OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

DeKalb County FAB Committee Meeting - March 24, 2026

Board of Commissioners & CommitteesTuesday, March 24, 2026
BodyDekalb County, Georgia
SessionBoard of Commissioners & Committees
DateTuesday, March 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:13:21

Transcript — Verbatim
0:06

All right, good afternoon.

0:07

Welcome back to our Finance Audit and Budget Committee chaired by myself, Commissioner Ted Terry, joined by committee members, Commissioner Michelle Long Spears and Commissioner Shakira Johnson.

0:16

We have our agenda before us today.

0:19

Have a couple updates and a couple agenda items.

0:22

So we'll just start off first with our meeting minutes from March 10th.

0:26

This is item 0569.

0:28

If there's no edits or changes, I'll open the floor for a motion.

0:31

Motion to approve.

0:32

Second.

0:33

Motion seconds signal for the discussion.

0:35

All in favor of your hands say aye.

0:38

All right.

0:47

And it says Malden and Jenkins, but it is a it's meant to be the um momentum firm, right?

0:53

Yes, the momentum firm uh led by uh the CEO of momentum firm, Lakeisha Ciseg will do the presentation.

1:00

Okay.

1:00

Um the reason it says Malden and Jenkins, it really role is is taking the report that was done by Malden and Jenkins.

1:08

That's right, yes, yes, and working with us to implement it.

1:10

Okay, great.

1:11

All right, and presentations being passed out now, and CSA come on up.

1:19

Welcome back.

1:23

Okay, perfect.

1:30

Hello, all ready.

1:31

Hello.

1:32

You let me know when to begin.

1:34

Good to see you all.

1:34

Good afternoon.

1:37

Uh hopefully you have the printout of the report today.

1:42

Um, good to see you again.

1:43

Lakeisha Sai, managing principal of the momentum firm.

1:46

Um, and as COO Zach Williams mentioned, um last September we awarded the contract to help implement uh the Malden and Jenkins operational assessment, which laid out over 250 operational improvement activities uh across 19 departments, and we've been uh sort of shepherding that process along with departments to uh realize progress as early as possible.

2:11

And um we promised at the beginning of this process to engage the board um early and consistently, and this is one of our quarterly updates to each one of the committees that have departments um who were assessed aligned to them.

2:27

All right.

2:28

Today I will uh this has been a pretty consistent format with the other um the other committees that we've presented to this month.

2:36

We'll be back in June uh for the next quarterly update, and we will have enhanced some of the items that we're reporting on.

2:42

So we're taking note of the different questions that are coming up in each committee, and we'll be refining this report and process for more detail in the future.

2:50

And of course, more progress to share in the next time uh you see me, hopefully.

2:54

So uh we'll talk a little bit about the operational goals that our process has uh defined, in which we're looking to realize results in.

3:02

Um I'll talk about our implementation management process, how that's going, um, and I'll provide an update on um the implementation status of recommendations that uh departments are overseeing.

3:15

The departments that are included are up for discussion for the FAB committee or finance, um, the office of man uh the OMB, um, the Office of Management and Budget and Purchasing and Contracting.

3:31

Okay.

3:32

So just a refresher that following the Malden and Jenkins assessment, you're over 500 pages, like I said, 2006 over 260 recommendations.

3:42

Uh, we laid out some change drivers or goals rather that uh the implementation of this assessment is aiming to achieve, and we are uh realizing many results in these areas.

3:54

Um some noteworthy things on this slide is uh through this process, we are attempting to do things like reduce year over year internal audit findings, improve customer satisfaction, identify and achieve cost savings opportunities where reasonable, um, uh automate processes and better integrate our technology across the county and enhance our uh data-driven governance capabilities with uh a goal being over a hundred percent of departments reporting KPIs this year.

4:31

Um, you know, this this slide just represents the process that we're taking to support departments with planning um or sequencing rather progress.

4:43

Um we're taking things into consideration like the type of goals or impact we're attempting to have, as well as the level of effort required and our focus uh for this assessment or implementing this assessment rather is in the uh top quadrant.

5:00

So we're looking at the quick wins as defined in the Malden and Jenkins assessment as high impact opportunities that have you know require low effort to implement and major projects, very impactful things, but you know, our heavier lifts to get across the finish line.

