Clark County Planning Commission Meeting - June 2, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
All right, so we're on the air.
We're gonna go ahead and open up this public hearing for the for the meeting car cloud carning commission meeting for Tuesday June 2nd, 2026.
And so we'll we'll start first with um a uh roll call, please.
Yeah, Chairman Frazier here, Vice Chair Mohica.
She'll be on the line.
Okay.
I'm here.
Can you hear me?
Yes.
Commissioner Stone here.
Commissioner Kirk here.
Commissioner Kalarski.
Commissioner Brady.
Here.
Commissioner Reutman.
Live and in person.
Mr.
Chair, we have a quorum.
Thank you.
So can you rise and join us in a pledge of allegiance?
I pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.
One nation under God, indivisible with liberty for all.
All right.
First item on our agenda is public comments.
Um this is a section of our meeting we open up to the public.
Um you're welcome to come down and make comments.
The commission cannot act or make any comments on your public comments.
It can be on any issue.
Now's the time to come down and do that.
All right, seeing no one coming down for public comments, we'll close that section of the public hearing and we'll start with the first agenda item.
Good evening, everyone.
The next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda after any additions, holds, or deletions.
At this time, we have the following requests.
Delete from the June 2nd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting to be heard at the June 3rd, 2026 Board of County Commissioners meeting per staff is item number 11, DR260236.
For the applicant's information, additional renotification fees may be required in accordance with Title 30 for items held or deleted, or if there are modifications to the original application.
The above public hearing items are going to be open as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the date previously stated.
This is for item 11.
If there are no requests by the planning commission or any members of the public, the agenda stands ready for your approval.
So I'll enter the motion for approval of the agenda.
If there's nothing further from any member of the board, I'll move that we approve the agenda with the deleting item number 11.
Thank you.
There's a motion on the floor for approval of the agenda.
Cast your vote.
Commissioner Mohica, yes.
Thank you, Commissioner.
That motion passes.
Next item.
The next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes.
There are no planning commission briefing and regular meeting minutes for tonight's meeting.
For the audience's information items on tonight's agenda are final action unless appealed to the board of the county commissioners or otherwise announced.
All appeals must be filed in writing to the comprehensive planning department by 5 o'clock p.m.
on Wednesday, June 10th, 2026.
And any appeals from tonight's meeting will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, July 8th, 2026 at 9 a.m.
in these chambers.
Per title 30, an agreed person may appeal an item.
An agreed person includes the applicant, someone who attended this meeting in person or through an authorized represent representative or someone who has submitted comments in writing, which may include a person included postcard or letter.
Members in the audience must complete the meeting sign-in sheet found at the entrance of the chambers as well as near the dais to confirm their attendance at this meeting.
Mailed notices of appealed applications will be sent to the property owners within the same notification radius as the original application and to those listed on the meeting sign-in sheet.
Additionally, any person may call the comprehensive planning department at 702-455-4314, or go to the county's meeting agenda web page and review the meeting notice of final action to find out if any items have been appealed.
Next are the routine action items, which consists of items four through twelve, except those items that were previously deleted.
These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item.
If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open, and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.
Thank you very much.
So this is this is a section of the meeting where we're going to approve the routine action items.
That is items four through twelve.
Unless someone wants to have an item removed and be to be heard separately.
And so if you want an item removed, now's the time to come down and ask for that.
So give me your pick up the mic, give me your name and address for the record and tell us which item you'd like us for us to pull.
Hi, my name is Rachel Park.
My address is 6A50 Spring Mountain Road with uh Las Vegas, Nevada 89146.
I request to remove the item number nine, UC 260229 be removed from the consent agenda to be heard, please.
Thank you very much.
All right.
Anyone else want to have any other items removed from the consent agenda?
Okay, so so we're about to approve again items four through twelve, except for gonna hear number nine and number 11 has been deleted.
So I'll entertain a motion for approval.
Mr.
Chairman, I'll move that we approve items four through twelve, with the exception of item 11, which had been deleted, and item nine, which will be heard separately.
Thank you.
There's a motion on the floor, cash vote.
Vice Chair Mahiker.
Yes.
That motion passes.
Thank you.
Next item this is final action unless appealed.
We're gonna go ahead and hear item number nine now.
So item number nine is UC 260229.
Use permit for household pets in conjunction with the proposed recreational or entertainment facility within an existing shopping center on 1.67 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located east of Rainbow Boulevard and north of Spring Mountain Road within Spring Valley.
Thank you very much.
Um applicant for now for number nine.
Hello.
Yes, uh, my name is Markham Salvador.
Um residing at 10931.
Theras will place Las Vegas never 89138.
Yes, I am the one of the applicants.
Thank you.
Tom, tell us about your application.
I do have a presentation here.
Oh, sorry.
That's that's fine.
If it looks good to you, it looks good to us.
So good evening, um commissioners.
Uh, my name is Mark Salvador.
I'm here with my wife Maria Salvador, also co-applicant of this um application um for a special use permit um APR 25102093 for the location 6870, Spring Mountain Road Suite 9.
Um, first of all, thank you for this opportunity for hearing us out.
And um hear us out that's um something that we believe that we could contribute um to this community.
So, what is our business all about?
Oh my god.
Um I I think if you leave it like that, we'll we'll get we'll get staff to to um zoom in.
They'll zoom in, yeah.
Thank you.
So um so the business is a um it's called Cat in Koi Lounge, and what is this business all about?
It is a supervised animal interaction um and relaxation space, um, hoping to give uh the the guests a calm and cafe style lounge where guests spend structured time session with resident cats.
So guests purchase 3060 19 minute time session and staff will always be there to guide.
We are not a shelter, we are not a pet store, we are not a boarding kennel.
We are a recreational and entertainment facility with household pets.
Um for those who are not familiar with the concept.
Let me give you some briefing.
So cat cafe concept, it is a proven global concept.
It started back in 1998 in Ta Taiwan.
It jumped to Japan in 2014 where it is over um uh popularized, and back in 2014, it um first cat cafe um has been established in Oakland, California.
Right now we have 200 plus um cat cafe around the states.
Um to give you a more concrete um idea what's this all about.
This is what is something we are trying to bring in this county.
This is only a brief um short.
So you can see it's uh it's a lounge where one can study, read, and interact with cats.
idea what's this all about this is what is something we are trying to bring in this county this only a brief um short so you can see it's uh it's a lounge where one can study read and interact with cats okay and um just to point out um again there are different uh cat cafes um scriving cat cafe already um across America there's crumbs and whisker in washington LA there's one in New York um there's one in in Denver actually we do have two here in town Las Vegas has two cat cafes but under the jurisdiction of city of Las Vegas none in Clark County again I want to emphasize enough that this is a precedent cat cafe in along Rainbow Boulevard um this is a Hearts Alive Cat Cafe which is still operational right now and immediately next door Calabasha African kitchen meaning next to a food uh uh food establishment here is just a map of um different cat cafe across the America again we have two here in town but none at Clark County so we are here mainly for this one special use permit that we are um respectfully requesting we are requesting to allow us to keep a maximum of 18 household cats on site in a general commercial general CG zone not associated with residential development because under Clark County code 30 title 30.3.4.8.11 household pets in CG zones are conditionally permitted only in conjunction with residential development and because cat in coi lounge is a standalone commercial use with no residential component a special use permit is required and this has been um coordinated with the Clark County animal control already in fact Clark County Animal Control would allow us to have 10 cats with their fancier permit.
However we want 18 cats and I'll explain why later why 18 and at this point I want to clarify why household pets so household pet is something that provided or advised by the planning planners from the zoning committee just to emphasize that we are not keeping anything exotic or wild for the purpose of this permit this is essentially domesticate household cats.
Why 18 cats essentially is to support animal welfare rotation model having 18 cats would allow us to have six to eight cats resting cats and at the same time 10 to 12 active cats interacting with the guests that's why the 18 number and this number is not something that we've just guessed this is something backed up by a peer reviewed science.
So back in 2025 there um there's a study conducted inside an operating cat cafe found that cats consistently retreated to a cat only room during high occupancy period so authors specifically called for a private rest areas and available to guests exactly what the our 18 cat rotation model provides I want to also briefly talk to you about our our our our our space just it's only 1200 square feet rectangular functional zone there will be a reception area cat interaction area a quiet study area cat care or staff room area where um guests cannot come in and a restroom support this will be the the floor plan this will be our envisioned reception area where the the guests will be briefed up this will be our envisioned cat interaction area where um people will interact with the cats this is a study area quiet area there will be a digital coi pond hence cat and coi um where people can relax um read and study and this is a cat care um only for staff and for cats area and this is how we run quickly um our workflow um it is a time session again it's 30 60 90 minutes um again staff members always present children under six is not allowed um no outside footwear no outside food um hand sanitizers um are all uh provided all over and I'll discuss later in more depth about sanitation and animal welfare I want to raise two common misconceptions or concerns um concern number one sanitation near food establishment and animal welfare for sanitation piece I just want to um point out that the prior tenant of this suite nine is Poppytown a dog and puppy retail store um they operated at exact address suite nine from 2018 to 2025 November 2025 so they're relocated to a Sahara address now still at Clark County the food establishment on both sides operated throughout all those seven years as far as we know seven health incidents attributed to this pet store so we are proposing a cleaner a better ventilated professionally managed operation if the neighbors neighboring restaurants or neighbors thrive beside Puppytown for seven years there's no I believe there's no objective basis for sanitation objection here.
As far as we know, seven health incidents attributed to this pet store.
So we are proposing at cleaner, a better ventilated, professionally managed operation.
If the neighbors, neighboring restaurants or neighbors thrive beside Puppy Town for seven years, there's no, I believe there's no objective basis for sanitation objection here.
And regarding animal welfare, um, again, this is not a pet store or breeding facility.
We these cats will be treated and protected as the companion they are.
Animal welfare is the founding value of the business, not an afterthought.
As you can see, this is the picture of this was taken in 2024.
