Duluth City Council Meeting – November 10, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Duluth City Council Meeting – November 10, 2025
The Duluth City Council convened on Monday, November 10, 2025, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting began with presentations from Evergreen Energy on its 2026 district energy budget and from the Parks and Recreation Manager on the Anger Park Golf Course 2026 operating budget. Following public comments, the council voted on several resolutions and ordinances, including interim controls on short‑term rentals, a short‑term rental moratorium, and an ordinance reorganizing protected class commissions.
Consent Calendar
- Approved unanimously (8‑0) all items on the consent agenda, which included resolutions confirming appointments (Airport Authority, boards and commissions), approving lawful gambling applications, issuing liquor licenses, accepting a $1,000,000 EPA Brownfields Revolving Loan Cleanup Fund grant, authorizing an agreement with MSA Professional Services for brownfield cleanup oversight, accepting a $100,000 state grant for a Registered Apprenticeship Hub, updating Housing Trust Fund program guidelines, accepting $970,416.10 from St. Louis County for employment and training services, accepting a temporary construction easement in Lincoln Park, accepting a $18,220 emergency management grant from Minnesota DPS, authorizing an amendment to a DNR Lake Superior Coastal Program grant for Park Point recreation area planning, and declaring intent to sell property in Morley Heights/Parkview neighborhood.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Eleanor Dolan (District 4) criticized the council for ignoring constituents and opposing right‑to‑repair, tenant organizing, and other progressive policies; she said the election proved the council is on the wrong side of the people.
- Brandon Parker (ward not stated) echoed similar criticisms, accusing Councilor Forsman of initially supporting the tenants union and then opposing right‑to‑repair after pressure from city attorneys, and questioned conflicts of interest involving Councilor Nephew’s real estate ties and the Lake Superior Area Realtors association.
- Asher Estran (District 4) alleged that Mayor Reinert publicly stated the library budget would not be cut, but a city email indicated a supervisor position would not be backfilled until at least 2027; he questioned the mayor’s truthfulness and called for recall elections.
- Brett Sees (Second Ward) urged the council to maintain the full‑time sustainability officer position, citing over $50 million in grants brought in over five years and the importance of the climate action work plan; he noted a petition with over 550 signatures supporting the position.
- Linda Heron (District 2) also spoke in favor of filling the sustainability officer role, emphasizing the need for dedicated leadership to achieve carbon‑free energy goals by 2050.
- Beth Tamanin (District 2) argued that losing the sustainability officer would result in missed grant opportunities (e.g., a state solar‑on‑public‑buildings grant deadline of December 1) and that the role cannot be effectively split among other staff.
- Mike Casey (District 4, far western Duluth) urged passage of the short‑term rental moratorium, alleging that some operators (e.g., River West Development) are bypassing permit requirements with city approval, while compliant operators are treated unfairly; he also criticized council members for not making eye contact with speakers.
Discussion Items
- Evergreen Energy 2026 Budget Presentation: Mike Burns, Evergreen Energy President, presented the proposed budget. Total appropriations for 2026 are just under $15 million, about $1 million less than the 2025 budget. Overall customer rate increase is 1.1% for the downtown steam/hot‑water system, but a 5.3% increase is proposed for Canal Park hot‑water customers (historically low rates are being aligned). Evergreen has reduced coal usage to near zero, cut carbon emissions by 40% since 2012, and converted 46% of loads from steam to hot water. A planned boiler conversion RFP proved too expensive; the project is being revamped. The council asked questions about the Canal Park rate disparity and the status of coal use.
- Anger Park Golf Course 2026 Budget Presentation: Parks and Recreation Manager Jessica Peterson reported that the course had an excellent 2025 season, with 36,600 rounds (vs. budget of 34,000) and a projected net income of ~$122,072 (before capital expenses) and ~$95,000 after capital. The 2026 budget projects 38,000 rounds, $1.8 million revenue, $1.585 million in labor/expenses/equipment, and net income of ~$42,000 after reinvesting $75,000 in capital equipment and paying the annual bond payment ($178,500). The course has completed stream restoration (Buckingham Creek) and irrigation upgrades, and rebranded the three nines (Skyline, Bridge, Tower). The next major need is a clubhouse replacement estimated at $2 million (basic) to potentially $5–10 million for a community space. Councilor Forsman asked about capital needs and potential use of proceeds from a possible Lester Park golf course sale; Ms. Peterson said early clubhouse estimates are around $2 million.
- Ordinance 25‑027-O (Protected Class Commissions): Councilor Awal introduced a motion to amend the ordinance to allow each protected class advisory commission to vote on whether to incorporate as a committee under the Human Rights Commission by June 30, 2026. Dr. Lewis confirmed that the NQ commission had already voted to move to committee form. The amendment passed 8‑0 after discussion.
Key Outcomes
- Resolution 25‑0808R (adopting interim controls on short‑term rental permits pending a moratorium): Tabled at prior meeting, taken off the table, and approved 8‑0.
- Consent Agenda: Approved 8‑0.
- Ordinance 25‑028-O (short‑term rental moratorium, first reading): Approved (vote count not explicitly recorded but passed after being taken off the table; earlier voice vote suggested 6‑0, but final approval was by voice vote with no dissent).
- Ordinance 25‑029-O (exempting certain city single‑family housing projects from prevailing wage requirements): Read for the first time; no vote taken.
- Ordinance 25‑030-O (conveyance of property in Morley Heights/Parkview to Park Hill Cemetery Association): Read for the first time; no vote taken.
