OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Joint City-County Committee Meeting: Comprehensive Plan, Gun Violence Prevention, and Museum of Durham History - June 20, 2023

City Council Work SessionTuesday, June 20, 2023
BodyDurham, North Carolina
SessionCity Council Work Session
DateTuesday, June 20, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:07

Good morning, good morning.

0:09

Happy Tuesday, June 13, 2022.

0:14

Good morning.

0:18

Happy Tuesday, everybody.

0:20

It's now the hour of the hour for our joint city county committee meeting.

0:26

We are here on the second floor in City Hall chambers this morning.

0:31

And I greet everyone who's joined us here in person, as well as those who would join us remotely.

0:38

We have a couple of excused absences.

0:48

I do want to take a moment of personal privilege to county commissioners and a happy birthday today.

0:54

Everybody gives you all our role here.

1:03

Thank you, Madam Mayor.

1:04

Chair Brenda Howerton here.

1:07

Vice Chair Lendy Jacobs.

1:09

Here.

1:10

Commissioner Nina Alam here.

1:13

And Commissioner Heidi Carter.

1:16

Will she be attending?

1:17

Correct.

1:18

Sure.

1:19

Okay.

1:20

And on the city side, Mayor O'Neill.

1:24

I have heard word from Councilwoman Johnson, Councilman Freeman, and Councilwoman Rosie Hyman.

1:35

They will not be here today.

1:37

I think all of them have work obligations this morning.

1:42

So we will probably not have a quorum on the city side.

1:48

I think that might be the only one perhaps any city this morning, which is fine.

1:53

But so we'll go ahead and have our presentations, but we will not be able to take a vote on the excuse absences for our minutes.

2:02

So let's go right into we have a fairly fluid agenda today.

2:06

And so we want to go right into our item number two, uh, which is the comprehensive plan update.

2:12

And uh we will ask those person who have to come forward at this time.

2:22

Hello everyone.

2:23

Uh thank you for having me.

2:25

My name is uh Carl Kalazna, and I'm a senior planner in Durham City County Planning Department.

2:29

I'm here to share information on the draft Durham comprehensive planning.

2:34

Um so today I'm gonna give some brief background on the plan and then I'm gonna jump into our main item for discussion, which is the place type map, and that includes the urban growth boundary and future growth areas.

2:47

Make sure, yep.

2:52

Okay.

2:53

I'm all mic done for you.

2:55

Thank you.

2:58

Um, like I said, uh our main discussion today will be at the urban growth boundary and the future growth area, which I'm going to explain in more detail soon.

3:08

Um, so we today uh we're seeking guidance on the full plan before it comes uh in front of a joint session of the county commissioners and city council on August 31st.

3:20

Um, and that includes specific decision points related to potential revisions to the map from the January 2023 published draft that we've released.

3:31

Um, as we've been working on this project since 2019, there are a lot of pieces that I won't have time to discuss today.

3:37

Um, in the agenda, we shared the full memo and attachments for the JCC PC discussion, uh, which includes a lot of those background details.

3:45

But again, today I'm going to focus on a few key discussion points that are looking like the most controversial elements of the plan.

3:52

So your guidance today will help us put forward a final draft for your review as we head towards the joint session between the city and county uh in late August to consider adoption of the plan.

4:07

Um so we began this work in 2019 and have worked throughout the plan's development to undertake equitable engagement following the equitable community engagement blueprint.

4:17

Uh, this has been a learning process as we found what works for residents and where we need to improve.

4:22

For example, we've provided siphons to residents as the helps lead and design engagement at different points.

4:29

We brought residents into policy drafting processes through our policy working groups, and we improved our transparency and accountability to the community at each step of the process by showing what we've heard and how the plan content drafts have changed as a result.

4:44

Uh, we're now in the adoption process for the plan.

4:47

We continue to share resident feedback that arises in the process with you, our elected officials, and with the planning commission, whose final hearing on the plan is now scheduled for this evening.

5:00

So this slide lists some of the key ways that this new plan is different from the 2005 plan as we've worked towards more ethical engagement that's had an impact on what this plan includes, particularly when compared to our last plan.

5:13

So I wanted to highlight this first item because it's relevant to this discussion point we have today, which says focuses more growth within the existing city footprint.

5:23

This plan focuses on encouraging development to fill in within our existing city footprint or connections to water, sewer, and other transportation infrastructure already exist.