The Puppet Town was there.
Beside it is a hot pot restaurant, beside it's a bakery.
Um next next to it is a um pineapple cafe.
So up to this point, they are still operational.
Again, Poppy Town was the previous tenant.
It was a dog who was occupying, and then this time we just want to change it to a cat.
Um I want to discuss our five-layer sanitation system because we want to make sure that everyone is comfortable.
Um, layer one, we are we have dedicated ex-face ventilation.
Our enclosed litter room is connected to a dedicated excess dock in our TI plan.
Air flows up out toward and upward, never into the guest spaces or neighboring units.
Layer two, we are gonna utilize automatic self-cleaning litter boxes, meaning all leader boxes are automated.
Every use triggers an immediate scooping cycle.
Waste is sealed into a closed drawer.
No open waste is uh ever visible to guest area.
Layer three, we are gonna utilize HIPAA HEPA rated air purifiers and enzymatic deodorizes that continuously run throughout the lounge.
Layer four, again, we won't allow any outside footwear or outside food.
In layer five, we do have waste disposal protocol.
We have a coordinated and affirm this with the public service that cat liters are regular non-toxic municipal waste only.
There's no need for extra or additional um uh um preparation or to trash it.
However, we still we're gonna decide to double bag it just for added precaution.
Also, if I may add, both owners, me and Maria are an active licensed nurse practitioner.
Why?
What why it doesn't matter?
Because meaning public health in infection control and hygiene is something integrated in us when when we're planning with this um project.
This is the envisioned cat literature area.
As you can see, we're gonna utilize automatic litter boxes connected to vent system.
Um and then he pair purifiers will be all over the lounge.
This is um just to uh show that on the right side that again it's connected to the exos um outside.
The aerial gonna go outside and upward.
Regarding our cats, um, we're assuring I'm sorry.
Okay.
Yeah, just let me finish looking at this.
Thank you.
Um how about our cats?
Again, we do have fire and evacuation protocols.
Um cat carriers are stored on-site all site um all the time.
24-7 security cameras will be utilized.
We do have staff close of day protocol with a checklist just to make sure all cats are uh counted, um, including their water and food statuses.
And and and these protocols are in line with industry's best practice and benchmark, including the crumbs and whisker, or even Pets Mark, Pet Smart.
Again, we have a written emergency plans, care storage, veterinary contact, and stack um evacuation assignments.
For the next couple of slides, I'm almost done.
Um for the next couple of slides, um, I would like to highlight the benefit it would bring our community.
Um, there are actually four benefits that um this business could bring.
Um, number one, it could um it has a positive or um it could bring something good for the Las Vegas family to individual and the community.
For Las Vegas family, um actually let me step back and step back from the technical attributes or arguments and talk to you as a father.
I'm me and Maria have three kids.
Um there's six, ten, and and twelve.
Um we're always um looking for an um family-oriented wholesome attraction here in in town here in Chinatown.
Um we're running out of um idea.
We've been to a different um places.
Um Chinatown has many things to offer, including Marijuana dispensary, vape shop, hookah bars, oversaturated boba or um matcha tees, Korean Japanese barbecue, club machines, arcade, indoor golf, pickleball, indoor playgrounds, but none of these can offer a 10-year-old kid interacting with with a cat.
None of this will have a teenager decompress during to study, and none of this could give an elderly who cannot have a pet in their residence, perhaps.
And this is the place where he or she can have that experience.
So again, um, we want to contribute something positive to the community by adding a wholesome family-oriented attraction.
Number two, as a science of um, as a man of science, um, I want to highlight what's the benefit it could bring to an individual, the cat therapy itself.
Uh, according to study, it could lower down cortisol or that's the stress hormone.
Like um, within minutes, according to National Library of Medicine, multiple peer-reviewed study confirmed interacting with cat lowers cortisol level.
It could increase oxytocin level or love hormone.
So, according to a 2022 Japanese study, 10 minutes of feline interaction, significantly increased oxygen level that could actually lowers down your stress, depression, and anxiety.
According to Mental Health Foundation and Cat Protection, 600 people found 87% of cat owners reported to have a positive impact of on well-being.
And according to Harvard Medical School, it um uh feline interaction could lower down blood pressure.
Number three, we are fully aware that there are 200 cats awaiting for adoption here in Clark County area.
And Clark County has released three million um emergency fund for the expansive expansion based on our research for to increase cat intake up to 25%.
By doing this um cat and coi uh business, um, we do we're planning to have an adoption partnership plan with different um um foundation like Animal Foundation and Local Rescue to promote adoption.
Um we believe that adoption uh adoption doesn't occur by looking at a website with a picture of a cat.
Adoption occur if someone could feel um uh a cat coming to him or her and and pet the actual petting of the cat could actually promote that adoption.
And then our our proceeds also um we plan to share it with with uh the uh this nonprofit organizations.
Lastly, for Spring Mountain Road, we believe Cat and COI launch is positioned to generate trust traffic and economic activity that extends beyond our 12 um hundred square feet.
Um our guests will book 60, 19 minute session, they will arrive early or they will uh be some will stay late.
They they'll gonna eat at a neighboring restaurant, uh shot to the local market and explore the corridor.
So a customer become a corridor's customers.
Number two, Las Vegas tourists seek authentic non-casino experience, a Japanese Korea-inspired cat cafe on Spring Mountain Road is uniquely marketable.
We think this will be an Instagram destination that will put this corridor on tourist itineraries.
Jobs and local spending.
We will generate two to four full-time equivalent jobs at opening.
We will support local vendor relationship for food supply and cleaning services.
There would be event private bookings and membership that will create steady recurring revenue.
And then again, daytime and evening food traffic would be generated with this.
Um lastly, just want to talk to you not as a business entity, but uh as as um who we are.
Again, we are healthcare professionals, um professionals.
If sanitation is one of the concerns, um we are telling you that we are having a rigorous sanitation plan to implement this project.
This we are just uh uh starting small family business.
Um we are not outside investors.
Um we are Filipino American family, and we choose this community who lives in it.
We are very thankful for this um community, and you want to give something back to this community.
So before we ask, um before I tell you my final ask.
Um I again I I believe I've explained to you in detail um our business plan or thriving business plan or the science behind it, the benefits of it, and our mitigation plans for different um issues.
And with this, um we uh with deep respect and humility um seek for your support to for this approval of SUP.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
All right, so thank you for that presentation.
And so now we'll open this application up for a public hearing.
And so now's the time.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item, now's the time to come down and do so.
You can just have a seat, that's fine.
It's just so the record is clear, name and address again, and then tell us your comments.
I'm Rachel Park again.
I'm from 6850 Spring Mountain Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89146.
I'm the property manager of the Korea town.
I'm here for just a little bit of concerning about their business model.
And before I prepare while I'm here, his presentation, I have some question again, so I brought it up again first.
So he showed two of the one of the cat cafes, which is uh located in the city of Las Vegas.
It's under uh animal rescue organization.
One of them is from you can see in the file that uh the Barbara Boyd, who is from House of Second Chances Animal Rescue, it's under their organizer.
One of the cat cafes, like a rescue uh under their organization.
So most of the cat cafe or animal cafe is um nonprofit right now in the city of Las Vegas.
So I want to point out one.
And another one is he told uh that um the next door restaurant when the pet uh pet store was there, they are they don't have any issue.
They have a lot of struggling because of next door is pet store, and then they sold the pet, which was illegal.
It was not illegal at the first time, but then uh Clark County by the Clark County code, we cannot sell any pet, right?
So they are struggling because of the illegal issue, and then the next door restaurant in Bakery Cafe had uh a lot of issues about the sanitation, ventilation from because they couldn't, they tried hard.
I know that, but then the pet store, they try hard, but then they were not the professional as an animal rescue or animal sanitation, so they were kind of struggling next door.
I want to point that.
So my concern, so more than 120 individuals signed a petition to deny the application for a special use as in the file submitted by Cat and COILAND.
As the property manager of Korea Town Plaza, I have a concern about how Cat and COILAND intend to operate its business, remain in full compliance with the application regulation and ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the cats in its care.
First, under Clark County code, uh a maximum of 10 cats is allowed.
Um the applicant is requesting 18 cats.
Why would 10 cats which are allowed by the law not be enough?
Because there should be a reason making a code, making a law.
The all the profession are gonna have a research and everything, and then they made a decision.
The maximum of the 10k is enough.
Please continue.
Okay.
So I am also concerning about whether the applicant has any experience operating this time of this type of business-relating animal business.
And second, Claude County Animal Control Condition Cat and COILAND as follows.
In the agenda, you can see uh no sales, no breeding, or transfer of animals allowed.
Also, no animals will be replaced or substituted for animals listed without prior authorization.
However, the applicant stated that they need 18 cats to improve adoption opportunities.
So, how many cats do they ultimately plan to adopt?
Or how long do they intend to keep those adopted cats?
And then like five years, 10 year, or rest of their life, or after five years or 10 years, what will they do with this adopted cat?
So I'm concerning about that too.
And also, third, this is the applicant business, and they need to make a profit.
I'm concerning about how they intend to make a money from cats that cannot be sold, just keep for the rest of their life.
They have to take care of it, vaccination, like a they have to bring the cat to the vet too.
And then especially if they plan to keep them for a long period of time.
Also, where will this cat come from?
Um, are they rescue cat, customer-owned cat, or cats from breather?
So the source of the cat is like uh it's concerning too.
Fourth, the applicant is proposing 18 cats and 26 to 32 people in 1200 square foot.
Um the assert they assert that 18 cats are needed to improve cat welfare rotation.
However, as you see in the letter from the director of the animal rescue, um, she mentioned she submitted a letter to the commission stating that 10 cats would be better than 18 cats for welfare purpose because cats are very territorial and may become extremely stressful if 18 cats are kept in one space regardless of the size of the space, but 12 square foot is like too small.
It will not be completely for them.
Restroom, the staff area, lit litter area, and reception locker.
