Cleveland County Equalization Board Special Meeting - July 24, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Cleveland County Equalization Board Special Meeting
The Cleveland County Equalization Board held a special meeting on July 24, 2026, at 10:00 AM to hear formal appeals on property valuations. The board addressed three appeals: one residential from the Nauman family, one residential from James D. Atkinson, and a consolidated commercial appeal for multiple properties owned by GCP Norman LLC. All motions to retain the assessor's proposed values passed unanimously.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the Special Meeting held on July 17, 2026.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No separate public comment period was held, but appellants provided testimony during their respective appeals.
Discussion Items
Appeal 1: Nauman, Jill E. & Michael A. (Account #88738)
- Appellants' Position: Mr. Nauman described ongoing issues with a nearby pump jack and flare, including safety concerns, health impacts (a grandchild's lung surgery), and lack of support from multiple government agencies. He requested that property taxes be suspended until the situation is resolved, arguing "no taxation without representation."
- Assessor's Position: The assessor's office presented a market value of $320,352 ($149.91/sq ft) for the 2,137 sq ft home built in 2001. After a 20% adjustment for proximity to the flare, the taxable value was set at $257,500 (a 3% increase from 2025's $250,000). The office stated that the well and flare existed before the home was built and that the property's assessed value already reflects the environmental impact.
- Board Action: The board acknowledged the limitations of its authority and recommended retaining the proposed taxable value of $257,500, noting the increase amounts to approximately $200 in taxes. Motion passed 2-0.
Appeal 2: Atkinson, James D. (Account #32471)
- Appellant's Position: Mr. Atkinson (participating by phone) argued that the property at 2625 72nd Ave SE was overvalued at $314,903. He purchased it for $270,000 in 2021 and discovered structural defects requiring remediation. He claimed comparables (across the street) sold for $104,000 less and that the condition of his home did not warrant the assessed value.
- Assessor's Position: The assessor's office noted the property's market value decreased from $329,000 in 2025 to $314,903 in 2026. They included interior photos showing improvements and argued that the recent sale across the street was at a lower price due to dated condition. An on-site inspection was requested but refused.
- Board Action: The board voted to retain the assessor's value of $314,903. Motion passed 2-0.
Appeal 3: GCP Norman LLC (Accounts #37675, 37676, 37677, 37687, 37747, 37748, 37775, 37776, 37782, 37783, 194001, 45585, 45587) - Consolidated
- Appellant's Position: Anthony Semini, representing the owner, argued that the 13 commercial parcels (operating as the Gardner Crossing student housing complex near OU) should be valued at $31.6 million rather than the assessor's $37.3 million. He cited an income approach, allocating 15% of the sale price to intangible assets (in-place leases, goodwill). He also argued under mass appraisal principles that one sale does not establish market value.
- Assessor's Position: The assessor's office presented four sales (all part of the same transaction but recorded separately) totaling $37.1 million in July 2025. They conducted income and sales approaches, arriving at a market value of $37,308,272. They noted that the property sold recently in an arms-length transaction and that the income approach (using a 7% vacancy) supports a higher value than the appellant's.
- Board Action: The board voted to retain the assessor's value of $37,308,272, affirming the recent sale as the best indicator of market value. The motion covered all 13 items (4-15 on the agenda). Motion passed 2-0.
Key Outcomes
- Nauman Appeal: Motion to retain taxable value of $257,500 (market value $320,352) passed 2-0.
- Atkinson Appeal: Motion to retain market value of $314,903 passed 2-0.
- GCP Norman LLC Appeal: Motion to retain combined market value of $37,308,272 for all 13 parcels passed 2-0.
- The board instructed Mr. Nauman to seek relief through district court or other legal avenues and encouraged him to bring new evidence of property degradation in future years.
- The meeting adjourned at an unspecified time after approximately 2 hours of discussion.
Meeting Transcript
Call the roll. Here. Here. We have a core. Uh purposes compliance. Uh, this meeting was uh properly posted on July twenty-sixth. Uh purpose of the agenda action means any of the following amending, approving, approving as amended, deferring, denying, giving instructions to staff, making a recommendation to another public body, receiving documents or presentations or referring to committee, reconsidering, reopening, returning, striking, or postponing any of those items. So I would ask for uh item one in the agenda, uh, the approval of the minutes. If there's any discussion, uh, please bring forth your comments. If none, I would entertain a motion. And I second that. You have to give the first. Oh, I make a motion. I will second that motion, and Madam Chairman call a roll. Yes. Yes. Um, are there any public comments? No, that's it. All right. So we will move on into the first item of business on the agenda. Uh discussion of impossible action regarding uh the following formal appeal submitted by Jill and Michael Nauman. Nauman. Thank you for that clarification. We will be discussing the property fourteen twelve Clear Cleek Road, Clear Creek Road, and more account number eight eight seven three eight. Uh, Mr. Nauman, um, we have got a very big agenda. Um we've got fifteen items, so I would just respectfully request uh for your comments to be concise. So I came prepared. Great. We appreciate that. All right, very good. Well, the floor is yours, sir. Thank you very much. Uh, we were here a year ago. Don't know if you remember us. Hopefully, you do. Right there. Okay. Uh, we moved next to a pump jack just to cover it again. Uh we uh didn't mind about that because we have OCC, DEQ state and local oversight protecting us. We live there for twelve years. Um, operator installs last year an enclosed combustor at a twenty-foot flame and it vibrated our home, which began this whole ball of rolling. Um, you helped us out back then. I appreciate that. However, it's been a year. Our taxes are back up because the assessor is gone pretty far up. Uh so kind of undid what we uh resolved last year. So uh here's where we are today. A brief recap. Since the last time I saw you, this right here.
openpublica.com