Test one two.

This is a test one two.

Okay.

Testing testing one, two, one, two.

This is audio for a captions test.

This is audio for a captions test.

Place the unit in front of your mouth and speak directly into the microphone.

Your mouth should be six inches or less from the microphone while speaking.

Testing one, two, one, two.

This is an audio for close a closed caption test.

Testing one two three.

This is a test for captions.

Testing one, two, three.

Thank you for your patience as we corrected our audio issue.

We appreciate it.

Social media folks just testing one, two, three.

This is a test for social media streaming.

Thank you very much.

We are going to continue talk.

I will continue to talk to make sure there is audio on Facebook users.

Standby Facebook users.

Hopefully you hear me as well.

This is a test for social media.

Testing one two.

Testing one, two.

This is a test for social media.

Testing one two.

This is a test for social media streaming.

Enlarge the presentation by hitting control and L on your keyboard.

This is a test for social media streaming.

Select stop share.

So are we speaking about another extra 20 minutes?

So the the on-the-book answer is the meeting is ran at the prerogative of the chair.

I'm not I'm not saying that.

I'm saying that I want to be very consistent and there's nothing that's changed, and I appreciate it.

But we just had some technical issues today and we used our time so that we don't have to be here all night.

But rather than just sitting here in an empty room, uh we went into closed session and then we're back.

And I'm going to call us back to order.

Uh five recesses now over.

Closed session is closed.

We're back in open session.

It is 226.

All right.

Um I was about to read the consent agenda.

And as you head into that, Mayor, let me just apologize on behalf of the administration uh for the delay that uh know our public representative.

We do have all the technology working now.

Uh folks who are streaming the meeting should have full audio.

Thank you.

All right.

And colleagues, thanks for your patience as well.

Uh to the public, apologize about all the riff raff.

Uh whenever the council goes into closed session, that's uh usually some of the heaviest work that we have to do.

And it is not something you want us rushing nor getting wrong.

Trust me.

All right.

And this time I will read the consent agenda.

Item number one, Durham Performing Arts Center Oversight Committee.

Number two, Mayor's Council for Women.

Number three, approval of city council minutes.

Number four, contract st three forty-two, street repairs and repaving 2026, 2024 bond referendum.

I think pull that.

Number five, contract as contract st three four three, pavement preservation twenty twenty-six.

Number eight, resolution accepting a North Carolina land and water fund grant to construct the South L AB water stormwater project.

Absolutely.

Number nine, second amendment to interlocal cooperation agreement with housing authority of the city of Durham to procure and install security equipment.

I'll pull that one.

Number nine is pulled.

Okay.

All right, cool.

Okay, good.

Uh number 10, uh, contract with Paragraph Technologies Incorporated to procure an operations management platform for Durham City Police.

That has been pulled by the public.

And then we have our presentations.

Uh number 12 digital equity plan update.

Number 13, false lake nutrient strategy rules overview presentation.

And we have our public hearings coming up on the next meeting.

Uh 14, RTP 3.0 or privately initiated unified development ordinance, studio text amendment number 15, TC two five zero zero zero zero two, R V parking amendment.

Number sixteen, consolidated annexation nine three eight, McLamb Drive.

Number seventeen, consolidated annexation curly gardens.

Number eighteen, consolidated annexation thirty-six hundred pine view circle.

Number 19, zoning map change creekside, mixed use.

That's going to be a long meeting.

Wow.

All right.

Those are the consent uh agenda items with items four, nine, and ten pulled.

All right.

At this time, I will go to Citizens Matters.

Okay.

Did we pull number nine?

Okay, yeah.

Okay.

Number nine right here, Citizens Matters right here.

All right.

Got it organized.

All right, Ms.

Peterson, Victoria Peterson.

Oh at the very bottom.

Sorry.

One moment, please.

All right.

Leon West.

I'd like to address it once about a topic that is not okay.

Mr.

West, Leon West, can you hear me?

Leon West, can you hear me?

DC M online.

Mr.

Mayor, Mr.

West is online, but he's not responding.

Okay.

We'll we'll we have some mix-ups today, so we'll see if we can keep reaching them.

Can you uh see if you can message direct message?

All right, Ms.

Wagstaff, Jackie Jacqueline Wagstaff, can you hear me?

Welcome.

You have three minutes.

Okay.

Um good afternoon.

I was intending not to speak today, but after I witnessed Monday night um council meeting, I really felt like I needed to address some things that were happening.

And one of the things that disturbed me the most was the decorum of the council members.

In particular, certain council members that were upset about comments that the public, a public member said.

As I watch these meetings, I always see you, Mr.

Mayor, discipline people in the audience because they're speaking too loud or you don't like what they're speaking of.

And then Monday night you did the same.

But while you were doing that, I was listening to you one basically discipline another council member by basically saying she didn't know what she was talking about.

And then you also discipline another council member that stood up for that council member, telling her that you didn't say what you said.

Now we all watched this meeting.

Then we had Councilman Riff that seemed like he was upset about a member of the audience comments about another council member because that's what she believes, like most of us in Durham believe that there was a council member that bought his seat on that council.

And we'll stand by that, and I believe that.

But the way that you insist that the public has to come into that arena and have a certain decorum to your liking.

It astonishes me that while you're asking us to behave a certain way, you along with some of your colleagues behave a different way than we behave, and we don't see it's almost like being hypocritical.

You're telling the public they can't behave one way, they can't speak a certain way, they can't say things, and then you behave the same way towards your colleague.

So I think that in your flight to discipline the citizens of Durham, you need to reevaluate how you operate as a group up there on that council because it it's embarrassing to watch it, and I'm not the only one that has watched it.

I'm pretty sure other people are watching it.

So I that just my comment today on this matter.

Thank you.

Thank you for your comments.

Mr.

West, can you hear us?

All right, I'll resume with in-person.

Ms.

Peterson, Victoria Peterson.

And make sure you uh hit that button on the right.

No, no, no.

Uh right in front of you.

Okay.

Okay.

But this one here is also showing the time.

Great.

I I was all I'm also very concerned, and Mr.

Mayor and City Council members of what happened Monday night.

There seems to be a disconnect.

The kind of information that the city employees, and not all of them, because you've got some really nice city employees, uh got a lot of good ones over there.

But some of the city employees, when they come and they address the city council, to me, they are lacking some of the information.

This city, and I don't want to be wrong, Mr.

Mayor, received about $50 million of COVID.

The county received about 60 million.

The other day, the organization that was being discussed was only talking about six million.

My question is what happened to the 10 million dollars that this organization was fiscally supposed to be responsible to make sure whoever they were working with that those dollars would be accountable.

So I'm going to try to get something to councilwoman Burrs that she asked.

I'm going to try to write something up for you by tomorrow.

But I'm asking the city manager also, because to me, this is also his job.

And I want y'all to know, I have asked him in the past.

Now I'm not trying to embarrass him.

I have asked him in the past for the tax monies that the city has generated off of that 50 million or whatever it was.

Those monies are being held somewhere for the city.

Every day, or folks in here who know about banking, the city is generating income off of those monies.

To this day, I have not received anything in my hand of how much money you folks have generated off of those tax dollars, off of those COVID monies.

Also, we need a report of each of those programs that was funded.

You've got folks that was funded two, three, six, seven million dollars.

Were you all aware of that?

Now I know some of y'all were not, because you're new.

But I want you all to know, the new ones, ask the city manager for a list of each and every one of those organizations that received COVID monies.

How much of those monies have been spent?

How much of those dollars, Mr.

Mayor, those organizations are still waiting for the city to give to them because several of those organizations, Mr.

Mayor, I spoken to, and this was several months ago, they told me that they had not received all their monies.

Thank you for the same thing.

So anyway.

So I'm hoping that there's gonna be some follow-up here.

Thank you.

Yep.

That's why we have the update coming.

Okay, so I will get a report.

You you there are a lot of this information is already available.

We'll make sure that it's uh provided again for you.

Okay.

Uh next I have uh you're welcome.

Oh, here we go.

Next, I have Gregory Williams, followed by Richard Davis.

Good afternoon.

Today I'm going to speak a little bit on safety and design.

Last week I was lucky enough to meet with some of the engineers from North Carolina's Division 5 of our Department of Transportation.

They informed us that they are working closely with the city on the redesign of Roxburgh Mangum, which we are um excited to hear.

And we want to be clear that that color that collaboration matters in some really tangible ways.

Some of the most dangerous streets in Durham are state maintained, and the decisions in those design rooms uh ultimately fall with the state, but need to be heard by the city staff as well.

We're dealing with a broader driver culture problem that needs to be addressed.

Speeds are higher in areas, distractions are everywhere, and our streets are often built in ways that forgive dangerous behavior instead of preventing it.

Years ago, if y'all are wondering why I have a cane today, I was in Raleigh, I was rear-ended at a stoplight, and I fractured two of my spinal vertebrae.

I think it's L4 and L5.

When the weather is very cold, when I ride my bike more, I can barely get out of bed.

I've been in a wheelchair before.

Um, and the that's one of those tangible injuries.

A few months ago, my girlfriend was on Holloway, um, traveling from the Sharon Road food line back to our house right behind Lynn Road.

Um a driver was speeding, did not see that she was stopped in the turn lane, waiting to turn.

The light was green, she had her flasher on, completely destroyed our vehicle.

Had our children been in the car, we would have lost them.

Our rear row of seats was in the middle.

Our car seat in the second row was shattered.

And that brought up some really kind of scary questions for our family.

And today I am humbled to be here with Mr.

Davis, who has the terrible answers to those questions of when the design doesn't meet the safety standard, and someone loses their life in a traffic crash.

Um what happens after that?

It's something that no one wants to answer.

No one should ever have to answer.

And today we're both here just to bring attention, especially to the design on Guest Road and to our other state-owned roads like Roxboro and Mangum, which right now I believe has the U.S.

business designation, and in the conversation for the two-way conversion, there's talks about the city maybe not wanting to keep that designation or wanting to keep that designation.

And so my statements today are just um please keep up these collaborations.

Um these choices have real effects on folks' lives.

From me to Mr.

Davis, his family, and his son, and we can we extend our condolences.

We just urge the city council, the city staff to take these decisions seriously.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Mr.

Davis.

Okay.

It's on already.

You go.

Good morning.

God is good at all the time.

My name is Richard Davis.

Um I represent my son Isaiah Davis on uh on November the 13th, 200 um 25.

My son's name is Isaiah Davis.

He was killed on November the 13th on guest row by a reckless speeding driver.

Her name is Ebony.

She was, she had histories of reckless driver's behavior in May of May 11, 2025, she was arrested in Raleigh for uh aggressive to police officer, DUI on July 2025 to temp.

She also was arrested for uh aggressive to senior citizens.

Um she also was charged October, pardon me, December the 16th for killing my son.

The charges of involuntary manslaughter, two counsel, um, uh uh in vi um three minutes is just not enough time to get this all out.

But what are we gonna do about um the speeding on guest road?

And I have my son.

This is his uh, this is his diploma.

He went to Hillside High School and he was killed recklessly.

If I can't have more than three minutes to talk, then I do have this here forms to give to your clerk or your secretary where everyone can get a copy because um I don't know how the fatality of death where a person like me as a father have three minutes to talk about the death of my son.

This is not accepted with your hospitals in Durham.

So everyone on this here board here, please read this here because this is not accepted.

Like I said, three minutes, I'm all choked up.

This here is my family.

Anyone want to come out in the hallway after you finish?

Out of respect of the mayor, you can sign this here.

This is 300 signatures on guest row.

This is emails and phone numbers of everyone is concerned about guest role that the fatality of death that's going on in Durham.

All of this police investigators.

That's all you hear on the news that every case that's being investigated and is nothing that's never happened.

You have a nurse from Durham, she got hit.

You have uh Richard got hit at the bus stop.

You have my son Azai, you have a seven-year-old girl that got hit on her way going to school.

All of these access is on guest roll.

You have also a speeding car went through the star birth uh um coffee shop, went straight into the lobby of the coffee shop.

What is being done about safety?

What can be done?

We need to have some arrow boards, electric devices to say calm down the speeding.

This is uh a commercial, more than 35 stores is there.

Thank you, Mr.

Davis.

Thank you.

Sorry for your loss.

Yes, uh please read what I um hand it to uh everyone please.

Number four, right?

Someone colleagues, uh I'm sorry, who for number four?

All right.

Councilmember.

Thank you.

Um this is part of the uh bond that was uh recently approved.

Um my questions are somewhat related to uh I want to say thank you to um Gregory Williams and Mr.

Davis for coming and speaking to us about the safety of our streets.

Um it's a it's a big problem.

Um the uh specific to uh uh agenda item four, and it's I'm speaking a little bit to agenda item five as well.

Um just curious.

These are local streets, um, not as dangerous as uh several of other of our other uh arterial roads and and NCDOT roads.

Um, but will, as part of the repaving and resurfacing, will there will there be incorporation of traffic calming elements um and the using the deploying the NACTO guidelines.

