, 26, 27, and 28, which are all companion and can be heard together.

Item number 25 is PA 26-7012.

Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from mid-intensity suburban neighborhood MN to compact neighborhood CN on 1.75 acres, generally located east of Pecos Road and south of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

Item number 26 is C C 26-0161 zone change to reclassify 1.75 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an RS2 residential single family two zone, generally located east of Pecos Road and south of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

Item number 27 is WS26-0162, amended waivers of development standards for the following.

One, eliminate open space, two increase retaining wall height, three, increase fill, which is no longer needed.

Four, allow an attached sidewalk to remain, and five eliminate eliminate driveway separation design review for a single family attached residential development on 1.75 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone within the airport environs AE65 overlay, generally located east of Pecos Road and south of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

AE65 overlay, generally located east of Pecos Road and south of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

And item number 28 is TM26-50045 tentative map consisting of 24 single family residential lots on 1.75 acres and an RS2 residential single family two zone within the airport environs AE65 overlay, generally located east of Pecos Road and south of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

Thank you, staff.

Name and address for the record.

Tell us about your applications.

We'll do good evening.

Lexa Green 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant.

This application is a request for a townhome development.

The subject site is 1.75 acres, located on the east side of North Pecos Road.

We have Las Vegas Boulevard a little further north, as well as broad acres to the northwest.

The site is currently master planned MN, which allows up to eight dwelling units per acre with the zoning designation of RS20.

The applicant is proposing a 24 lot townhome development at a density of 13.71 dwelling units per acre.

Access will be from the west on Pecos, where we have a private drive and a cul-de-sac bulb.

We are requesting to maintain the attached sidewalks, which run on both sides along Pecos.

Um they're existing for miles from about Las Vegas Boulevard to Washington.

So we are looking to maintain that.

With that, the applicant is requesting a zone change from uh the current RS20 to RS2 as well as a master plan amendment from MN to compact neighborhood.

Uh this will um again permit this type of product.

We feel it's compatible with the neighborhood.

Going back to the zoning map.

Uh we are surrounded uh to the north, east, and south by RS5.2 as well as uh the city across or on the west side of Pecos, which is R1.

We feel it's compatible.

This clearly is in a rural area, it is an established area, an older area, so we feel that this is an opportunity with this info project to provide a diverse and new product to an area that it doesn't see a lot of new development.

Additionally, I want to touch on some of the waivers that we are requesting with this application.

The first being to reduce open or to eliminate open space.

We are not providing a green space in this development again.

We are kind of limited just based on its size and it being an infill project.

Uh each unit will have a minimum of a five-foot backyard that isn't a ton of space, but it will provide some space for residents to get out.

Additionally, there are parks in the area.

Um, if you go about a mile north, uh, you have uh a park area near the CSN campus as well as half a mile south.

You have the Melvin in Innis recreational facility as well as a park area there.

We are requesting to increase retaining wall heights that will be along the southern and also eastern property lines.

That's simply due to the topography of the site.

We do have to build those pads up on both sides to allow for proper drainage.

We're taking that drainage back to the private street and um ultimately out to Pecos.

Lastly, we are requesting uh to eliminate the setback requirements for the driveways.

Um you're required to have a uh to the property line, you're required to have six feet from the driveway to that property line, just based on the product.

As you can see here, the driveways will be side by side for the separate units.

So there is a continuous driveway that we're proposing.

Um, so with that, um, I thank you all for your time and consideration.

I thank staff for their recommendation of approval on the zone change and master plan amendment.

I thank you for your time and consideration, and I'm here to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you very much.

Um, so at this time we're going to open the application up for a public hearing.

Anyone in the audience like to come down and speak on this item.

All right, seeing no one come down.

I will close the public hearing on this item and on these items and open it up to the commissioners for comments.

Commissioner Brady.

This is the one I was thinking about.

It is, yes.

We did brief you on both at the same time.

So that was the confusion.

I think I knew there was one that had the single uh driveway.

So when you go back, and first off, when you look at this image here in the driveway, it shows it they're budded together.

There's no no gap.

Correct.

So is that the way it is, or is there gonna be a gap?

So that is how we're presenting it.

And I when I spoke to you, it was my understanding from going back to some existing product, the same product that was developed on the east side.

Um there is a landscape strip gap.

They are not proposing this at this time, but at that time, but they are open to providing that.

Okay.

One thing I look at with this is if you don't, um I've been to a lot of college towns and stuff where you and we've discussed this, but more for the the rest of the commissioners to kind of hears, is where there wasn't that gap, and then they paint a line down the center.

Right.

And then it's oh, you're too close to the line, you're not done.

It's it's a supermarket type setup.

Um otherwise, dinging doors, wind blowing, kids slamming.

It's it's a neighborhood dispute in the in the in the making.

Um, and so I personally thank you for going to them and talking about creating some form of of gap, because I don't want to have to hear about that later when we are dealing with neighborhood disputes.

Um, and then also just some type of greenery.

Um now is if they do do that gap, is there still going to be a space on the road for a car to park?

Yes, so uh as of right now, we're providing 24 foot wide driveways, so you have 12 feet on each side for um each unit, so we would be able to cut out a portion of the 12 feet each to provide that landscape strip.

So I'll have to work with my design team to see exactly how wide we can get it and still provide sufficient space for parking, um, but we wouldn't have to cut into any of the um street parking that's permitted on on site.

Um that that was one thing, and also I'm personally I'd love to see seem to see some type of like greenery or something, just so I just want I I hate to see communities um go look bad over time, and um I think it's great that you guys are improving the neighborhood with uh with something new, um, but it would be nice to have it stay looking new and fresh and mature eventually.

