DeKalb County Board of Elections Pre-Certification Meeting – March 12, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
DeKalb County Board of Registration and Elections Special Called Meeting – March 12, 2026
This special called meeting was held to conduct the required pre-certification review of precinct returns from the March 10, 2026 special election for House District 94, covering DeKalb County precincts. The board reviewed the returns in accordance with state election board rule 183-1-12-.12, with no public comments and a uniform focus on election integrity and procedural accuracy.
Pre-Certification Report
- Director Dr. Smith presented the pre-certification report, which compared the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers per precinct, and broke down votes by method (absentee/advance, election day, and provisional) as required by state rule.
- The report covered only DeKalb County’s six precincts for the special election (the race also included Gwinnett County).
- No provisional ballots were received. No equipment issues were reported. No errors were found in the returns.
Board Discussion
- Board Member Lee asked about provisional ballots and equipment issues; both were confirmed as nonexistent for this election. She also requested a list of voters who cast ballots, but Director Smith clarified that providing voter names is not required under the rule cited for this meeting; the focus is on comparing ballot counts to unique voter IDs, not releasing voter lists. After rereading the relevant rule section, the chair concluded the request was not required.
- Board Member Bowden inquired about general provisional ballot trends, noting historical rarity but acknowledging upcoming law changes (a 5 p.m. precinct voting cutoff) that may increase future provisional voting. No specific uptick was observed.
- Board Member Swift commented that the change in law might cause more provisional ballots in future elections as voters turned away from wrong precincts earlier in the day could only vote provisionally after 5 p.m.
- The chair noted that 20,000 voters were eligible in the special election, but turnout was significantly lower, encouraging public participation in future elections.
Key Outcomes
- No vote was taken; the meeting was solely for pre-certification review.
- The next certification meeting (combined with the regular business meeting) was scheduled for Monday, March 16, 2026 at 12:00 p.m.
- The meeting adjourned without any further business.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon and welcome to today's special called meeting. Can we get the roll call? Good afternoon, board members. When I call your name, please respond by saying here. Vasu Abhi Rahman. Travis Bowden. Here. Gil Lee. Here. Daily Loman. Here. Carly Swift. Here. Madam Chair, we have a quorum. Thank you. Can I get a motion to approve the agenda? So moved. Second. Okay. All in favor? Aye. Okay. Great. I do not see any public comment today. Uh, just for the per for the audiences watching today's uh meeting is primarily to um complete the pre-certification meeting that is required. Um so with that, I will ask the director, Dr. Smith, for the pre-certification report. Okay, thank you. And uh, madam chair. So in accordance with state election board rule 183-12-point twelve, which requires the board of registration and elections to hold this meeting for the limited purpose of conducting a review of precinct returns, where for each precinct, the board shall compare the total number of ballots cast to the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the total number of ballots cast by each vote method shall be determined for each precinct and include all one absentee ballots received by the close of the polls, including those cast at um those cast by advanced voting, two ballots cast in person on election day, and three all validated provisional ballots that have been tabulated to determine the total number of unique voter ID numbers, the department shall compile a list of all voters who voted in the election, including by method of voting and examine said list for duplicates. The list shall then be sorted by precinct, and the number of unique voter IDs from each precinct precinct shall be counted. The total number of unique voters who voted by each method shall be reported for each precinct. And so what you have uh this the report that you have in front of you today um is for your review and it meets the uh specifications as outlined in that ruling, and so what we're asking is for the pre-certification review for the March 10th special election, which was the House District 94 race that was covered by um both DeCab County and Gwinnett, and so of course what you have before you today are the DeCab County numbers. Thank you. Um I guess I'll start with Miss Lee. Are there any questions? Yes, okay. Um have all the provisionals or have there been any provisionals uh to be resolved? No, we did not receive provisional ballots. Okay. Um were there any equipment issues that would have uh affected the totals? No, ma'am. We were not uh made aware of any equipment issues. Good. Um is this report before the adjustments were made for errors or after? There were no there weren't any errors. Wow, that's wonderful. Yeah, yeah. And um how is it that I can't get a report of the voters who cast to bail it? It's provided in that uh rule of the SEB that you read what exactly are you requesting?
openpublica.com