5:14

Nonetheless, we don't want to lose sight of those because of their impact potential.

5:19

It's in the major project area that we anticipate some departments may require additional support.

5:25

Um, and we're tracking the types of support that's required and helping overcome those obstacles throughout this process as well.

5:34

Um this slide lays out our implementation management process, and I'll just uh bring your attention to what we're actually tracking or monitoring.

5:42

And and it's the implementation monitoring table.

5:45

It's this uh it's these areas that I said we can continue to enhance as we come back and report.

5:51

Uh but so far we're looking at the recommendation status, the projected timeline and rate of progress, uh, the type of additional support needed as reported by departments.

6:01

We're looking at the reasons behind why some recommendations are currently being reported as blocked or rejected.

6:08

Um, and in the future, we're gonna be able to quantify some of these cost savings as well as um align the number of recommendations met by challenge area so we can start to see uh where and how uh we're making impact and progress.

6:25

Uh this dashboard represents um all 18 departments that were assessed.

6:30

So you'll see that the 26 266 recommendations for the assessment there across the board.

6:36

Currently, there are 59 recommendations that are being reported as met, 11 um blocked across the entire uh organization, um, and over 123 recommendations requiring some sort of additional resource.

6:52

So the reason why that number is higher than what's blocked is because there's some recommendations that were reported as in progress, but they still require additional support of some sort in order to complete or meet the recommendation fully.

7:07

Um that was across the board.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████21%
Procurement Policy████████10%
Procedural███4%
Personnel Matters██3%
Public Engagement██2%
Affordable Housing██2%
Public Health1%
Technology and Innovation1%
Summary of Proceedings

DeKalb County Finance Audit and Budget Committee – March 24, 2026

The Finance, Audit, and Budget (FAB) Committee of the DeKalb County Board of Commissioners met on March 24, 2026, chaired by Commissioner Ted Terry, with Commissioners Michelle Long Spears and Shakira Johnson. The committee reviewed the quarterly implementation update from The Momentum Firm on the Maldon & Jenkins operational assessment, received financial statements for enterprise funds, and considered a resolution authorizing the issuance of tax anticipation notes (TANs) for 2026.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of March 10, 2026, Meeting Minutes: Motion to approve carried unanimously.

Discussion Items

  • Operational Assessment Implementation Update: LaKeisha Cisse (The Momentum Firm) presented progress on implementing over 260 recommendations across 19 departments. For the three departments under FAB (Finance, OMB, Purchasing & Contracting): 5 of 39 recommendations met, 1 blocked (now resolved via FY26 budget), and 30 require additional resources. Over 80% of financial recommendations are targeted for 2027 or later. Common challenge areas: governance, org structure, and technology. Key insights: cross-departmental support is a frequent need; 13 of 14 recommendations requiring additional funding lack defined cost estimates. The firm will re-engage departments in April to accelerate timelines.
  • Financial Statements – Enterprise Funds: Director Diane McNabb presented year-end operating statements for watershed management, sanitation, airport, and stormwater funds. Highlights:
    • Watershed: revenues under budget but higher than prior year; expenses 63% of budget due to purchased/contract services underrun.
    • Sanitation: revenues slightly below budget; net position negative $13 million largely due to unfunded pension liability and post-closure landfill costs. A multi-year rate increase is planned.
    • Airport: net assets increased to $20.9 million; purchased/contract services under budget.
    • Stormwater: revenues exceeded expenditures by $6 million; fund balance increased.
    • Committee requested future reports include breakdown of pension vs. closure liabilities for sanitation, subcategories for airport miscellaneous revenue, and automated vendor evaluation tools.
  • Tax Anticipation Notes (TANs) for 2026: Elisa Mellon (PFM) presented the annual TAN borrowing to cover cash flow deficits. The anticipated borrowing amount is $150 million, due December 15, 2026. Interest rates have declined but remain volatile. The resolution authorizing issuance and competitive bidding was approved out of committee for full board consideration on April 14, with final approval on April 28.