Good afternoon.

My name is Clint Blackburn.

I'm with the environmental and street services department.

I'm running the contracting and design groups.

Um so um yes.

There we work closely with our transportation department, and so we send them all the streets that we're planning on repaving, and they look at those streets and uh compare them to towards the Durham Bike Plus walk plan and other um traffic calming things that they are interested in their researching.

And then we restripe the roads accordingly.

We change a lot of times we'll change the striping.

In some cases, we add um speed cushions and speed humps and other things that when when it's applicable.

So, yes, we we we do look at that.

Okay.

Thank you.

That's my only question.

I I also just want to call attention to um when you look at the agenda item um and look at the attachments, the the map um that that we see of where these projects are going to take place, which I appreciate, and thank you for including that.

Um I think this is part of uh the bigger question of of how we grow and who we grow for um when we continue to grow uh for in in the form of auto-dependency and car-centric development, which which we've been doing for many, many years.

Um, we create that demand, induced demand for vehicles, and the longer the distance are, the faster people drive.

Uh we've for for a very long time had poor design of our streets, and North Carolina Department of Transportation notoriously has poor design of their streets.

Um so between auto-dependency, the design of our streets, uh, and then also when you look at the map, you can you can see the connectivity of the different neighborhoods uh where the repaving and resurfacing is happening.

You can see the the newer or more recent uh developments are disconnected and curvilinear, you're not gonna have a lot of uh options for transportation in those areas or ways of getting from point A to point B.

Um we also have streets, uh, I believe in Trinity Park uh here that are much more connected, where you're going to see more modes of transportation, uses that are uh uh mixed mix of uses so that people can use uh alternative modes of getting to places and and some safer designs in those areas and and everyone deserves that.

Um so I think it as we move forward, we we really need to very deeply think about how we transition from a city that is continuing to promote um car-centric design, moving vehicles faster, and auto-dependency to one where it is actually safer and more viable to get around.

Um, and it has a human cost and human implication as well as a financial cost and implication when we are not uh fully considering the lifecycle costs of new kinds of development and thinking about that.

So just wanted to add that commentary and context to to this item and and I appreciate you answering, answering my question.

Thank you.

Thank you, Ms.

Mayor.

Yeah, I just want to echo those comments from my council, my colleague, Councilman Baker, as one of the two council members that biked in today.

I certainly understand the importance of having connected bikeways and safe ways to get around.

I just also want to mention, because uh Mr.

Blackburn did mention the bike and walk plan.

And just for my council colleagues and the rest of the folks in the public and staff, we are in the process now for the first time updating that bike and walk plan to do a joint city-county bike and walk plan, which I think will be completed sometime later this year, if I'm not mistaken.

We just have received an update and some of the members of that commission received an update last week.

That report will provide, I think it's going to be 25 priority intersections, 25 priority roads, 25 priority off-road sort of elements and 25 party gaps that will then essentially, once we adopt that plan, commit the city going forward in our CIP to making those priority investments, as I understand as we as we develop a safer and more robust bike and pedestrian infrastructure.

So thanks to you and your colleagues in different departments who are doing that work.

This is an important way that we and the county together, again, can make sure we prioritize key investments in our infrastructure to make sure our streets are safe for everybody.

Thank you.

All right, thank you.

So that's item number for item number nine is the next item that I have pulled.

I pulled this one.

I have this pulled by Mr.

Victoria.

Oh, is there a lot of people?

All right, is there public as well?

There was a public comment as well.

What order did you?

Ms.

Peterson, I have you sign up for number nine.

Yes.

This is to help uh Durham Public Housing to uh get to get security equipment.

I'm gonna just this community, I live in a walking condition and walking area of one of the cities.

I'm sorry, we're just one of the city's public housing.

We really need to find out what public housing units are these security equipment, and exactly what kind of equipment are they speaking about purchasing?

I live in walking distance of one of your public housing, where there's constantly shooting going on in that area, and I'm not just saying just right there on the property, but in that area.

Okay, excuse me.

Please listen to me.

I try to respect you and I'll be able to do that.

Okay, please.

So I will like to get some more of my time back.

We've got over on the police report, and I want the city officials to know, you've got two sets of crimes.

You have your part one crime, which is the crime that the feds keep up with.

That's the reports that you're getting.

But you also need to ask for the part two crimes.

I have a criminal justice background.

I think I mentioned this to the mayor several times.

I actually have three degrees dealing with crime or criminal justice or the law.

So what I'm asking the council here to ask public housing, what security equipment are they planning to purchase?

Where is this security equipment going to be located?

Which public housing, or are they even planning to even put it in public housing?

Or is this security equipment going to the new Fairville Street public housing where they're going to be doing their new what is it?

What?

$8 million development, I believe.

So I would like Mr.

Mayor, if you can ask if if there's somebody here with public housing to ask them what uh or the housing authority, uh what security equipment are they per are they only going to be purchasing cameras or exactly because that's a very broad statement when you have security equipment.

Is that cameras, is that video?

What exactly um are they purchasing now?

If they are not going to put cameras and security equipment in the public housing units, my question is why not?

Because when you if you look at your uh part one, and I'm not saying that the part one, because I'm gonna speak on 10 2, Mr.

Mayor.

So thank you.

Uh we will get uh representative, which I believe uh Ms.

Coggins is here.

They'll be able to answer that question for you.

Great.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, Mayor.

Mayor Pro Town, City Council.

Um, Yvonne Scoggin's General Services Department.

Um General Services is serving as a liaison for this item, and I have representatives from Durham Durham Housing Authority and participatory budgeting here to answer your questions.

Thank you.

Colleagues, there were some for this as well.

Um Councilmember Cook, go ahead.

Um I just have a couple of quick questions.

So I'm I am wondering, though, if you could speak to what this item is for to answer the public's questions because this is for cameras in a specific space.

Could you just speak to that information quickly for us?

So I'm going to defer to Durham Housing Authority.

We are simply the liaison and they have the specifics on this item.

Okay.

Good afternoon.

My name is Ashanti Brown.

I'm the chief operating officer for the Durham Housing Authority.

I am here with a few of my colleagues as well.

Um and good afternoon, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Manager, City Council members, as well as city staff.

We um were awarded this participatory budget grant funding based on votes from the citizens of Durham, specifically for our price-still place communities, uh our price still place community as well as Cornwallis Road.

And that was for the installation based on the request for cameras, um locks, um, additional new door hardware, as well as some lighting.

Thank you.

Um my next questions are going to be for staff, but thank you for being here, Ms.

Brown.

Um and these might be um budgetary questions, but I'm interested in how we set up and structure these participatory budget asks.

I see that you you're shaking your head.

So this hello.

Um, thank you.

Good afternoon.

Um my name is Carmen Ortiz, and I manage the participatory budgeting program.

So good afternoon, um, Mayor.

Mayor, Mayor Petempt, and members of council.

Um thank you.

So I guess my confusion is um sort of when this is set to the public.

There's an assumption that we're going to be able to do the things that we put.

I think you know where I'm going with this what we put on there.

Um then it's just interesting that like later on we're gonna have to amend.

It's not for very much, but it is a different amount than what we said we were gonna going to uh attribute to this project when we put out the participatory budget.

So I was just wondering if you could speak to any issues with how the partnership went and how we made determinations about the cost of this and and sort of how we are here now amending it later.

Absolutely.

That's a great question.

Thank you.

So the ideas generally come very specifically from residents, and the ask is very specific to answer the question about you know what the project entails is lighting, security cameras, and in price deal, um boat lux.

And so these came ideas from residents, were voted by residents, and as we are going through the proposal development process, we work with our technical departments to get the best estimated cost for this specific project.

Um we do understand that sometimes there are fluctuations with market changes, um some things may come up, and so we always um allot or have contingency funds available um in case these things happened.

And so specifically with this project um in DHA, as they were in the process of implementing the project, uh they realized that they need more funds because of course there are things that we can't anticipate.

And Sean can tell you a little bit more about what are those items that we didn't or they didn't anticipate um that were actually needed um, you know, in order to uh implement the project.

Does that answer the question?

Yes, and so this is coming out of a out of a fund that y'all had already set aside for any of these projects in case they were more costly than we thought.

Absolutely.

So um with each project, as we are putting them in the proposed of development, we do have a 10% contingency that we allot for those un you know unexpected uh price increases or changes that um may come up.

And you know, we've seen throughout history, it does happen a lot more often than than not.

Sure.

And then um, and I do want to hear the answer to that question, but while you're up here, um this one is has taken a little bit longer to come before us because this is not this last year's participatory budget, but the year prior, is that correct?

Yes, this was a cycle three project.

Um and so can you just speak to the timing?

Because I think there were some residents that were worried about that as well.

Sure.

And potentially I think maybe Ashanti can tell you a little bit more about sort of the timing and the delays.

Okay.

Sure.

Thank you for that question.

We have also received a number of calls related to this.

Um the initial approval that we received, we came back for um another approval or an amendment to the contract so that it would not be a reimbursement contract, but an upfront, because we did not have the funding available to front the cost um for these repairs.

And so that contributed to the timing around or the delay, the delay timeframe.

Additionally, we also had to take it through our own internal process to get approval to actually expend the funds from a budgeting standpoint.

And then after that, we had some staffing changes and had to change our project manager on this particular project.

And that runtime or that runway to get them up to speed did also contribute to some of the timing, but they were immediately or not very long after able to deploy some of the funds to get the project moving.

And then I was wondering if you could then speak to the technology that y'all are finding that you need for the cameras as well.

Absolutely.

Um that might inhibit some of these improvements.

And one of those things, or that we might not have or that wasn't anticipated initially was around our elevators.

Getting cameras in those elevators requires some infrastructure updates in order to make cameras work in those elevators.

We also um found that there was a need in order for us to actually remote into that into those cameras and actually get the feed from it, that we need to also um get some servers to support that and to actually record that information or anything that comes on those cameras.

And lastly, I think there was one more item.

It was just those two.

Okay.

And so she's into my kind of next question, which is this technology that is going to require investment in the future, or is it is it like a one-time we purchase the technology?

It and I imagine that we do have to continue paying for technological upgrades and that sort of thing.

Do you have information on that?

So to the best of my knowledge, there will likely be some ongoing expenses related to that that we're looking at now, and that's mostly related to some of the um the service the cellular service that those cameras have to have in order to record to another area.

Um that's something we're looking at now to see if we can mitigate those expenses.

Um but beyond that, it is not something that the city is being asked to maintain.

Okay.

So DHA is going to be able to take on the cost of that moving forward.

We are looking at that to see if it's something that we can absorb if we can't avoid the costs.

Okay.

And then and I guess will that technology then be able to be used for other things within DHA or within those buildings, I guess that they're being put into.

I'm sorry, I'll have to ask another team member is totally fine.

If that's the case.

Um I also have our deputy operating officer, Mr.

Sean Buchanan here with me, as well as our director of IT, but Mr.

Buchanan may be able to answer that question.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, everyone.

Sean Buchanan, Deputy Operating also for Durham Housing Authority.

And uh can I can you ask the question?

Yeah, so I guess I was asking like if we are doing these technological upgrades, are these things that y'all are going to be able to use or implement for other things within the building?

Um, I know that obviously putting a camera in.

Um is in installed, and so that that'll stay there.

Um the only additional costs we expect again is just the ongoing maintenance of our camera system.

Um again, I think the housing authority, uh, we again we are looking at um how to manage the ongoing maintenance of the system, but should be something that the housing authority can accommodate and operate.

Great.

In regards to if it's something that we can plug into for other uses, as those needs arise, we'll have to assess it at the time.

Okay, because I'm hearing you say that like the transmitting of the cameras is related to cellular to cellular service, and I'm just thinking that there's going to be other things that probably need to be transmitted.

So I'm just wondering how like as we're sort of doing these technologically or as we're doing the tech upgrades if there are things that are needed to be done at the same time, we can work those in.

But just out of curiosity.

Um thank you.

Those are my questions.

Councilman.

Things on the Mr.

Mayor, just with just one comment.

And I want to appreciate the comments from Councilmember Cook or the questions about the due diligence here on this.

I just want to say this is I mean, as the PH or the representative from the City Council to the Durham Housing Authority.

I want to thank you all for being part of this project.

I want to thank Ms.

Ortiz and her department.

This is a great example of cross-jurisdictional collaboration.

This is I understand was the highest ranking item on the on that round of participatory budgeting.

So our citizens said this is a need we have identified that.

We voted on that.

As this came to the Durham Housing Authority as I know we have been in meetings talking about this.

The Housing Authority was glad to receive that gift, but then in doing the due diligence about sort of technology upgrades and sort of infrastructure upgrades, realized we couldn't with those dollars we had actually execute that.

And so that's why this has come back to us.

But again, it's a good example of engaging staff and residents and making sure this offer from participatory budgeting can actually work effectively in the housing authority.

So thank you for your your work on that and and enjoy being the uh liaison to the public housing authority from the City Council.

So thank you.

Thank you.