You see the all the plan, right?
So um so also uh can the applicant clarify actual usable scare footage of the cat interaction area, which is zone two.
Uh the entire turboscope will not even avail up for the cat.
Um I mentioned it before.
So lately, if customer-owned cats will be allowed in the facility, a system for the vaccination verification, disease prevention, and animal health monitoring will be necessary.
Who will be responsible every single day?
Operate operation uh environment.
In addition, the application provides limited information regarding the ventilation.
He showed the automatic ventilator box, but then it's only in zone four.
What about zone one, two, three, and five?
We need uh special ventilation for 26 to 32 people with the 18 cat, cat welfare, the people who visit there, and then all the public health and safety and not for so we need uh ventilation plan for everywhere for that facility.
Um, how will be the ventilation system protect the neighboring restaurant and uh next door bakery cafe?
So this is all the concerning that I have from the application and then the last time hearing and agenda.
So I respectfully uh request that the applicant clarify this concerns.
Thank you so much.
Thank you very much.
Anyone in the audio, anyone else in the audience like to speak on this item?
Great.
Seeing no one else coming down, we're gonna close the public hearing.
I'm gonna open it up to commissioners for comments, and I'll start with Commissioner Brady.
Would you like to start?
Well, I actually had a question.
Were you the property manager for this for this location?
Just just for the record, like I got can you just please come back down?
Sorry.
Just so we can have the record clear.
And I need name and address.
Rachel Park 6850, Spring Mountain Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89146.
I'm property manager for 6850.
They're gonna be located 6870.
Okay, so it's one of the one of the store.
Okay, thank you.
That's what I just wanted to understand.
Any other questions for the but you're not the property manager for this location?
No, I'm for the 6850, right next door in between.
So we're 6870 and 2062.
Um, so the landlord has accepted this use.
Maybe that's a question for the applicant, but you don't represent the landlord for this property.
No, I represent another landlord in between 6870 and 682, and then I'm in 6850.
All right.
So Commissioner Brady would continue.
Okay, no, so so the bake is at the bakery.
Uh bakery is the tenant of the 6870 as well, but then bakery located inside 6850 as well.
Okay, sorry, and I just wanted to understand that a little bit.
And then all right.
I'm I'm done with questions with you.
I just wanted to figure that, but I do have a couple questions for the uh applicant for sure.
Thank you, ma'am.
You're welcome.
All right, so we get the applicant to come back up, come back up.
Yes, 100%.
Both can come down.
Uh I need both names and address for the record.
Hello, commissioners.
My name is Maria Salvador 10931 Terra Azul Place, Las Vegas, Nevada.
And Mark Salvador again.
Thank you.
Commission says I have a few questions for you.
Go ahead, Commissioner Burry.
So this was originally Puppy Town, is what it was before.
Yes.
Okay.
According to our realtor, which he double checked with the property of that whole building.
The Papitown tribe there for about seven years?
Six seven years.
We actually went there before.
We've been there before.
Okay, so according to the realtor.
That would be why would that be a question when they try for six, seven years when there's no that's fine.
You answered the question.
Yeah, so then there's I the only thing I saw is like in the drawing, the ventilation part of it.
Um ventilation that probably helps the place smell better inside and ventilates, keeps the airflow.
Someone like me, I'm allergic to cats, so that would save me if I were to go there.
Um but I just be cat boarding as well in this location, or is it strictly it's the same cats all the time?
Yes, these are the same cats all the time.
And we'll um hire cat attendance slash groomer who'll gonna um care for them at least for their grooming um feeding.
Okay.
Um then my only I I guess I'm gonna just make a statement, then overall I'm fine with that um with this whole entire thing, it's just the air ventilation part of it because if you're going to be cycling the air and putting it outside if there's some type of air filtration or something like that.
So people like me who are allergic to cats.
In this presentation, I'm sorry.
Um in this presentation, I only highlight the the cat care room, but all over the the lounge has a ventilation system that's going outside.
None that's number one and number two.
Um we are utilizing the the um air uh purifiers as well inside in every part of the room.
Okay, that's all the questions I have.
Thank you.
Commissioner Klarski.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
Um I I'm sorry, I I just I'm not quite certain what I'm looking at.
A lounge.
We have dog parks, so I guess having a cat park, and that's essentially what this could be called.
Uh would be the same thing.
This is new to me.
I have never heard it about it.
Okay.
Let me get my thoughts going.
Uh please, because I tend to forget.
Um so I'm I'm I'm really kind of confused on what exactly we have here.
Do we have in reading our our backup material?
It sounds like this could be a place for adoptions, but yet I didn't see that in your presentation.
But it's written here that that's I guess your intent down the road.
Not quite certain.
Uh so that I would like to have addressed.
Uh now you're talking grooming.
Well, that's a whole nother use, and I don't know if that requires a whole other use permit.
Uh because grooming, I think it isn't that something different.
That's a different business.
Well, we would consider it basically accessory if they're if there's an attendant coming in to just room the cats so that they're clean for the patrons.
We we view the facility as more of it's a recreational facility.
Well, that's why I was asking if you know what they need another permit, because now they're talking grooming, and that I think is a separate use.
I think there's just a groomer coming in to groom the cats.
Right.
No, just that we want to make sure that cats are taken care of.
It's like a staff in our lounge.
And and that's fine.
I that was the question I had, so I wanted just to make sure that I had I had the right answer.
So thank you.
Thank you, Commissioner.
Um what are your hours of operation that you're looking at doing this?
10 to 10 to 7.
10, 7.
Okay.
And I saw where you had the three six to 12 and then 12 to 18, and uh the number of cats.
Um why why is staff okay with with going up to 18 is my question rather than what's allowed.
Usually we don't do that.
Well, code says any dogs or cats shall be in conjunction with the residential development.
So we view it as they're not even allowed to have any because it's not with a ha with a residents.
So they're asking for the 18 because that's what they basically want.
Okay, but according to Ms.
Park, she said that somewhere in code it said 10.
No, not not for us.
Our use table says any dogs or cats shall be in conjunction with residential development.
So we wrote the staff report as where none are allowed because it's not with a house.
Okay.
Um right now that's all I can that's all I have, but I may have more.
Okay, so let's go to Vice Chair Mohica online.
Any questions?
I'm sorry, it's our area.
Okay, all right.
So we won't go to Vice Chair Mohica online.
Let's go to Commissioner Wrightman.
Uh this is for staff.
So if we approve the use permit, there's got to be like animal control or some other folks around here that are going to make sure that things are operating safely for these animals and stuff like that.
That's not our drive.
Correct.
Okay.
So we don't even need to condition that because that's going to be part of the overall plan is that these cats will help.
Right.
We have an advisory in the staff report um to have compliance with Title 10 of the county code and policies and procedures for animal protection services are required.
I'll say I'm I am okay with this, right, Maya.
And I might suggest that there be a year review.
Um, but other than that, I I don't see a problem with it if this is the business model and they want to get going on it.
And and again, I don't think it's really our role here to determine that these cats are going to be safe and things are going to be taken care of because that's going to be animal control, which will have some jurisdiction over this.
Is that just for that's confirmed, right?
Okay, cool.
Thank you.
I think I think animal animal control and health and health district.
Um so before Commissioner Mohica, I I can make the I can make the motion, but before I do, can you just give us your comments if you have any?
Um yes, I actually have several problems with this.
Um I was contacted by a community leader who share with me that the there might be an issue with sale of the cats, number one.
Number two, there's too many businesses that have food in that little shopping center, and there's a major concern, and I know Commissioner Kalarski also brought that up as far as the ventilation, and too many cats.
And and that's the other thing I don't understand.
Staff just said that they said zero cats were allowed, so why was this on consent?
I I guess we'll let staff answer that question.
So we consider um the cat lounge.
Uh the cats are household pets.
So if it's not in conjunction with the residents, then we um we'd say that none are allowed.
So we just from previous history of what's happened to the site, it's a commercial use.
Um, we're not gonna get involved with what animal control and would require.
Um, we're looking at it as is it is it compatible to the commercial center.
There was a previous pet store that's been there for several years and existing restaurants.
Um, and that's why we recommended approval.
Well, um again, I I think there's just too many concerns with this that I'm not I'm not in support of it.
Okay, that's fair enough.
I um I'll just give my comments and then and then we'll since it's your area, we'll let you make a motion and we'll see where it goes.
But uh I can support the application.
I agree with Commissioner Workman, you know, especially with the with the review period.
Um so so I won't go into many more details than that.
It looks like they're responsible for um care of the cats, health districts gonna monitor them.
We also have um let's see, planned to planned adoption.
We've talked about that.
Yeah, I'm good with the application.
So, Commissioner Mohica.
I'm sorry.
Sorry, Commissioner Wrigman, one more question.
Yeah, just for one clarification.
So when you have a puppy town, that needs to apply for a special use permit because those are more than zero household pets in a commercial or no.
So we considered puppy town retail if they were selling the the dogs.
This is more of this is a recreational facility.
They charge an entrance fee to come in, hang out with the cats.
May I so how many puppies could you have 18 puppies at Puppy Town as a retail?
So how many puppies could you have 18 puppies at Puppy Town as a retail?
I I don't know that answer.
You probably could have more if if I'm I'm unsure of how many dogs you could sell.
So if they were applying to sell these cats, which to be clear, there's no sales.
Just tell me if I'm wrong here.
There's no sales, correct?
Correct.
No sales.
There's no adoption, correct?
No adoption.
No one can bring their own cats and no one can leave with a cat.
Correct.
It's our resident cats.
The cats will be stay on site.
And the only people who are going to be coming there to do any grooming are the people who are going to come to be caring for the cats that live on site.
Correct.
Okay.
And theoretically, if they were selling the cats in the same location, they would be able to have 18 cats there for sale with multiple cats rotating in and out.
And they would not have to apply for a special use permit?
Theoretically, yes, if they're because it's retail.
Okay.
So if if they were applying to bring in 18 cats to sell, they would not require the special use permit, they would not be for us today.
