OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

DeKalb County Board of Elections Pre-Certification Meeting – March 12, 2026

Board of Commissioners & CommitteesThursday, March 12, 2026
BodyDekalb County, Georgia
SessionBoard of Commissioners & Committees
DateThursday, March 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:09

Good afternoon and welcome to today's special called meeting.

0:14

Can we get the roll call?

0:16

Good afternoon, board members.

0:17

When I call your name, please respond by saying here.

0:20

Vasu Abhi Rahman.

0:22

Travis Bowden.

0:23

Here.

0:23

Gil Lee.

0:24

Here.

0:24

Daily Loman.

0:26

Here.

0:26

Carly Swift.

0:27

Here.

0:27

Madam Chair, we have a quorum.

0:29

Thank you.

0:31

Can I get a motion to approve the agenda?

0:33

So moved.

0:34

Second.

0:35

Okay.

0:35

All in favor?

0:36

Aye.

0:37

Okay.

0:38

Great.

0:40

I do not see any public comment today.

0:43

Uh, just for the per for the audiences watching today's uh meeting is primarily to um complete the pre-certification meeting that is required.

0:53

Um so with that, I will ask the director, Dr.

0:59

Smith, for the pre-certification report.

1:01

Okay, thank you.

1:03

And uh, madam chair.

1:04

So in accordance with state election board rule 183-12-point twelve, which requires the board of registration and elections to hold this meeting for the limited purpose of conducting a review of precinct returns, where for each precinct, the board shall compare the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the total number of ballots cast by each vote method shall be determined for each precinct and include all one absentee ballots received by the close of the polls, including those cast at um those cast by advanced voting, two ballots cast in person on election day, and three all validated provisional ballots that have been tabulated to determine the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the department shall compile a list of all voters who voted in the election, including by method of voting and examine said list for duplicates.

2:19

The list shall then be sorted by precinct, and the number of unique voter IDs from each precinct precinct shall be counted.

2:28

The total number of unique voters who voted by each method shall be reported for each precinct.

2:35

And so what you have uh this the report that you have in front of you today um is for your review and it meets the uh specifications as outlined in that ruling, and so what we're asking is for the pre-certification review for the March 10th special election, which was the House District 94 race that was covered by um both DeCab County and Gwinnett, and so of course what you have before you today are the DeCab County numbers.

3:09

Thank you.

3:11

Um I guess I'll start with Miss Lee.

3:13

Are there any questions?

3:14

Yes, okay.

3:16

Um have all the provisionals or have there been any provisionals uh to be resolved?

3:23

No, we did not receive provisional ballots.

3:26

Okay.

3:26

Um were there any equipment issues that would have uh affected the totals?

3:32

No, ma'am.

3:33

We were not uh made aware of any equipment issues.

3:36

Good.

3:37

Um is this report before the adjustments were made for errors or after?

3:45

There were no there weren't any errors.

3:48

Wow, that's wonderful.

3:49

Yeah, yeah.

3:50

And um how is it that I can't get a report of the voters who cast to bail it?

4:01

It's provided in that uh rule of the SEB that you read what exactly are you requesting?

4:12

The voters, the list of the voters who cast to bail it in the election.

4:21

The names of the names of the voters, yes.

4:24

Okay, is that something that can be provided?

4:28

I'm not sure that is that not what you read there.

4:32

No, no, I don't think it's required for this meeting.

4:35

No, we don't ever provide, just so I'm clear.

4:40

We don't provide a list of voters, right?

4:44

This is comparing the number of people who voted and the number of credits, the ballots versus the credits.

4:52

Um yeah, that's one part of it, but the first requirement is the list of voters who cast the ballot.

5:00

But the first requirement is the list of voters who cast a ballot.

5:03

There's that does there's nothing in the ruling that or the SEB rule that I read that states that the names of the voters who cast the ballots are required for this.

5:20

Well, I didn't bring a copy of it.

5:23

So I mean this is straight out of it.

5:29

Yeah, that's it.

5:32

I can read it again if you want.

5:35

Okay.

5:36

So in accordance with state election board rule 183-1-12 dash uh dot uh point twelve, which requires the board of registration and elections to hold this meeting for the limited purpose of conducting a review of precinct returns, right?

