Detroit Budget Finance and Audit Committee Meeting on March 30, 2026: Oversight Agencies Seek Proportional Funding
Detroit Budget Finance and Audit Committee Meeting on March 30, 2026: Oversight Agencies Seek Proportional Funding
The expanded Budget, Finance, and Audit Standing Committee convened on March 30, 2026, with a quorum present. The meeting focused on presentations from three city oversight agencies—the Ombudsman’s Office, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Board of Ethics—regarding their requests for proportional funding as mandated by charter and city ordinance. Council President James Tate outlined the truncated process: no questions during presentations, with questions to be submitted later, followed by executive session and a public hearing at 5 p.m. A motion was made and approved to place the funding requests for all four oversight agencies (including the Auditor General, already heard) into executive session for further deliberation.
Discussion Items
-
Procedural Overview: Council President James Tate explained that budget hearings were suspended to allow oversight agencies to present specifically on proportional funding, as approved last year but not included in the mayor’s proposed budget. The agencies were limited to opening statements and presentations on their proportional funding requests.
-
Ombudsman’s Office Presentation: The Ombudsman reported receiving 3,462 complaints in fiscal year 2025–26, along with 884 online submissions and 2,357 legacy complaints. High-complaint areas included BC (59%), DPW, DWSD, and DPD. The office emphasized a transition to proactive, data-driven oversight. Requested restoration of proportional funding: $314,752 ramp up plus one FTE at $65,000, as outlined in the proportional funding ordinance.
-
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Presentation: Inspector General Maribel presented on the charter mandate for proportional funding, noting the 2012 charter required an ordinance, which was passed in July 2024 with a resolution adopting a three-year ramp-up in April 2025. Year one funding results: closure times on non-jurisdictional complaints dropped by 89%, complaint volume more than doubled since 2024. Requested total of $2,577,947 for FY 2026–27, including ramp-up and restoration of a budget cut, to add investigators, an intake specialist, and reclassifications.
-
Board of Ethics Presentation: The Board detailed achievements from proportional funding: a second investigator, a marketing and outreach coordinator, and a learning management system (ClearCo) launched March 16, 2026, with 6.5% of public servants completing the introductory module in 10 days. The mayor’s proposed budget of $817,554 is an $82,244 decrease from the current $899,788. Requested supplemental of $282,244 ($82,244 shortfall plus $200,000 ramp-up) for a total FY 2026–27 budget of $1,099,788.
-
Motion and Verification: Councilmember Gabriela Santiago Romero called for a vote on the motion to place the proportional funding amounts into executive session. The motion passed without objection. Councilmember Scott Benson requested that the Legislative Policy Division (LPD) verify that the amounts requested align with the law. Mr. Corley confirmed verification will be performed.
Key Outcomes
- The committee approved a motion to place the proportional funding requests for all four oversight agencies (Ombudsman, Inspector General, Board of Ethics, and Auditor General) into executive session for further deliberation during the budget process.
- The oversight agencies’ requests for proportional funding were formally noted and will be considered in executive session.
- The LPD was directed to verify that the requested amounts match the statutory requirements of the proportional funding ordinance.
- Public comment and the 5 p.m. public hearing were announced for later in the day but are not reflected in this transcript.
Meeting Transcript
Everyone this we are now in session like to call to order the expanded budget finance and audit standing committee for today, March 30th, 2026. Good morning, Madam Clerk. Will you please call the roll? Councilmember Scott Benson. Councilmember Letitia Johnson. Present. Councilmember Denzel Anton McCampbell. Present. Councilmember Reneta Miller. Member Miller did uh send a notice indicating that she would not be present. She's dealing with uh family concerned at this moment. Clerk will so not council member Gabriela Santiago Romero. Present. Councilmember Mary Waters, Councilmember Angela Whitfield Callaway. Council President Pro Temperor Coleman A. Young the Second. Thank you. Here. Council President James Tate. Here. Mr. President, you have a quorum present. Thank you. We have a quorum present, which means we're now in session. Madam Clerk, I've neglected to indicate that Member Waters did send a memo indicating that she would not be present for this morning's session. So uh that absence is excused as well. Cycle so note. Thank you so much. Uh Pro Tim Young. Mr. President, I don't know if I could do this, but I just want to say for the sake of expediency. I want just to admit all my questions to everyone writing, other than the city council divisions, because I might have to say something about that, but other than that, I'll just want to know if I could just kind of get ahead of the process, just submit all my questions in writing. You just say hello to everybody as we can move ahead. Would that be okay? Yes. And congratulations to the abudsman again. All right. Thank you so much, Pro Tim. Just want to give everyone kind of a layer of the land on how today is going to go. Uh today we are uh at last uh Friday we did end up suspending all of the budget hearings that were scheduled for today uh to allow for uh an hour from 10 until uh 11 for our oversight agencies to provide uh the body um their uh desire uh and presentation uh and need if you will for proportional funding uh as discussed initially last year and approved last year. Uh did not see it in the uh mayor's proposed budget. I wanted the um oversight agencies again to have an opportunity to come before this body and give a presentation narrowly focused on that area. Uh so we will have all three. We did have uh originally the umbudsman's office scheduled for 10 a.m. Um but again we will not have full presentations from the oversight agencies. Um but the we'll allow them to have an opening statement clearly, uh, but then we will go in secession. Um their presentation solely focused on the uh proportional funding and the request for that in this particular budget. Uh following that, uh we will then jump right into executive session. Uh, we'll have Mr. Corley give just a brief overview of where things are, uh, and then we will begin our executive session process.
openpublica.com