OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Clark County Board of County Commissioners Zoning Meeting – September 2, 2026

Meeting PortalWednesday, September 2, 2026
BodyClark County, Nevada
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, September 2, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:40:48

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Now you can participate.

0:01

Today's agenda includes different types of items the Board of County Commissioners will discuss and may vote on.

0:07

Some items are routine and may be approved together in one vote, while others are considered individually and may include a public hearing.

0:16

Sometimes an agenda item may be held at the request of a commissioner or county staff.

0:21

When an item is held, it will not be discussed or voted on during today's meeting and will be brought back at a future meeting.

0:27

There are two opportunities for public comment during this meeting.

0:31

And it's important to understand the difference.

0:33

The first public comment period takes place at the beginning of the meeting.

0:37

This public comment is only for items that are listed on today's agenda.

0:42

Comments during this time must relate to a specific agenda item.

0:46

If you wish to speak about a particular agenda item, you may comment at the beginning of the meeting, or you may wait to see if that item is discussed later and includes an opportunity for public comment when the item is being considered.

0:59

Some routine items may be approved together as part of what is called the consent agenda.

1:04

If you do not agree with a staff recommendation for one of these items, you must request that that item be removed before the board takes action.

1:12

If it is not removed, it may be approved early in the meeting as part of a single vote.

1:16

Items that are not routine are considered one at a time and may include an opportunity for public comment before the board votes.

1:24

When it's time to speak, please come forward.

1:26

There are three microphones available, including a handheld microphone if you have documents you would like to show.

1:32

If you wish to show a document, an overhead camera may be used at the direction of the board chair.

1:38

Please do not display documents that contain personal or sensitive information.

1:42

When speaking, please talk directly into the microphone, clearly and at a steady volume.

1:48

This helps ensure your comments are heard and recorded as part of the public record.

1:52

Speakers are required to state their name, spell their last name, and state their address.

1:57

At the end of the meeting, there is a second public comment period.

2:00

This final public comment is for items not listed on the agenda.

2:04

No action may be taken on those comments at that time.

2:07

All public comments are limited to three minutes unless otherwise announced by the chair at the beginning of the meeting.

2:13

During all public comment periods, board members may listen but are not allowed to respond.

2:18

Thank you for being here and for taking the time to participate in your local government.

3:56

Welcome to the continuation of the Clark County Commission meeting.

4:00

Today is September 2nd, 2026.

4:05

I will begin the meeting with our first time set aside for public comment.

4:10

This is an opportunity dedicated for individuals to speak on any item that is on today's agenda.

4:16

If you would like to speak on items that are posted on today's agenda, please come forward at this time.

4:26

Good morning.

4:37

Items 14 through 17 are being held today.

4:39

But if there are any neighbors uh here for those items, I can definitely meet them outside if they have any questions.

4:45

Thank you.

4:46

Thank you.

4:49

Anyone else wishing to speak?

4:51

Please come forward.

4:52

State your name for the record.

4:55

Good morning.

4:57

Good morning.

4:58

My name is Ed Ulin.

5:01

I wanted to ask about item number six, I believe it is.

5:10

This is a project right in front of our house, and it involves using 16 acres of land to build the care facility.

5:20

This land is right on Maryland Parkway, the main uh one of the main uh arteries of the whole county.

5:28

And uh you've got to we've this city is going to grow drastically in the next 10, 20 years, and what is needed is for high intense residential to be built on streets that have transportation on our major streets.

5:50

Otherwise, you're going to continue this uh this uh building uh practice of sprawl.

5:59

Uh we're gonna have another Los Angeles uh in 20 years, and having to build uh highways uh way out in the country.

6:10

Um so uh I I know this has negative it would to build a 20-story apartment building on this property uh would mean that uh that the transportation would be used, it would mean that people wouldn't have to travel so far, not as many roads would have to be built, uh all the all those things.

6:32

It would interfere with our view, of course.

6:34

It's right in front of our property, but uh I really uh and and I'm sort of a hypocrite with this.

6:44

I went to the I went to the meetings uh two years ago when when this was first heard and agreed to agree with this.

6:54

Uh I didn't know it was coming up.

6:56

It's just a pure coincidence I'm here today.

6:59

Um so anyway, um I agreed with it then.

7:05

I'm not so sure I agree with it now.

7:08

Then uh it says that items one through 20 are on the consent agenda, yet 18, 19, and 20 are public hearings.