Any other comments, questions on this one?

All right.

Thank you so much.

Next up.

Item number 10.

Let's start with online speakers.

Uh Brittany Price, can you hear me?

Britney Price, can you hear me?

All right.

Um Jagon.

Fioru, FIOTU.

Zigon.

Um.

Uh, yes, who must we go with?

All right, I'll start my statement.

Who's on the call?

I am FOT Jagoon.

Okay.

And I'm here to express my deep concern about the city contracting with Peregrine technologies.

It's been stated multiple times that Peregrine will not generate new data, but it'll allow more efficient surveillance in Durham residents, especially black residents such as myself.

This contract will serve as a force multiplier on an already increasing surveillance state.

Data from every facet of citizens' lives being made readily accessible to third parties.

The CEO Peregrine, named on the city's contract, was formerly affiliated with Palantir, which is currently providing support to the Trump administration's uh immigration produced the Israeli defense forces genocide in Gaza.

If ICE or a federal agency produces its abena, they will also have access to this more efficient surveillance software.

We have an administration that is disappearing people off the streets like me and cracking down on political dissent.

I know we've paid lip service to protecting immigrant communities and standing up to Trump at town hall, but now it's time to walk the walk.

Please do not provide tools that can be weaponized against our community.

Invest in our communities in affordable housing and youth programs and services for residents in need.

I do not consent to my personal information being handled uh in the ways outlined with the contract with Peregrine.

I do not consent to my tax logs going to peregrine technologies.

Please vote no on this agenda item.

Thank you.

Thank you for your comments.

Shanise Hamilton.

Shanice Hamilton, can you hear me?

Mr.

Mayor, Ms.

Hamilton's not in the queue.

Okay.

Um Paul Barton.

Paul Barton, can you hear me?

Yes, I can hear you.

Welcome.

You have three minutes.

All right, thank you.

My name is Paul, and I'm speaking in opposition to the Peregrine contract.

I'd like to start with a with uh reading an excerpt from Ben Rudolph, the co-founder of Peregrine, who posted on LinkedIn.

We are quietly building a best in class data platform that enables users to ingest data from a wide variety of sources at massive scale, apply transforms, and build AI models.

Despite this, Peregrine denied that their system uses generative AI in November listening sessions.

Their marketing materials make it very clear that they are building large language models or LLMs.

This is the same tech that ChatGPT uses.

And like ChatGPT, it is impossible to tell the complete story of how Peregrine's LLM will be trained.

If it used solely Durham data and police queries, it clearly could not be robust enough to function as advertised.

It could be learning from the wider internet data from multiple cities, or as we've seen in an expose from 404 media on Flock, with which Peregrine often partners, leaked private information and stolen data from the dark web.

For the moment, let's address a problem with the model being trained by the police.

Peregrine boasts on their website that they use crime rates and arrest records to identify patterns and predict crime hotspots.

This is called predictive policing.

And it depends entirely on the data being inputted.

The Peregrine AI will inherit the biases and systemic racism of the system preceding it and reinforce biased policing.

Naturally, police will create records about the places where they spend most of their time.

So if police are allocated most often to a hot spot, then that spot will continue to receive activity and remain hot.

In the statement of work for Peregrine, they say the DPD has volumes of valuable data, but that value cannot be unlocked because data is scattered across separate systems, siloed in ways that prevent it from being understood and analyzed together.

Manual processing and scattered silo data is a feature and by design a crucial tenant, a crucial tenant of data privacy called purpose limitation.

Hospital records are separated from 911 call records and school records and social worker records because to add all that contacts into one place creates an entirely new data set.

The rich peregrine or any police officer or ICE or border patrol agent or any motivated hacker could have access to.

Imagine if a patient arrived for an appointment and the doctor could open a profile about them that included not just their medical history, but the names and addresses of every member of their family and how they feel about them, the schools that their children attend, which candidates have donated money to in the last election, and a map of everywhere that they've driven, cycled, or walked to in the last few years, including who they were with.

Interdepartmental and commercial collaboration with Peregrine boasts about their boasts about this in their marketing materials.

Does a doctor need this information to make a decision about how to treat your cold?

No.

Should a police officer be able to see all this information and more without a warrant and without probable cause simply by piping into a search bar?

No.

Thank you.

Price had to leave the meeting.

She did uh emailed her comments.

Hi.

Hi, you have three minutes.

Okay.

Thank you.

Um I am reaching out to speak about using our tax money to find DPD basically upgrading their tech and surveillance technology.

Uh $500,000 to upgrade surveillance tech and bring Peregrine here and make it easier for Durham Police Department to do their jobs when we have people sleeping out on the streets right now.

We don't have affordable housing for our people.

But yeah, let's lay look make life easier for Durham Police Department and ICE and whoever else wants to like surveil us uh 24-7.

Um at the gun reduction like seminar that was hosted by um hosted by the city.

One of the steps, like even in that was reduce gun violence and the ways to reduce gun violence was to provide community with like real resources.

And I still have questions about that whole thing, but we've all been saying this like for forever now.

And where are these resources coming from?

$500,000 could definitely be used to help our community, but we want to give it to you, like make us more unsafe and give it to DPD to expand their resources and make it easier for them to watch us.

Never mind the fact that, you know, and folks have already said it, Peregrine is connected to Palantir and it's all connected to ICE, like point blank period.

And so the funding that we had uh as community um to ask for like the initial heart expansion into Durham Public Schools was actually less than the funding that's being asked for for Peregrine.

Uh and we can't even get that, which is absolutely insane to me, because the city could fund heart expansion, even with the interlocal agreement, instead of like pushing it off on the county or whoever else.

But again, why give more mental and behavioral health uh resources to our children and community when we can just fund more surveillance in Durham?

Like for what?

To watch people suffer in 4D?

Is that what we're doing?

When we ask for funding, we I mean our people, when we ask for funding to help our people, we get the runaround around who can do what, where, when, and how, but we continue to have to show up to all of these meetings and all the things to continue to speak out against more funding for policing and for surveillance and for police violence against our people.

So I'm not understanding where the priorities are, especially in a moment like right now.

Things are not about to just, you know, turn a switch and things are going to get easier for our people.

I wish it was that way.

And Durham has been radical in a way that like we show up and we show out, and this is another one of those ways, but right now it's not happening for us.

Thank you, at all.

Thank you.

I have Avery Avery W.

Ivory W.

Mr.

Mayor, um, Miss Ivory is not in the queue.

All right.

I have um D S Nandy.

Wandy S.

Nandy.

Nandi, can you hear me?

Yes, I just got permission on mute.

Hello, everyone.

My name is Nandy.

I'm a longtime resident in Durham, and I'm here to invite the city council to make the right decision.

Quit wasting our tax dollars on more surveillance.

This real-time crime center is a project that many myself and many other community members found out about as folks were trying to move it, move it around behind closed doors, and didn't even have listening sessions until we uplifted the concern of not knowing.

And so, and and those listening sessions mean during the working hours.

Many of our folks who work nine to five.

So really wanting to invite y'all to take the time to ensure your investments are grounded in the needs of those who will be most impacted, like we've been talking about with this participatory budgeting project, like we've been talking about with Hayti.

Um, yeah, to do the right thing by our people.

Um, we live in a time of technology and there being massive data leaks.

It also being a time where our federal government is seeking federal police agencies on our people and kidnapping our community members and our including our young people.

And so thinking about the implications of this this peregrine contract, which has stated um that they're open to sharing this information to whoever they decide as a private company.

Um, yeah, I think I probably find it deeply troubling about the ways that we're thinking about using um this technology.

Um, and want to invite y'all to return to the community safety and wellness task force report that has so many recommendations from our community members about what would help um with increasing safety in our communities.

There was no uh mention of more surveillance in our communities, and that was I think one of the most thorough projects when it came to community engagement from this city.

So really want to invite y'all to return back to that.

It has so much good work in it.

Um, continue investing into programs for youth, more robust infrastructure around house neighbors, affordable housing, like so much more that folks continue to come to these work sessions and meetings about um yeah, and to to really return to not wasting our tax dollars when it's already hard to get receipts on past dollars we've used in the city, say no to peregrine and say yes to the people of Durham and the investments we continue to ask folks to invest in um that don't include this.

There's so many other priorities, and we can't allow AI and more more tech and surveillance in our communities to be that when people can't eat, um, and all the other things that I mentioned.

Thank y'all for my time.

Thank you.

Poet Williams.

Poet Williams.

Hey, can you hear me?

Yes, welcome.

You have three minutes.

Peace from Paul Williams, born and raised in Durham.

Um, I too I'm here to ask y'all to make the right decision and to not uh bring these technologies to the city.

I find it very interesting.

Uh earlier this year, the uh the county approved all of this money for the sheriffs to build their own, they got their own 911 center and to upgrade their shooting range and to bring all of these technologies for all these different things, and then now we have this happening.

And yeah, with these technologies now uh try to be brought to help to aid law enforcement to continue to um yeah, just cause havoc in our neighborhoods as they've been doing.

I'm just not really feeling that trend at all.

I don't understand how for decades we have dumped millions and millions of dollars into law enforcement all across the board, and none of the problems that they are supposed to be taken care of are gone.

Like, why do we keep dumping more money into law enforcement and into technologies?

Cameras ain't gonna stop crime.

Like, yeah, just it's it's very frustrating being born and raised here in Durham and having to have dealt with this continued cycle my whole life, and when is this shit going to end?

Like, let's not like there are many things that could be built here outside of a real-time crime center that would actually help the community, a real-time healing center, a real-time restorative justice center, like anything outside of a real-time crime center, like that's yeah, this that's crazy.

And last note, I'm I I really don't like your energy, Leo.

You act like it's a like it's a problem for you to be here listening to community.

And if that's the energy that our mayor has, you feel me?

You need to get get up out of here.

I'm done.

Thank you for your comments.

Do you see Ivory W.

All right, sounds good.

All right, moving to in-person speakers.

I have Raina Rusenko.

Lindsay.

Start with those two.

Uh good afternoon.

My name is Raina Rosenko.

I'm a Durham resident.

I attended two of the town halls hosted by DPD about this contract, and it was made clear in those sessions that Peregrine is in the driver's seat here, not DPD.

DPD and city staff appeared largely uninformed and incurious as to Peregrine's record and other cities and how Peregrine systems operate, not to mention the implications of setting up a third-party platform into which data on people in neighborhoods in Durham will be amassed.

Instead, DPD seems seduced by Peregrine's promises that these simple these systems will simplify their work and be a quote force multiplier, end quote.

In other words, DPD's interest in these systems serves only its own ends to accrue tools to fight so-called criminals, people who I define as my neighbors.

Anyone today can see how throwing money and equipment at law enforcement agencies so they can chase and harm society's perceived enemies has horrifying consequences that destroy lives, destroy community, and keep none of us safe.

Specifically in light of national politics, no one here today can promise that Durham's policing tools and infrastructure won't be used against us all in six months.

There are two issues at hand here.

One is policing, the other is tech.

We know that policing unjustly and disproportionately ruins the lives of people belonging to racial minorities.

Data shows that 40% of DPD arrests over the last decade have been for low-level nonviolent crimes, and research found, quote, black people were 6.2 times more likely and Latinx people were 3.4 times more likely to be arrested than a white person, end quote, in these cases.

All these people have police records now.

And unless policing protocols change, black and brown folks will continue to be disproportionately impacted and linked to data labeling them as criminals.

Today, in 2026, women's access to birth control and abortion is being criminalized.

Trans existence is being criminalized.

Being an immigrant is being criminalized.

Being a leftist is being criminalized.

Folks from these groups, especially when they belong to racial minorities, have always experienced more entanglements with criminal justice systems, and they will face even greater policing in months to come.

We have not solved these fundamental problems of policing, and it has been proven that machine-driven tools exacerbate racial and other biases, including in policing.

In addition, Peregrine's platform is a third-party platform that will not only integrate volumes of data in one place where it can be easily accessed or hacked by others, but it will create a demand for more data that can be fed into this platform for policing purposes.

Under no circumstances should we be acting like governance in 2026's business as usual, especially when it comes to policing and tech.

Both are dangerous to whimsically invest in.

To invest millions in Peregrine in the real-time crime center at this time in history is ludicrous.

Thank you.

Next I have Lindsay.com.

That information would also be aggregated and available in Peregrine.

It is impossible to comprehend the complexity of what will be exposed by the real-time crime center.

These are huge data sets that could come from any software the city uses.

To name a few, Inside LPR, Tangles, Juloda, the clinical management system that HART uses, 4-A Adams, which provides drones to DPD, Park Mobile, Motorola Solutions, which provides body cams, and Axon Enterprises, which does evidence.com.

All of that will all be used to create profiles of everyone in this city who has ever interacted with city resources.

The simple truth of the matter is that this data should never be collected and shouldn't exist.

And certainly the aggregation of it should not.

I'm demanding that the city council reject this contract with Peregrine, explain why we have an MOU with inside LPR, stop the building of the real-time crime center, and bring every single MOU and contract that DPD and the sheriff's office have or are seeking to discuss with the public.

