All right, it's nine o'clock.

We'll get started.

This is the city plan commission meeting for Thursday, April 9th, 2026 for the city of Fort Worth.

Um we will begin with uh minutes, right?

Opening statement.

Yes, ma'am.

See, I forgot my cheat sheet, I don't know where to go.

Okay.

Good morning, and welcome to the April 9th, 2026 in-person meeting of the City of Fort Worth Plan Commission.

The Commission meets monthly in open session to get that public hearings on advertised cases.

Specific rules and procedures governing these hearings include the city subdivision ordinance, city plan commission rules, regulations and bylaws, and related provisions of the Texas state law.

The commission's primary responsibility are to review and act upon subdivision plans and plats, street and alley right away vacations and closures, annexations, comprehensive planning, and other land development issues affecting the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction area.

The commission is made up of 11 Fort Worth citizens, each of whom have been appointed by the city council.

A quorum of six of the 11 members must be present in order to conduct the commission's business.

Eleven members are present.

Therefore, the hearing may proceed.

Seated at the center of the table is Miss Caroline Kranz, the chair of the City Plan Commission.

Other commissioners members present today, or in and Commissioner Beardon, Commissioner Adams, Commissioner Lamberth, Commissioner Johnson, Commissioner Turner, Commissioner Henderson, Commissioner Reicher.

And Commissioner Kelly, Commissioner Reed, and Commissioner Gillette.

Staff members present today are Alex Johnson, Paul Rodriguez, Jessica Williams, Alex Johnson, Michelle Pinya, Barbara Siltero, and Representative from FIRE.

My name is Stephen Murray, plating manager and facilitator of today's meeting.

Copies of the meeting agenda and staff reports are included in the commission's docket and are available on the city's website.

The staff reports have been called compiled by the city's development review committee to inform the commission and applicants of city code requirements and technical issues associated with the cases to be heard.

Today's public hearing are to be are being documented by CAP.

Well, today's public hearing is in person.

To achieve an orderly and timely hearing, we request that you observe the following rules and procedures.

All cases are called.

Applicants and others in support of the case will be asked to present their testimony for a total of five minutes.

Opposing testimony will follow and be given a total of seven minutes.

The applicant will be allowed a two-minute rebuttal.

Each side will be allowed a collective total of seven minutes for initial presentation.

We have Barbara Soltero keeping the time today.

When you come up uh to the dais, please clearly state your name and city prior to addressing the commission.

All dialogue will occur only between the speaker and the commission.

Upon the chairman's initial close of the case, the commission will remain an open session to discuss and vote upon the case.

No further public testimony or commentary will be allowed.

Be advised that the commission's decision on plating man matters is final.

Action on the other docket items constitute a recommendation recommendation to the city council.

If you need additional information about a particular case, please call the development services department at 817-392-8027.

Thank you for your attention.

Mr.

Chair, our Ms.

Chair, Commissioners, the first order of business is the approval of the minutes for March 12th meeting.

All right, your minutes are in front of you.

Hopefully you had a chance to review them as well.

Um motion or discussion.

I move that we approve the previous meeting minutes from CPC on March 12th.

I second we have a motion by Commissioner Johnson and a second by um Commissioner Turner, I believe we were competing for that second.

We call a vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henderson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Richard, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillette, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Cranes, how do you vote?

Yes.

Great.

First case VA 26003, vacation of a portion of Curry Street right away and a portion of Weissenberger Street right away, adjacent to vlog 18, Weissenberger Edition, Council District 9.

General locations north of Whitmore Street, south of Wingate, East of Flooch, and west of Wimberley.

This case will be continued to next month due to the Urban Design Commission.

They need to meet before the Urban Design Commission prior to coming here.

I think next week they're meeting or when are they meeting the Urban Design Commission?

It's on the 16th, so they'll be coming on the 30th to uh for this case.

I think we still have to vote on it though.

So all right, do we have a motion?

District.

Yes, this is District 9.

Don't have district nine here.

Uh make a motion to continue VA26003 until consideration by the Urban Design Commission.

Second.

Motion by Commissioner Henderson, second by Commissioner Johnson.

If you'll call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henserson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Visher, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillette, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Uh right here because it's coming before the air sign.

Thank you.

Chair Cranz, how do you vote?

Yes.

The motion passes.

Next case VA 25 uh 6005, vacation of a portion of San Shell Boulevard right away north of Basswood Boulevard waiver request section 3163 E6A street vacation recommendation.

Expiration, Council District 4.

This case will also be continued, or we're requesting a continuance uh to the city plan commission.

Uh last month we needed one because of the master transportation plan.

Uh I think we have things figured out, but we needed one more continuance on this uh to move forward on April 30th.