7:19

How how does that uh can someone explain how that works?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Veterans Affairs█████████████████17%
Affordable Housing█████████████████17%
Procedural██████6%
Parks and Recreation████4%
Disability Rights███3%
Transportation Safety██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Education██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Clark County Board of County Commissioners Zoning Meeting – September 2, 2026

The Clark County Board of County Commissioners held its zoning meeting on September 2, 2026, beginning at 9:00 AM. The agenda included routine action items (Items 4–20) approved on consent, and non-routine items (Items 21–53) considered individually. A major focus was a proposed affordable housing development for veterans and active military families (Items 39–42), which was held to October 7, 2026, pending further documentation. Other significant items included approval of the Echo Trail Community Center, several residential and commercial developments, and appeals regarding school flashers and a gaming facility.

Consent Calendar

  • Items 4–20: Approved collectively with the exception of Items 14–17 (held to October 7, 2026) and Items 29–33 (held to September 16, 2026). Routine approvals included design reviews, zone changes, waivers, and ordinance introductions. No objections were raised.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ed Ulin spoke on Item 6 (congregate care facility), expressing concern about urban sprawl and suggesting high-intensity residential on major arteries would be preferable. He later commented on Items 39–42, questioning the legality of discriminating by veteran status in housing.
  • Arony Barra (Southern Nevada Building Trade Unions) expressed support for Items 39–42 (Patriot Housing Project), noting a project labor agreement ensuring local and veteran hiring.
  • Ryan Matthews (Electricians Local) supported Items 39–42, citing the need for 348 affordable units for veterans and their families, with wrap-around services. He shared personal experience as a veteran who had been homeless.
  • Vincent Palmer (Commander, Chapter 7 Eleven, Military Order of the Purple Heart) urged approval of Items 39–42, stating veterans deserve housing in the community.
  • Levi Schultz (Nevada Veterans Fund) spoke of delivering food to 21 military families and pleaded for approval, calling a denial a “slap in the face.”
  • Mark Christensen (Paralyzed Veterans of America) supported the project, emphasizing that veterans protect the country.
  • Stephanie Phillips (Veterans and Politics) highlighted the project’s amenities and supportive services.
  • Evelyn Bocheco (American Legion Post 51, Nevada Women in Trades) supported the project, citing job creation.
  • Al Rojas (Sunrise Manor Neighborhood Watch) welcomed the veteran community and supported Items 23 and 39–42.
  • Robert Davison (Vietnam veteran) urged approval, contrasting with a similar project denied in North Las Vegas.
  • Steve Sanson (Veterans and Politics International) strongly supported the project.
  • Ludisalvio (Labor’s Local 872) asked supporters in the room to stand.
  • Whitney Horky opposed Item 50 (Visible Noise gaming facility), arguing it is incompatible with the residential neighborhood and that conditions would burden residents.
  • Liliana Geary (Blessed Day Academy) requested phased compliance for school flasher conditions on Item 49.

Discussion Items

  • Items 39–42 – Patriot Housing LV (Veteran Affordable Housing): The applicant, Bob Gronauer, presented a proposal for a 348-unit affordable apartment complex on 15.2 acres near Vegas Valley Drive and Tree Line Drive in Sunrise Manor. The project is designated for active military and veterans, with incomes at 30% AMI, and includes wraparound services. The property is currently a solar farm owned by the City of Las Vegas. Commissioners expressed concerns about zoning permanence (zone change to RM32) without guaranteed affordable housing, as the deed restriction would run with the land for only 50 years but the zoning would allow other uses if financing failed. Commissioner Gibson noted the county’s strong affordable housing record (47 communities, 5,700 units since 2022). Commissioner Kirkpatrick questioned the financing (LIHTC and HOME funds) and the lack of a plan if funding falls through. The applicant agreed to a six-month review, a 50-year deed restriction, an MOU with the city for reversionary zoning, and to share the purchase contract. The board voted to hold the items to October 7, 2026, for further documentation.
  • Items 21–22 – Garden Foundation Disability Services: Approved with a condition that recreational events be limited to tenants of the property.
  • Item 23 – Shopping Center on Desert Inn Road: Approved; a public speaker supported development to address homelessness.
  • Items 24–25 – Single-Family Residential in Lone Mountain: Approved; note that houses will be one-story.
  • Items 26–28 – Office Building with Cross-Access: Approved after applicant revised plans to include cross-access to north and south.
  • Items 34–35 – Single-Family Residential near 215: Approved; similar to previously approved northwest corner development.
  • Item 36 – Warehouse in Sunrise Manor: Held to October 7, 2026, due to lack of revised plans.
  • Item 37 – Echo Trail Community Center: Approved. The 58,000-square-foot community center on 36.3 acres includes a gymnasium, indoor walking track, and increased parking (from 33 to 320 spaces). Waivers for driveway throat depth were granted.
  • Item 38 – Single-Family Residential in Enterprise: Approved with conditions limiting the front setback waiver to specific lots and requiring 32 feet of paving on Miller Lane without curb/gutter/sidewalk.
  • Items 43–45 – Utility Structures (BESS facility) near Boulder City: Approved with conditions to extend water system by 2030 and install fire hydrants per Boulder City requirements.
  • Items 46–48 – Long-Term/Short-Term Hotel near Koval Lane: Approved; applicant withdrew waiver 8A (driveway width) to conform to standards.
  • Item 49 – Appeal of School/Daycare Conditions (Blessed Day Academy): Approved. The applicant may open the daycare immediately; the school flasher condition is waived pending a traffic study update. Driveway condition corrected. One-year review required.
  • Item 50 – Appeal for Gaming Facility (Visible Noise): Approved with conditions reducing maximum occupancy to 100, events to four per month, hours 9 AM–9 PM, mandatory shuttle service with invoice submission to the commissioner’s office, sound mitigation, and no loitering. One-year public hearing review.
  • Item 51 – Discussion on Fences and Walls in RNP Overlay: Commissioner Becker requested board discretion to allow wall height waivers in odd situations. Board agreed to direct staff to consider amending Title 30 to make such waivers permissible, and to place on the next RAC committee agenda.
  • Items 52–53 – Ordinances for Development Agreements: Introduced; public hearings set for September 16, 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • Items 39–42 held to October 7, 2026, pending a six-month review, 50-year deed restriction, MOU with City of Las Vegas for zoning reversion, and disclosure of financing plans.
  • Items 21–22, 23, 24–25, 26–28, 34–35, 37, 38, 43–45, 46–48, 49, 50 approved with conditions as read.
  • Item 36 held to October 7, 2026, due to missing plans.
  • Item 51: Direction given to staff to explore amending Title 30 to allow board discretion for wall height waivers in the RNP overlay.
  • Items 52–53 introduced for public hearing on September 16, 2026.
  • Consent Calendar approved with holds as noted.