Retail and retail sales and services is a permitted use in CGC.
Okay, so their landlord will allow it.
If they were selling the cats, it would be allowed.
And the only difference here is that it's going to be the same cats living there and hanging out with kids, reading books and looking at fish.
And Puppy Town could have also sold cats.
Sure.
They call it Pet Town, maybe.
All right, Commissioner Mohica.
I think the the board is finished.
It's um it's on you to make a motion, please.
Okay, I motion is I I still feel uncomfortable due to the fact that there's a lot of food uh in that area.
So my motion is to deny the application.
All right, thank you.
There's a motion on the floor, cast your vote.
All right, that that motion does not carry.
Um I will make a motion to approve the UC 26029.
Motion on the floor, cash your vote.
Excuse me, Commissioner.
Um, would you like to add the review um sorry from certificate pocket?
Thank you for that clarification.
And um with staff if approved conditions and adding a review period.
From the certificate from the C's give them two years.
Two years to two years to review from C of O.
Yep.
Okay.
Thank you.
Motion on the floor, cast your vote.
Commissioner Mohica, no.
That motion passes.
Good luck.
I'm sorry, staff.
Next item.
Thank you.
Next item on the agenda is item number 13, UC 260142 holdover use permit for proposed bankru facility in conjunction with an existing commercial center on a portion of 1.74 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located south of Tropicana Avenue and east of Doonville Street within Spring Valley.
Thank you.
Name and address for the record.
Tell us about your application.
Good evening, my good evening, Commissioners.
My name is Rebecca Mahana, the owner of Wild Party Decor.
My name is James Mahan, and I'm uh same yeah, husband.
And uh I live in 6877 Black Ash as well.
89148.
Thank you very much.
Um tell us about your application.
My my application is uh a special permit proposed to uh a bank with facility.
We request um a business license for uh as event space, but it fall in into a category of a banquet hall.
That's why we're here.
Uh we are within two hundred feet from residential area.
That's the concern.
Oh, we're here to please.
Okay, all right.
So so thank you for that.
I will open this application up for a public hearing.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item?
Now's the time to come down and do so.
Seeing no one coming down, we will close the public hearing and I'll open it up to commissioners for comments.
No one, no lights on right now.
Um, Vice Chair Mohica, any comments on this application?
No comments.
Okay.
Um, I think Commissioner Worton is going to have some comments and he'll take us right home.
Um, I'm I'm not gonna belabor the point.
I think you were here a couple weeks ago, and we asked you to go to the town board meeting that had already been missed or maybe ignored a couple times.
Um I think in that meeting, I didn't check, but I think I said that I was gonna deny it maybe with prejudice and make you wait another year, but based on the recommendation of the town board, which was I believe to allow them to come back one more time to present.
I'm going to follow that recommendation and hold this for one more month.
But you are gonna have to pay the refiling fees, and I really hope that you guys can get it together to make it to the town board because by my count, this was the third.
This is this has been on our agenda four times, and this has been in front of town board, I think three times.
And um, I just I don't like to waste everyone's time up here, which I'm doing with this diatribe, uh, or to waste the town board's time.
So we we really do respect uh what they're doing out there and their work, and so um you're gonna have to refile and you're gonna have to renotice.
I think that might cost you some money.
Um, but I am was very close to denying this with prejudice, and so we will hold this for another 30 days to give them time.
Is that enough time?
That's correct.
We need to hold it to the July 7th planning commission meeting and the June 30th um town board.
And so I suggest you talk to someone in planning to make sure you have uh all the information you need to make this next one.
And with that, I yeah, I I uh just before the motion is made.
I just want to say I'm I I hope that the applicant understands that the the process is the process and it's important.
And and you know, we're here to help, and we and we want to get you to the finish line, but you gotta go through the process.
So please make town board.
Okay.
And I don't mean to talk down anyone.
I know life happens.
I don't think you were.
I'm just yeah, life happens to all of us, but okay.
So with that, I motion to hold it for 30 days.
Um with the that go to town board.
Thank you.
Oh, there's a motion on the floor, cash your vote.
Commissioner Mohica, yes.
No, that motion passes.
Thank you.
This is final action less appealed.
Thank you.
Next item on the agenda is item number 14, UC 260232.
This is a use permit for proposed vehicle maintenance or repair in conjunction with an existing vehicle sales facility within an existing office warehouse complex on 4.31 acres in an IP industrial park zone within the airport environments AE60 overlay.
Generally located north of Warm Springs Road and west of Buffalo Drive within Spring Valley.
I'm sorry, name and address for the record, tell us about your application.
Jonathan James Fode, 9250 Whittag Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, A9149.
I currently have a exotic dealership uh on this location, just adding maintenance and upkeep to the facility so we can take our business to the next level.
All right, thank you for that.
I I will I will open this application up for a public hearing.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item?
Right.
Seeing no one, I will close the public hearing and open up to commissioners for comments and questions.
One question.
Um, Commissioner Kalarski.
Um you do outside storage on this?
Not at all.
It's just only our vehicles indoor.
Okay, thank you.
I I don't have any questions or comments.
Um, Vice Chair Mohiker.
No comments or questions.
All right, Commissioner Workman, you want to take us home?
So when do you plan to do the vehicle maintenance?
As soon as this is approved.
Uh what hours during the day?
Uh I have to get it approved with DMV as soon as I get the special use permit that I can submit the DMV.
What what is there a time that we would be approving here?
And is that part of the the part of the reason this was rejected by staff or denied by staff because it's too close to the residence?
I imagine that's because of concerns.
Correct.
Um where the lease space is located, it's 15 feet from the residential um uses to the west, and we we require 200 feet.
And that's mainly because of noise.
Yes, noise, odor, um things that happen with vehicle maintenance places.
Can I add please?
Okay, yeah.
Yeah.
But yeah, I guess the question for me in my mind is how do you plan to mitigate that?
So before Title 30, as far as I'm getting to know this process, there's a a unit in my vicinity who had the repair and maintenance uh quite a bit down.
So when this was placed in effect, now I need a special use prevent prior.
I wouldn't have needed one.
Uh the back of the building is facing the residence, which is over a hundred feet from the nearest actual building.
And our actual building is the back of it, so vehicles won't even be anywhere close to where the residents would be.
They want to be able to see it or do anything, and all our maintenance will be in side the building.
So staff, so you're saying it's 15 feet.
It looks to me like there's a street separating the back of his building from the actual homes.
Right?
These are not homes.
Those are that's a parking structure.
There's a parking lot.
This is a parking lot.
So when you say 15 feet, it's because it's 15 feet from the parking lot.
Right.
So from the from the lease space to the property line of the residential.
So um can I condition on some no noise medium?
So and you're gonna be doing it in all indoors inside there.
Can we condition on some type of noise mitigation?
Like keep indoors closed or something or something.
Or installing something at the back of the building.
Well, we already have already have noise standards that are measured at the property line.
But I mean, if you want to somehow mitigate noise like required during certain activities, maybe have their garage doors closed or something.
Like yeah, and and we can close and we can limit the hours.
Yes to daytime hours.
So what was your plan of operations as far as hours?
Service is usually nine to five.
Okay.
So we'll limit the service to nine to five.
Keep the doors closed.
Okay.
I'm okay with it.
I was gonna say any of you wanted to add a review period, we can do that.
Yeah, and we'll review after one year.
If your neighbors are complaining and stuff, maybe you come back here and we ask you to put up some of those uh fancy foam barriers or something.
Okay.
Hopefully, I own a property by then.
Yes.
Okay.
Uh I motion to approve with the conditions of uh nine to five for the operation of the maintenance.
Um a one-year uh review period, and that they take make efforts to mitigate noise, including keeping the doors closed during those hours.
And with those conditions, I motion to approve UC 260232 R.
And the maintenance does inside.
The maintenance is done inside.
All right, thank you very much.
There's a motion on the floor, cash your vote.
Vice Chair Maliker.
Commissioner Mahika, yes.
All right, that that uh motion carries.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You're welcome.
Um good luck.
Next item.
This is final action unless appealed.
Next item on the agenda is item number 15, WS260202, waivers of development standards for the following.
Number one, reduce setbacks, and number two, reduce building separations for existing accessory structures in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.15 acres in an RS5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone, generally located east of Talbot Street and south of Balboa Avenue with Winchester.
Thank you.
Name and address for the record.
Tell us about your application.
Carol Pareda, I'm the daughter of the property owner, Alma Amaya.
Uh 1931 Balboa Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169.
You have to tell us what you want to do.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Um, well, we wanted to like to request a waiver to reduce the setback and separation requirements for RS5.2 zone.
Do you do you have um any photos or uh a floor plan of of what you yes?
Yes, yes.
This is my invention.
Well, my floor plan I also have photos.
Uh yeah, I'm I'm gonna rested in photos if other commissioners are.
You have photos.
Do I just put whatever I have here so you guys can see?
Yes, ma'am.
If you put them up there, the the uh staff will I could line them up here.
Put it on the dot.
Put it on the dot.
Well, that's the cardboard that we have there because we're qu we're quick learners, so if you put it on the dot and then you can move to the next one.
Okay.
We'll stop you if we if we need to see it for a longer period of time.
They're a little bit mixed.
Okay, next one.
Okay, next one.
Okay, next one.
All right, no problem with me.
Next one.
Next one.
Hold that for a second.
Okay.
Commissioner commissioners, if I can just kind of interject here on this particular picture.
Those are the two gazebos.
You'll see the wall that looks uh that first wall.
The retaining wall.
That's that's the re that's a retaining wall.
And then it goes back probably about four or five feet, and then you have the perimeter wall.
You just want you to be aware that that you're looking at two different walls, same property.
Yep.
So Commissioners, there's nobody looking down in their backyard.
You can't uh no, because uh the upstep of that but that and you can see the uh rough of the house behind them.
It's also uh um at least five feet above grade, above their grade anyway.
