Edmond City Council Workshop on Downtown Edmond - August 24, 2026
Edmond City Council Workshop on Downtown Edmond - August 24, 2026
The Edmond City Council held a workshop on August 24, 2026, to discuss various topics related to downtown Edmond, including defining the downtown area, reviewing the 2014 Downtown Master Plan and subsequent developments, future planning efforts, tax increment finance (TIF) districts, and city-owned properties. The council provided direction to staff on updating the master plan, focusing on the festival marketplace as a standalone effort, and exploring TIF modifications.
Discussion Items
-
Definition of Downtown: Council members shared their views on the boundaries of downtown. There was general agreement on a core area but divergence on including areas east of Boulevard, the UCO campus, and extending south to 9th Street. Council discussed whether boundaries are needed for planning vs. legal purposes. Staff (Ken Bryan, Director of Planning) noted that for planning, lines can be fuzzy.
-
2014 Downtown Master Plan Review: Staff presented highlights of the 2014 plan, including catalytic infill projects, pedestrian enhancements, and district branding. Council noted positive changes since 2014, such as increased housing and vibrancy, while preserving historic character.
-
Future Planning Efforts: Council unanimously supported updating the downtown master plan and also supported a standalone effort for the festival marketplace. Topics to be included: housing, mobility, streetscape, parking, open space, infrastructure, economic development, and specific items like a boutique hotel, public art, gateway signage, and improved landscaping. Council emphasized the need to involve local stakeholders like businesses and the farmers market.
-
Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Districts: Lena Dozier, Economic Development staff, reviewed the existing downtown TIF (adopted 2020, 20-year term, 7 projects). Council expressed support for exploring new TIF districts, including one for the UCO master plan area and one for the festival marketplace, potentially extending to 25 years. Council emphasized TIF must be tied to direct revenue commitments from developers.
-
City-Owned Properties: Staff listed sites (A-F) and sought high-level direction. Council discussed:
- Sites D (old council chambers) and E (City First): premature until relocation of remaining departments (legal, risk management) to the new building is complete. Urgency to finish the building and move staff.
- Site A (parking lot) and Site C: need improvement and maintenance; potential for gathering spaces.
- Third Street (Mobile Meals): maintain current use and improve maintenance.
- Council expressed low patience for ugly, vacant properties like Sites D and the parking lots. They want to avoid further delay and consider redevelopment options for some sites, possibly with hotel or mixed-use, but cautious about long-term city needs.
- Staff to synthesize feedback and bring back a range of options for properties A, B, C, D, and F.
Key Outcomes
- Unanimous Support: Council unanimously approved updating the 2014 Downtown Master Plan.
- Separate Festival Marketplace Study: Council agreed to pursue a standalone planning effort for the festival marketplace, with smaller-scale improvements rather than wholesale redevelopment.
- TIF Exploration: Council supported examining modifications to the downtown TIF, including potential new districts for UCO and festival marketplace, with emphasis on direct revenue linkage.
- City Properties Next Steps: Staff will develop a plan to complete relocation of city departments to the new building within 60-90 days, and will come back to council with a range of redevelopment options for city-owned sites, while maintaining the Third Street site for Mobile Meals.
- Other Directions: Council prioritized improvements to landscaping, light poles with hanging basket capability, public art, and gateway signage. They also emphasized preserving downtown's charm, improving communication with businesses, and lowering barriers to redevelopment.
Meeting Transcript
Ready? Okay. I'd like to call the Edmund City Council workshop on August 24th, 2026 to order. Item two on our agenda today is an only item on the agenda today. Is discussion of topics related to downtown Edmund. Including do we pick them up one at a time, or do we want to just read through them and then go? Well read through them, then we'll just go on. Sure, I'll read through them, then we can just go because I don't know where we're gonna wander on this. Um discussion regarding what area constitutes downtown Edmond. Discussion regarding the 2014 downtown master plan and investments, projects, and activities that have occurred since the 2014 downtown master plan was approved. Discussion regarding future downtown Edmund planning efforts and other citywide planning efforts that would affect downtown Edmund. Discussion regarding tax increment finance districts in downtown Edmund, discussion regarding current potential future of uses of city-owned properties in downtown Edmund, and discussion of prioritized actions and next steps related to downtown Edmund. So Mr. Bryan, you're sitting right there. I'm guessing you're gonna start us off. Yes, thank you. Uh Ken Bryan, director of planning. Um I just want to start by saying a lot of staff have contributed to assembling the information we're gonna go through today. We've tried to design this workshop to be highly discussion-based, so feel free to um interrupt and interject at any point. I've got some natural pauses in here to uh solicit discussion and feedback from from the council. So as we get going, quick reminder the purpose of this workshop, we think um we're trying to provide a shared framework for downtown and a related discussions. We're gonna highlight recent activity and successes and catch up on applicable planning efforts that have occurred in the past 12 or so years, and then see if we can have a discussion about prioritizing short-term, long-term, and maybe even medium or uh long-term actions and initiatives. As a quick reminder, I think the reason we're here is the council's strategic initiatives include three major bullet points related to downtown, update of the 2014 master plan, identify and evaluate city-owned properties, and produce a plan that supports an enhanced festival marketplace. So jumping right in, we had a council mapping activity. So everyone, um, council members are invited to map out what they believe to be the area they consider to be downtown. So you've got a handout in front of you that shows two versions of this exercise. Um, the one on the screen is designed to overlay all five responses onto one map. So it's easy to point out that there are uh a wide agreement in where the you know the downtown is in the kind of the downtown core, Stevenson Park area, um the area south of Edmund Road and west of the railroad tracks, um sometimes affectionately referred to as the PaCon Grove, and working your way over to Fretz. I think areas of discussion that we're interested to um to hear from the council on would be um particularly south and east of Boulevard and second. So you can see an area there, Capitol View neighborhood and Clager, and that has not traditionally been included in the urban district. Um a discussion about how far north downtown might extend, whether it in fact includes UCO in the area around the campus. Um so with kind of that as a setup, I would invite um I would invite council to kind of weigh in on on their thoughts, and I'll try to take that. I'm just glad to see that we all have an exact agreement on what downtown is um thoughts. Well, my my first thought when I look at this, and and I know we've tried for years, other councils, the city, everyone tries to include east of a boulevard toward the campus as part of downtown. I think I'd be lucky to find a hundred residents of Edmund that think of that as downtown, and especially since UCO is now going to we'll have to see what they do, but it's the university district. I see nothing wrong with calling that the university district or Bronco blocks or whatever you want to call it. I I think that the thoughts about making it walkable, leading into proper transition and what we want in there is great, but but I just feel like we're trying to cram a square peg into a round hole that there's nobody in their mint mental mind thinks of that as downtown. Except that I had a meeting last week with someone who said I live in downtown Edmund, and she lives one block east of Boulevard. So you found one people, there are a few people out there. You found one over. Of course, then we'll have a problem if we say it stops at Boulevard. We can't call or can we call the current library the downtown library? Because then it wouldn't be in downtown. Closest there too. So it might help me to talk about why it matters what we what we call downtown. I know we've got like various overlaying districts that are intended for different things, like TIFF and Opportunity Zone, and so are we just trying to nail down like what we want the downtown master plan to cover. It seems like maybe there are definitions for different purposes. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but I think why does it matter? I think that'd be a part of it for you to tell us what you think represents uh the poor part of downtown. We started talking about like a lot of other topics where we have maybe more wants and needs than we have resources.
openpublica.com