Gotcha.

That's it.

Thank you, Commissioner Brady.

Um Commissioner Kirk.

Me?

Yes.

Sorry.

Thank you.

Uh the only I'm not really hard over either way, but I think with the uh division in the driveway.

I mean, let's think about this.

Um the nearest park is I think you you didn't quite we didn't really know where it is, maybe a half mile, a mile away.

So it's um so if I'm living there and I have young children, where are they gonna play?

They're gonna play in the street or they're gonna play in the driveway.

And I I think it gives them more uh ample opportunity to play in the driveway if with their neighbor if there is if it's one big driveway without the division, but I'm not really hard over either way.

I just think um I mean I just imagine uh with one of those portable basketball standards, they can put in uh and they could play in the driveway, they wouldn't be in the street.

So just a thought.

Um like I said, I don't care either way, but I think it's just something to think about, and I appreciate the fact that you are uh upgrading the neighborhood.

I wish there, uh, like we talked about in a briefing, a little more architectural um design to the building.

I mean that's pretty ugly, but that's just my opinion.

I know beauty's in the eye of the beholder, but it doesn't do anything for me.

So if we could do something more, maybe some more articulation in the building, I think that would help.

Okay.

Um just the thought.

So but I I'm I'm in favor of the project and uh thank you very much.

Thank you, Commissioner Kirk.

I will take that back to my client and see how we can add in uh beautify to the beautify the elevation.

So thank you for that.

Commissioner Kowarski.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um I have to agree with everything that my colleagues have said.

I don't I like the idea of that division.

I also want to say that the homes that Mr.

Alvin Donald built, uh if everybody's if anybody's familiar with state streets over there off of Mellis and Sahara, they have streets that have got cities and state names.

Um but he's built six or seven homes there, and they're much prettier and much better than these pictures, let me tell you.

So uh I would hope hold him to that at least that standard is the minimum.

But I also have to agree with with Commissioner Brady, because I would like to see five five feet.

I can lay down and a five foot.

And I'm not wind up in see sitting because I'm taller than five feet.

So I think these are like starter homes.

You're gonna have one or two kids maybe.

You're gonna have them out in the street.

I think if it's possible to have to maybe lose two units, have the uh you've got four triplexes, and maybe make them duplexes.

Just a thought, something I just want to throw out.

Okay, because it's you know, but but just for a little area for the for people to congregate, because they're that's their own little community, and you don't want them to have to be taking your camping chairs out and parking and sitting them in the street.

I sure don't.

You know, there's just no place.

But I like his projects.

He does a good, he has a good product, he really does.

Yeah, and uh I can support this.

Thank you.

And I will take those uh comments back uh regarding elevations, open space, and the driveway through my client.

So thank you.

And a reduction, maybe.

You can take that back.

Yeah, I think that's a good idea.

Thank you.

That's that's true.

Thank you.

Thank you, Commissioner Kalarski.

Can I get the applicant to put your photo up of one of the existing projects?

I want to see the one that's not necessarily that one.

Give me another one.

There's one that has like I would say designs on the face of the structure itself.

No, no, it's the one of the one of his existing properties.

Sorry, bear with me.

It's okay.

Can we keep so I I think it's worth noting well that that wasn't the one I was looking for.

That's the one I was looking for.

Yeah, so so not just a plain face something that gives the property a little more character.

So I think that's the I'm I'm just letting you show it on the record so they know they know what to shoot for.

Um I think that's what we're looking for.

If there's no more questions, I'll go ahead and make some motions and we'll see if we can get to the end of this.

Um I'm gonna move for approval of PA 2670012.

Um okay, great question.

Uh I'm kind of like on Commissioner Kirk's boat.

I it doesn't matter to me either way, so um we're gonna lean toward Commissioner Brady, so we want a separation between the the um the uh driveways.

Fair enough?

Yes, um I'm happy to take it back to my team and discuss uh with that works for them, but absolutely all right.

Sounds good.

Motion on the floor cast your votes.

All right, that one that motion passes.

Um next one is going to be taken together, and we'll do 26, 27, and 28 is gonna be ZC 260161.

WS 260161 and TM 265045.

All for approval.

Motion on the floor.

Did you want to add any conditions to that?

I'll do staff if if approved conditions.

Okay.

All right, and then so there's a motion on the floor, cast your vote.

I'm sorry, I I'm tossing the the thoughts that both Commissioner Brady and I were talking about when we were talking about open space taking back stuff, and it doesn't sound like that's what we're doing.

Yeah, we're not doing open space.

So no, but just recommendations to be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners, I guess is what I'm saying, not adding conditions, but the suggestions that were brought forth by the commissioners to be forwarded or to be recommended.

I don't know if they'll be passed over, so I'm debating.

But it's a good project.

All right.

The motion passes.

Good luck.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate it.

Have a great evening.

All right, and those items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for final action on June 3rd, 2026 at 9 a.m.

unless otherwise denounced.

And that will conclude our non-routine section.

All right.

Thank you very much.

Um so the only item left for business tonight is um per NRS, we have to leave a space at the end of our meeting for for public comments.

So I'm gonna open this section up for public comments.

Anybody in the in the audience can come down and speak on any item.

Um we cannot act or make any votes on such items.

So but now's the time to do that.

All right, and seeing no one coming down to make a public comment, I'm going to adjourn the meeting.

And thank you folks for coming and hanging out with us.

But I think there's probably