- Ordinance 25‑031-O (authorizing Duluth Public Utilities Commission to establish stormwater inspection and reinspection fees): Read for the first time; no vote taken.
- Ordinance 25‑027-O (incorporating protected class advisory commissions as committees under Human Rights Commission): Motion to amend passed 8‑0; the ordinance as amended passed 8‑0.
- Special Canvassing Board Meeting: Resolution 25‑0863R declaring results of the November 4 municipal general election was approved unanimously.
- Next Steps: The council will receive further information on capital needs for Anger Park Golf Course and will consider the clubhouse design funding in the parks capital budget. The sustainability officer position remains under discussion with the mayor.
Meeting Transcript
My name is Mike Burns. I lead the operation for Evergreen Energy, and I have, in case you have some difficult questions tonight, I've got a group with me here. Andrew Cassidy, the CFO from Evergreen, Steve Ramback, who leads our customer service area and customer building interface, and Chris Johansson, who leads the Duluth Energy Operation here in Duluth. So Andrew and Steve are from St. Paul with me. We're going to talk to you about the operation in Duluth, our plan for the budget in twenty twenty six and some of the things that we plan to accomplish, the accomplishments from twenty twenty five as well as what we're planning to do in twenty twenty-six. A little over a year. Our rates for the Duluth Energy System are consist of a consumption charge, which is the fuel consumed and some of the other consumables that are based on a per unit of energy used and a capacity charge that covers the more fixed cost as opposed to the variable cost. That's the labor, that's maintenance activities, that's debt service. And so you can see a lot of stability year over year between the 2025 budget and 2026 budget on the revenue side. So one thing that's noteworthy there is you'll see chilled water charges. We are no longer in the uh chilled water business. That was a an enterprise that was set up about 20 years ago. Um it was uh served some of the buildings in this area, and uh that con those contracts had run their course, and the system would have required a significant investment to continue it, and so that means long-term contracts with customers, and because we just weren't able to put that all together and make that investment feasible, we've decided to sunset that cooling operation. Relatively minor part of the operation, but that's no longer in the budget, so that's a little bit of the uh the difference year over year that you'll see there. But um overall we're expecting uh total revenues being about $300,000 less than 2025 budget, and right now we're trending quite a bit below budget on revenues, mostly because on the consumption charge side, we only charge what it costs us to fuel and to buy the consumables, and the fuel costs this year have been lower than what we had budgeted last year, and so the revenues that we've collected from customers are lower. So you see that in that uh next to the last column. Um there are some other minor revenues. You'll see that pass-through grant. That is actually a real benefit. There's a grant that is being uh it was provided to Duluth Energy to do some enhanced metering of our customer um meters so that we're able to see in real time customer utilization. It helps us considerably in troubleshooting, and so that's what that uh that pass-through grant reflects. And then on the expenses side, we're planning to spend those revenues. You can see the uh the first block to the first gray bar is the uh are the operating expenses related to energy and consumables. And so uh you can see we're planning for a slightly lower expected fuel cost year over year compared to budget, 2025 budget, and a little bit above what this year is trending. Again, we try to be conservative when we're budgeting fuel costs, and so you'll see that uh forecast in 2025 is coming in quite a bit lower than budget, um, and we're actually budgeting for 2026 in between, so slightly above the forecast for 2025, but below budget for 2025. Um then the non-operating expenses, that's again the cap what feeds into the capacity charge, uh very close year over year, 24,000 higher year over year in budget. Some of that is uh we're gonna spend a little bit more on maintenance, but a little bit less on people, because as I showed in that first slide, we're we're going to have a couple of less uh from a head full-time equivalent head count year over year. Um, and then we've got the the debt service that interest and and uh actually we show that uh in the next slide, but uh you can see um uh overall very similar budget year uh year over year budget. And then uh the appropriation, the amount that we're planning to spend overall over the course of the year, it has those uh energy charges, the non-energy operating expenses, but that this is where you see that principle and interest for the debt service, the things that we've invested in over the years uh that uh we are um gradually paying off the mortgage on those things, and so that that debt service is reflected there. So our total appropriation is just a shade below 15 million dollars over the for uh 2026, um a bit about a million dollars less than we had anticipated spending in 2025, a little bit above what we're actually trending on, the trend line that we're on right now for 2025, and again, that's primarily uh driven by lower energy expenses in uh 2025 compared to what we budgeted and planned for last time uh last year at this time. So, what does that lead to from a customer uh uh uh rate impact standpoint? Well, it's actually happy to report that it's an overall 1.1% rate uh impact rate increase, so well below the rate of inflation, uh driven by that reduction in expected cost of fuel and consumables with a small uptick in the uh amount of uh non-fuel cost operating costs that we anticipate. We do have two separate systems. So this is the steam and the hot water system that is connected to the downtown. We do have a hot water system that's been operation for over 20 years in Canal Park. It's several of the hospitals along the eastern side of Canal Park. That was set up at that time with a much different rate structure. And so we've been playing catch-up with the rates. Those rates have been historically lower than the steam rates. And so you'll see in this next slide, we are anticipating for a 5.3% rate increase for that group. They'll still be enjoying a slight discount. It will probably take us a couple more years to align the hot water rates in Canal Park with the hot water rates that for the service that's provided in downtown that are really tied more to the steam rates. So but that we're working towards that. We've been doing that, it's been a multi-year thing. We didn't want to make that big uh change in one fell swoop. So we're getting close to kind of finishing that up and getting those uh those rates aligned. Uh before I move on, any questions related to the budget, or shall I just continue and questions afterwards. I'll just continue on. So uh let's talk about 2025 accomplishments.
openpublica.com