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes Approved: March 10, 2026, minutes approved unanimously.
  • TAN Resolution: Committee approved the preliminary resolution (motion passed unanimously); full board will authorize bidding on April 14, and final award on April 28.
  • Budget Process Discussion: Chair Terry suggested moving the budget completion date to November 1 (via home rule) and involving commissioners earlier in budget development, citing City of Atlanta’s budget priority resolution. Law department to provide guidance on whether changes require a referendum.
  • Vendor Evaluation Automation: Committee requested IT explore automating vendor evaluation forms (recommendation PCTR244) to reduce manual workload; status to be updated by next quarter.
  • Future Reports: Financial statements for governmental funds to be presented at the next FAB meeting. The Momentum Firm will provide a refined quarterly update in June with more specific timelines and cost estimates.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good afternoon. Welcome back to our Finance Audit and Budget Committee chaired by myself, Commissioner Ted Terry, joined by committee members, Commissioner Michelle Long Spears and Commissioner Shakira Johnson. We have our agenda before us today. Have a couple updates and a couple agenda items. So we'll just start off first with our meeting minutes from March 10th. This is item 0569. If there's no edits or changes, I'll open the floor for a motion. Motion to approve. Second. Motion seconds signal for the discussion. All in favor of your hands say aye. All right. And it says Malden and Jenkins, but it is a it's meant to be the um momentum firm, right? Yes, the momentum firm uh led by uh the CEO of momentum firm, Lakeisha Ciseg will do the presentation. Okay. Um the reason it says Malden and Jenkins, it really role is is taking the report that was done by Malden and Jenkins. That's right, yes, yes, and working with us to implement it. Okay, great. All right, and presentations being passed out now, and CSA come on up. Welcome back. Okay, perfect. Hello, all ready. Hello. You let me know when to begin. Good to see you all. Good afternoon. Uh hopefully you have the printout of the report today. Um, good to see you again. Lakeisha Sai, managing principal of the momentum firm. Um, and as COO Zach Williams mentioned, um last September we awarded the contract to help implement uh the Malden and Jenkins operational assessment, which laid out over 250 operational improvement activities uh across 19 departments, and we've been uh sort of shepherding that process along with departments to uh realize progress as early as possible. And um we promised at the beginning of this process to engage the board um early and consistently, and this is one of our quarterly updates to each one of the committees that have departments um who were assessed aligned to them. All right. Today I will uh this has been a pretty consistent format with the other um the other committees that we've presented to this month. We'll be back in June uh for the next quarterly update, and we will have enhanced some of the items that we're reporting on. So we're taking note of the different questions that are coming up in each committee, and we'll be refining this report and process for more detail in the future. And of course, more progress to share in the next time uh you see me, hopefully. So uh we'll talk a little bit about the operational goals that our process has uh defined, in which we're looking to realize results in. Um I'll talk about our implementation management process, how that's going, um, and I'll provide an update on um the implementation status of recommendations that uh departments are overseeing. The departments that are included are up for discussion for the FAB committee or finance, um, the office of man uh the OMB, um, the Office of Management and Budget and Purchasing and Contracting. Okay. So just a refresher that following the Malden and Jenkins assessment, you're over 500 pages, like I said, 2006 over 260 recommendations. Uh, we laid out some change drivers or goals rather that uh the implementation of this assessment is aiming to achieve, and we are uh realizing many results in these areas. Um some noteworthy things on this slide is uh through this process, we are attempting to do things like reduce year over year internal audit findings, improve customer satisfaction, identify and achieve cost savings opportunities where reasonable, um, uh automate processes and better integrate our technology across the county and enhance our uh data-driven governance capabilities with uh a goal being over a hundred percent of departments reporting KPIs this year. Um, you know, this this slide just represents the process that we're taking to support departments with planning um or sequencing rather progress. Um we're taking things into consideration like the type of goals or impact we're attempting to have, as well as the level of effort required and our focus uh for this assessment or implementing this assessment rather is in the uh top quadrant. So we're looking at the quick wins as defined in the Malden and Jenkins assessment as high impact opportunities that have you know require low effort to implement and major projects, very impactful things, but you know, our heavier lifts to get across the finish line. Nonetheless, we don't want to lose sight of those because of their impact potential. It's in the major project area that we anticipate some departments may require additional support. Um, and we're tracking the types of support that's required and helping overcome those obstacles throughout this process as well. Um this slide lays out our implementation management process, and I'll just uh bring your attention to what we're actually tracking or monitoring.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com