Sounds and I understand that because that's my house with the neighbor behind me.
You can yeah, you put the next photo up that shows that.
Um I'm good with pictures unless commissioners want to see some more.
All right, so um are you done with your presentation?
Um, I don't know if you guys wanted to see other pictures from yeah, yeah.
You can you can continue giving us photos if you want.
That's fine.
Show us some more.
Put it on the record.
We do uh entertain a lot with the family.
Um our sheds, uh we store our seasonal stuff, Christmas.
Um we have a tool shed.
Um we like to be in the backyard.
We just like to throw family parties and gatherings and stuff.
Uh I think it's nicely done.
I um so um I'm gonna open this application up for a public hearing.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item?
Now's the time to come down.
All right, seeing no one coming down to speak on it.
I'm gonna close the public hearing and open up to commissioners, and I'll start with uh Vice Chair Mohica online.
Any questions or comments for the applicant?
Yeah, I do have a question.
Um the the two the first set of pictures where the cars were parked.
Um so though that's the front, and that's all wood, right?
Yes, it's two pergolous.
Uh we um to provide shade to the cars because we have direct sunlight, and a lot of damage is getting on top of the cards, the color and stuff.
Okay, my concern was just that there's a lot of wood, and I just don't know how close it is to the house, and just in case of a fire, but that's just a comment I have.
Thank you very much.
Um sorry, I I just want to make a couple of comments here.
Is there's the building to the um what I call southeast part of it?
Um that's right on the the wall line.
There's it looks like it's older.
Was that one approved already?
Um which one so let's say if you were looking at the house from the from the street.
Yeah, go all the way back to the rear back left.
Side by side, so you can put up your side plan, please.
That was the first one you put up.
Okay, yeah.
So shed one.
Is that is two feet from the wall, or is that two inches from the wall?
Yes, I also have a picture if you want to see it here to see how it looks side by side.
Uh side by side.
Side by side.
Oh, okay, okay.
One on the right, one on the left.
This side.
Yeah, and then I also have the back and the front of it.
One foot, not even two foot.
Okay.
One and a half.
One and a half feet.
And then it's one feet from the wall, and that wallet, and that's a wood fence.
Yeah, that's how it was when we made it.
I'll have to tell you that one brings concern to me.
Um, and then also when you go to the back to the opposite side of the backyard in the far corner.
And there is uh there's the lifted.
That's the retaining wall right here.
And the distance off the back of that one between that is a high wall.
All right, and then on the side of the house, what you'd call number four, number three, and number four.
That's a foot and a half in between that wall.
Um next to your neighbor.
Uh and have we heard anything from the neighbors on these?
No, we our thing was with coal in first enforcement that um we had all nothing about rocks.
She fixed it up with cement, uh the grass, because you're not allowed to have full cement.
We didn't know that.
So we put the hearts uh one part is heartscaped grass and then rock gravel.
So everything got approved.
Um, and then we got another complaint about the structures.
You know, yeah, but uh after that, um, we haven't gotten surprisingly any complaints or anything.
I just want to make a comment.
Is like we this is something that comes up every single time, and this is just where I always have a hard thing with is when we start cutting into these easements and we're putting things against wall lines, and then if the neighbor wanted to do the same thing, it just if a fire happens, this is how I jump from one wall to the next wall.
This is the Chicago fire, so that's what ends up happening here.
I'm sorry, um on the gates.
Hang on, hang on, just one second, ma'am.
This this is what it's just my concern, and I see this happening time and time again, and there's plenty of room in that backyard to build one big shed that could hold all of this, and so that's where with me I struggle with these type of things.
I just I'm someone I I I can't approve it for for me, and that's just me.
And so what the rest of the commissioners do, they can do.
It's just that at some point we have to say that there's easements and there's the separation created for a reason.
And and I for me, I can't go along with this one, but it's not up to me.
So thank you for the comments, Commissioner Brady.
Um, and I I apologize, I'm losing track.
Did I go to Vice Chair Mohica already?
You did, but I do have something to add.
Yes, ma'am, please do.
I I agree with Commissioner Brady.
I am extremely concerned about a fire uh fire hazard in this property.
All right, so all right, thank you, Commissioner Mohica.
Um, I'm gonna no, I see no more lights.
So I you know, for this particular one, I I I guess I'm gonna try to give a little uh level of you know what my concerns are.
I can support the application, however, because of the majority of the structures being wood and up against wood fences.
I do have similar concerns.
So uh I'll I'll let Commissioner Kalarski give us what she wants to do, and then and then we'll we'll make a vote.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
I do have one question at one time under old code, we had a certain amount of uh footage that we could have for accessory structures.
Is that in the new code?
It is not it is not so then she could have when you add all these sheds, she could have more than it used to be what 50 percent.
Right, I believe old code is you couldn't exceed the total number of accessory structures that were not agricultural related, could not exceed, I think it's 50 percent of the residents.
Okay, that was only an RS20 or no, it was because this is an RS5, or it would be the old R1.
Sorry, Commissioners, it was one structure, one accessory structure could not exceed 50 percent of the footprint of the house, and then the total of all accessory structures could not exceed the footprint.
So the first one was one, could not be more than half the footprint of the house, and then all accessory structures added together could not exceed the total footprint of the house.
Okay, and that no longer applies because that's no longer in code.
So all that information I can just throw out of my brain.
Correct.
Okay, thank you.
Which how many I know this the sheds in the pictures that I saw, the sheds that are behind your heart scaping?
Okay, they're on as you look at your property, they'd be on your right hand side.
Yes.
Okay.
Uh those are made out of what?
Um for the lifetime brand sheds, you know, those uh, I think it's plastic, these oh right here.
Okay.
Those are made out of that.
Yes.
And this is so is the one above the retaining wall.
Okay.
Um we were thinking about that one could go down if anything has to be required.
All right, so that's not the wood.
Oh, it's not.
And and we're asking for the setback from the wall and from the primary structure.
Those are the two waivers that I've got here.
Am I correct on that staff?
That's correct.
Okay.
And what about the two sheds?
What about you?
Then you have the gazebos.
The shed in the back in the upper left-hand corner that Commissioner Brady was talking about.
That's made out of wood.
No.
Um, this one right here?
The one on top?
No, that what is that made out of?
Um, this one, it's the same brand lifetime, it's the plastic.
Okay.
So that's okay.
Uh and what is the shed that is to be on the opposite corner of that?
What's that made out of?
The opposite corner is it's this one we have right here.
Um that's wood.
That's where it's a few.
And that's the one that's made out.
Uh that's the one that's up against the wood wood fence.
Yes.
Okay.
Yeah, that one's that was the first one that was in there.
You have a lot of stuff back there.
Yeah, that's mainly my brother's tool shed and stuff, because he's in the military, so he likes to, he works on cars and stuff.
Well, I don't know if I'm so much worried about the sheds creating problems with fire, but with all the stuff you have.
I see the pallets, I see a lot of wood in between.
Oh, yeah, we've cleared uh we've been clearing a lot of stuff.
That's those that's not there no more.
There's quite a few.
Well, yeah, we've cleaned up because you have electrical running into the uh into the sheds.
Excuse me?
Electrical?
No, no.
There's no electrical running into the sheds.
No.
Did you get letters of support from either the neighbor in the back or the neighbors on either side of you?
Uh no, why they didn't know what can we very new with this.
We didn't know we because you know somebody has called you in on this.
Oh, yes.
And whether it's the neighbors on either side of you or behind you, I don't know, or across the street.
I don't know.
No, well, there is a uh this past year, uh a new house well, house that got turned into an Airbnb.
So there's everybody saying that because the my other neighbors are getting complaints about their front yard, um, stuff in their well, like they're around their house as well, but ours was the main one because we only had um nothing but dirt.
Okay.
Yeah, is it possible that's sorry, Commissioner Kalarski?
It's possible that code enforcement just made their way to that side of town right now.
Commissioner Clark, can you have a question?
Uh can you tell us, right?
You you said there were no electrical running to the sheds, but what is that uh nine foot arrow pointing at?
What is that?
Is that a is that a wire?
Um that's the nine foot.
No, I think that my brother had something hanging well, he hangs his clothes or something.
I don't know what that is.
What's uh so that's not a light I'm looking at that little black?
No, leave that up there.
So I'm pointing, put that back, please.
Yeah.
What is that, right?
Is that a light?
Uh no, a light.
No, we don't we don't have electricity on it must be.
Maybe it's a four by four sticking through the okay.
All right, you can say there's no electrical.
No, we don't have electrical thank you.
They also mentioned about like they can have somebody like the fire and safety or something go look to see if it's a fired hazard.
They on the board meeting our last they can go take a look.
Yeah.
Are any like I look at flammables, so paint, lacquer thinner, anything like that.
Well just by a four maybe it's a four by four sticking through the okay all right you can say there's no electrical no we don't have electrical thank you they also mentioned about like they can have somebody like the fire and safety or something go look to see if it's a fired hazard they on the board meeting our last they can go take a look yeah is are any like I look at flammables so paint lacquer thinner anything like that is it I was in wood shop in high school and you you put a whole bunch of rags with lacquer or anything like that or chemicals together and it can ignite oh yeah but no we don't no no no no no yeah okay all right okay the these prop these particular sheds they have to unfortunately be X number of feet away from the primary residence which is six feet so if you can't get them if you're gonna want to put them on the side of your house in order for them to meet that six foot setback we could move them like yeah if we if you have okay can I finish please okay and then and then you we then we can see what you can do to to help us okay thank you um the ones on the side is the the separation between the primary and the perimeter is probably about eight feet so there's no way that unless she move that into the back then you have a problem with the back because then you have your separations between the gazebos that retaining wall unless we put them on the top which I don't want to do um but that retaining well now takes up part of their of their yard so I think what I would like to do I don't like the one on top because it oversees and when you go up there to do whatever you do you go and you you're overseeing your neighbor so since building department has to go in there and make sure that it's fire rated that it's whatever I'm going to go ahead and move to approve sheds the car port one and two but it's one car port basically they're just not attached to each other.
