OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Special City Council Budget Request Hearing - March 24, 2023

City Council Work SessionFriday, March 24, 2023
BodyDurham, North Carolina
SessionCity Council Work Session
DateFriday, March 24, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:33

Good morning.

0:34

Happy Thursday, March 23rd, 2023 here in City Hall.

0:40

We are in our committee room on the second floor of City Hall.

0:44

And I'm going to call this special meeting of the city council to order at this time.

0:51

We will be continuing our budget request hearing.

0:54

And so at this time an ex black work, is she will call a role.

0:59

Good morning, Madam Mayor.

1:00

I'm calling the role, Madam Mayor O'Neill.

1:03

I am here.

1:06

Councilmember Caballero.

1:08

Councilmember Freeman.

1:10

Councilmember Holse Hyman.

1:12

Councilmember Johnson here.

1:14

Councilmember Williams.

1:16

Thank you.

1:17

Thank you.

1:18

And at this time I'll turn it over to our financial budget and management services that are Mr.

1:24

Donna.

1:25

Good morning.

1:26

Morning, Mayor O'Neal, members of Council.

1:32

This we have two hours this morning to uh finish the process of discussing the council budget requests.

1:39

And this morning's uh meeting will be facilitated by um Lindsay from our um from our innovation team.

1:49

Um Lindsay Gavin and her staff, and uh so we don't waste a whole lot of time.

1:56

I'm gonna turn things over to her and uh we'll just unless the city manager has any other comments, and we'll uh continue the process from where we we left off uh two weeks ago right after.

2:19

All right, good morning, mayor members of council and manager page.

2:24

Uh as John said, my name is Lindsay Gabin.

2:26

I manage the innovation team here at the city uh along with my colleagues and teammates, Mary Gray Stone King and Eric Pena and our assistant director Holland.

2:37

Um I will essentially be your MC and timekeeper for this.

2:42

Um and Christina Reargan, assistant director for budget management services will be handling sort of the visuals um same process that we did last time.

2:52

So as a brief reminder, uh the folks from TJ Cog had started walking us through an exercise to categorize council budget requests.

3:02

Uh green means that the request will be put forth to the city manager for consideration.

3:09

Uh red means that the request will not be uh included for consideration for this upcoming fiscal year.

3:16

You'll notice you don't have a yellow option today because what we're doing is we're actually taping everything that was yellow last time, uh having a uh open floor for QA and discussion, and then uh designating those yellows as either green or red.

3:33

So we don't plan on going back through the whole list.

3:37

Uh we have 11 items that were yellow from last time.

3:41

So I would bring those up.

3:43

I'll probably read the titles um and maybe the brief descriptions, and then I'll open it to you all for comments.

3:51

Uh I am going to set a timer for about six minutes for each of them.

3:56

Um so if they get to the point where the timer goes off, if we could try to just wrap the last spot or two uh there, then we will uh go ahead and decide whether those are going to green or red.

4:09

Uh I've got folks taking some detailed notes again to capture this discussion.

4:14

Uh anything that is green at the end of today will go back to affected or associated departments at the city for some further analysis before being provided to uh manager page.

4:26

So just to reiterate, uh red doesn't necessarily mean an idea doesn't have merit.

4:32

Uh it doesn't mean that it maybe isn't part of the annual budget uh process, or it's not likely to infer budget needs in the next fiscal year.

4:42

Did that all make sense?

4:45

Sorry.

4:46

Uh about the reds.

4:47

Uh so red doesn't necessarily mean an idea.

4:50

It doesn't have merit or isn't supported.

4:53

It might mean that it's not part of the annual budget process, or that it won't uh have budget needs in the next fiscal year, which is what we're we're setting the budget for the next fiscal year.

5:08

Uh quick present question.

5:10

Um so there were some items that we didn't get to at all in the last round.

5:14

Are we going through those today in addition to the ones that were yellow?

5:18

Are there ones that we did not vote on at all?

5:21

Yes.

5:23

Yeah, yeah.

