El Paso City and Firefighters Union Contract Negotiation Meeting - June 18, 2026
El Paso City and Firefighters Union Contract Negotiation Meeting - June 18, 2026
This meeting was a continued negotiation session between city representatives (Office of Management and Budget, Human Resources, and others) and the El Paso Firefighters Association (union) regarding the collective bargaining agreement. The city presented updated cost estimates and pay scales for its latest proposal, while the union presented administrative asks and a summary of its priorities. No votes were taken; the session focused on information sharing and discussion ahead of a future meeting.
Discussion Items
-
City Presentation of Proposals and Cost Estimates: The city’s budget director (name not given) reviewed the union’s April 17 and May 5 proposals. The union’s request to increase compensatory time accrual from 240 to 480 hours was estimated to cost $65.8 million over the life of the contract. The city’s previous proposal (April 17) offered 3% COLA for four years with step adjustments starting at step three (7% upfront increase). The new city proposal (presented at this meeting) increases COLA to 2.5% per year and adds a 5% step adjustment, totaling 7.5% upfront increase. Estimated cost: $10.5 million in the first year and $40.1 million over the contract life. Pay scales for 2028, 2029, and 2030 were shown, with starting firefighter salary rising from $50,640 to $54,506 (7.5% increase).
-
Specialty Teams Update: Randy Marker (city) noted current authorized specialty team members (196, paid per CBA) and proposed adding critical care and peer support members, bringing the total to 272 authorized.
-
ERI (Economic Research Institute) Study and Comparisons: Addisendigera (city manager’s office) presented updated ERI rankings: Lieutenant moved from 5 to 4 (then to 4 to 3) and Captain moved from 5 to 4 to 5 to 3. Union representatives questioned the accuracy of 2027 comparisons, noting that some cities (e.g., Phoenix, Corpus Christi) were omitted because their pay scales were not yet published, potentially inflating El Paso’s ranking. The city acknowledged this and stated they only use verified data, offering to continue updating as information becomes available.
-
Union’s Administrative Proposals: Union President Captain J. Nicholson presented eight items: (1) Limiting use of fire department personnel for non-firefighting/EMS functions; (2) Allowing electronic distribution of documents; (3) Categorizing station repairs by severity with timelines; (4) Prohibiting requirement to use personal electronic devices for city work; (5) Deleting an obsolete section; (6) Removing former EMS text on 40-hour operations; (7) Updating language for electronic deduction of union dues; (8) Creating a new article on labor-management committees (Medical Wellness Advisory, Professional Development, Paramedic Advisory, restructured Rules & Regulations and Fitness committees, expanding from 7 to 9 members).
-
Union’s PowerPoint Summary of Requests: Nicholson highlighted the union’s 7.5% annual increase demand (COLA and step), noting that many incentive pays (e.g., paramedic, bilingual) currently have zero pay. He called for cleanup of insurance/health and safety language, recognition of the peer support team as a specialty team, exploration of a healthcare trust (citing potential savings from House Bills 4144 and 198), changes to vacation/sick leave accrual (from 75 to 90 days), comp time alignment with FLSA, and improvements to discipline and promotional exams. Nicholson emphasized the department’s achievements: ISO Class 1 (only 504 of 30,000 departments), CPSE accreditation (337 worldwide, 128 also ISO Class 1), and high EMS volume, all done with less staffing and less money than NFPA 1710 standards.
Key Outcomes
- No votes or decisions were made; negotiations are ongoing.
- The next meeting is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, June 25, 2026, but may be rescheduled due to city budget briefings. The city will confirm dates.
- The union requested a copy of the city’s presentation slides.
- Both sides agreed to continue discussions on the ERI methodology and updating comparisons as data becomes available.
Meeting Transcript
Very good, good morning. Thank you for coming today. We have a short presentation. We're gonna go through what like we have done before. We'll do a recap of the union of your proposal, the cost of that, the estimated cost of the city proposals, and then we'll go over some specialty team data and some comparative analysis on the ERI to update with one of the new uh changes we made. It's going to change how those look for the lieutenants and captains as well. And then we'll pass it on to you. So with that, we'll get started. We'll go briefly through uh first couple of slides. This first slide is uh your proposal from uh April 17th for for April 7th. So the slide number 4 is uh your proposal from April 17th. So this is your proposal from May 5th. Uh so your new proposal core calls for a new section, comp time, creating a new section, establishing the criteria for the use of comp time uh to compensate employees for work performance beyond the their normal schedule, and then uh uh section 10 increase of maximum compensatory time accrual and payout uh limits upon separation uh from 240 to 480 hours. Next slide is the OMB estimation of the total variance uh between current contract and uh uh your proposal from uh from April 7th. Uh we are we are estimating the the variance for the uh increase of the compensatory time from 240 to 480. And uh I just want to mention that uh uh the variance is 65.8 million dollars for the life of the contract. The city proposal from uh April 17 was uh three percent from uh two percent cola for for four years, uh and adjustments to the entry levels of the of uh first steps. Uh so we start from the step three. Uh this will this is going to bring uh uh upfront increase of seven percent. So the next slide is uh comparison between union proposal from 4.7 uh with uh with the city proposal for for 4.17. It's 28 million dollars of difference. We have a new proposal. So our new proposal is uh increased cola to two and a half percent from the last from our last proposal for the uh period of four years, uh which means that the first and an adjustment of the steps will mean that uh the upfront decrease will be seven and a half percent. Um two and a half percent uh is in uh relation to uh consumer price index, CPIU for the urbanized uh uh communities. Uh right now uh it's 2.8 percent. 2.2 for Texas, 2.8 for uh United States. And then uh I will just read increase entry salary for firefighter, which includes removing step two and uh start at step three or five percent increase, fire suppression technician combining FS2 and FS3, but island chief, deputy chief and assistant chief remove step six and seven and start at step eight, at new step eleven to provide a five percent increase for the firefighter, fire suppression technician, lieutenant, captain, battalion chief, deputy chief, and assistant chief, uh flight medical paramedics assignment pay of five percent while working as a paramedic on an aircraft transport unit fire star. And if I may, Sasha. So it says add step eleven, it's really adding step 12, and you'll see that later in the pay scales. Yes, so our proposal is to shift the steps because right now they will start from three, so to shift the steps uh earlier, just to make it uh more logical. Okay, so the next uh slide is our estimation for our proposal. Uh so it's calling for two and a half percent step uh cola increases and five percent step increases in total seven and a half percent increases uh between both steps and uh colo increases. Uh first year we are estimating 10.5 million dollars of variance, uh and 40.1 million dollars for the for the life of the contract. These are the pay scales. So we are starting from 54. Right now the FS1 starts from 50, 640. So next year starting salary will be 54506, which is seven and a half percent increase. So these are pay scales for 2028, and also 2029. And the pay scales for 2030. So this is slide for uh specialty teams. Randy, yes, sir. We can talk about these. Good morning everyone, Randy Marker. Uh this is our specialty teams. The authorized team members are what we have now and are being paid in line with the CBA, and the actual team members are the difference, including the addition of the critical care and the peer support members. So we would be adding the difference between 196 of what we currently have and 272 with the two changes. Okay, good morning, Addisendigera with the city manager's office. Once again, the ERI is what we utilize to obtain the data in the comparisons that we've been collecting for other cities, and we did upgrade update the rankings. Um, sorry. There we go.
openpublica.com