5:53

Where for each precinct, the board shall compare the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers.

6:03

Yes.

6:05

The total number of ballots cast by each vote method shall be determined for each precinct and include all absentee ballots received by the close of the polls, including those cast by advanced voting, two ballots cast in person on election day, and three all validated provisional ballots that have been tabulated.

6:30

I've read something different.

6:34

Okay.

6:34

Okay.

6:41

Sorry.

6:43

Any more questions?

6:44

That's it.

6:45

Okay, great, Mr.

6:46

Bonin.

6:47

Um not quite as focused.

6:50

I'm just kind of curious.

6:51

Um in general, would you say that we have not seen an uptick in provisional votes in the past couple of years?

6:58

Like it seems to me the overall trend is that they've always been sort of rare, but have we seen them go up in elections?

7:04

Obviously, not on this one, but I mean, like in general, have you seen them go up?

7:08

I wouldn't say that we've seen an uptick.

7:11

Of course, the the percentages depend on the total number of voters.

7:15

So I I don't think since I've been here, I've I've noticed an uptick in provisional.

7:20

Yeah, just curious about that, because I you know, obviously it's it's a little bit of uhration when it happens anyway.

7:26

I know that it's not ideal when they when they go forward.

7:28

I just trying to familiarize myself with it, but just since we're not seeing it, I just was curious about that.

7:36

No questions.

7:37

No questions.

7:38

Um I actually don't have any questions.

7:41

I well, I guess a comment on the provisional.

7:44

I think with the change in law, um, which means one of the changes was that if you vote in your precinct after you you have to vote in in your precinct up until what 5 p.m.

7:58

or six five p.m.

8:00

So usually you you would have more you would have provisionals all day on voting election on the day because you could vote provisionally and it could get cured, but now you may have more like we will see what happens, but there could be more provisionals as people may go to the wrong precinct earlier in the day on election day and be turned and be told that they can't they have to wait until 5 p.m.

8:28

And uh in order to to vote provisionally.

8:32

So I think we won't we won't really know how it impacts until we see it over the next few elections because we'll have lar you know the the next to this year's elections are gonna be more competitive until we will have more people voting.

8:45

So I just want to flag that.

8:46

No, and I get that, I get that, and that and that's kind of why I was asking, because I know that you know sometimes people do go to the wrong precinct, and I know that sometimes there's an issue with curing, and I know that sometimes that you know correct.

8:56

I just was trying to just just for my own better understanding.

8:59

Yeah, no, no, I'm just flagging that point that general because of that change, we don't know yet um how that will impact people's ability to vote.

9:11

So okay, I don't have any other questions with that.

9:14

Um so for the public, um today's meeting is required by the SB rule that uh director Smith um referred to.

9:25

There is no vote that we need to take.

9:28

We will have a certification meeting on next Monday at noon if anyone wants to join us.

9:34

Um there were only six precincts uh for the special election.

9:40

Uh so don't expect that meeting to be very long either, but thank you.

9:45

Is that a and that oh I'm sorry, and that will also be our regular business meeting.

9:52

So it will be a little longer because it will be our regular business meeting plus our certification of the special election.

10:00

Thank you for that reminder.

10:01

Madam Chairman, would you mind repeating that date again?

10:03

Just one more time.

10:04

Um March 16th.

10:06

March 16th, okay Monday, March 16th at noon.

10:11

Okay.

10:14

With that, um, are there any board comments?

10:21

May all elections be as quick and easy as this one.

10:26

Just like to thank everyone for coming out today and uh seeing and seeing us up close.

10:31

I definitely appreciate people enthusiastic about election security and election integrity, and I look forward to seeing you next week.

10:39

No comments, thank you.

10:41

Uh thanks to the staff uh for for executing uh a great election.

10:46

Uh to the public, please come out and vote.

10:49

Um there were I believe 20,000 uh eligible voters, and uh as you can see, uh there were significantly less of you that actually showed up.

10:58

So we'd love to see you at every election.

11:00

Thank you.

11:01

Uh can I get a a motion?

11:04

Oh, what no?

11:05

Is there one more thing?

11:06

Okay.

11:07

Can I get a motion to adjourn?

11:09

So moved.

11:09

Second.

11:10

All in favor?