It is clear to me there's very little understanding of the cost of surveillance, and the city has not has not only learned nothing from the shot spot or debacle, is now attempting to install something dramatically more dangerous and invasive in the name of public safety.

We know what reduces violence in a community, and it is taking care of the people within it.

Until everyone in Durham has their basic needs fulfilled, what the state deems crime will always exist.

Thank you.

Uh final speakers, May M.

Jen Wickman, and Victoria Peterson.

All right, good afternoon, y'all.

I'm here to demand that DPD reject the contract with Peregrine and use the allotted $500,000 on Project Durham residents are requesting that I will list at the end.

We can look to Hillsborough for an example of buyer's remorse with surveillance tech, and I urge you to meet with their mayor or commissioners to get a local government level insight to the ulterior motives of these companies.

The bottom line is the Peregrine, like Flock inside LPR and others are private surveillance companies.

They exist to generate a profit and require the existence of crime to do so.

With crime dropping in the city, there's no justification for spending so heavily on more tools to generate proof of crime.

Their contract with the city explains Peregrine would be the one storing the surveillance data indefinitely, training AI models on it, and selling it to third parties.

And they operate nationwide.

The environmental impacts of long-term cloud storage at those volumes, plus the increasing number of data centers, new fuel sources, and inevitable force displacement that the expansion of AI would necessitate are unfathomable.

Then we must consider the harm at the community level.

The type of technology is already being used by law enforcement and ICE across the country despite Fourth Amendment rights violations.

Errors are being made by algorithms resulting in violence done by humans with no accountability to those harmed.

Real-time crime centers are on the rise as police push to hand over decision-making capabilities to programs designed to give predictions based on user input and bias.

They have and will continue to pre-criminalize already marginalized communities because they are taught on racist historic crime data.

We see the ongoing killings of civilians in Gaza at the hands of Israeli forces and the tech as the other side of the same coin of what is unfolding on U.S.

streets today.

Our police train with their occupation forces, and we are both customers of the same surveillance tech companies.

There is no difference between local or federal government spending endless amounts of our tax dollars on tools of state violence to use against civilians globally and locally while we all plead for the basic means to survive.

Beyond the call for the community to be informed and resist the growing infractions of our privacy and liberty that come with Peregrine and a real-time crime center, I want to remind police and lawmakers that your careers are no safer than those in any other industry that is rushing to rely on machine learning tools.

You are training your replacements and your current positions of power will offer you no extra protection when this tech pushes you out of a job and you become just as vulnerable to the hallucinations of AI as the rest of us.

Educate yourself on the wider reaching harm of this technology and ongoing misuse, as well as the people profiting from it.

It doesn't matter how benevolent any local agency is.

These companies have their own plans for the data that you would be collecting for them and paying for the privilege to do so.

We need you to focus on the human elements of our communities and your role in serving us.

Please consider these requests gathered from folks at the people's table for alternative ways to spend the half a million dollars of our tax money instead of on surveillance and policing.

Supplemental child care, many calls for permanent affordable housing, health care, youth and reading programs, political education, black history initiatives, land and food sovereignty projects, and trade training programs.

And please consider that the level of surveillance tech already in use in the city deters the very people whose input you claim to want from even coming into this room.

Hence why you see those of us with privilege to exercise carrying their message to you.

Ramping up surveillance will only push people further out of public life.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Oh, okay.

Come on.

I'm sorry, I thought I would say that.

Hi, good afternoon.

Um, I'm Jen Wickman.

And I want to reiterate what other folks have said that in this moment when I've heard, thank you.

I'm not very tall.

Um, I've heard each and every one of you express concern about ICE and um CBP and what's happening nationally.

And this is the moment, like this is the time right now, because all of these surveillance tools are connected.

I feel like we're gonna get assurances from DPD.

Um, I'm sure that they are genuine.

Um, but I assure you that the private companies will also give assurances, and private companies are here to sell you something.

And um, they'll tell you what you want to hear and then do what they will.

We've seen um even ring recently um settled a lawsuit that they would not ring cameras, that they wouldn't share their information.

They've gone back on that in October, and that's been proven.

Um, I also want to back up a little bit to express concerns, like I've heard other folks saying about the way um some patterns I'm just seeing over and over and over again at work sessions and um city council meetings.

I hear over and over again um folks saying communities can't come to an agreement on something, or we're not hearing from the right people, or we're hearing from the same people over and over.

Sorry.

Vodka.

No, just kidding.

It's not vodka.

That was a joke.

Um I want to lift up what council member Burris um shared, lifting it up about the white moderate, and I would like to um maybe have some reflection on maybe some members of the council who are white and may not be white, um, who are having the function of the white moderate.

Okay, because Dr.

King said um they are more devoted to order than to justice.

The white moderate says, I agree with the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action.

I see this over and over.

I see y'all rolling eyes on iPads.

Um, I mean, maybe you're taking some notes, but I don't think the eye rolling is about taking notes.

I hear you talk about decorum and um grace and courtesy, and you're not extending it to your community members.

Period.

If you're sick and tired, step down.

That's yeah, and also vote no on Peregrine, please.

Thank you, Ms.

Peterson.

I'll remind our speakers, let's please please please stay on the uh the the item, the agenda item at hand.

Mr.

Mayor.

I'm so disappointed in what I've been hearing to this afternoon.

I really feel like crying.

I really do.

The crime that is going on in the African American community is unbelievable in this city.

Here's a crime in Durham last year.

33 murders, 113 rapes, robbery, 321, aggravated assault, 681, violent crime over a thousand, burglary, lawsuit, motor vehicle theft, property crime over 8,000.

In this community in Durham last year, close to 10,000 crimes were committed.

Close to 10,000.

I bet you that many of those crimes were done on senior citizens and the elderly in this community.

I don't care what you bring in this community.

Do something.

I support this.

I'm tired of young black men being murdered in this community.

Most of the people who spoke, I bet you they do not even really live what I would call in the inner city of this community.

I'm tired of it.

The killing and the murdering the seniors in this community who cannot even go out at night because many of them are afraid that they're gonna be mugged or murdered or raped.

I'm tired of this crap.

These people coming in here, beating up on the law enforcement, beating up on the federal people, and all they're trying to do is get the crime under control in this community.

I'm sick and ton of these folks coming up in here, beating up on our police officers, being up on people who want to who want to be able to go out in their community and be free and enjoy life.

We can't enjoy life, Mr.

Mayor.

Sometimes at nine and 10 o'clock at night, I want to walk out of my door.

But because people who live down the street, people have stolen plants, plants, lawnmowers from my home.

Other citizens in my community.

Yes.

If they need a million dollars for cameras, give it to them.

I'm tired of black men being murdered in this community.

And people sitting around, all these complaints about what the government is doing.

This is my money too.

And the seniors in this community pay taxes also.

We want you young folks to start doing something about this murdering going on in this community.

Give the law enforcement what they need.

And I'm gonna go and sit down.

I'm probably gonna have some leave, Mr.

Mayor, because I've got very upset.

Thank you about listening to these folks and this crap that they're saying.

Ms.

Peterson.

Thank you.

It's ridiculous.

We need policing in this community.

Mr.

Peterson, you're out of order, please.

I'm sorry, sir.

You may not have to go get a police officer and get me up out of this room.

They got me.

Ms.

Peterson, you're out of order, please.

This murdering crime going on in the black community.

It's ridiculous.

Yeah, we need cameras, and we need more than cameras.

Ms.

Peterson, please step out and calm down.

All right.

Colleagues, were there any comments before we this item was pulled by the public or the any colleagues?

I don't feel the need to have a super long debate on this, but obviously I think we should put it on GPA.

So that's going to be my request.

And just for the public, y'all already know this, but I want to reiterate that this is a work session.

The vote, any vote that will happen will happen on our next meeting, which is February the second.

Same deal.

You can sign up to speak.

You have to sign up on an agenda item.

So when you do sign up, make sure that you sign up on this agenda item if you want to be heard on that as well.

And I do want to also state that I've received people's uh emails, texts, phone calls, I had a handwritten letter.

Um I am reading all of the uh correspondence that I'm receiving on this issue, and I want to thank folks for engaging.

And I also want to thank our uh police department for hosting the um info sessions that we requested and um and state that uh I am not planning to support this, and it is not a statement of my distrust in our police department, but rather a question of what this lends itself to down the line.

Um, and I will have more comments to say at our Monday night meeting, but I do appreciate everyone's work around this, including the staff who was really uh responsive to our requests.

And so just motion for that to be on GPA.

Thank you.

Thank you to um everyone who's uh spoken today, who sent in uh letters um and emails, uh everything that council member cook uh mentioned.

Um thank you also to uh DPD.

I I when this first came around, I was a cautious no.

Uh I wanted to uh to really dig in and in good faith uh learn more about this uh this technology.

Um I attended one of the town halls.

I've spoken with uh police, I've spoken with community members, I've done uh as much research as I possibly can.

Um and while some of my concerns have been alleviated, uh other new concerns have have uh have come up uh for me in ways that I uh also uh like uh councilmember cook uh would not feel comfortable moving forward with uh at this point.

Um so I do again, I I also support having this on um on GBA.

I really appreciate the the QA memorandum that um DPD put together.

Um I thought that uh the police department did a really good job of conducting the the meeting that I was able to attend, which is uh moved online.

Um I thought that there was very good engagement from the public that was able to attend, ask questions, make comments uh during that meeting.

This is uh a contract in this time and in this moment in this country that touches on uh a huge number of some of the most polemic issues um cloud computing, AI, uh even touching on you know, somewhat touching on um the connection to uh Palantir uh Peregrine is is not Palantir.

Um so it's not surprising that it is uh raised this amount of concern, I think, from uh across the community, including many people who are who are not here, who are not planning to speak up, who quietly hold uh deep concerns about this.

I think when I hear the public square, I hear valid concerns about surveillance and um policing that are related to this contract.

I hear valid concerns that are not directly related to this contract.

And so I do think that larger questions are raised.

For me, um I I do think that the Durham Police Department needs to have the tools to do the necessary work that needs to be done on a daily basis.

I think to move forward with any kind of new technology like this in this moment that we're in, um, there need to be very robust guardrails.

So for me, I would need to see a either an advisory, a whole new advisory commission or task force uh directly related to privacy and surveillance.

Um such boards and task forces uh exist in in many other communities around uh surveillance technology.

So this is not a brand new idea.

Um those time those types of boards have done fairly decent work in establishing protocols, guidelines, ordinances that set the uh guardrails that make folks in those communities uh more comfortable with um the operation of uh and deployment of surveillance technology, as well as um uh even putting in self-imposed uh guidelines on their own practices.

So I think this raises bigger, bigger questions.

Um at this point, I'm I'm still uncomfortable with this item.

I see the purpose of it.

I think that uh that if we needed to move forward with it, there there needs to be uh deeper engagement through the form of of a task force or uh or advisory board.

Thank you.

Yeah, all right.

Thanks, Mr.

Mayor.

Yeah, I appreciate the the comments from my colleagues.

I look forward to further conversation.

Uh as my my colleagues have said, we've heard a lot of received a lot of emails, calls, texts about this, and appreciate all the folks that reached out to us.

We've responded to many, if not all.

Um I also want to raise a question that I'll look forward to talking more about at the um at the at the uh council meeting since this will be on GBA, I expect.

And that is that we've we've invested in this joint city county violence reduction plan, a very big effort that we and this the county are involved in.

And I'm curious how this how this technology may or may not interact with that whole plan we're developing around violence reduction.

So that's a question I have and look forward to hearing more about that.

Thank you, Mr.

Mayor.

Anyone else?

Yep.

No.

I'll come back to her.

I just want to echo my colleagues uh with uh the gratitude for folks who've reached out uh uh on this issue, um, the handwritten letters, the uh the emails and the calls.

Um, it's been from uh you know primarily folks uh who have concerns uh about this proposal and this technology uh and also from residents like we heard uh uh today during this meeting who um are directly um you know experiencing uh crime and particularly violent crime, not to say folks who experience that also don't have concerns, but some of the people I've been hearing from also are just looking for something.

And uh I'm hearing an absolute right to demand that the city do what we can um to reduce uh the crime that they experience in their communities.

And so um a willingness to try something.

Um at the same time, I think more than one thing can be true.

Uh and I think this proposal raises uh a lot of real concerns that I share.

And you know, I appreciate what councilmember member Baker said.

Some of the concerns we're hearing, I think relate directly to this proposal and and and some don't, but reflect a really critical uh issues that we need to um really dig into and assess uh as a city, as a community as a society.

Um I I I like the idea of having some sort of uh commission uh to to dig deeper, uh formal or informal, but just to help us think through some of these uh broader concerns around privacy and surveillance that um most of us are facing uh in our personal lives with our our families, our kids, uh as well as you know, in in our experience uh day-to-day in in our communities.

And so uh I think that would be helpful.

