Erie Town Council and Planning Commission Joint Study Session on Comprehensive Plan Land Use Scenarios - March 5, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Erie Town Council and Planning Commission Joint Study Session on Comprehensive Plan Land Use Scenarios - March 5, 2024\n\nThe Town Council and Planning Commission held a virtual special study session on March 5, 2024, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:26 p.m., to review draft land use scenarios for the update of Erie's Comprehensive Plan. Staff presented three draft scenarios (Status Quo, Commercial/Employment Focus, and Neighborhood Centers) along with key findings from economic market and land use fiscal analyses. The session was for discussion and direction; no formal votes were taken.\n\n### Discussion Items\n- Presentation of Key Findings: Staff summarized the economic market analysis by EPS, which showed Erie captured 92% of new retail development in its secondary market area since 2010, with a 2.5% vacancy rate (compared to 6.1% in the market area). Office vacancy was 1.6%, and industrial 0% (with higher rents). The fiscal analysis by Verdunity indicated that Erie's current development pattern (large-lot single family) is not paying for itself long-term; denser mixed-use and commercial properties generate positive net revenue per acre.\n- Draft Land Use Scenarios: Josh Campbell presented three scenarios for vacant and underutilized parcels (including some unannexed key properties in Scenarios B and C):\n - Scenario A (Status Quo): Continues current Comprehensive Plan land use designations with no boundary expansion. Projects ~28,000 new residents and ~11,600 new jobs at full build-out (no time frame).\n - Scenario B (Commercial/Employment Focus): Emphasizes regional commercial and primary employment (office/light industrial). Projects ~53,000 new residents and ~18,800 new jobs.\n - Scenario C (Neighborhood Centers): Focuses on walkable, mixed-use centers with higher density. Projects ~65,000 new residents and ~26,700 new jobs. This scenario has the lowest vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, but the highest demand for fee-in-lieu parks contributions.\n- Group Discussion: Council and Planning Commission members raised questions and provided feedback: Councillor Hoback asked about the status quo scenario's effect on existing entitlements and clarified that a former landfill parcel was mistakenly included in earlier maps. Councillor Bear sought clarification on population projections and water supply (staff noted utilities are planning for a 6% annual growth rate through 2040 with surplus). Councillor Harrison emphasized the need to clearly communicate trade-offs to residents, particularly fiscal sustainability and park maintenance costs. Mayor Pro Tem Lasson inquired about cost savings from moving the planning process in-house (staff cited deeper local knowledge and flexibility). Broad discussion touched on the changing nature of workspaces, the importance of bikeability/walkability, and the role of fee-in-lieu programs to optimize park land acquisition.\n\n### Key Outcomes\n- No formal votes were taken; the session was for input and direction.\n- Staff will use feedback to refine the three scenarios (including potential creation of a fourth scenario) and complete a fiscal impact analysis of each scenario with Verdunity.\n- The refined scenarios will be presented to the public in a final community engagement phase, followed by drafting of the Comprehensive Plan update.\n- Adoption hearings are targeted for summer 2024.\n- Staff committed to sharing updated slides, methodology details, and final consultant reports with both bodies.
Meeting Transcript
Thank you. Hello, and welcome to the March fifth, twenty twenty-four town council and planning commission joint study session. My name is Justin Brooks. I'm the mayor and um the presiding officer over this study session. I'm joined here with the planning commission chair, Mr. Tim Burns. Who is named Kelly Riskel because I said her the Zoom thing, but she's really Sarah Normella. Oh, is Sarah going to do it? I'm sorry. So uh I'm Sarah Normella, planning and development director, and I uh thank the town council and the planning commission for uh spending time with us tonight, our our team, which includes Kelly Driscoll, our planning manager and Josh Campbell, our senior planner. And uh we're going to be walking through some draft scenarios with all of you tonight is not uh to to talk about oh, we have these polished scenarios for you to consider and choose from. It's more of an opportunity for you all to weigh in on the direction in which we're headed with these scenarios. Our full expectation is to refine the scenarios that you're seeing today and to enhance some of the information around them. So, and we may end up with another scenario that you that might come up from conversation tonight. So I wanted to lay the ground for that with the expectation that we do want to have a dialogue and um we want to hear from you with respect to the kinds of things that the community you think that the community might be thinking or wanting to know is part of the information around these scenarios. And um yeah, that this is definitely a conversation and our next step is refinement and getting into um uh a much broader outreach with the community. So with that, I'm going to hand it off to Kelly Driscoll. Thanks, Sarah. And yes, thank you all for taking time tonight to to be with us. Um what we're gonna go over is um the project timeline where we're at um and where we're headed. Um some key findings from two of our consultants um on the economic market analysis and our land use fiscal analysis. We'll take a little break and do a little interactive activity. Um I emailed you around 6.15 a link. Um let me know if you did not get that. Um, and then um we will go into our draft scenarios. Um, wrapping up with next steps, and we'll we'll have time for um questions and discussion moves as well. So um most of you remember the the project started in late um 22. Um, and um we kind of um pivoted uh in that analysis phase as we um terminated our contract with our um our main consultant and moved the work in-house. Uh we are now in this third phase, the the visioning phase there, which is probably you know our largest in terms of effort and um timeframe. And throughout all of these um different phases, we've had periods of community engagement. Um, like Sarah said, um, we wanted to get your feedback as well as we're um we're meeting with the the PAC and the TAC on these scenarios before we go out um to the public in our what we're calling our final phase of engagement for the plan. Um so we are still on track to um have the draft plan, adoption hearings, all of that um in um summer this year. So um oh my goodness, sorry, skipped ahead there. Um moving on to the key findings. Our economic market analysis consultant um is EPS. And on the screen here, you see um the map of Erie in green, and then the uh the red boundary around it is what they've defined as our secondary market area, which is a 15-minute um drive time outside of Erie's boundaries. And some of the information they provided is really some some snapshots on um the commercial uh activity that we see within Erie. So for retail, um, since 2010, Erie has managed to capture 92% of that secondary market area's new retail development square footage, which is fantastic. Um our average rent is around $25 a square foot, and our vacancy is is pretty low at um two and a half percent, which is way below our secondary market area at um 6.1. Um, and this just goes into a little bit more detail as far as um comparison from 2010 to 2023 in that square footage and shows the annual growth rate for the town of Erie as well as the secondary market area. And we did have them look at our existing mixed use centers, so our downtown area and town center, so we could get an idea of um how those are performing in context. And then the table on the other side shows the uh rent changes for those areas. And the office market since 2010, we've captured almost 85%. And our vacancy rate is really low at 1.6%. We just don't, we don't have a lot of office in town. Downtown Erie vacancy is a little bit higher at 3%, but that's still well below our the secondary market area that's almost at 10% vacancy. As far as industrial, we've only captured about 55% of the market area since 2010. And this might be due to the fact that our um our average rent is a little bit higher than the secondary market area. Again, our vacancy rates are really low. We just don't have a whole lot of industrial available in the town, and what what we do have doesn't stay vacant for very long.
openpublica.com