5:34

And this approach allows us to protect some of the more insensitive environmental lands and rural character in parts of the county.

5:45

So after a long process that started in 2019, we have the full plan pulled together, which was released in January of this year.

5:53

And I just want to briefly mention each of the components that are included in the plan.

5:58

The first is the community goals and objectives and the accompanying guiding values.

6:03

And these were adopted both by the city and the county in the summer of 2021, and they have guided the rest of the work to create this plan.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning██████████████████████22%
Gun Violence Prevention██████████████████18%
Public Schools████████████12%
Public Health██████████10%
Mental Health Awareness████████8%
Public Engagement█████5%
Arts And Culture█████5%
Funding Sources████4%
Public Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Joint City-County Committee Meeting: Comprehensive Plan, Gun Violence Prevention, and Museum of Durham History - June 20, 2023

This joint meeting of the Durham City Council and Board of County Commissioners covered several major topics including the draft comprehensive plan update (with focus on the urban growth boundary), reports on youth gun violence prevention and survivor support programs, a presentation from the American Red Cross, and an update from the Museum of Durham History. Due to a lack of a quorum on the city side, no formal votes were taken, but the committee discussed key issues and set next steps.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Rebecca Freeman (1818 South View Road): Expressed that rural residents felt unheard in the comprehensive plan process, stating that engagement was inadequate and that over 16,000 dwelling units are already approved but unbuilt in her area. She urged the committee to listen to smaller property owners.
  • Thomas Freedom (1880 South View Road): Criticized upstream development in Southeast Durham for causing erosion and environmental damage to Falls Lake, claiming that leaders did not consider secondary consequences. He opposed expanding the urban growth boundary.
  • Pam Williams (Southeast Durham resident and engineer): Questioned the need to expand the urban growth boundary, noting the plan only requires 60,000 new homes by 2050 but provides capacity for 150,000, plus additional units from RTP. She cited severe grading and erosion problems and urged against adding more land to the urban growth boundary or future growth areas.
  • Malarna Paul: Cited Policy 1.66 of the draft plan, which requires that changes to the urban growth boundary demonstrate no expansion into critical watershed, no significant long-term infrastructure costs, and address a clear community need. She urged referencing the plan's policies in decisions.

Discussion Items

  • Comprehensive Plan Update (Urban Growth Boundary and Future Growth Areas): Senior Planner Carl Kalazna presented the draft plan, focusing on the proposed urban growth boundary (UGB) and future growth areas. Staff recommended retracting the UGB from about 660 parcels (nearly 7,000 acres) currently in the suburban tier to focus growth within the existing city footprint, citing infrastructure limitations, environmental constraints, and cost. The committee reviewed several specific areas (Stagville/Oxford Road, Farrington Mill Road, Patterson Road, Cheap Road/Redwood, Hamlin Road, and Southeast Future Growth Area) where property owners requested to be added back into the UGB. Planning commission straw polls showed split opinions. Commissioners discussed costs, environmental impacts, and the need to balance growth with infrastructure capacity. Commissioner Jacobs stated support for all staff recommendations. No formal action was taken due to lack of quorum, but staff will prepare materials for upcoming work sessions and a joint public hearing on August 31, 2023.
  • Youth Community Hackathon to Prevent Gun Violence: Clark Haldeman (parent and activist) reported on a student-centered hackathon held on May 6, 2023, with 20 students. Key student requests included more mental wellness days, more trusted adults trained in mental health, and opportunities to express grief. Students expressed feeling unsafe and unsupported in schools. The report highlighted the need for trauma-informed approaches and compensation for student participants. A funding shortfall of $2,000 was noted (students were paid $75 each instead of the promised $175). Commissioner Burns urged resolution and suggested the safety and wellness task force or county/city could cover the remainder.
  • Prescription for Repair Pilot Program: Asmond Johnson (coordinator) presented a one-year pilot (funded by City of Durham and Duke Institute for Health Innovation) that uses restorative justice circles to listen to survivors of gun violence (those shot or family members). The program aims to identify healing needs. Currently 28 participants enrolled (goal of 40). Services include facilitator support, compensation for participants, and connection to community resources. The program emphasizes deep listening and survivor-centered approaches.
  • Safety and Wellness Task Force Update: Co-chairs Marcia Owens and David Case reported that the task force has extended its term by six months (per bylaws) to complete its work. The final report is expected by September 2023. They highlighted the need for community input and collaboration across organizations.
  • American Red Cross Presentation: Executive Director Lori Hughes and Disaster Program Specialist Sweetley Sanders described Red Cross services: disaster response, home fire campaign (Sound the Alarm - free smoke alarm installation), blood services, and training (CPR, first aid, etc.). They requested partnerships to spread preparedness messages, especially in schools and public housing.
  • Museum of Durham History Update: Executive Director Patrick Wolko requested $568,000 for architectural design and development phases for a future museum at 500 West Main Street, plus $108,000 for operational items (digital exhibits, salary increases, development staff). The museum has an annual operating budget of $152,000 from city/county. Commissioners discussed forming a joint committee to explore options, but noted that elected officials on the museum board may have conflicts of interest due to state law. Chair Howerton directed the museum to help organize a committee with city and county staff. The item will be on the next meeting agenda (August 8, 2023).