Um I do also want to echo the thanks to to DPD for their uh engagement for the QA.

Um, you know, I I have some uh questions about that, which I can uh direct to DPD or in the meeting, find the right time to do that about the engagement process and you know, kind of who we we heard from uh in that.

Um but uh I'll just close by uh saying, you know, I appreciate that we're hearing and discussing these critical issues, and I have uh really serious and sincere concerns uh about this uh this item.

Thank you.

Um thank you all for your various feedback.

I have received the handwritten letters, the emails and concerns in regards to what this technology brings forth and how it will be applied, and I've had the opportunity to speak with city staff.

I want to also thank DPD as well for all your hard work and ensuring that we are safe in our city.

For my colleagues, I do want to um just upload the fact that we have to think of something because people are being terrorized by gun violence in our community, and just because it may not directly impact you all, we gotta figure out a way that we actually support the work of DPD and thinking about so if we do not go this route, which I'm not gonna get in the practice of saying I'm gonna vote on an issue in a work session.

But what I will say is that I will hope that we um think about ways to ensure that we can increase DPD's um pay to make sure they can actually live here in Durham.

We're thinking about other ways to have community police and how we make that actual and attendable to our community because as it has been stated, a lot of people sometimes talk about what they don't want, but they don't hear the voice of people who do need something to feel safe.

And we take think about that, you know, we always talk about our taxes are our highest revenue, right?

There are people who are scared to go out to um commercial hubs in their community because of the crime, particularly gun violence, or being robbed.

And so I would encourage folks to go to those areas and talk to those people and then let's try to figure out collective strategies to address the issues people are bringing forth because I am quite tired of reading about and look hearing about young men who look like me, who could be my children at my big age at this point.

And I just really have an issue allowing.

So I know that this is a very the timing is off of this, but I want us commit to thinking about strategies to address the issue of gun violence and have a little bit more empathy towards those in our community and making sure we're actually just saying a thing, that we're being intentional about what we're saying, because like you know, a commission is great, but if you want to just stall it out, let's just say that.

So look forward to additional conversation and learning more about what we can do to actually move this forward and address the issues of our community.

Thank you.

Since I will not be there on Monday, I will I do plan on saying how I would vote if I were there, which is no.

Um I don't um uh I understand this item will be on on our general business agenda.

Um I appreciate all of my colleagues' comments.

I also appreciate the the task force that is being done currently with the county.

It is the first time I think that we are we are deeply digging on the issue of violence in our community with all of the important partners.

It can't just be DPD, it can't just be the city.

We know that when we are talking about violence.

It is often it is often our young people, and we know that often the school system is the first touch point for those students.

Every principal, every guidance counselor in every school in the city knows which kids are the ones who probably need that extra help.

And if we don't have a plan and connection from the city to what the schools are doing, we will never succeed.

So I'm really looking forward to that work.

I will also very much encourage folks to go back and read the very, very important work that the community safety and wellness task for did.

Again, it was comprehensive.

It involved our council, our uh county commission, our school system.

They had a lot of community interviews, they had a lot of community input, and they had incredible recommendations that fall to the city, that fall to the county, depending on what the recommendation is.

And so we have actually done a lot of that deep collaborative work.

And it's now the burden of local government, depending on who they are, to implement some of those recommendations.

And none of those recommendations did it really encourage extra surveillance.

That wasn't a thing that many folks were asking for.

They were asking for safer communities.

Absolutely.

But they were not asking for tech that surveilled them.

I have a lot of concerns.

I think the success of our community safety department is in large part because of that collaborative nature of Durham's police department.

So I understand the intent behind this was not in any way malicious.

They're really just trying to respond to this issue of violence in our community.

I don't think this is the way to go.

I know that we're going to have some incredible recommendations, and we're going to have to fund those recommendations, and that's going to be hard as far as where do we find the funding.

So I look forward to those conversations and I look forward to those recommendations.

One of the things that I know, and this is a conference that I took it to took part in last year, is specifically around the surveillance and immigration and how it's being used.

And I was relieved to know that we don't have a flock contract here in the City of Durham.

I was relieved to know that we had not gone down that path because so many communities are having to reel themselves back from those contracts, from those decisions from a few years ago.

And I don't, I don't want to relitigate that.

I'm glad that we don't have it now.

I don't want it in the future.

I do not trust our Federal government in this moment, and I do not trust that even if we have the intention of not sharing, that we won't be forced to share.

So that's where I am as an individual council member again.

Thank you to all community.

Uh I know that there is uh a violence, gun violence, and beyond in our community.

I know we've made important work, important improvements.

It's not enough.

But I also am really proud that we are moving together as a community in this in this task force work, and I look forward uh to seeing uh what unfolds from that.

Thank you.

Any other comments?

All right.

Uh considering this is a work session, I do have a few questions.

Um Madam Seaf, I'm going to ask you to come up.

There have been a lot of comments today on uh from community members who the ones who showed up in the room and showed up online who have stated their interpretation of what the software is.

Can you give us a matter of fact from your professional perspective of what the software will do, how it'll be how it will be used in the city of Durham?

And uh there's a big concern around surveillance.

Um could you talk a bit about what that exactly means in regards to the information that would be collected, you know, and how that information can or cannot be accessible to ICE or Israel or the Federal Government?

Um could you just clear the air with some clarity?

Yes, thank you, uh Mr.

Mayor, uh Mayor Pro Tim, City Council, manager, thank you for giving me an opportunity to come up and speak today.

Um what I would say is one, this is not surveillance equipment, this is not surveillance technology.

It's not.

There's been a lot of really egregious disinformation, despite the meetings that I have personally had with people in this room for hours after work.

I'm just me, two of my colleagues, and that those folks.

And it's really disheartening to hear the amount of disinformation that is being spoken out there about DPD, about how we're going to apply the technology, about what the technology is.

Um on the side of DPD, so uh we started envisioning the real-time crime center two years ago.

Is there a better way that we can do the work that we do?

If you've never been in a homicide, you've never investigated a homicide, you've never been there when someone has taken their last breath.

If you've never done a notification, you can't have the you don't have the ability to feel what we feel.

And so what we knew was that what was priority for us is reducing the time for investigations so that we would be able to actually have some closure for not just violent crime, victims, survivors, families for violent crime, but also those who have been victims of property crime.

Our numbers for property crime are far higher for our motor vehicle break-ins, where guns are being taken, cars are being stolen, used in violent crime.

So we wanted to see if you know, is there a way that we can reduce the time for investigations while reducing property and violent crime, and then being able to provide an opportunity for our community to interface with us in another way, not just by the canvases that we do, but being able to upload their own video, if they like to our evidence.com.

Videos of actual murders, and we have those, videos of drive-bys, and we have those, videos of car break-ins that have been key for us.

And so how do we do all of that and then be able to reimagine the way in which we compile our cases?

So we do have a lot of technology, and we have a huge team, a tremendous team that's doing amazing work, sworn and non-sworn, and many of those team members are in the room with me today.

It's just very difficult.

And so we kind of started looking at what other agencies are doing.

So as you know, real-time crime center or whatever you want to call the agencies call it different things, but it is not a new thing in this country.

There are progressive cities that have been doing real-time crime centers for years.

And they have guardrails in place.

Um of real-time crime centers in the country.

And it researched specifically those benchmarks that I just talked about, which was crime reduction, investigation, quality of cases.

What does that look like when you're able to put all of those resources that every police department has or should have into one place and isolate the work that you're trying to do?

And they uh researched it 2023, 2024, and published it in April of 2025.

So it was started under Biden's administration and published under Trump's.

So we can't say that it was one-sided, and it's based upon factual recommendations and factual information.

One of those police departments being the Winston-Salem police department, who has a real-time crime center.

Um, unfortunately, I couldn't find a platform.

Many police departments don't provide platforms of data in the way that we do.

We are very unique, whether it's information about officers, um, complaints on officers, everything.

We provide it, uh, much like we did with the shot spotter.

Um, we provide it very forward-facing information that was easily viewed and um consumed and digested by our everyone to include our community, the Raleigh Police Department.

Um, and then there were more progressive police departments.

So in Seattle, in Portland, um, Minnesota.

So there's an example of how they're using real-time crime centers and what they're actually using.

Um, one thing I did notice is that many of them use Flock.

We we don't use Flock.

We there's a there was some disinformation provided today that the manager signed an MOU with inside LPR.

That's not true.

We have a basic MOU with Flock.

When Flock first came on the scene in Durham, Flock wanted us to pay for top tier.

They wanted us to pay to play, essentially.

And we said, well, we're not going to, we're we have no plans on dealing with you, not the way these other law enforcement agencies are paying and working with you.

But we do find value in many of the private companies and uh neighborhoods in Durham that use Flock.

We find value in being able to receive that information should that resident choose to share it.

So essentially Flock said, well, we'll allow you to do it.

But we you've got to sign at MOU just basically saying that we're not going to use it for anything else.

Um it was very wordy, but essentially it was a very brief MOU.

The only thing that this provides is an opportunity for the communities that have Flock in Durham right now and the commercial businesses that have Flock in Durham right now.

It provides they can send us still photos or video.

It's a one-way interface.

So that's the extent that we use Flock.

And that's the only way that we plan to use Flock.

We um we have policies.

I will tell you, no other agency has policies like we do.

Our policies are forward facing, they're publicly available right now, and they are real time.

So when we make updates to policies within 24 hours, virtually real time, those policies are updated.

We have had officers that have been terminated from here in the last two years for misuse of our police functions, of our police equipment technology.

They have used our technology for their own benefit and gain, their the software and the way in which we found those things out by audits that we do regularly by complaints.

And we will separate you for them from the agency.

That's a no, that's a non-starter for us.

Right now we have a draft real-time crime center policy.

Our practice is to before we even start purchasing or trying to purchase any equipment or technology, we always have a policy in place.

So we have the draft real-time crime center policy.

Um that is not on the public portal yet because it's in draft.

We actually have a policy on our like on license plate readers whenever we have those.

We already have the policy ready to go.

And it has all sorts of guardrails.

That's to use the department computers.

If that isn't enough, we also have a computer use agreement for DPD that you have to sign.

And then we also rely on our own uh information technology one and four uh policies, use of information as well as information technology security policy.

Then we have human resources policy.

All that guides us and is mentioned in our policies across the board, but specifically for how we use data and data management and our computers and and all of the really sensitive information that we house.

We are CGIS compliant, we are a CLIA accredited agency.

Um we are a hot high standard go gold standard accredited agency.

And then we also at the very end of it, we have really heard and tried to turn around responses from the listing sessions that that we did.

It might not have been what everybody wanted to see or hear whenever the answers that we provided, but those were the answers based upon fact, not rumor based upon fact.

Some of the metrics that we would really like to measure in one of the few real-time crime center dashboards that we will we will actually put into place.

Um we will start to measure the actual real-time crime center response.

How how do how well is the real-time crime center working?

What are we using it for?

Who are we sharing data with?

We will actually tell you who data is being shared with.

So if you have a law enforcement agency that says, hey, we'd like to actually look at some of your real-time crime center data.

Um, we, and if we agree to that, we would provide that information.

We want to be able to capture how long it takes or time responding to investigations, how long it takes for us to clear cases.

The agencies that were profiled in this uh paper or in this research that was done by the DOJ, all of them across the board saw increases in arrest and case clearances by arrest.

They saw reduction in response time.

They saw reduction in the actual time it took for to develop a lead for a case and then arrest.

Um I think that's all very critical information, but the only way that it works is if it's in one place, is if it's easily accessible by individuals that have special authority to be able to use it.

As of right now, our officers don't have authority to use all of the systems that we have.

Our intelligence unit uses systems that I could have access to it.

I don't want it.

So it's not a blanket carte blanche, everybody has access to the systems.

Our real-time crime center would be staffed by sworn and non-sworn.

We would work with you to figure out what kind of guardrails do we need to put in place for auditing.

For we would we would show you and show you what an example of our audits that we do all of the time for our systems that we currently have.

It's just about ease.

It's about ease, not for us, because at the end of the day, yes, we would love to be able to solve cases quicker.

We would love to be able to get offenders off of the street.

It's about serving our victims.

It's about serving the families.

It's about serving people that have been victimized repeatedly, because it is happening and it's happening more times than it should.

Our commitment is to serve.

And I think we have demonstrated that we do have the ability to utilize technology in a way that we can we are able to hold ourselves accountable for how we use it.

And we are able to implement it in a way that is very transparent.

And I'll just refer back to ShotSpotter.

I do want to bring up the what has been talked about with the ability for government agencies to gain access to our software.

So that is only through either we provide them access, which we will not, or subpoena, court ordered by a judge.

But that's true now.

We don't have to have peregrine.

That's true right now.

For any for the federal government to come in and with a court-ordered subpoena, and that's as far as my legal information goes, but they have the authority to do that and could do it.

I mean, we see what's happening.

We don't house the information that they want to know, not in the information that would be going into Peregrine.

We do house federal documentation in the form of our U visas that is not housed within the information that's going into Peregrine.