5:25

So all of the items up to the point that we interviewed.

5:29

There was a decision made about them.

5:31

Right.

5:32

So the ones that we're going to start with today are the ones that went to yellow.

5:38

No, no, I don't believe maybe went to first meeting.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Engagement██████████████████18%
Youth Programs█████████████13%
Budget Equity Analysis████████████12%
Historic Preservation████████████12%
Arts And Culture██████████10%
Grassroots Violence Prevention███████7%
Capital Improvement Planning███████7%
Housing Stability██████6%
Staffing Levels███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Special City Council Budget Request Hearing - March 24, 2023

This special meeting of the Durham City Council continued the budget request hearing, focusing on 11 items previously categorized as "yellow" (requiring further discussion). Councilmembers deliberated each item, with the goal of reclassifying them as "green" (submitted to the city manager for consideration) or "red" (not included for the upcoming fiscal year). The meeting lasted approximately two hours and was facilitated by the city's innovation team.

Discussion Items

  • City of Durham Mentoring Alliance Collaborative Pilot Program (Councilmember Hyman): Proposed to enhance community partners who mentor youth and create a one-stop shop for updated mentoring information. Discussion centered on whether this should be a directive to the Office on Youth or a budget item. Some councilmembers expressed concern about adding a new FTE, while others highlighted the need for accurate and accessible information. The city manager noted that the county already maintains a similar list. After debate, the council modified the proposal to remove the FTE and instead allocate up to $50,000 in city funds, with the expectation that county and school partners would match. The item was advanced as a green.

  • Community Conversations Reboot (Councilmember Johnson): Proposed to restart a resident engagement program that brings residents, city, county, and school district staff together for in-depth budget discussions. Estimated cost: $163,000 for one year. Councilmember Freeman expressed concern about adding workload to already stretched staff; Johnson clarified the program would be contracted out. Councilmember Williams suggested aligning it with an existing engagement contract. No final decision was reached during this segment, but the item remained under discussion.

  • Community Design Lab Pilot (Councilmember Williams): Proposed to establish a brick-and-mortar community design lab for solution-focused engagement. Williams agreed to withdraw the proposal and instead incorporate the concept into the Community Conversations reboot, noting it could be a hosting site. The item was effectively merged with the previous item.

  • Durham Symphony Orchestra (Councilmember Williams): Proposed $100,000 recurring for the Durham Symphony Orchestra to support salaries and concerts. Councilmember Freeman worried about setting a precedent for direct, ongoing funding outside the existing competitive arts grant process. Councilmember Williams indicated willingness to reduce the amount. Mayor Pro Tem Caballero and Councilmember Johnson supported the idea as a sustained investment in a city-named institution. The item was not finalised; further discussion was deferred.

  • Employee Ownership Technical Support Pilot Program (Councilmember Johnson): Proposed $15,000 over two years to contract with a nonprofit to support employee-owned businesses. Some councilmembers saw overlap with existing programs (e.g., the trades apprenticeship pilot, the "Built to Last" initiative). No final vote was taken; the item remained undecided.

  • Grassroots Violence Prevention Efforts (Councilmember Hyman): Proposed to create funding for grassroots violence prevention programs. Councilmember Freeman argued that several existing budget items (e.g., guaranteed income, Marshall Plan) already address this. Hyman agreed to withdraw the request if she could see the funding elsewhere. The item was not formally red-circled but discussion indicated it might be covered by existing initiatives.

  • Home Ownership Education Pilot (Councilmember Hyman): Proposed to create a home ownership education program. After hearing that the Forever Home Durham program already includes home buyer training and counseling, Hyman withdrew the request, satisfied that the work is being done.

  • CIP Fayetteville Street Planning Group (Councilmember Freeman): Requested that items from the Fayetteville Street Planning Group be moved into the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Extensive discussion ensued about historic disinvestment in the Hayti/Fayetteville Street corridor, the Marshall Plan (already green-lighted at $10 million), and other funding sources. Councilmembers disagreed on whether to commit additional dollars immediately or first obtain a comprehensive picture of current and planned investments. The council agreed to pause, directing staff to prepare a holistic funding and project map for the corridor before making further decisions. No vote was taken on this item.