So the car ports one and two sheds can you put your site plan back on again thank you sheds three and four and one's one and two and you have to take down shed two and I am going to have you do that one year to complete the building permit with an 18 month review so that they can get all that all done oh wait a minute no that won't work I I'm trying to I want to do a review period and I'm trying to s look at staff to see what they're recommending how they're recommending I do that so I mean we're recommending the one year um I'm not sure if that's enough time but you can do you can do the 18 months or two years or okay uh I don't know I'm I'm gonna look to my what do we think especially my uh our chairman because he's a contractor and he's so so we could we could say we let's review one year after they're finished with permits we could do that okay and that would be one year for the permits to be completed or no no we're not I'm not putting a time on the permits I'm just saying one year after they're finished with permits can take four months you can take for yeah permits could be six months or permits could be two months that's then how will we know what what what the review period will be how will that be notified too many questions.
That's the applicant's responsibility to track that so if they don't they don't come back for the review then at some point if they're ever caught without having done the review five ten twenty years down the road then they'll come back before you in other words what you do is when you get your inspection done you need to apply for review for one year.
Am I correct if you're adding if permits are required and you're adding one year a one year review from the date that the permits are finalized then yes within one year so she should put a note on her calendar for 11 months after that final permit.
Okay and she should apply at that point.
So kind of what my thoughts are is because permits could take anywhere from two months, four months, six months, or whatever.
If you don't put a time limit on a review, it's how he said it's never gonna come up again until they're reported again down the road.
How about maybe put like a two-year um check on it?
So no matter what, they'll get permits done within that amount of time.
So the standard is for them to be completely done with the permits when they have code violations within one year.
One year from today, done with the permits.
If she's done with the permits in two months and gets her final inspection in two months, then you'll see her again 14 months from all right.
Let's let's make it 18 months from now.
Okay.
So building a complete building permit and a year and a half from today, yeah.
For a review for review.
Okay.
And if you don't understand that, who's your planner?
Um JI.
Yes.
Yes.
Jolene.
Jolene.
Okay.
She's one of our new planners.
Yes.
Get with her and she'll explain it perfectly.
All right.
There's a motion on the floor.
Cast your vote.
Mr.
Chair, may I ask a question, a clarification question before I vote?
Yes, please do.
Um this is for staff.
So permitting will confirm that there is absolutely no electrical in any of those sheds.
Am I correct?
That's correct.
Thank you.
Then Mujica, yes.
All right.
That motion carries.
The motion carries.
Good luck.
Sorry.
Next item.
Thank you.
This is final action unless appealed.
Next item on the agenda is item number 16, WS260206.
We have development standards to increase a proposed fence height in conjunction with the existing single-family residence on 0.42 acres in an RS20 residential single families when he zone within the neighborhood protection RP overlay, generally located south of RB Avenue and east of Hinson Street within Enterprise.
Thank you very much.
Name and address for the record.
Tell us about your application.
Hi, good evening.
Jessica Lane with Proficient Patios representing the homeowners.
So here we are requesting today for a side setback reduction for a privacy uh privacy wall, lattice wall built out of the Luma wood product, like we build a lot of the Luma wood covers.
Um this is pretty much the final product of what the lattice wall looks like.
Um it is with a one-foot separation instead of a five-foot, believe is what's being required on this one.
Um 36 feet in length and five foot in height over the existing CMU wall.
So this is the existing CMU wall, and it would be five foot in height over in height.
Um color of it is color as you see, pretty much.
I mean, it's a similar color here, but to match the color of the wall.
So color is to match the color of the wall.
Main deal why the customers are asking for this is for privacy.
Um let's put this in the center.
This is their privacy.
The basically it's for privacy from this main um neighbor.
They have kind of a big tree, but the tree doesn't go this length, and they're just trying to get the lattice wall to go longer into this side.
So um no HOA in this community.
And um, this is the corner here where the lattice wall was going prior.
Um that's pretty much it.
Open if you guys have any questions.
Uh thank you very much.
So I'm gonna open this application up for a public hearing.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item?
No, okay.
So I will close the public hearing and open up to commissioners for questions and comments.
Um I see a brilliant lines.
I'll start with Commissioner Kirk.
Thank you.
Is the is the neighbor uh in approval?
Has an A approved of this no letter.
Um, no, that we I don't have any signed approved from the neighborhood.
Have they contacted the neighbor at all?
Do you know to I'm not at least discuss with the neighbor what's being proposed?
Yeah, I'm not sure, Kirk.
I'm not sure on that, Mr.
Kirk.
All right, let me just I do know I asked, right, if we had neighbors' signatures, but because there was no HOA, no, she didn't go for neighbor's signatures, so I believe not.
All right, I'll go next to Commissioner Kalarski.
Uh I'm gonna say that if we don't know.
I'm I'm they had to have been notified.
Were there any were there any protest cards that was probably no?
We we did not receive any.
We didn't receive anything.
I I personally I cannot support an 11 foot wall without knowing one way or another about the neighbor.
Uh and I have I approved one time, and it was but the neighbor was he was absolutely thrilled to have it there.
So I don't know.
I can't do an 11-foot wall.
I'm sorry.
Uh and that's all for me.
All right, thank you, Commissioner Kalarski.
I'll go next to Vice Chair Mohica.
Any questions or comments for the applicant?
I agree, especially if the neighbor was it's not part of this process, but I would never approve an 11-foot wall ever.
Thank you, Vice Chair.
I I have a question for the applicant.
What is the height of the existing CMU wall?
Um, here, Commissioner.
Five foot two.
Um so just for the record.
Um, I mean, I I could go within three feet on top of the five, so at eight foot height, that would be that would be a no-brainer for me.
I am having a problem with 11 feet, but I will I will defer to my fellow commissioners.
I'll turn it over to Commissioner Workman.
I think I agree with the rest of the commission that if the neighbor was on board with this, I'd feel a lot better with a yes, but I don't think I can do that without even with not knowing.
Um what I'm willing to do is to hold this for 30 days, and if you go get the neighbors to sign off on this, then I think I'm not gonna say it's a yes for me, but um again, if it was an eight-foot wall, I'd feel a lot better about it.
Neighbor approval.
I think you can definitely come back with neighbor approval and get a wall increase, just maybe not at this level.
So if that works, then um does that work?
Yeah, so I actually brought that up at the town board, not about the neighbor.
Um, but yes, we will definitely on board with that.
Um, my question was okay, so let me propose to my customer if we can go down to eight, and I think town board said no, Jess.
You would have to like or staff.
I don't know if you guys are not basically what I got from town board was that I couldn't just modify it at this point.
Let me ask staff.
So if she comes back in a month and say doesn't get the neighbor's approval, then can we reduce the I know we don't design from the dais, but can we make that reduction that yes you can she can come back and make the reduction?
Does that work?
Yes, all right.
With that, I motion to hold this for 30 days.
Um and I encourage you to go talk to your neighbors.
All right, so so the motion on the floor, cash your vote.
Commissioner Commissioner Mohica, yes.
Thank you very much.
All right, that motion passes for a hold.
Thank you.
Just for clarification, that'll be going to the July 7th planning commission meeting.
And this is final action unless appealed.
And for the last set of items for tonight's meeting, items 17, 18, 19, and 20.
Um for current planning items, are we'll be heard together.
So that's for PA 267018 plan amendment to redesignate this existing land use category from neighborhood commercial and C to business employment BE on 1.24 acres.
Generally located north of Quail Avenue and east of Santa Margarita Street alignment within Spring Valley.
ZC260214 zone change to reclassify 1.24 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone, generally located north of Quail Avenue and east of Santa Margarita Street alignment within Spring Valley.
VS 260216, faking and abandoned eastments of interest to Clark County, located between Russell Road and Quail Avenue and Rainbow Boulevard and Torrey Pines Drive and a portion of right-away being Quill Avenue located between Rainbow Boulevard and Torrey Pines Drive within Spring Valley.
And last item on this set is WS 260215.
Waivers of Development Standards for the following number one, reduce buffering and number two, increase parking.
AE6C overlay, generally located north of Quail Avenue and East of Santa Margarita Street Alignment within Spring Valley.
Thank you very much.
Name and address for the record.
Tell us about your application.
Good evening.
Jennifer Lazovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here tonight on behalf of the applicant.
The site is located in Green, which is just north of Quail Avenue.
The two major streets just to the west of us are Rainbow, and to the north is Russell.
I think this is a good map to really get an idea of what is going on in reality around the site.
Immediately to the north is a two-story office building and a commercial project.
To the west of the site is a developed electrical substation.
All of the property all the way up to our edge is owned by the Clark County Department of Aviation.
The substation sits on this piece, but the entire piece is owned by the Clerk County Department of Aviation.
To the east of us is a community residence, which has a business license to operate.
And to the south of us is uh vacant land approved for a church.
Diagonal is a multi-story mini warehouse.
We are asking for a plan amendment to take this property, which is currently planned for neighborhood commercial, and as you can see, neighborhood commercial is to the north, uh corridor mixed use to the east.
Um this is where the church is to the south, and uh to the excuse me, that was to the west, and to the east of us is also master plan for neighborhood commercial.
We are asking for a plan amendment and zone change uh to go to business employment.
If you can scroll up just a little bit to see the full site, to go uh thank you from business employment and industrial park for the zoning.
This is the site plan.
We do have a little bit of a um of an offset, if you will, right here.
We worked with public works on the front end to see where they would rather have our driveway given that Santa Margarita Street comes in.
We have sited the building to the east of the site so that there's no activity on the east side.
I would like to withdraw waiver one B.
That would be the waiver that is with uh reducing the landscaping on the east side.
Um as I explained earlier, this has a house, but it is being used as a community residence, nonetheless, it is a house, so we can comply with the landscaping on the east side.
We do have a waiver to reduce the landscaping to the north.