When we take a report, we don't ask anyone's status because we don't care.

You're our community.

You're in our community.

And if you've been victimized, we want to figure out who did it and bring them to justice.

We do not seek to lock people up.

We work with our community to seek solutions to not do that.

As evident in us and our participation in the diversion program.

We are the only law enforcement entity here in the City of Durham that does that.

And we are committed to it.

So we seek to do the other rather than take people to jail.

But there are people that don't want the help.

And I've said that before.

I know I've said more than a mouthful and probably more than I should, but I would just ask counsel to I know you have a tough decision to make, and maybe some of you have already made your minds up and your decision.

But for those of you that have not, I would ask that you make your decision based upon actual facts, not on supposition, not on he say she say, not on bias, because if this was not the police department bringing this forward, we wouldn't be here.

I would just ask.

And I will still be actively involved and engaged in this community.

And so I'm sorry, I took way too much time, but thank you.

Oh, thank you.

Uh thank you, Chief.

You uh you took the time that was needed, and I appreciate that.

Um colleagues, any questions before we move on.

Okay.

I'll just uh close this out.

Um I should probably state I I'm you know I would like all of us, we were elected by the people of this community, not a few people, not just our base.

We were elected by the city at large.

Um therefore we are all here, we all are here to do a job, uh not to a specific group or not to a specific person.

Um I'm very intentional about our delivery.

I always say with all due respect, or just to make sure I say it as nice as possible because I do mean it that way, and yet I'm going to be described as an a-hole uh by certain folks based on your perspective of me.

So let me be very clear.

I'm not here to be liked.

I'm not here to make folks feel comfortable, but I do understand that I'm a big black man and I can make people feel uncomfortable.

So uh if you don't like my vibe, so what?

I'm not here for vibes.

I'm here to lead.

And I gotta say that this always when it comes to this, we get a little uncomfortable.

Um I want to say on the record that the aggressive approach that I took with ShotSpotter was probably not the best.

Because after doing a little more research and engagement on this this collaborative approach with the violent crime reduction uh collaboration, uh I realized that one thing is just not it.

And these companies, I one of the speakers said earlier, they're gonna give you their best shot and want you to sign up on it, and that's their little contribution.

They're gonna make money, and you're gonna still have the issues.

So Shot Spotter wasn't the silver bullet.

Uh Bull City United was not the silver bullet.

Peregrine is not the silver bullet.

A raise to our police officers is not the silver bullet.

But interestingly enough, every single time that we try to do something to fight back crime, which is inevitable, we need a task force, we need a commission, we need all these technicalities.

Every single time we get we get the talking points, we get the pushback.

And this is, you know, again, colleagues, we all have our, you know, position.

I'm just stating my comments of you as you stated yours.

Um, but I can tell you the inbox messages that I get, the handwritten letters that I get, the emails that I get, a lot of them are from folks who lost their son or lost their daughter or law or the young lady I spoke to this morning who lost her mother and father, which Chief, I'll be reaching out to you about that.

And all they all she wants, she's 23 years old, and she said she she saw me walking this morning, my dog, she's like, I told my friend when she saw you to call me, so I'm walking over here.

I just want to know, like uh my mom died, you know, um in the county jail, and and my um my dad was found, you know, dead, and I just want I just want answers.

And and I don't know who to reach out to.

I don't I don't know what to do, Mr.

Williams.

So when I come into a meeting and I I see people stand up and I hear them speak, which everyone has the right to do.

But no one looks like that young girl who just won't answer.

I'm still looking for the day where me, myself, as a black man in this community is not looked at as a victim.

I just that's all I want.

I want to be able to say my community stepped up and stepped forward.

And they tried these, they tried something.

It wasn't too technical, but they tried something.

But right now, we just all objectively, and I'm saddened to see many speakers got up and walked out.

But if we just went back and looked at this video clip, and we ask a very objective question, what is Durham doing for the people who are feeling this terror at the core?

How would that question be answered?

It's two sides to this.

It's we are here to do a job, and we're the ones that we're we're voted in to do this job, and this is what we have.

That's one side.

And the other side is just like folks had the privilege to come in here and speak today on not having, you know, technology to, you know, fight back and close out crimes and try and be a contribution to keeping folks safe, you have to come in as well.

And unfortunately, I know people can't really get in here because they have things, you know, like I I asked the question the other night where are the CDC folks?

Oh, but some of them have two or three jobs and they're volunteering.

They just can't be at the meeting.

So I um I'm looking forward to the day where you know, uh, the folks that are experiencing this terror will be able to actually have their voices heard and not spoken for.

I'm looking forward to the day where the folks that are closest to this terror can actually identify what the city is doing for them rather than what we're not giving a chance.

So if I was voting on this today, I would vote heck yes.

I trusted our technology, our TS department actually heard a request from our police department, and they did their due diligence.

They looked at all types of software, and this was the best option.

And that I the police chief is standing up here today because I requested her to come to the podium because she was in the room, but this is actually a technology solutions issue.

So we're either going to work to keep people safe and fight by crime, or we're not the collaboration we're doing with the city and the county is going to take things like this.

It's not the silver bullet either.

But it's part of it.

Shot spotter, it's not the silver bullet.

And it could be part of it.

I don't know.

But valence interruptors, it's not a silver bullet, but it's part of it.

So I hope that everyone that had took the time to do the research on how this is not good.

Go tell the mother just lost their child.

What's the option?

What's the resource?

Once again, it's too technical.

So, Chief, I appreciate your work and your staff.

But thank you.

Yeah, that's true.

Colleagues, I am gonna give us a break.

Uh, we'll take about what do you mean?

That is that the last time?

No, we have two presentations.

Two presentations.

Yeah, let's take a let's take a ten minute break and we'll come back to the other.

All right.

We'll we'll we'll go we'll go ahead and continue.

One, two, three, four, five.

You can go ahead.

Good afternoon.

I'm Michelle Wolf with the Environmental and Street Services Department.

Good afternoon, Mr.

Mayor.

Mayor Pur Tim is now not sitting here, but her too, and the rest of City Council.

I'm here to talk to you about the Falls Lake rules.

And what do I do to make this move up there?

It's magic, it's going to move on its own.

Is it the middle one?

Oh, it came up.

Okay.

I may skip out and come out and come back again on um doing these presentations, but Councilman Mayor Protein will take over at least.

Um, after probably a three or four year rulemaking process that the state engaged in.

And we're expecting it revised rules to come through in twenty twenty-seven now.

It was twenty twenty-six before, but it's twenty twenty-seven now.

Um, those use rules are still under development.

The communities in the Falls Lake watershed are working with the state to develop those rules and to make sure that there are rules that can be implemented and that actually get us what we want, which is a a better Falls Lake.

So in the fall, I came and gave you a presentation, and I did a Falls Lake on a good day and Falls Lake on a bad day kind of presentation.

So these three pictures, the two on the left are from that good day, bad day discussion.

The one on the right is a new picture that is illustrating what I told you back in the fall, which is when the algae are covering a lake, and the the water quality or the water look is very opaque, so you can't see through it at all, which you can see through the middle one.

And that's usually an indication of a harmful algae there.

What you can't see in this picture, at least on this screen, is that there are bubbles all over the top.

It is not full of fish.

Those bubbles are happening because the water is off-gassing.

So water can get really bad if we don't take care of it.

So for those of you who don't know, Falls Lake is a not is not a natural reservoir or not a natural lake.

The only natural lakes in North Carolina are down east.

All the rest of the lakes in North Carolina exist because there's a dam.

There's a dam, a little dam, a little dam could only be two feet.

Little dam could be as tall as me, or a big dam, like what's on Falls Lake, what's on Jordan Lake, what's on High Rock Lake, all of those lakes.

Lake Mickey has a pretty good size dam.

That one is significantly older than Falls Lake.

Lake Mickey, Lake Mickey's Dam went in in the 1920s.

Falls Lake was impounded in 1981, so it's a very young reservoir, which also impacts what happens with water quality because it is so young.

Okay, I've I included this slide just to give you some guidance.

I don't expect anybody to read all of these rules.

You don't need to read these rules because they're all being redeveloped.

So this lists the entire package of rules that deal with Falls Lake.

If you are working on Jordan Lake, or when you get to Jordan Lake, maybe I should say, the structure of those rules will be exactly the same as the structure that I'm showing you now.

So looking at this is not just preparation for future Falls Lake work that you'll be asked to do, but also for future Jordan Lake work that you'll be asked to do.

What's in red is the stuff that really directly impacts the city.

What's in blue, not so much.

So the Falls Lake rules are drafted in two phases.

There's a stage one, which has been fully implemented by all the local governments in the watershed, and then there's stage two, which the General Assembly paused on indefinitely until there's new rules adopted.

So what's what's being implemented now is fully in compliance with the existing Falls rules.

This is a state strategy.

It is not a city strategy.

Um we are expected to implement what the state asks us to do.

All right, so I'm gonna go through each one of these rule sections and give you a little bit more context as to what they're for and why it's important.

So the first set of rules is the purpose and scope rules, which is really a fairly short one.

I think it's about four pages, maybe five.

Um, and the reason why these rules exist is because there's yet another set of rules that are federal rules that require local governments to do things if a water body is considered impaired if it's not meeting a state standard.

So we have avoided those federal types of rules by doing the state strategy.

So that's a really important thing to remember.

Um what it says here is that we're trying to comply with the chlorophyll A standard.

That's the standard that the state has that they use to measure how much algae is in the lake.

So, yes, there's a chlorophyll B, yes, there's a chlorophyll C, but you won't ever hear me talking about that.

You'll only hear me talk about chlorophyll A.

Um, the baseline water quality reductions from 2006.

So I get a lot of questions about why 2006.

Um the entire strategy, and this will be true for Jordan as well, is based on monitoring data and scientific studies from a particular period.

In the case of Falls Lake, that that monitoring and scientific study period was 2005 to 2007.

If you were in this area at that time, you'll know that in 2005, Falls Lake was about half full.

There was a severe drought.

2007, Falls Lake was about half full.

There was severe drought.

2006, most of the year, Falls Lake was really, really low.

And then we had like a big tropical storm.

I think it was Alberto came through and just dumped a huge amount of water in the Falls Lake watershed and pulled the lake level all the way back up.

One storm by itself.

So the state decided to develop the strategy based on 2006 because at least part of the year the lake was back up to where it was supposed to be.

Um the purpose and scope also allows for a re-examination of the of the models.

So having a drought in 2005 and having a drought in 2007 means that 2006 was actually not a normal year, right?

Um it's like me losing 50 pounds this year and then gaining it back and then losing 50 pounds in 2028.

What's happening with my body in the middle is probably non-normal.

It's probably pretty angry, actually.

So that was why there was a provision allowed in the rules to re-examine what the the science is behind the rules and to develop all the new tools.

So the new rules that are being worked on right now also are based on scientific data, monitoring data from 2015 to 2018, I believe is the time frame.

Um is important when we start talking about the actual rules that require the city to do something.

So I always have to quote Mr.

George Spox, who's a famous statistician.

All models are wrong, but some models are useful.

Remember that always.

They're always wrong, but they are also useful.

Um don't bet your house on a water quality model.

You might lose your house.

In fact, I would say there's a good chance you're gonna lose your house.

But the models that we have right now are based on that monitoring data that we've collected, whether it's the city or the state or the city of Raleigh, whoever has collected, and then a model that's developed based on our knowledge at that time.

Obviously, science is advancing all the time.

Um, and we know more now than we knew in 2006.

So the models are always gonna lag a little bit behind what we currently know.

So they're all wrong.

Just remember that.

There we go.

Oops.

So one of the things that the group of local governments is working on with respect to the purpose and scope rules specifically is trying to expand what we're looking at.

So we're not just looking at chlorophyll A, but we're looking at other things that tell us about the health of Falls Lake.

Um we will also revel the reevaluate the chlorophyll A levels in the lake because that is the current standard that the state has.

Um, and then we are also trying very hard to make sure that the city, as well as all the other local governments, get credit for anything that was done since 2006.

So obviously the city has invested a lot of money in multiple places.

I work with stormwater, but also with wastewater to try to meet these nutrient reductions.

And we want to make sure that we're still getting credit for that, um, which is not a given.

So the state reports that I mentioned in the previous slide, all of those would still have to happen.

We might be changing the frequency because it is a little hard to get a five-year report out of them.

Um, and these new rules are supposed to be recognizing the new methods that the state is using, where all rules have to be readopted every 10 years.

So instead of adopting these rules for a very long time, um, they are going to be re-looked at in 10 years, and we are fully expecting them to change in 10 years.

So you'll be having presentations about this again in 10 years.

Now we go.

Okay.

The next rule that's important for the city is new development.

Um you guys hear about this lots, so I don't have a lot to put on this slide.

New development, any new development that's going in in the city doesn't just have to have sediment and rosure control measures at the site.

They also have to have stormwater control measures that are supposed to be there in the long term.

Those should be functioning for at least 50 years.

