OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Cranston City Council Budget Hearing for FY2026-2027 - April 16, 2026

City CouncilThursday, April 16, 2026
BodyCranston, Rhode Island
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, April 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 6:09:29

Transcript — Verbatim
14:03

We are going to have a long evening this evening, so when we get started, we're running a little bit late.

14:09

But this time I like to call this meeting to order, and I asked the clerk to please call the role.

15:01

Those will be at the end of the meeting.

15:03

This is going to be at the beginning of the meeting.

15:07

People, I'm gonna give people four four minutes to speak as per the council rules.

15:12

If there was a large amount of larger amount of people, I may have to alter it.

15:16

Um, the other program I may include a lot of people who were here, some who are online, and some on social media have spoke a lot about the budget increase that was proposed.

15:32

The seven point for tax increase.

15:37

Know this that the members of the city council are going to deliberate over every line of this budget, every department to ensure that we're with we're not relying solely on the backs of the taxpayers.

15:51

We're going to be looking for savings in this budget.

15:54

I also want to add this, that was the mayor's proposed budget to solve the financial situation that we are in.

16:03

But know that if we go above the cap, this council will have to have a strong majority.

16:09

From what I understand the charter, this this council would have to approve of a resolution of a seven-nine majority, a very high majority.

16:19

So know this that nothing is written in stone right now.

16:22

And if we don't, at the end of all our deliberations, go beyond that cap.

16:28

We will be asking the departments to look for additional savings because we just don't have the money.

16:34

That's the that's the harsh, and I'm gonna say very harsh reality of this budget.

16:39

Okay, now that I put everybody in a dour mood, um not my intention, but that's the reality.

16:46

Um, let me begin with the per first public speaker, um the vice chairman of the school committee, please, Anthony Melillo, and I believe he has some uh you said you had some documentation.

17:05

There won't be a necessary for a motion.

17:07

You can pass them out.

17:08

Thank you, so if no one has an objection, I see none.

17:19

Okay.

17:22

Thank you.

17:23

Anthony Malillo, 33 Harvard Street, Cranston, Rhode Island.

17:27

As council president said, I'm vice chairman of the Cranston School Committee.

17:30

Good evening, Council President, Finance Chair, members of the City Council, members of the school committee, superintendent Nora Massey, and members of our community.

17:42

Before I begin this evening, I think it's important to start tonight with a few, what I like to call myths versus facts.

17:51

Because public understanding matters when we talk about the future of public schools.

17:57

Myth number one.

17:59

During COVID, the school district added over 100 positions using federal funds.

18:05

Fact.

18:06

In reality, over the last four years, Cranston Public Schools has reduced their staff by 95 positions.

18:15

This is not growth, that is contraction.

18:19

This is the district making difficult decisions to live with it within its means.

18:33

Fact.

18:35

Over the last six years, the school department has received an average of approximately one million dollars per year.

18:43

While any support is appreciated, that level of increase has not kept pace with the real costs we face.

18:50

Costs that continue to rise every year.

18:54

And that brings me to the heart of why we are really here this evening.

18:58

Responsibility.

19:06

Costs are rising, mandates continue to increase.

19:11

The financial pressures are real and significant.

19:14

But I want to be very clear about something.

19:21

It's not my fault that decades of infrastructure needs have finally caught up with us.

19:27

But it is our responsibility to fix it.

19:40

But it's our fault, our responsibility to manage them.

19:44

It's not your fault that contractual obligations must be honored.

19:48

These are ratified contractual obligations, by the way.

19:52

It's not my fault that utility costs, transportation expenses, and fleet maintenance continue to climb.

20:00

But again, it is our responsibility to address them.

20:02

None of us created these challenges alone.

20:05

Many of these issues have developed over years, even decades, but today we are the leaders entrusted with solving them.

20:12

And the truth is responsibility does not belong to one body, one department, one administration.

20:19

It belongs to all of us.

20:20

The school committee, the city council, the mayor's office, and our state partners.

20:25

When we work together, Cranston succeeds.

20:28

Because at the end of the day, this is not about budgets and spreadsheets.

20:32

This is about 11,000 students who make up 11% of our city's population, but 100% of our future.

20:39

The responsibility we carry is not small, but it is an honor.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Education Funding█████████████████████████████29%
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████21%
Public Safety████████████12%
Government Operations███████7%
Procedural██████6%
Fiscal Sustainability████4%
Fleet Management███3%
Elections███3%
Personnel Matters███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Cranston City Council Finance Committee Budget Hearing - April 16, 2026