This is where that two-story office building is, and on the immediate other side of this block wall is the carport for that two-story office building.
Um, in addition, we do have a waiver to increase the number of parking spaces.
Uh we don't think that that's an inappropriate waiver given the tenant mix that we may have here.
And to give you an idea of what this would look like.
It really has it's an office warehouse, but we tried to give it the look of a retail building with that warehouse component, and you can see that with these taller doors right here.
They are not depressed docks or anything that would allow for an 18-wheeler.
These are just doors that would allow for maybe a uh smaller box truck or a van.
Um, we had a tenant in a prior project that um whose business it was a local company.
Their business was that they use the office for office activity, but they use the smaller warehouse set up just like this for snacks, bulk snacks, and then their their kind of van delivery trucks delivered those snacks to their uh clients.
So those are the kinds of tenants we get in these spaces where they do have some office use, but they have that need for that.
What I would consider um a very low-intense warehouse or storage area, and that's what this would bring.
Um board actually did recommend approval of the plan amendment, and um, with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Thank you very much.
I'm gonna open these applications up for a public hearing.
Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item?
Seeing no one coming up, I will close the public hearing and open up to commissioners for comments, questions.
Sorry.
Go ahead, Commissioner Clark.
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
Um, I've been looking at this, and and I got briefed.
And when you look at this whole thing, if you can put up the master plan, I would appreciate that.
Okay, we see this.
We know what we've got here.
Um site will be the only industrial.
We know that over here in this open land and the public.
All of this is owned by the Department of Aviation.
Probably is not going to be residential.
And putting this as an industrial land use is now just shoving that door wide open for everything to the east of that to become industrial.
You have homes south of there that are large estates.
If you were to stay in there, and we had special use permits for projects like this, like the warehouses that could go with a special use permit into a commercial zone.
I think we we'd be better off, but I think that's a cleanup thing.
That's something that we need to get with our commissioners about our board.
But I do believe there are some projects that should be able to go into commercial, and they can't, they have to go into an industrial.
This is gonna open it up.
I cannot do that.
So sorry, but you don't have my support on the plan amendment, which means that I will be voting no on the rest of them.
Thank you.
Thank you, Commissioner Kalarski.
Um, before I go to Commissioner Wrigman, Vice Chair Mohica, any questions, comments for the applicant.
While she while she's getting her mic on, I'll just say that for the record, I can support the application.
I I see it's a it's a tough piece.
Um there is there is development to the east of it already, which kind of breaks it up a little bit.
And um I I believe that the site plan that you provided is is not intense as it relates to what's around what's surrounding it, and you know, I'm I'm okay with the application.
This is Commissioner Mohica, Mr.
Chair.
Um with the removal of one B, I can support it.
Thank you very much, Commissioner.
Can I just Commissioner Brady?
You know, I came in here today actually thinking I was 100% in favor.
Um, but when you mentioned something that we always keep on talking about is spot zoning.
And that is something that makes me concerned here.
Is we're this is a spot zone, and it does, I agree, open up some future possibilities of what could then turn this area into something completely different.
So as much as I came in here thinking I was gonna go one way, I think I'm gonna have to go the other.
Um, and I'm really well, I'm really interested to see what you say down there at the other end, but I I'm here.
Thank you, Commissioner Brady.
Commissioner Reichman.
Um I don't find this to be that much more intense than a lot of the stuff around it, including like the mini warehouse and the office building to the north.
Right.
And so understanding the concern about the spot zoning.
I wonder if there, I mean, maybe this is for some of the folks who've been on here longer than I.
Is it the concern that we're setting a precedent with this one, even though the building is not gonna be so intense, that the next one this will be used as a justification?
Is that is that the concern?
Because even if we put if we know that this is the site plan, and I'll I'll pass it along in a second, then like even if we put another condition on this parcel, which is you are going to do it this way with this type of light office warehouse thing.
Does that solve some of the concerns that you say, oh well, yeah, we did it, but this doesn't mean this whole thing is gonna turn industrial and the I don't know.
I I guess that this is a question for some for the rest of you.
Yeah, so that is a question.
I I would say, you know, um what the way I look at it is, and I think I've said this before that we look at all applications on their own merit, and and granted, we're we're we're putting something in the site.
To me, I still say there's a boundary where you see the group home parcel, you see the church, and then to the east of that is all of the other property that could be developed.
And we have as a group the control of there's something else that comes before us that's non non-conforming, if we don't want to, or we feel it's not a good fit, we have the opportunity to say no.
And and I I would also offer to the board that those folks that are developing land in our community, they have an idea of what the commission and what the county commission and also the planning commission for the county, what we expect and what we what we would like to see.
So most times they're not going to bring anything before us that that's that's that's unreasonable.
I'll use that, I'll use that word.
And so that's my that's my two cents.
Go ahead, Commissioner Brady, and then Commissioner Kalarski is our light back.
I just want to throw one more thing on this.
So I I go there and I hear on the spot, and I'm the one that used the word spot zoning everything.
I do see the big power um treatment there right next to it, which to me does feel industrial to me.
Um what it comes up is later on when we're all sitting here and we say pull up the plot map and we see all the different colors, and then we're gonna see something that's yellow, or we're gonna just see the different color.
And so it's gonna be somehow I wish we could tag this, it showed, yeah, this is yellow, but there's a way to know why it was done.
Um the use and what it is going to be by the image of it.
I actually think it's it's fits the area fine.
It's the precedence of what might go next to, and yes, we've we've always said we do things on its own merit, but man, that own merit really carries over from what's around it.
So anyway, with that, I'm it's gonna be interesting how I go on this one.
Uh yeah, I'll just for the I think the maybe I saw that there's a lot of this.
I think maybe you stayed.
Sorry, Buffy.
Oh, you're fine.
And and I agree with what you say about the substation.
That is in the more of an industrial type thing.
I get that.
This mini warehouse goes in at a and on a commercial.
Okay, you're uh warehouse office.
So what makes it required for that to be industrial?
It you got a mini warehouse just south of that in a commercial zone.
So why can't what why are we having to change this into an industrial?
That becomes my question to staff.
And I still and and I understand what you're saying, Mr.
Chairman, but we got to, you know, you got you gotta remember that we we do take a look at these individually, but when we start putting bits in pieces, then we kind of lose where we're going, and we're we we just lose that whole that whole uh area to whatever thank you, Commissioner Kalarski.
I think you bring up a good question about why what's being proposed can't go in a commercial zone.
But while that while staff is looking that up, um let's go to Commissioner Kirk.
Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.
Uh to me, this feels uh a lot like an infill piece because to the south you have a church.
To the west, you have a substation, a power, and to the north you have a building, a office building, I think, right?
Yes, and then to the east, looks like that's a house, an old house.
Group home.
Yes, right.
It's an infill piece.
I mean, it's one of those parcels that we just I mean irrespective of the fact that you might say it's a spot zoning, that's kind of what infill is.
It's kind of the spot zoning.
We try to find something that fits in the neighborhood that works, irrespective of what the zoning says.
So church, power station, group home, office building.
This is not perfect for us, but I think it's uh the way the building's designed, and the what you've displayed tonight, and what I heard in my briefing, I'm okay with it.
I think it's I think it fits.
Uh it doesn't stick out like a thorough thumb.
And uh I think it'll work just fine where it's at, and I'm in favor.
Thank you, Commissioner Kirk.
Staff, you have some comments for Commissioner Kalarski's question.
Um, our code says a warehouse and distribution, it's it's permitted in IPIL and a special use permanent IH, it is not permitted in C N C P C G C C C U C R.
So they would have needed to do the zone change anyway because they wanted to they're proposing the office warehouse buildings.
Then how did the mini warehouse um is in a commercial use permit?
It's a special use permit in CG zone.
Might I just offer I think the mini warehouse is a different type of I think it's considered a different type of storage that then you would find in something like this that it's a business storing something, whereas in a mini warehouse it might be people who live in the surrounding areas renting a storage unit and putting their leftover furniture or Christmas decorations in.
And so that's a use that's allowed in commercial.
Like I said, I I think that the pro the product is good.
I just think that we need to not do the land use change with the plan amendment.
And that's that's where I stand.
And so that goes that that makes me go with with no all the way.
Thank you.
Um okay, I won't ask any questions.
Go ahead.
Go ahead, Commissioner.
I I appreciate uh the responses from the board to to my questions, and I and I agree that we we up here and hopefully future boards can have the judgment to look at what's actually there and not just you know say this was spot zoning.
So and I think the the other point about the the aviation zones, and that there will not be a bunch of residents being built in this area.
Um for those reasons, although I am sympathetic to the other opinions on the board.
I can motion to approve the plan amendment, PA two six seven zero zero zero one eight.
All right, there's a motion on the floor for approvement of the plan amendment item number seventeen.
Vice Chair Mohica.
Mohica, yes.
Okay, that motion carries.
Next item.
I'd like to motion to approve items number 18, 19, and 20, ZC 260214, VS 260216, and WS260215 with the removal of waiver to be to B.
It is waiver one B.
With the removal of one B as stated by the applicant.
All right, so motion on the floor, cast your vote.
Vice Chair Mohica.
Mohica, yes.
All right, that motion carries.
Thank you very much.
These items will be forwarded to the board of county commissioners um meeting for final action on July 8, 2026 at 9 a.m.
unless otherwise announced.
All right, next item.
Item number 21 is the um agenda item.
And that is um for ORD 26900 review and ordinance to amend title 30 regulations as previously directed by the Board of County Commissioners, board and to bring regulations in alignment with the Nevada revised statutes for legal non-conforming lots, residential multifamily 18 arm 18 standards, cannabis, special events, light manufacturing or correction to the accessible space and access design requirement, and make corrections and clarifications as appropriate and providing for other matters properly related there too.
Thank you very much.
Do I need to open this item up for a public hearing?
Okay, and also I'm I'm sorry, the last question is do I just need to motion that we forward this to the board of county commissioners?
Yes.
Uh, motion's not required, it's just for discussion and direction.