Um, and they have to be designed and built for any kind of development in the city, not just residential, but commercial, industrial, institutional, all of it.

They have to have stormwater control measures.

The rule is very specific on this.

So the targets for those stormwater control measures, what they discharge, the numbers are up there.

I will say that the 0.33 pounds per acre per year of total phosphorus is a very tough standard.

Um, and the complaints that we hear from developers are usually about that phosphorus standard.

Um a lot of the developments, maybe not most of them, a lot of the developments that happen around the city of Durham and certainly within the city proper where it is now, um, have to buy offset credits for phosphorus because they can't meet that phosphorus target on site.

So that is a problem because the offset credits are actually really difficult to make.

Um they buy those credits either from a state bank or from a private bank.

Both of them do that, but both banks have been having issues getting credits that are available for developers to buy.

So that is something that these the new rules are gonna try to address is the fact that developers can't get those phosphorus credits.

There's a scarcity there.

Um, and I have the rural single lot development thing on here, which you probably saw last fall.

Just because of all the rules that are in the Falls Lake package or the Jordan Lake package, the ones that the General Assembly tends to bother the most are the ones with new development.

So we can expect some change to happen roughly every two years with the new development rules.

So whatever goes into place in 2027 will probably change in 2029.

The other section that's really important to the city is existing development.

This one really has more weight for the city proper.

So once the development development is in, these are houses that have been built for a long time in the city.

If they were built before the new development rules were in effect, they are they are generating nutrient loads, right?

So the onus on reducing the loads for existing development, which would include City Hall, actually, is on the city proper.

So we are supposed to be doing something as a city to reduce nitrogen phosphorus from the existing developed lands within the watershed.

That is really hard.

And during the rulemaking in 2020, 2010, this was actually one of the big elephants in the room because there wasn't really any science that said that we could do that, that we can meet that goal.

There was certainly science that says we can make things better by putting stormwater control measures in.

And there was not a lot of cost information.

So the information that we gave the council at the time was very much supposition for how much it might cost.

And our numbers were in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

There is a schedule on this one.

It looks like it's being covered by the closed caption, but there's an implementation schedule for each one of these rules.

So just because the rules are passed today doesn't mean that we have to meet them tomorrow.

There's always some time period to get things done.

And I'll talk a little bit more about that.

With existing development as well, I have starred on here accounting for nitrogen and phosphorus.

So this was one of the first rules that made the local governments actually count every pound that is being reduced by a stormwater control measure.

Not that any of us knew how to do that.

We had to discover how to do that after the rules were passed.

And we found that that was it was not a good way to go.

It was very difficult to calculate, it was often off by some amount of number and the stormwater control measures that they thought would get more reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus when we actually started calculating it.

So the state has a tool that they use to help us do that.

It's called the SNAP tool, and I think we're up to SNAP five, maybe SNAP six, just since these rules were adopted.

So in the 15 years since these were adopted, we were we've had five different tools to do this.

So you all have heard about the IAIA, the alt, let's see, the interim alternate implement implementation alternative, good God.

Investment approach, yes.

Um that was a plan that the Upper Noose River Basin Association local governments came up with to switch from counting pounds to counting dollars invested.

And Councilmember Caballero will remember this.

It took years for us to get that in place and to get the state to accept that as an alternative.

That has been working.

Um the upper new local governments have spent something like five times more than we had to spend.

So things are getting on the ground.

Generally speaking, I think folks are pretty happy with it.

The environment is like that a lot better than counting pounds as well.

So what we're going to try to do with this new rulemaking is codify that so that we don't have to go through as much effort as we did before to have an investment-based approach.

Um the state still wants to have an option for counting pounds.

I don't know why they think anybody would do that, but they want that option, so it will also be in the rules.

And right now we're thinking that this investment-based compliance will be either as a group or as an individual.

So if the city wanted to do that by themselves, they could, or if we wanted to do it with the other local governments, we could do that too.

So that's a future decision that you all will need to make.

Okay, the elephant in the room.

Um I kind of hinted to this in the fall that the wastewater issue was looming large.

It is still looming large.

Um the wastewater plants, all of the wastewater plants in the watershed, the big ones which of which there are three in Durham's is one of the big ones, and there's a handful of smaller ones, all have numbers of pounds again that they can discharge, period.

I'm gonna say it's 10,000 pounds, so they can do easy math.

That's all they can discharge, period.

Regardless of what comes in, regardless of what kind of treatment is offered.

They have 10,000 pounds.

They also have a schedule for when they had to implement all of the wastewater treatment plants, exceeded the schedule time and exceeded the amount that they needed to reduce, but the entire region is continuing to grow.

And the wastewater that is treated at a wastewater plant is coming from the people and the businesses that move to the area.

So as we increase what's going into the plant, there's going to be a corresponding increase is what's going out of the plant, right?

And the current rules do not adequately account for more people moving to the region, more businesses moving to the region, and the need for more wastewater capacity in terms of discharging nitrogen and phosphorus.

We are kind of at an impasse on that right now.

Hopefully, something will break soon.

Okay, watershed investment.

So one of the things that came out of the upper noose local governments was yes, we will agree to having more wastewater, agree to negotiating for more wastewater capacity, but in return, we need to have more investment in watershed projects.

So that because there's not a one-to-one offset.

I think I mentioned this before.

So you can't invest in a stormwater control measure and get another 10,000 pounds, for example.

If you invest in a stormwater control measure, you might get 300.

So there's not a one-to-one thing there.

But there was put on the table that there needs to be watershed investment.

That is still in the plan for the upper noose rules.

Um I think that has moved to the plan for the state rules.

What that number is going to be hasn't been decided yet.

That is the Upper Noose River Basin Association for those of you who don't know.

All of those local governments are in that association.

That's all that's there for.

Okay, so what does that mean the city is going to have to do?

So this gets a little bit to the implementation schedule.

Um almost always the rules will either they will have adopt and implement a new ordinance.

So the city may have to do that.

Obviously, that will come to you.

Um we might have to develop and implement a new program.

We might have to modify anything that's existing, and a modification to an ordinance would have to come to you.

Um particular, those things also have to be approved by the state.

So normally the department who's leading the development of the ordinance will go back and forth with the state multiple times before it will bring an ordinance to you for approval, which doesn't mean that you have to accept it.

It just means that it's already gone through a lot of back and forth discussion.

Um I have the city attorney's office listed on my very, very simplified flow chart because whenever we're adopting ordinances, we work really closely with the attorney's office to make sure that we are getting things correct and getting our language correct.

Um we do always take those to the city manager before they come to you, and then you can approve them.

The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission also has to approve those ordinances.

So even if we've worked with the staff people at the state level, all of these ordinances go to the environmental management commission for approval as well.

So there's a lot that's involved there.

Again, having an expectation that something is implemented immediately after a rule is adopted, doesn't fit even my simplified flow chart here.

We can't do that in a month.

We can't even usually do that in six months.

So that's just something to keep in mind.

Um if you start to hear somebody saying that something needs to be implemented immediately, it it can't be implemented immediately.

Reporting, which is my last bullet there.

Um, I wish I could say our reports get fewer or smaller, but they keep getting bigger and more complicated.

Um so we we have staff that literally stop doing their jobs for a month or two just to generate the information that goes in reports because we have a significant number of reports to do.

Um good for everybody else because it's easy for people to hold our feet to the fire, hold us accountable, we tell you exactly what we've been doing and what what benefit that's been.

It just takes a very long time to get all that together.

And I think that, oops, nope.

Okay, so why am I here today?

Um there is a very serious movement to petition the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission with an alternate set of rules that is not consistent, not fully consistent with what the division of water resources is developing.

While we are continuing to try to work with the state, there are a couple of places where we are really diverging, one of which is that wastewater issue.

Um I think I think pretty much everything else we can find some kind of middle ground.

Obviously, we're going to give a little bit, they're going to give a little bit, but the wastewater issue is going to be a big one.

And just depending on how things go in those negotiations, the Upper Noose River Basin Association is ready to petition the Environmental Management Commission with a different set of rules.

And that is allowed by state law.

We can petition the Environmental Management Commission to adopt a separate set of rules.

If the Upper Noose River Basin Association board members decide that that is the route to go, I will be back here very fast.

And I needed to not go through all of what I just went through with you, because you will need to make a decision fast about whether or not to approve, excuse me, approve that submittal of a petition or not.

So that is why I'm here now.

That could happen, the petition could happen as soon as April.

Or it could, or we could all feel like things are still progressing and everybody is working together and we're trying to get a new to a new middle on all of the rules, including wastewater.

But as of today, this is still very much an option that is on the table with the Upper Noose River Basin Association to actually petition for rulemaking with the rules that the local governments have come up with in consultation with the agricultural community and the environmental community and the Department of Transportation and others.

There have been a lot of people who have been sitting at the table with us.

Oh, and the development community, I shouldn't leave them out.

They've been at the table as well while we've been trying to develop these rules.

So once the environmental environmental management commission can choose to move on the petition, or they can choose to move on the rules that the state is developing.

Once they decide what they're going to move forward with, they still have to go through their normal process.

The process isn't any different.

That depends on how they get the rules.

The process is the same if they choose our rules or if they choose DWR rules.

The only thing I would say is once they actually start to move to hearing, their ability to change a lot of things is significantly diminished.

So if they're going to change something, they will usually change it before they go to public hearings.

In the past, I know we've had city council members go to the public hearings with staff and make comments.

So that would be something that I would float through the city manager's office and Gina, who's my DCM, to get you that information if that would be something that you would like to do.

And I'm pretty sure that is my last slide.

Yes, I have to fix something on that, so I'm going to go backwards.

So, questions.

Thank you, Mayor.

I'll jump in first.

So first of all, um thanks, Michelle, for the presentation.

I forgot when we were at the meeting on on Wednesday that you were going to be here today to present this.

And actually, you may not have been here in the beginning.

I actually gave a quick preview that like Michelle is going to be here.

We were at a long meeting on Wednesday, so thanks for being here.

Thanks for all the um all that you've taught me about Falls Lake and all the sort of water stuff and science.

I really appreciate that.

So I know you guys get tired of hearing this from me, but I am also this the council's representative to the Upper News River Basin Association.

Um a couple of things I wanted just to highlight.

Um you talked about 2006 as the baseline year.

Can you just share for the folks in the audience in the council like how we've reduced dramatically our discharges of nitrogen and phosphorus since 2006 through our wastewater treatment plants?

It's a lot of effort we've gone through, right?

Right.

So the wastewater treatment plants, um, they had a a numeric reduction that they had to make.

They made that reduction.

They exceeded that reduction by, oh, collectively, probably 40,000 pounds a year or something like that.

I think it is around 40,000 pounds.

They exceeded it so far that there actually was less of a push to do the existing development rules.

And that's one of the reasons why we were able to get this investment-based approach through the state was because the wastewater plants had given us so much room in terms of nutrients.

Um, so the state was willing to listen to something else because the reductions had already happened.

Yeah, that's great.

And then in terms of why this is important for us to hear, and you mentioned that you may come back to us and say, hey, we're gonna need your support for these the rules that we're developing with Upper News River Basin Association.

Just want to council to know that we pay this one of the best investments we make.

We pay about 160,000 a year to be part of the UNRBA.

We're one of maybe like 16 jurisdictions in those five counties.

Um that includes these are rural folks, urban folks, a range of folks.

Um it's allowed us to have, and you can correct if I'm wrong on this.

We have some of the strictest stormwater controls in the state right here in Durham.

And so can you talk more about the process once the beyond the Environmental Management Commission?

This will go to the Rules Review Commission.

And there's a process there where if we get enough enough comments, that could get kicked to the legislature.

So what's the as we look ahead to this process in 2027?

Like what's the risk that we're looking at in Durham, given that we have these strict stormwater controls?

If this were to go to the Rules Review Commission with more than 10 commons and get kicked to the legislature, what are we looking at there?

Okay.

So the process after the Environmental Management Commission takes the rules out to hearing is that the hearing officers will come back and convene.

There's usually two or three of them.

They'll convene, they'll go over all the comments that they got from the public and from the local governments and they will try to make tweaks.

Remember, I told you they can't make big changes at that point, but they'll try to make tweaks to address the things that they heard.

Once they finish and they approve the rules, they go to the Rules Review Commission, which is a State Commission of completely different people, not usually environmental lawyers, but all attorneys who will review the rules according to what the state wants to see for clarity.

But if somebody still objects to the rule package at that point, they can file an objection with the Rules Review Commission.

Ten objections at the Rules Review Commission means that the rules will automatically go to the General Assembly.

And once they go to the General Assembly, the General Assembly makes the decisions about what stays in, what goes out, they can they can change anything.

The Rules Review Commission and the Environmental Management Commission have their hands tied a little bit more.

So if the rules are adopted, let's say in the spring of 2027, assuming that we stay with the DWR rules, there could still be an entire year between those rules and final rules if there are 10 objections filed.

They can come from anywhere.