The Cranston City Council Finance Committee held a public hearing on the proposed FY2026-2027 budget on April 16, 2026, starting at approximately 7:39 PM and adjourning at 11:49 PM. The meeting focused on the mayor's proposed 7.44% tax levy increase and the financial challenges facing the city, particularly the school department. The committee heard testimony from school committee members, citizens, and representatives from police, fire, schools, and other departments.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • School Committee Vice Chair Anthony Melillo (33 Harvard Street) presented "myths vs facts," stating that Cranston Public Schools reduced staff by 95 positions over the past four years (not added 100), and that over the last six years the city allocation increased by only about $1 million annually on average, which has not kept pace with rising costs. He emphasized shared responsibility for the budget challenges.
  • School Committee Member Catherine Crowley (Ward 6) explained the school department's structural deficit, noting that the mayor's proposed $1.5 million increase is insufficient. She warned that cuts would lower education quality and deter new teachers.
  • School Committee Member Keith Catone (61 Windsor Road) challenged claims of deficits, stating the school department only recorded a deficit in FY25, while FY24, 23, and 22 had surpluses. He argued that the city budget has been balanced "on the backs of the schools" and that transparency is needed to build public trust.
  • Resident Valerie (last name unclear) stated that taxpayers have "nothing left to give" and urged the council to find budget cuts rather than increase taxes, emphasizing the strain on seniors and families.
  • Councilman Steven Steikos (37 Ferncrest Avenue) observed that school funding increased only 4.3% total from 2024 to 2027, while fire and police funding increased 15.6% and 12.5% respectively. He also noted an $852,000 cash balance in the charter school account and suggested reviewing tax breaks for veterans and elderly.
  • Resident Stephen Fryers (107 Garden Hills Drive) said the budget problem is a "failure in local government" due to over-reliance on one-time federal ARPA funds. He recommended spending cuts and not going above an 8% tax rate effect.
  • School Committee Member Anna Madeiris (21 Bridgeton Court) shared positive stories of student achievements and urged full funding for schools, warning that deteriorating buildings and large class sizes hurt students.
  • School Committee Chair Dominic Fusco (no address provided) noted that Cranston spends $19,950 per student, well below the state average of $22,800. He said the school department has "no choice now but to close schools, increase class sizes, cut programs."
  • Local 1363 President Jonathan Francis (35 Fifth Avenue) defended the fire department, stating that a fifth rescue was added after 40 years and that the department faces 12 vacancies. He said minimum manning of 43 firefighters per shift falls short of the national standard.
  • Seventh grader Sally Finkel (55 Roger Williams Circle) asked to fully fund schools to preserve middle school sports, which she said give students motivation and community.

Discussion Items

Police Department Budget (Chief Winquist, Director Strom)

  • Proposed budget: $33 million. The chief described the budget as "bare bones" and stated that overtime budget of $2.2 million is aligned with historical averages. There are six vacancies; the department had to reduce vehicle purchases from eight to six due to cuts.
  • Revenue projections were adjusted downward because previous years were overestimated (e.g., police detail car revenues were underperforming).
  • The department is in contract negotiations; a contingency line item of $700,000 is included for potential contract costs.
  • Council members questioned gas/oil budget adequacy ($12,500 increase) and the need for more police vehicles given high mileage. The acting director noted oil prices are speculative but assumed the Middle East conflict would not persist.

Animal Control (Chief Winquist)

  • The shelter is handling more animals due to economic pressures; budget increase of $10,000 for care. Revenue from impound fees is projected lower due to conservative estimates.
  • The department uses social media to promote adoptions; average stay is 4-6 weeks.

Harbor Master

  • No current harbor master since previous one passed away. The city still collects mooring fees (~$3,500 last year without a harbor master). The council discussed whether to reinstate the position (stipend $3,500) or have police handle duties, but noted the net revenue gain is small.

School Department Budget (Superintendent Massey, CFO Balducci)

  • The school department requested $4.2 million new city funding to meet contractual obligations (salary and benefits). The mayor proposed $1.5 million. The state aid increase is estimated at $2 million, but when accounting for a $241,000 reduction in non-public transportation support, net new state money is about $1.8 million.
  • The school department has a budget savings gap of approximately $3 million (assumes $4 million city ask). If only $1.5 million is provided, the gap grows to $2.5 million.
  • Cranston Public Schools has cut 95 staff over the last six years and laid off 40 teachers this year; about 12 will likely not be called back. Class sizes are already at contractual limits, and further cuts will increase class sizes and reduce services.
  • The district spends $19,950 per student, well below the state average. Inflation since 2009 is 56-58%, but city funding only increased 18% over the same period.
  • Health insurance costs have risen 15% and 10% in the last two years; the district is self-insured and part of a collaborative. A cumulative deficit of $9 million exists, but a new pharmacy contract is expected to generate $4.5 million annually to reduce it.
  • Charter school impact: $7.2 million in FY25 in tuition and lost state aid.
  • Discussion of selling former school buildings (Barrows, Waterman) to generate $750,000 one-time for capital needs, but that will not be available in future years. The city solicitor clarified the funds are intended for capital improvements, not tuition.

Fire Department Budget (Chief, Director Strom)

  • Proposed overtime budget: $6.3 million (up slightly from FY25 actual of $6.073 million). The chief noted summer overtime is highest and 12 firefighters short, with vacancies due to contractual limits. Fuel costs are a concern due to global prices.
  • There are 15 firefighters on occupational injury; seven are waiting for state pension board decisions. These injuries increase overtime.
  • The department had to cut vehicle replacements; two staff vehicles are included.
  • Council members expressed concern about accuracy of overtime projections given prior years' underfunding.