Key Outcomes

  • Comprehensive Plan: No formal vote; staff will incorporate feedback and present to the Board of County Commissioners work session on August 7 and City Council work session on August 10, with a joint public hearing on August 31.
  • Hackathon Payment: The city and county managers were directed to work with the community safety and wellness task force to find a path to cover the remaining $2,000 owed to student participants. Dr. Haldeman will submit a formal request.
  • Museum of Durham History: The committee agreed to form a joint city-county staff committee to explore the museum's capital request and land issues. The museum will help identify members. The item will be revisited at the August 8 meeting.
  • Safety and Wellness Task Force: Extension to October 2023 acknowledged; final report expected by September.
  • American Red Cross Collaboration: City and county officials will explore partnerships to promote preparedness programs in schools and public housing.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, good morning. Happy Tuesday, June 13, 2022. Good morning. Happy Tuesday, everybody. It's now the hour of the hour for our joint city county committee meeting. We are here on the second floor in City Hall chambers this morning. And I greet everyone who's joined us here in person, as well as those who would join us remotely. We have a couple of excused absences. I do want to take a moment of personal privilege to county commissioners and a happy birthday today. Everybody gives you all our role here. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Chair Brenda Howerton here. Vice Chair Lendy Jacobs. Here. Commissioner Nina Alam here. And Commissioner Heidi Carter. Will she be attending? Correct. Sure. Okay. And on the city side, Mayor O'Neill. I have heard word from Councilwoman Johnson, Councilman Freeman, and Councilwoman Rosie Hyman. They will not be here today. I think all of them have work obligations this morning. So we will probably not have a quorum on the city side. I think that might be the only one perhaps any city this morning, which is fine. But so we'll go ahead and have our presentations, but we will not be able to take a vote on the excuse absences for our minutes. So let's go right into we have a fairly fluid agenda today. And so we want to go right into our item number two, uh, which is the comprehensive plan update. And uh we will ask those person who have to come forward at this time. Hello everyone. Uh thank you for having me. My name is uh Carl Kalazna, and I'm a senior planner in Durham City County Planning Department. I'm here to share information on the draft Durham comprehensive planning. Um so today I'm gonna give some brief background on the plan and then I'm gonna jump into our main item for discussion, which is the place type map, and that includes the urban growth boundary and future growth areas. Make sure, yep. Okay. I'm all mic done for you. Thank you. Um, like I said, uh our main discussion today will be at the urban growth boundary and the future growth area, which I'm going to explain in more detail soon. Um, so we today uh we're seeking guidance on the full plan before it comes uh in front of a joint session of the county commissioners and city council on August 31st. Um, and that includes specific decision points related to potential revisions to the map from the January 2023 published draft that we've released. Um, as we've been working on this project since 2019, there are a lot of pieces that I won't have time to discuss today. Um, in the agenda, we shared the full memo and attachments for the JCC PC discussion, uh, which includes a lot of those background details. But again, today I'm going to focus on a few key discussion points that are looking like the most controversial elements of the plan. So your guidance today will help us put forward a final draft for your review as we head towards the joint session between the city and county uh in late August to consider adoption of the plan. Um so we began this work in 2019 and have worked throughout the plan's development to undertake equitable engagement following the equitable community engagement blueprint. Uh, this has been a learning process as we found what works for residents and where we need to improve. For example, we've provided siphons to residents as the helps lead and design engagement at different points. We brought residents into policy drafting processes through our policy working groups, and we improved our transparency and accountability to the community at each step of the process by showing what we've heard and how the plan content drafts have changed as a result.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com