A motion to continue VA2605 until the April 30th City Plan Commission meeting.

Second.

Motion from Commissioner Lambert, second from Commissioner Johnson.

Call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henderson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Vischer, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillette, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Crantz, how do you vote?

Yes.

The motion passes.

All right, let's get started with the new cases.

VA25028, vacation of a portion of Northwest 35th Street, Ross Avenue and Alley Block 23, Washington Heights edition, and vacation of all the alley and block 117, MG Ellis Edition, Council District 2.

General location is north of Northwest 34th Street, south of Northwest 36th Street, west of Clinton Avenue, and east of Meacham Airport.

Good morning, Commissioners.

This application here is a collection of right-of-ways that is being proposed to be vacated.

The applicant is the city of Earth.

This is to be a support facility for the uh Meacham Airport.

Um essentially it's going to be located there at the intersection of Northwest 35th Street and Ross is where the facilities to be located.

But in order to vacate those two rights of way, um, it would have ended it, ended up creating a dead end alley there to the west, which is the reason for the inclusion of this the alley that's running north-south adjacent to Ross Avenue.

And obviously, by vacating that portion of 35th Street, it would have dead-ended the alley going north and south.

And since the subdivision ordinance prohibits dead-end alleys, those two rights of way had to be included with what their original submittal was.

It kind of increased the scope of the project a little bit.

So here's those uh vacations in a little bit more detail with the uh proposed development.

Um so this is pretty straightforward.

Staff recommends approval of the vacation of all these rights of way to city plan com or to city council.

And that's what our CPC recommendation is as well.

Are there any questions?

I just had a couple of quick questions.

The city of Fourth own all the adjacent property to what's being no.

So as you can see, there's a small facility there at the northwest corner of the alley there that is owned by what is known as the uh now their name is just all of a sudden slip my mind.

But there's a trust of a family trust that owns a hospers family trust that owns the land there for that.

There's two.

If if I go to the this exhibit here, you can I don't know if you can see it.

Let's see if I can zoom in to um.

But they own this land right here.

And the remainder of the property is so when this when the property is replatted, they will be getting their half of the alley, and that will be replatted with what is lots four or five and this sliver or remainder of lot eighteen, and that'll be a part of the plat as well.

So the city will be replied the properties here to the south as a part of this alley abandonment, and then they and then these adjoining lots here as well to the north.

All right, okay.

The uh owner of that has been notified.

And yes, they're there, there's they've signed the application, they're they're in agreement.

That they've uh the uh property management division has been in contact with them and they're participating in the replatting process and so forth.

Thank you, Alex.

Yes, sir.

Any other questions for staff?

Okay, thank you, Alex.

Is any anyone here to speak on this matter?

All right, don't see anyone.

I think I have a green paper though.

Thank you.

You'll state your name and your city, please.

My name's Cody Watson, uh City of Fort Worth.

Uh I'm the signing surveyor on this, so I'm just here on behalf of the applicant in case there's any other questions that need to be answered.

Thank you for being here.

Any questions for the applicants, representative?

I don't see any.

Thank you very much.

Well, all right.

I will close the public hearing and entertain discussion or motion, and this is in council district two.

Madam Chairman, is it appropriate to motion or to have one motion that includes all three?

Is that fine?

Is that fine with everyone?

Yes, they are one matter, so yeah, one motion would be appropriate.

Okay, here we go.

Um, I'd like to motion um that the commission approve VA 25028, uh vacation of a portion of northwest 35th Street, Ross Avenue and the alley in block 23 Washington Heights edition, and vacation of all of the alley in block 117, MG Ellis edition.

And we approve VA 25030.

Is that what I was asking?

Oh no, no, no, all three sections of this one.

Sorry, I misunderstood.

No.

One one case that is.

That's that's my motion then.

Thank you.

Do we have a second?

Second.

Motion by Commissioner Beardon, second by Commissioner Reed.

Call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henderson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Richard, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillette, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Crantz, how do you vote?

Yes.

That motion passes.

All right, next case VA 25030, vacation of an alley and a portion of an alley in block 18, exchange subdivision, council district two.

General location is north of 24th Street, south of Exchange Avenue, west of Houston Street, and east of Clinton Avenue.

Okay, Chairman.

So here's uh this one's this one's a little bit different.

Um, what I mean by that is there's they're classified as alleys because that's what they have become.

But when you look historically at this, I didn't notice this until after this was already reviewed, approved, and sent out.

So they're functioning as alleys now.

The northwest, the north-south portion of this actually was a former street right-of-way that has been narrowed down to this alley section.

I think it was originally called Anderson Boulevard.