Meeting Transcript

Now you can participate. Today's agenda includes different types of items the Board of County Commissioners will discuss and may vote on. Some items are routine and may be approved together in one vote, while others are considered individually and may include a public hearing. Sometimes an agenda item may be held at the request of a commissioner or county staff. When an item is held, it will not be discussed or voted on during today's meeting and will be brought back at a future meeting. There are two opportunities for public comment during this meeting. And it's important to understand the difference. The first public comment period takes place at the beginning of the meeting. This public comment is only for items that are listed on today's agenda. Comments during this time must relate to a specific agenda item. If you wish to speak about a particular agenda item, you may comment at the beginning of the meeting, or you may wait to see if that item is discussed later and includes an opportunity for public comment when the item is being considered. Some routine items may be approved together as part of what is called the consent agenda. If you do not agree with a staff recommendation for one of these items, you must request that that item be removed before the board takes action. If it is not removed, it may be approved early in the meeting as part of a single vote. Items that are not routine are considered one at a time and may include an opportunity for public comment before the board votes. When it's time to speak, please come forward. There are three microphones available, including a handheld microphone if you have documents you would like to show. If you wish to show a document, an overhead camera may be used at the direction of the board chair. Please do not display documents that contain personal or sensitive information. When speaking, please talk directly into the microphone, clearly and at a steady volume. This helps ensure your comments are heard and recorded as part of the public record. Speakers are required to state their name, spell their last name, and state their address. At the end of the meeting, there is a second public comment period. This final public comment is for items not listed on the agenda. No action may be taken on those comments at that time. All public comments are limited to three minutes unless otherwise announced by the chair at the beginning of the meeting. During all public comment periods, board members may listen but are not allowed to respond. Thank you for being here and for taking the time to participate in your local government. Welcome to the continuation of the Clark County Commission meeting. Today is September 2nd, 2026. I will begin the meeting with our first time set aside for public comment. This is an opportunity dedicated for individuals to speak on any item that is on today's agenda. If you would like to speak on items that are posted on today's agenda, please come forward at this time. Good morning. Items 14 through 17 are being held today. But if there are any neighbors uh here for those items, I can definitely meet them outside if they have any questions. Thank you. Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak? Please come forward. State your name for the record. Good morning. Good morning. My name is Ed Ulin. I wanted to ask about item number six, I believe it is. This is a project right in front of our house, and it involves using 16 acres of land to build the care facility. This land is right on Maryland Parkway, the main uh one of the main uh arteries of the whole county. And uh you've got to we've this city is going to grow drastically in the next 10, 20 years, and what is needed is for high intense residential to be built on streets that have transportation on our major streets. Otherwise, you're going to continue this uh this uh building uh practice of sprawl. Uh we're gonna have another Los Angeles uh in 20 years, and having to build uh highways uh way out in the country.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com