Key Outcomes

  • Mentoring Alliance: Modified and advanced as green (no FTE, up to $50,000 city share, matching expected).
  • Community Design Lab: Withdrawn and folded into the Community Conversations reboot.
  • Home Ownership Education: Withdrawn, since the work exists in Forever Home Durham.
  • Grassroots Violence Prevention: Effectively deferred with the understanding that existing programs may cover the intent.
  • Fayetteville Street Corridor: No decision; staff to return with a complete investment overview.
  • Remaining items (Community Conversations, Durham Symphony, Employee Ownership) were not resolved; they will be addressed when the council reconvenes.
  • Total green-lighted items as of this session (including previous decisions) amount to $10.9 million one-time, $1.4 million over two years, $750,000 over three years, and $2.8 million recurring—totaling approximately $15 million. The largest single item is the $10 million one-time Marshall Plan.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. Happy Thursday, March 23rd, 2023 here in City Hall. We are in our committee room on the second floor of City Hall. And I'm going to call this special meeting of the city council to order at this time. We will be continuing our budget request hearing. And so at this time an ex black work, is she will call a role. Good morning, Madam Mayor. I'm calling the role, Madam Mayor O'Neill. I am here. Councilmember Caballero. Councilmember Freeman. Councilmember Holse Hyman. Councilmember Johnson here. Councilmember Williams. Thank you. Thank you. And at this time I'll turn it over to our financial budget and management services that are Mr. Donna. Good morning. Morning, Mayor O'Neal, members of Council. This we have two hours this morning to uh finish the process of discussing the council budget requests. And this morning's uh meeting will be facilitated by um Lindsay from our um from our innovation team. Um Lindsay Gavin and her staff, and uh so we don't waste a whole lot of time. I'm gonna turn things over to her and uh we'll just unless the city manager has any other comments, and we'll uh continue the process from where we we left off uh two weeks ago right after. All right, good morning, mayor members of council and manager page. Uh as John said, my name is Lindsay Gabin. I manage the innovation team here at the city uh along with my colleagues and teammates, Mary Gray Stone King and Eric Pena and our assistant director Holland. Um I will essentially be your MC and timekeeper for this. Um and Christina Reargan, assistant director for budget management services will be handling sort of the visuals um same process that we did last time. So as a brief reminder, uh the folks from TJ Cog had started walking us through an exercise to categorize council budget requests. Uh green means that the request will be put forth to the city manager for consideration. Uh red means that the request will not be uh included for consideration for this upcoming fiscal year. You'll notice you don't have a yellow option today because what we're doing is we're actually taping everything that was yellow last time, uh having a uh open floor for QA and discussion, and then uh designating those yellows as either green or red. So we don't plan on going back through the whole list. Uh we have 11 items that were yellow from last time. So I would bring those up. I'll probably read the titles um and maybe the brief descriptions, and then I'll open it to you all for comments. Uh I am going to set a timer for about six minutes for each of them. Um so if they get to the point where the timer goes off, if we could try to just wrap the last spot or two uh there, then we will uh go ahead and decide whether those are going to green or red. Uh I've got folks taking some detailed notes again to capture this discussion. Uh anything that is green at the end of today will go back to affected or associated departments at the city for some further analysis before being provided to uh manager page. So just to reiterate, uh red doesn't necessarily mean an idea doesn't have merit. Uh it doesn't mean that it maybe isn't part of the annual budget uh process, or it's not likely to infer budget needs in the next fiscal year. Did that all make sense? Sorry. Uh about the reds. Uh so red doesn't necessarily mean an idea. It doesn't have merit or isn't supported. It might mean that it's not part of the annual budget process, or that it won't uh have budget needs in the next fiscal year, which is what we're we're setting the budget for the next fiscal year. Uh quick present question.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com