Uh, but what remains essentially after the vacations, as you can see along the east and west sides of this, are is a approximately 10 foot wide, what we'll call an alley section.

So some time ago, multiple decades ago, these portions of right-of-way on either side were vacated and left essentially an alley running north-south in that location.

Historically, there's always been an alley running east-west, but the street there is what was this is what basically a leftover portion of a street right-of-way, but functioning as an alley, or vacating it as an alley, um, because it's no longer really a street.

All right, so all that being said, um the purpose of this is it's to be vacated, and they're going to develop a new hotel on this side of the property.

They are they are, however, replatting the entire block as multiple lots, but the sole purpose of this really is for this new hotel on this side of the block.

Are there any questions?

Uh, just one that northeast corner.

Uh it looks like it's a different landownership than the rest of the applicants.

It is that is correct.

Okay, it's from are they also agreeable to the vacation?

Everybody signed the application.

Fantastic.

Any other questions for staff?

Okay.

Anyone here to speak on this matter?

I believe we may have one.

State your name and study, please.

Good morning, Philip Righes, uh, Fort Worth, Texas.

Um I'm here representing the applicant.

Um, you know, answering any questions you may have.

Thank you for being here.

Any questions for the applicant's representative?

Thank you.

Thank you.

Anyone else here to speak on this item?

All right, we'll close the public hearing.

Have discussion or a motion, please.

This is two again.

Um I have a question, maybe Steven can answer.

Uh we we do a lot of vacations, and I I realize that that it's administrative to some degree.

Um, because we don't own the land, we we just have the right-of-way that we're vacating.

Um, but and I don't even know if this is legal.

Um, so I'll give that the heads up.

I mean, does the city ask for considerations if we're going to vacate land such as we will vacate that alley to give you you know additional access to help you with your building, but we want you to redo the curbs on the north side that are crumbling.

I mean, is there any horse trading or is that just not appropriate?

It's not allowed, the that horse trading aspect.

However, what we can do is whenever they redevelop the site, require them to come up to current code.

So if there are no curb cuts or sidewalks and things to that nature, then they would have to do that.

Alex has something to say.

So anytime they vacate right of way, they're required to replatt it into the pro into the adjoining property.

During the replatting process, we do a rough proportionality analysis of the existing infrastructures adjacent to the site.

And if there's any improvements that are necessary, then the platting stage is when we acquire what we we exact things onto the property.

And so that's when if there were and that they're not limited just to around the property.

So if they have an impact by vacating these rights of way, if it has an impact the overall transportation system, that's one of the reasons they do a traffic study with these, and it requires updating signal timing at intersections that are adjacent to it.

Then that could be part of the that could be part of the uh exactions that we acquire on the on this property.

So there's there are things that are done.

We're not just willy-nilly giving these rights of way up.

We're looking at it at the overall transportation system when we do these.

So your concerns, I think, are being uh remedied.

This is just the first step, and then it moves on through in the process.

I understand.

Yes, sir.

That was a good question.

Okay.

Um, I'd like to motion approval of VA 25030 vacation of an alley and a portion of an alley in block 18 exchange subdivision.

Second.

Uh motion by Commissioner Beardon, a second by Commissioner Johnson.

Call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henserson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Richard, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gilats, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reid, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Cranz, how do you vote?

Yes.

The motion passes.

Next case is VA 26006, vacation and portions of Northwest 36th Street and Loving Avenue, Council District 2.

General location is north of Northwest 35th Street, west of Columbus Avenue, and east of Angle Avenue.

Applicant is master plan consultants.

All right.

So this one, uh the applicant has actually prepared a special presentation for this that I'll pull up here shortly.

But essentially the property owner that owns the properties on either side of uh loving or loving avenue there has sought to, and they also own the property to the north of Northwest 36th Street.

They've sought to reply this property and consolidate it as one lot for future development of their existing industrial property they have there.

Essentially, they're looking to clean up these encumbrances from their property and then reply it all together as one lot.

Does anybody have any questions about that?

Okay.

Sounds like the applicant is here to speak on this.

If you'll come forward, please state your name in your city.

Wes Hobwood, Fort Worth, Texas.

And we can give a presentation or not.

You know, we just want to be prepared.

So, you know, we think it's pretty straightforward, but we're happy to go through it if you guys want.

You've put the work in.

Why don't you run through it real quick?

We made it, so might as well do it.

So all right.

See, can I control it over here?

Is that possible?

So obviously, you know, here's the uh aerial of the side just shows that you know the roadway was never created, um, even though it's existing on the plat.

So we're just looking to clean it up and obviously re-plot and consolidate the property all into one since that's technically right of way that is not really visible.

Uh next slide.