11:11

Aye.

11:12

Thanks.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Election Administration█████████████████████████████████████████████82%
Procedural██████████18%
Summary of Proceedings

DeKalb County Board of Registration and Elections Special Called Meeting – March 12, 2026

This special called meeting was held to conduct the required pre-certification review of precinct returns from the March 10, 2026 special election for House District 94, covering DeKalb County precincts. The board reviewed the returns in accordance with state election board rule 183-1-12-.12, with no public comments and a uniform focus on election integrity and procedural accuracy.

Pre-Certification Report

  • Director Dr. Smith presented the pre-certification report, which compared the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers per precinct, and broke down votes by method (absentee/advance, election day, and provisional) as required by state rule.
  • The report covered only DeKalb County’s six precincts for the special election (the race also included Gwinnett County).
  • No provisional ballots were received. No equipment issues were reported. No errors were found in the returns.

Board Discussion

  • Board Member Lee asked about provisional ballots and equipment issues; both were confirmed as nonexistent for this election. She also requested a list of voters who cast ballots, but Director Smith clarified that providing voter names is not required under the rule cited for this meeting; the focus is on comparing ballot counts to unique voter IDs, not releasing voter lists. After rereading the relevant rule section, the chair concluded the request was not required.
  • Board Member Bowden inquired about general provisional ballot trends, noting historical rarity but acknowledging upcoming law changes (a 5 p.m. precinct voting cutoff) that may increase future provisional voting. No specific uptick was observed.
  • Board Member Swift commented that the change in law might cause more provisional ballots in future elections as voters turned away from wrong precincts earlier in the day could only vote provisionally after 5 p.m.
  • The chair noted that 20,000 voters were eligible in the special election, but turnout was significantly lower, encouraging public participation in future elections.

Key Outcomes

  • No vote was taken; the meeting was solely for pre-certification review.
  • The next certification meeting (combined with the regular business meeting) was scheduled for Monday, March 16, 2026 at 12:00 p.m.
  • The meeting adjourned without any further business.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon and welcome to today's special called meeting. Can we get the roll call? Good afternoon, board members. When I call your name, please respond by saying here. Vasu Abhi Rahman. Travis Bowden. Here. Gil Lee. Here. Daily Loman. Here. Carly Swift. Here. Madam Chair, we have a quorum. Thank you. Can I get a motion to approve the agenda? So moved. Second. Okay. All in favor? Aye. Okay. Great. I do not see any public comment today. Uh, just for the per for the audiences watching today's uh meeting is primarily to um complete the pre-certification meeting that is required. Um so with that, I will ask the director, Dr. Smith, for the pre-certification report. Okay, thank you. And uh, madam chair. So in accordance with state election board rule 183-12-point twelve, which requires the board of registration and elections to hold this meeting for the limited purpose of conducting a review of precinct returns, where for each precinct, the board shall compare the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the total number of ballots cast by each vote method shall be determined for each precinct and include all one absentee ballots received by the close of the polls, including those cast at um those cast by advanced voting, two ballots cast in person on election day, and three all validated provisional ballots that have been tabulated to determine the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the department shall compile a list of all voters who voted in the election, including by method of voting and examine said list for duplicates. The list shall then be sorted by precinct, and the number of unique voter IDs from each precinct precinct shall be counted. The total number of unique voters who voted by each method shall be reported for each precinct. And so what you have uh this the report that you have in front of you today um is for your review and it meets the uh specifications as outlined in that ruling, and so what we're asking is for the pre-certification review for the March 10th special election, which was the House District 94 race that was covered by um both DeCab County and Gwinnett, and so of course what you have before you today are the DeCab County numbers. Thank you. Um I guess I'll start with Miss Lee. Are there any questions? Yes, okay. Um have all the provisionals or have there been any provisionals uh to be resolved? No, we did not receive provisional ballots. Okay. Um were there any equipment issues that would have uh affected the totals? No, ma'am. We were not uh made aware of any equipment issues. Good. Um is this report before the adjustments were made for errors or after? There were no there weren't any errors. Wow, that's wonderful. Yeah, yeah. And um how is it that I can't get a report of the voters who cast to bail it? It's provided in that uh rule of the SEB that you read what exactly are you requesting?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com