The Elgin City Council convened on July 22, 2026, for a Committee of the Whole session at 5:00 PM and a Regular Council meeting at 7:00 PM. The agenda included several street resurfacing resolutions, an SRO agreement, and a significant debate on a conditional use permit for a downtown haunted house attraction.
Committee of the Whole / Resolutions (Items A-F)
Proclamations
Evil Intentions Haunted House (Other Business Items 1 & 2)
Elgin Sports Complex Expansion Grant (Item 3)
Identifies the city's plan for allocating its motor fuel tax funds for the construction and construction engineering services related to the improvements within this project. With this resolution, staff are presenting the project limits and scope of the work for the Shales Parkway and East Side Streets 2026 resurfacing project, as well as the estimates of for the cost of construction and the cost of construction engineering services related to the projects. This resolution is required because the city is using MFT funds for this particular resurfacing project. Move approval. Second. It's been moved and seconded for approval. Any discussion. Hearing none, Clerk, please call the rule. Council Member Zalfaro? Yes. Dixon? Yes. Good. Yes. Martinez? Yes. Ortiz? Yes. Powell? Yes. Stefan? Yes. Dorne? Yes. Mayor Captain. Yes. Motion's approved 90. Item B is the construction engineering services agreement with Fairgram for the 2026 Shales Parkway and East Side Street Resurfacing Project. This authorizes Fairgram to oversee the construction of the Shales Parkway and East Side Street Resurfacing Project, providing field inspection, design interpretation, contract administration, project coordination that will all ensure the timely and proper completion of the work. The project area includes east side streets, including portions of North Gifford Street, Jefferson Street, Martin Drive, Chippewa Drive, Duncan Avenue, River Bluff Road, Prospect Boulevard, Augusta Avenue, and the South continuation of Shales Parkway. This is also being funded with motor fuel tax revenue. Move for approval. Second. It's been moved to second or approval. Any discussion. Thank you. I just have a question for staff. Just clarification on the number because A and B are semi-link. And in A, the uh projected engineering costs that we had put the information to IDAT was 180,000, but this is 170,000. So I just wanted to make sure that it will stay 170 as of now. Um I I think that that's an estimate. So what happens when we put out the IDOT? That's we believe that it was going to be in 180. So yes, it's going to be the agreement with Fairgram is 170, so that's what the amount will be. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Anything else? Clerk, please call the roll. Council Member Zelcaro?