And then as you can see here, you know, there's a square foot total for the right-of-way we're looking to add to the property.

Um next slide, please.

And then the city of Fort Worth owns pretty much all the property to the uh east of the site, and you know, there's a photo later on that shows pretty much uh access on 35th street is blocked um near the airport with Meacham to the north and to the east, and then we have a couple uh you know other property owners, but predominantly the city of Fort Worth is the ownership of most of the properties to the east and south.

It's just another slide of the total square footage survey.

Here's just some side photos.

Um, you know, looking, it's kind of hard to even tell, you know, that there was a street there, they don't have any buildings on the street, of course, but um, you know, it's hard to determine looking to the south, and then on the next slide, you can kind of see the the blockage uh where you there is no access uh to the east side of the property.

So loving avenues are really the access point for the for this side.

And that's pretty much it.

That's all.

Thank you.

Any questions for the applicant?

Don't see any.

Thank you.

Appreciate your presentation.

Anyone else here to speak on this guest case?

See anyone?

We'll close the public hearing and discussion or a motion.

I'd like the motion approval of the 2606 of Northwest uh 36th Street and Loving Avenue.

Second.

The motion from Commissioner Beardon, a second from Commissioner Henderson.

Call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardon, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henderson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Visher, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillett, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Cranz, how do you vote?

Yes.

The motion passes.

All right, we'll move to other matters of business.

First case is OMB Mount Olivet Cemetery.

Waiver request section 31150 issuance of a building permit.

General locations north of Wataga, south of 28th Street, West of Sylvania, and east of Interstate 35.

Morning, Chair Commissioners.

Uh, today we have a OMB case for Mount Olivet uh Cemetery.

Um, they are requesting a waiver to um apply for a building permit without the the required uh final plat.

Um just to let you know the currently the property is unplatted.

Um it's been unplatted for for quite a while.

Um, and they are looking to uh take down the old maintenance facility and then uh rebuild it in another location within that same area.

So as you can see on the site plan to the south, um, that's the existing maintenance facility, and they're basically gonna move it to the west.

Um they feel that this is a better location for it because it's not directly adjacent to residential property.

The new location would be adjacent to believe it's a railroad track and some industrial use.

Um and uh just to be clear, they they have no intention of uh platting this property.

They feel that it's been unplatted for years, it's never gonna change, it's always gonna be a cemetery.

And um, it's worth noting as well that um this will not be open to the public.

This will only be for cemetery staff.

Uh in general, or the cemeteries in town not platted.

I have not come across any other one.

This is the first one that I've come across.

Yeah, I think it's a state law thing where they're not really required to do that.

Thank you, Steve.

So, yeah, we're just uh requesting uh or I'm sorry, recommending approval of a waiver um of section 31150 of the subdivision ordinance to allow for issuance of a building permit um for construction.

Um this is actually a typo, it's for a maintenance facility.

Um so without uh required or I'm sorry, recorded final plates.

Any other questions for staff?

All right, thank you, Paul.

I think we have a couple folks here to speak on this this matter.

On this case, we also have John Stephen, who is um with not all of the Cemetery Association.

Um graves and lots are sold off internally.

Um the site is located internal to the site, um, which poses a problem for plotting just the portion of the maintenance facility as it were would require public access and public utilities to be brought to it.

Um so we are requesting a waiver to the plow requirement for a building permit um essentially to build a new maintenance facility to replace the existing.

Thank you for that explanation.

Any questions for the applicants, representative?

Thank you very much.

And I know I have another green sheet here.

Did you want to speak?

You don't have to, just want to give you the opportunity.

Thank you for being here.

Any questions for Mr.

Stephen?

Appreciate you.

Anyone else here to speak on this item?

Right.

Close the public hearing and have discussion or a motion.

It's not listed on the agenda.

All right, I think this is up for grabs if anyone would like to make a motion.

Isn't it district 11?

I think it might be important.

Is it 11?

Yeah.

I'll go ahead and uh get the verbiage uh motion to approve waiver of section 31 150 of the subdivision ordinance to allow for the issuance of a building permit on the construction of retaining walls without a permit or recorded final block.

It's actually a maintenance facility, that's a typo.

My apologies.

Maintenance facility.

I second.

We have a motion from Commissioner Risher, a second from Commissioner Turner.

Call the vote, please.

Commissioner Beardin, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Adams, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Lambert, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Johnson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Henserson, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Turner, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Kelly, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Visher, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Gillets, how do you vote?

Yes.

Commissioner Reed, how do you vote?

Yes.

Chair Crenz, how do you vote?

Yes.

The motion passes.

Thank you.

All right.

That was our final case.

So I believe we are ready to adjourn.

Thank you all for being here.