Fire Alarm Department

  • Budget increased for computer maintenance and repairs (licenses increasing). No significant questions.

Canvassing Department (Director Lima via video)

  • Proposed operating budget for elections: $215,000, the lowest since 2018. Savings achieved by reducing poll workers (from 315 to 270), cutting poll worker management software (delayed until federal funds available), and benefits from moving the primary to Wednesday (saving ~$25,000).
  • The department faces increased voter registration transactions (23,822 in 2025) and security needs. Federal election security grant ($50,000) has been fully spent on physical security upgrades.
  • Potential new state Voting Rights Act may require bilingual ballots, increasing costs. Director Lima noted that federal executive orders could impact mail ballot processing.

Law Department (Solicitor)

  • Running under budget at 72.8% year-to-date. No provision for lawsuit settlements; the solicitor recommended budgeting a small contingency. Outside legal services are used for specialized cases and are negotiated at municipal rates (~$200/hour).

Executive Office (Director Moretti)

  • Proposing a 0.75% increase (less than 1%), achieved by eliminating one administrative position and consolidating government affairs with communications. Compensation increases for 18 administrative appointees (totaling ~$45,000) were included, but the mayor offered to forego those raises if the council desires, reallocating funds to police vehicles.
  • The mayor receives a $3,000 annual expense stipend (not monthly). Four city vehicles are assigned to executive staff; fuel and maintenance are charged to the police budget—a legacy accounting practice. Council members questioned this and requested transparency.

Key Outcomes

  • No final votes on the budget were taken. The committee will continue deliberations in subsequent hearings, including a planned executive session regarding police contract negotiations.
  • The council president noted that a 7.44% tax levy increase would require seven out of nine votes (four-fifths) per the city charter, and that nothing is finalized.
  • The council extended the meeting twice by 30-minute increments to allow full discussion.
  • Public comment was invited at the meeting's start and end; no online participants spoke.
  • The meeting adjourned at 11:49 PM.

Meeting Transcript

We are going to have a long evening this evening, so when we get started, we're running a little bit late. But this time I like to call this meeting to order, and I asked the clerk to please call the role. Those will be at the end of the meeting. This is going to be at the beginning of the meeting. People, I'm gonna give people four four minutes to speak as per the council rules. If there was a large amount of larger amount of people, I may have to alter it. Um, the other program I may include a lot of people who were here, some who are online, and some on social media have spoke a lot about the budget increase that was proposed. The seven point for tax increase. Know this that the members of the city council are going to deliberate over every line of this budget, every department to ensure that we're with we're not relying solely on the backs of the taxpayers. We're going to be looking for savings in this budget. I also want to add this, that was the mayor's proposed budget to solve the financial situation that we are in. But know that if we go above the cap, this council will have to have a strong majority. From what I understand the charter, this this council would have to approve of a resolution of a seven-nine majority, a very high majority. So know this that nothing is written in stone right now. And if we don't, at the end of all our deliberations, go beyond that cap. We will be asking the departments to look for additional savings because we just don't have the money. That's the that's the harsh, and I'm gonna say very harsh reality of this budget. Okay, now that I put everybody in a dour mood, um not my intention, but that's the reality. Um, let me begin with the per first public speaker, um the vice chairman of the school committee, please, Anthony Melillo, and I believe he has some uh you said you had some documentation. There won't be a necessary for a motion. You can pass them out. Thank you, so if no one has an objection, I see none. Okay. Thank you. Anthony Malillo, 33 Harvard Street, Cranston, Rhode Island. As council president said, I'm vice chairman of the Cranston School Committee. Good evening, Council President, Finance Chair, members of the City Council, members of the school committee, superintendent Nora Massey, and members of our community. Before I begin this evening, I think it's important to start tonight with a few, what I like to call myths versus facts. Because public understanding matters when we talk about the future of public schools. Myth number one. During COVID, the school district added over 100 positions using federal funds. Fact. In reality, over the last four years, Cranston Public Schools has reduced their staff by 95 positions. This is not growth, that is contraction. This is the district making difficult decisions to live with it within its means. Fact. Over the last six years, the school department has received an average of approximately one million dollars per year. While any support is appreciated, that level of increase has not kept pace with the real costs we face. Costs that continue to rise every year. And that brings me to the heart of why we are really here this evening. Responsibility. Costs are rising, mandates continue to increase. The financial pressures are real and significant. But I want to be very clear about something. It's not my fault that decades of infrastructure needs have finally caught up with us. But it is our responsibility to fix it. But it's our fault, our responsibility to manage them. It's not your fault that contractual obligations must be honored. These are ratified contractual obligations, by the way. It's not my fault that utility costs, transportation expenses, and fleet maintenance continue to climb.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com