It doesn't matter if they get 10 letters of objection from anybody, then they automatically go to the General Assembly.

It's like making sausage.

And I guess my follow-up question on that.

So to what extent have we have we already, and this is for for Kim or other staff, have we already do our do our lobbies already know about this?

Are they aware this is coming down the road a year from now?

The city lobbyists?

Because we don't know where this is going to go, but at least they are the they at least aware that this is something that could be happening next year.

And if not, should we let the question?

I don't know.

So should we connect that with uh Carmesha Wallace, who had to step out for the retreat, but um but we'll I'll update her screen.

Yeah, we'll do that.

Great.

Thanks again, Michelle.

Really appreciate it.

Thank you.

Are there any other questions?

All right, thank you so much, Michelle.

Thank you.

All right.

Uh next is on digital equity plan.

Thank you.

Okay, good afternoon.

Um, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tim, Council members and colleagues.

Um my name is Patrice Carroll, and I'm the digital inclusion program manager.

And today I'm here with our partner, Digital Durham, to provide an update on digital equity plan.

It is my pleasure to introduce Laura Fogle, the founder and board chair of Digital Durham.

Laura is a dedicated leader in digital inclusion and educational technology.

With extensive experience in both the public and private sectors, Laura has been a vital force in technology and education for many years.

A longtime resident of Durham for over 20 years, she founded Digital Durham and is also serves as a member of the North Carolina Digital Equity and Inclusion Collaborative.

Laura holds a bachelor's degree in engineering from Duke University and a master's degree in instruction of technology from NC State.

Prior to her current role, she worked for Durham Public Schools for 10 years before becoming the director of the Media and Education Technology Resource Center at NC State's College of Education.

She has presented on digital inclusion and technology integration at various local, state, and national conferences.

In 2022, Laura was honored with the Governor's Volunteer Service Award for her work with Digital Durham.

With over two decades of experience, bridging technology education and community engagement, Laura offers invaluable insight into how we can ensure that all residents benefit from the opportunities of the digital age.

Please join me in welcoming Laura Fokel.

Thank you so much, Patrice.

Good evening.

I think it's evening now, not afternoon anymore.

Good evening, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Manager, City Council, and City Staff.

Thanks for hanging in here with us.

I'm excited to be here and share an update on the digital equity plan.

So I'll give you a little timeline, history, go through the goals of the digital equity plan quickly, aligned with the city's current strategic plan, and then talk about our current activities and future challenges.

So Digital Durham is a nonprofit that serves as the backbone for Durham's digital equity collaborative.

So our member organizations are on this slide, and we work with our member organizations to create really a comprehensive network of organizations to address digital equity from many different perspectives.

And we work not just with our members but other organizations in the community who do digital inclusion work of some kind.

And so I'm really bringing good news to you about the progress that we've made on comprehensively addressing digital equity and closing the digital divide in Durham.

So Digital Durham was founded before the pandemic shone a light on this issue of the digital divide.

But the planning for the digital equity plan really was kicked off in the summer of 2020 with a digital equity convening.

Mayor Schul was there, and we brought together invited community members to be part of the planning.

We met every week for a year to create the plan and we got other input from the community as well, not just the people who were sitting as the planning group.

So in fall of 2021, we brought that plan to City Council and to the Durham County Commissioners, and it was endorsed by both.

So this is not Digital Durham's plan, it is Durham writ large's plan.

And the very next year we were recognized by the National Digital Inclusion Association as a digital inclusion trailblazer.

We Durham, not we digital Durham.

And I'm really excited to be able to formally announce that we've we've been selected or awarded digital inclusion trailblazer status as a city as a community every year since, including this year.

Thank you to Patrice's uh group for that work.

And we are the only municipality in North Carolina to get visionary digital inclusion trailblazer status, and we've gotten it two years in a row.

Um so great, great work that we're doing all together.

Um the city had the foresight to create the digital inclusion community engagement manager.

I think that was the title at the time, um, in the fall of 2022, and that is what has morphed into the role that Patrice fills now.

So moving forward after we had the plan, um, we needed to find funding for efforts to reach the goals.

Um, one of the ways that Digital Durham has helped with this is we brought together partners to apply for the Digital Champion grant, which was funded through the State uh Department of Information Technology.

Digital Durham did not receive funds with that, but the City of Durham did receive funds, and other community partners in Durham did receive funds for that.

And as a part of our role in that grant was really to get community feedback and community engagement and input.

And we shared what we found through those community listening sessions, talking to people with lived experiences and leaders of organizations.

At a town hall in the fall of 2024, Mayor Williams was there to give opening remarks and really again engage the whole community around this issue.

About the same time we were signing the contract for the ARPA work that Digital Durham was going to do, and also Cramden, one of our member organizations is doing implementing a digital equity project through ARPA funding.

We created a curriculum that I'm really excited about and started identifying our community-based organizations.

And I'll talk a little bit about implementation in just a second of what comes next.

So here are the four goals, right?

So there's two about universal access, one about digital skills, and one about implementing the plan.

So putting the access goals together for broadband and devices.

So this goal is really about economic prosperity and well-being for our fellow residents of Durham.

As we all know, right, uh technology empowers economic prosperity these days.

So whether it's applying for a job online, whether you have your own, you're an entrepreneur, you have your own business.

Even if it's a bricks and mortar business, you need right, you need online accounting software, you need to market yourself through social media.

So all kinds of economic prosperity are really driven through our online engagement and and our well-being, right?

So telehealth appointments, being able to connect with community members, family members, all of those things really require us to have a device and broadband of some kind.

So we've made fantastic progress on this since 2019.

So according to so this is using census data from 2024, which is what was just released a few weeks ago.

So we have 94.4 of Durham County households have some kind of broadband.

So this is at the at the looking at the county level.

So we have less than 6% of households that have not adopted broadband.

So that's great progress.

So the device access is goal two.

We've made fantastic progress there.

Also, we've reduced the so this is the percentage of households that do not have a computer.

So we've reduced that by more than 50%.

So we now have 97% of households have a device.

Of course, if you think about your own households, one device is not enough for most households.

That could mean, you know, if you have multiple students in the household, that one's able to do their homework while another one is waiting.

Um if adults are maybe wanting to do online banking, another one's waiting because they have to have a meeting for their an online meeting for work.

Um we know that one device per household really isn't enough, but at least we're making progress on that baseline.

Goal three is about the skills to use that technology that we have.

And this is really about workplace skills, right?

We again, this is empowerment of our fellow residents.

If you have the devices, but you don't know how to get to your health portal, or you don't know how to navigate the city of Durham's website, then having just the access doesn't do you any good.

Um so it's important that we're helping to people to build their basic skills and also level up those skills.

There's documentation that digital skills are required for most jobs, and I believe that the some of the income gap that uh the United Way of Greater Triangle was just uh released a report about that.

I think part of the gap between uh people who are out of state and in-state residents, and that um income gap can be attributed to differences in digital skills.

So we've made progress again on digital skills.

This one is a little harder for us to quantify, but I can tell you that the community-based organizations in Durham have really stepped up to address this issue.

Um and many of them were doing work in this area before we had a digital equity plan.

But since the plan, I know of at least 12 new digital literacy initiatives to impact people who are historically on the other side of the digital divide.

So I listed some of the covered populations.

These were populations that were identified in the Federal Digital Equity Act.

Um we know from uh national statistics that these are groups that are are tend to be more impacted by lack of digital skills.

Um so we're really proud of the the new initiatives that we've put in place around digital skills.

Goal four is about implementing this plan with fidelity, having accountability to our community, and really planning for the sustainability of this work.

Um, just like the city strategic plan is uh interested in building trust in the community around the the city's work.

If we create programs one day and then take them away the next, it really undermines trust in the community that we have their best interest at heart.

Um so we've digital Durham has worked really um tirelessly on this per this portion of the uh digital equity plan.

Um we have regular meetings that the that are open to the community that community-based organizations that are in the digital inclusion work participate in, where we share best practices, get input, and we've also had other venues where we've gotten input from the community, here heard from people with lived experience, and included that in our planning for the initiatives.

Um I mentioned some of the national recognition that Durham has gotten for this work.

Digital Durham itself has also been recognized.

Um the state digital equity plan mentioned digital Durham as a exemplar specifically.

Um we are the uh one of very few digital equity collaboratives that's literally on the map.

Um the National Digital Inclusion Alliance has a map, um, and we are one of very few local collaboratives that has been recognized in that way.

And um, some of our uh some municipalities in nearby places in North Carolina and and outside North Carolina have come to Digital Durham and have also come to Patrice for advice on digital equity planning and for running collaboratives because of the success that we've had.

So we're not resting on our laurels with all the accolades and positive attention because we're about serving the the people of Durham and really um achieving the goals of this plan.

Um so the things that are currently underway, the computer club, which is our ARPA project.

We have all of the CBOs are selected.

We have MOUs from four of them.

So I'm only going to read the names of those four because we don't have the contract inked for the fifth yet, but it's coming.

The Durham Literacy Center, Stanford L.

Warren Library, StudentU, Families Moving Forward are our community-based partners.

So we really intentionally didn't spin up like this new separate program.

We want to work through community-based organizations who have trust relationships in the community and build their capacity to close the digital divide, not try to start something new.

So we're trying to build their capacity.

So the digital navigators that are in those community-based organizations are being trained in January.

And then in February is when residents will start to be trained in the community-based organizations by the digital navigators.

We're having a kickoff event on February 25th that we're excited about.

If any of you are interested in coming to that kickoff event, I'll be happy to share the details with you about that.

We provided input to NCDIT's next digital opportunity survey that is supposed to be launched sometime this month.

And we're updating the digital equity plan with the changes in the landscape that have happened since 2020 that have been huge.

And also with the input that we've heard from the community to reflect that in the plan.

So the future, I I wish the future was so bright.

I had to wear shades.

But we have some challenges ahead.

New technology can broaden that divide.

So AI is a big concern that we hear from the community.

AI literacy skills.

Also cybersecurity, bad actors are continuing to get more sophisticated.

And so we need to try to keep our community members safe by improving the training that we're doing around cybersecurity.

All of this takes money.

And we have, because of the changes in federal support and attention to this topic.

So that is stretched thin.

And the ARPA funding for uh the projects that we were just talking about, that that ends the end of this year when that funding ends.

So we do have that cliff approaching.

Um we really believe in Durham that technology can be a bridge and and not a divide, and we don't want this great systemic progress that we've made to start to unravel for lack of funding.

So I'd love to hear how you all see this work intersecting with the city's priorities and how we can work together to continue the great work that's being done, not just by Digital Durham, but throughout Durham throughout our network.

I'll take questions.

That's my last slide.

Well, first of all, thank you for this extremely important work.

I have seen you guys in action, and I'm grateful for that.

I just want to say off the gate.

Rather than just creating a new arm or new branch to do a new idea.

Uh so I think that what you all are doing are making is making our community better.

So uh thank you.

Thank you for that.

Thank you.

Colleagues.

Yeah, I want to echo the mayor's comments.

Thanks for the presentation and all the good work you're doing.

Um, you know, and I like the way you frame this as part of shared economic prosperity, right?

It's a key way that people can either in some cases work become entrepreneurs.

It's all part of how you connect to the economy.

So this is helping our our community thrive and the work you're doing is really critical to that so I want to thank you for that.

You've got a great set of partners here that you're working with and so I'm proud of this work and look forward to how seeing how we can support this in the future.

Thank you very much.

Oh they're Wi-Fi devices that are like individual devices.

Patrice do you want to talk about that?

Just out of curiosity portable internet to have access um it's really bad I mean I'm like the millennial that uses tech support the most so I I really yeah don't look to me for any knowledge.

I think that it's it's something that we like I feel like a lot of communities kind of thought would just naturally sort of occur with the changes that were ongoing and it doesn't really work like that.

And so I just so appreciate and kudos to y'all for how well your strategy has been received and other communities that are benefiting from the work y'all have been doing just really appreciate the like care and attention that y'all have put into it.

Thank you so much for y'all's work though.

All right well thank you all so much I believe that that is all we have today and we've done our closed session so I'm going to call the meeting uh to adjurance the week oh to settle the agenda I'm sorry I'm trying to rush out of here all right uh I'll pass it over to the uh the manager to settle up the mayor for settling the agenda I have gone consent items one through nine and eleven on JBA item ten and on JBA public hearings item 14 through 19 all right an attorney motion to settle the agenda properly second all in favor all right colleagues I look forward to seeing you all uh shortly and then again tomorrow we'll say that tomorrow at 8 a.m there will be a press conference on uh the conditions of the uh the weather conditions so uh where is that gonna be here in the chamber in the chambers eight o'clock and then we gather at what time we gather at 8 30 at the retreat center yeah dinners at six tonight right six o'clock yep and six o'clock you'd like it there or something I just wanted you to know this gonna I'll meet you at the uh center yeah it'll be uh just really an opportunity for staff to share what they share today to the uh general public all right I'll see you guys in about uh yeah forty minutes good night I survey I mean I don't need to be certain