Thank you very much.
So this item has been read into the record.
Um, any questions or comments from the commissioner, the book commissioner's board?
Vice Chair Mohica.
No questions or comments.
All right, thank you very much.
So we'll move on to the next item, which I believe is um public comments.
All right, thank you very much.
So now is a section for public comments, and subsection we open up for the public to come down and make comments to the board where the board cannot act on any of those comments and seeing no one rushing down.
Go nights 5 4.
So seeing no one coming down for I'll put that on a public record.
See no one coming down for public comments, we'll close that section and adjourn the meeting.
Thank you.
Clark County Planning Commission Meeting
Overview
The Clark County Planning Commission met on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. The meeting was chaired by Edward Frasier III and included Vice-Chair Leslie Mujica (via teleconference), Commissioners Tyler Brady, Steve Kirk, Vivian Kilarski, Michael Roitman, and Nelson Stone. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Key actions included approval of a cat cafe use permit, a hold on a banquet facility application, approval of a vehicle repair use permit, approval of waivers for accessory structures, and approval of a plan amendment and related items for the Diamond Quail project.
Consent Calendar
- Items 4–12 were approved as a single motion (with items 9 and 11 handled separately). Items 4–8, 10, and 12 were approved with staff conditions.
- Item 4: Extension of time for a congregate care facility (approved).
- Item 5: Tentative map for one industrial lot (approved).
- Item 6: Tentative map for two commercial lots (approved).
- Item 7: Use permit and design review for outdoor storage (approved).
- Item 8: Use permit for a place of worship (approved).
- Item 10: Vacate and abandon portion of right-of-way (approved).
- Item 12: Resolution amending the Master Plan to add a heat mitigation plan per AB96 (adopted and forwarded to the June 17, 2026 BCC meeting).
- Item 11 (design review for office/warehouse) was deleted from the Planning Commission agenda to be heard at the June 3, 2026 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
- Item 9 (cat cafe use permit) was removed from consent and heard separately.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were made during the general public comment period at the beginning or end of the meeting.
- During the hearing for Item 9 (Cat & Koi Lounge), Rachel Park, property manager of Koreatown Plaza (6850 Spring Mountain Road), spoke in opposition. She cited a petition with over 120 signatures opposing the permit, concerns about sanitation, ventilation, animal welfare, and the applicant’s experience. She noted that a previous pet store (Puppy Town) had caused issues for neighboring restaurants. She also questioned the need for 18 cats versus the code maximum of 10.
Discussion Items
Item 9: UC-26-0229 – Use Permit for Household Pets (Cat Cafe)
The applicant, Mark Salvador, proposed a cat cafe (Cat & Koi Lounge) in a 1,200 sq ft space in a CG zone. The facility would keep up to 18 cats for structured interaction sessions. Key points:
- No sales, breeding, or adoptions; cats would be resident animals.
- A five-layer sanitation system including self-cleaning litter boxes, HEPA air purifiers, and dedicated exhaust.
- Applicant argued 18 cats are needed for a welfare rotation model (6-8 resting, 10-12 active), citing a 2025 study.
- Benefits: family-oriented attraction, cat therapy (lower cortisol, increased oxytocin), adoption partnership with local rescues, and economic traffic for the corridor.
- Commissioner questions focused on ventilation, animal welfare oversight (by Animal Control and Health District), and the appropriateness of the business model. Commissioner Klarski expressed confusion about the use, while Commissioner Mujica raised concerns about food establishments nearby and potential sales issues.
- A motion to deny failed (2 ayes: Mujica and Kilarski; 5 nays: Frasier, Brady, Kirk, Roitman, Stone). A subsequent motion to approve passed (5-2), with an added condition of a two-year review from issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
Item 13: UC-26-0142 – Holdover Use Permit for Banquet Facility
The applicant, Rebecca Mahana, sought a permit for an event space/banquet hall. The item had been continued previously. Commissioner Roitman noted the applicant had missed three town board meetings. He motioned to hold the item for 30 days to allow the applicant to present to the town board, warning that further delays could result in denial with prejudice. The motion passed unanimously. The item will be heard at the July 7, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.
Item 14: UC-26-0232 – Use Permit for Vehicle Maintenance/Repair
Applicant Jonathan Fode requested a permit for vehicle maintenance in conjunction with an existing exotic car dealership. The site is 15 feet from a residential property line, requiring mitigation. Conditions added: hours of operation 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., doors kept closed to mitigate noise, a one-year review period. The motion to approve passed unanimously.
Item 15: WS-26-0202 – Waivers for Setbacks and Building Separations
Applicant Carol Parada (on behalf of owner Alma Amaya) requested waivers for existing accessory structures (sheds, pergolas) on a 0.15-acre RS5.2 lot. Concerns were raised about fire hazard due to wooden structures close to property lines and the primary residence. Commissioner Brady and Vice-Chair Mujica opposed due to fire risk. Commissioner Kilarski moved to approve with conditions: removal of Shed #2, completion of building permits and inspection within 18 months, and a review period 18 months from the date of approval. The motion passed 6-1 (Brady dissenting).
Item 16: WS-26-0206 – Waiver to Increase Fence Height
Applicant Jessica Lane (Proficient Patios) requested a 5-foot lattice wall added on top of an existing 5-foot 2-inch CMU wall (total height ~10-11 feet) for privacy. The neighbor’s position was unknown. Commissioners expressed discomfort with an 11-foot wall without neighbor approval. Commissioner Roitman motioned to hold for 30 days to allow the applicant to obtain neighbor input and possibly reduce the height to 8 feet. Motion passed unanimously. Item returns July 7, 2026.
Items 17–20: Diamond Quail, LLC (Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Vacation, Waivers/Design Review)
These four items (PA-26-700018, ZC-26-0214, VS-26-0216, WS-26-0215) were heard together. The applicant, Jennifer Lazovich, proposed a plan amendment from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Business Employment (BE) and a zone change from RS20 to IP (Industrial Park) on 1.24 acres near Quail Avenue. The site is adjacent to an electrical substation, a two-story office, a community residence, and approved church site.
- The applicant withdrew Waiver #1B (reduce landscaping on east side) and emphasized low-intensity office/warehouse use.
- Commissioner Kirk expressed concern about creating a spot zone that could open the area to industrial uses. Commissioners Brady and Kilarski echoed this. Commissioner Roitman argued the parcel is infill, and that future commissions could judge individual applications. Commissioner Frasier and Mujica supported the plan.
- The plan amendment (Item 17) was approved 6-1 (Kilarski dissenting). Items 18, 19, and 20 were then approved 5-2 (Brady and Kilarski dissenting) in a single motion, with the removal of Waiver 1B. These items are forwarded to the July 8, 2026 BCC meeting.
Item 21: ORD-26-900317 – Ordinance to Amend Title 30 Regulations
Martin Gies, Planning Manager, presented an ordinance to amend Title 30 regarding legal nonconforming lots, RM18 standards, cannabis, special events, light manufacturing, and a correction to accessible space requirements. The item was reviewed by the Commission and scheduled for the June 3, 2026 BCC meeting. No formal action was required.
Key Outcomes
- Item 9 (Cat Cafe): Approved 5-2 with a two-year review from Certificate of Occupancy.
- Item 13 (Banquet Facility): Held to July 7, 2026.
- Item 14 (Vehicle Repair): Approved unanimously with conditions (hours 9-5, doors closed, 1-year review).
- Item 15 (Shed Waivers): Approved 6-1 with conditions: remove Shed #2, complete permits/inspection within 18 months, 18-month review.
- Item 16 (Fence Height): Held 30 days to July 7, 2026.
- Items 17-20 (Diamond Quail): Plan amendment approved 6-1; zone change, vacation, and waivers/design review approved 5-2. Forwarded to BCC July 8, 2026.
- Item 21 (Ordinance): Reviewed; forwarded to BCC June 3, 2026.
- Consent Items (4-12): Approved, with Item 11 deleted to BCC and Item 9 handled separately.
- Appeals: Any appeals must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 2026, to be heard by the BCC on July 8, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
All right, so we're on the air. We're gonna go ahead and open up this public hearing for the for the meeting car cloud carning commission meeting for Tuesday June 2nd, 2026. And so we'll we'll start first with um a uh roll call, please. Yeah, Chairman Frazier here, Vice Chair Mohica. She'll be on the line. Okay. I'm here. Can you hear me? Yes. Commissioner Stone here. Commissioner Kirk here. Commissioner Kalarski. Commissioner Brady. Here. Commissioner Reutman. Live and in person. Mr. Chair, we have a quorum. Thank you. So can you rise and join us in a pledge of allegiance? I pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty for all. All right. First item on our agenda is public comments. Um this is a section of our meeting we open up to the public. Um you're welcome to come down and make comments. The commission cannot act or make any comments on your public comments. It can be on any issue. Now's the time to come down and do that. All right, seeing no one coming down for public comments, we'll close that section of the public hearing and we'll start with the first agenda item. Good evening, everyone. The next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda after any additions, holds, or deletions. At this time, we have the following requests. Delete from the June 2nd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting to be heard at the June 3rd, 2026 Board of County Commissioners meeting per staff is item number 11, DR260236. For the applicant's information, additional renotification fees may be required in accordance with Title 30 for items held or deleted, or if there are modifications to the original application. The above public hearing items are going to be open as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the date previously stated. This is for item 11. If there are no requests by the planning commission or any members of the public, the agenda stands ready for your approval. So I'll enter the motion for approval of the agenda. If there's nothing further from any member of the board, I'll move that we approve the agenda with the deleting item number 11. Thank you. There's a motion on the floor for approval of the agenda. Cast your vote. Commissioner Mohica, yes. Thank you, Commissioner. That motion passes. Next item. The next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes. There are no planning commission briefing and regular meeting minutes for tonight's meeting. For the audience's information items on tonight's agenda are final action unless appealed to the board of the county commissioners or otherwise announced.
openpublica.com