Look all the way to the right, you'll see that Columbia Drive from Clarendon Avenue to Katie Kerr is currently on the LME 26 uh list.

Uh and that's the LMEC funds that the board recently approved that we get from the state.

So that will come up soon for resurfacing.

You also look up near the top of the list, you see Columbia and Rainbow.

That section of Columbia Drive was resurfaced in 2019, and it's currently rated at a one.

Now, also looking on the right, you see these three sections with a yellow dot.

Those three sections, while when we created the 300, uh the splot one list of 300 miles, none of those streets were rated high enough.

When we created the 200 mile list of splots two, those three highlighted sections were not rated high enough to be placed on that list.

Currently, as of the most recent rating, those three sections that have the yellow dot are now rated high enough to be considered for resurfacing.

But again, they don't currently appear on the 200 mile list because they weren't rated high enough at that time.

So uh with that being said, those streets uh should we have another splot should appear on the next group of splots resurfaced.

We we can't give them an exact time uh because we don't know uh when that next list will will come out, but they will stay on the list and they will move up accordingly as time goes.

Now, another section of streets uh the community wanted us to look at Spring Valley Subdivision that's in the Columbia Drive area.

We uh pull those streets up as well.

If you will look at the rating uh column to the right, you will see that the that um there's one street that um rated 29, and it is listed.

That section of street is currently listed on the Elmic, not L me is currently listed on the SPLOS 200 mile list of streets.

So that one section is currently listed on that on that list to be resurfaced.

None of the other streets in the Spring Valley subdivision are currently rated high enough or listed on the 200 mile list of streets.

So those were the two uh streets that uh the community wanted us to look at Columbia Drive and the Spring Valley subdivision, and we provided this information to them uh on uh a number of occasions.

So, and then one of the other questions that they they asked us was well was for plans or construction plans.

We don't do construction plans for uh resurfacing, but I did provide in the presentation a typical section just so they would be able to see the one and one half inch uh layer of resurfacing.

This is after the street is milled and prepped and resurfaced.

So that's all of the information in this presentation that's regarding the resurfacing process and the situation where their streets fell in the process.

Okay.

Wasn't there an issue of it?

Um pardon me, Zach, you're breaking up.

Was there an issue about a pot a pothole?

Oh, yes, there was a question uh that was raised last week about a small sinkhole on a street.

Um, and um initially I thought it was one that we had taken care of a month ago, but it wasn't.

We went out on that same day and uh took care of that.

So that small depression in the road has been taken care of.

All right, uh, if there's pictures related to that, um, can someone send that to me?

Um, or and whatever else you can share about that repair and that repair being done, so I can um and the date that it was done, so I can articulate that it's been done as you um guys are you know, maybe over you could imagine not everyone's um emails may be sent out and you know, information provided.

Not everyone has it um or has accessed it, is what I will say.

And so when it comes up as a question, I want to be able to speak to when we did it um when we got it done because um, as you can imagine, folks will argue that it's still not done, even though it had been completed.

You can certainly get that photograph to you, Commissioner.

I I think actually one of the members of the community saw the crew out there and um taking care of it and responded to that effect.

But we'll get the photo and the date.

Thank you.

So there was also discussion regarding uh traffic study crash analysis.

Um data showed what uh that is correct.

I pulled the slide up, and Tim is available to share that information.

And I appreciate that in hearing that because um, you know, um Isaac White constituent services, he's gone out there.

They were insistent, of course, meeting on the road and you know, in a side road there.

Um and so just to show some of the dangers there and which he was able to observe some.

So I'm glad that we're addressing this as well.

Yep.

And so we've done a study uh or an assessment and compared that to other areas throughout the county.

I believe the average per year uh was like 6.6 crashes, which is actually low compared.

Well, it's all relative, right?

But yeah, that's on the next slide.

We actually we actually had GDOT run uh um analysis on that, how it compares to Cab County, and they said it was rated 613, that's out of like a thousand.

That's the crash rate, the number of crashes per uh volume.

So they and it didn't show up on any of their lists, so not like high up on the crash list.

And so is paper or someone uh when we discussed this the other day.

So this uh commissioner, you'll see uh the primarily, I guess it's primarily rear end crashes is over five years, 33 crashes, 6.6 crashes per year, 14 rear end, eight side swipe, so on and so forth.

But uh I think someone said an interesting statistic uh that last year we had I don't know if it was 34,000 or some number like that crashes throughout the county of which you know maybe six or so were at this site.

Is someone able to speak to that just to tell the commissioner?

I believe the police chief said that.

Yeah, that was Chief Pedro.