Greenville City Council Workshop: Sports Complex, Housing, and Transit Updates (April 8, 2024)
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Greenville City Council Workshop – April 8, 2024
The Greenville City Council held a workshop on Monday, April 8, 2024, at 4:00 PM in Conference Room 337 of City Hall. The meeting covered presentations and discussions on a proposed sports complex, housing and community development programs, and public transit system updates. Mayor P.J. Connelly presided, and all council members were present.
Consent Calendar
- The agenda was approved unanimously (6-0) via a motion by Council Member Blackburn, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Daniels.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comment period was included in the agenda or transcript. However, Council Member Willis referenced community input at a recent forum, describing testimonials from families facing homelessness.
Discussion Items
1. Presentation on Sports Complex Feasibility Study
- Presenters: Don Octigan (Executive Director of City Projects and Recreation Services) and Brian Connelly (Victus Advisors) presented the study for a 12-field baseball/softball complex, with additional analysis on adding four rectangle fields.
- Key Findings:
- Original 12-field complex estimated at $30 million; adding four rectangle fields brings the total to about $40–41 million (land costs not included).
- Operating pro forma: with adjusted salaries (lower than regional benchmarks) and a removed marketing position (absorbed by the city’s visitors bureau), the facility is projected to break even with a slight net profit of approximately $160,000 annually. Additional revenue opportunities include parking fees during tournaments (e.g., $5 per car) and potential naming rights (not included in the model).
- Economic impact: The 12-field complex could generate $44 million in total economic output, over 70,000 hotel room nights, and more than $1.2 million in annual sales and hotel taxes. Adding only four rectangle fields would yield minimal additional economic impact (mostly local use) unless at least eight rectangle fields are co-located to attract tournament visitors.
- Financing: Debt service estimated at $2.8–$4.1 million annually (based on 5% interest, 20-year term). Funding sources could include occupancy tax (max $1.5 million/year) and property taxes ($1.3–$2.6 million/year). A general obligation bond referendum was recommended.
- Council Positions:
- Council Member Scully expressed support for forming a task force to further explore the project and partnerships (county, ECU, private sector).
- Council Member Robinson voiced skepticism about the cost ($30–$40 million) and potential taxpayer burden, citing Rocky Mount’s experience where a sports complex did not produce promised benefits.
- Council Member Willis emphasized the need for community buy-in, especially from affected neighborhoods (e.g., north of the river), and cautioned against prioritizing the project over urgent needs like homelessness.
- Council Member Foreman supported the idea but stressed the importance of inclusive community engagement and equal voice for residents.
- Mayor Pro Tem Daniels noted that proceeding with a task force would be a reasonable next step.
- Outcome: The council expressed consensus to form a task force to engage the community and explore partnerships before any final decision.
2. Discussion of Housing and Community Development Programs
- Presenter: Tiana Berryman, Director of Neighborhood and Business Services.
- Programs Overview: Includes owner-occupied rehabilitation, down payment assistance (up to $40,000 citywide), subrecipient funds for nonprofits, and new construction for rent/ownership. Major projects include:
- Lincoln Park: Creating 20 homeownership units ($2.1 million city investment).
- Arlington Trace: 180 rental units expected online by summer 2024 ($6 million public investment; rents starting at $647 for a one-bedroom).
- Turnberry Trace: 72 senior housing units (tax credits secured, additional funding needed).
- Non-congregate shelter: $715,000 for family rooms (contract with Community Crossroads expected in May).
- Hotel/motel lodging: $110,000 (CDBG-CV funds) for temporary housing.
- Council Comments:
- Council Member Willis highlighted the urgent need for affordable housing and homeless services, noting that current programs are insufficient. She cited rising rents, stagnant wages, and families (including working people) struggling to find housing.
- Council Member Foreman acknowledged the progress but stressed that immediate needs are not being met and called for faster action.
- Data Point: The programs aim to serve over 2,500 families over 2–3 years. The 2024–2025 Action Plan anticipates just under $1.5 million in new HUD funding, with additional program income (e.g., $1.2 million from Lincoln Park home sales).
3. Presentation of GREAT Transit System Updates
- Presenter: Kevin Mulligan, Public Works Director.
- Proposed Changes:
- Extend bus service hours from 7 AM–5 PM to 6 AM–8 PM (weekdays) and add Saturday service (9 AM–4 PM).
- Increase drivers from 8 full-time to 13 full-time plus part-time support.
- Reinstate a fare of $1.25 per ride (discounts for students, seniors, veterans: $0.75) and $2.50 for paratransit.
- Budget Impact: Total transit budget for FY25 is approximately $3.9 million (up from $2.9 million current). City match increases by about $300,000.
- Technology Upgrades: New fare boxes, electronic fare collection, automatic vehicle location, and passenger counting systems. RFP received for these upgrades.
- Infrastructure: Plans to add benches and shelters at every bus stop.
- Council Questions: Council members asked about driver training (80 hours), hiring challenges, ADA accessibility, and coordination with on-demand ride services (still under discussion).
Key Outcomes
- Sports Complex: Council agreed to form a task force to further study the project, engage the community, and explore partnerships. No final decision or funding approval was made.
- Housing Programs: Council acknowledged the need for speedier implementation but took no formal vote; the action plan will be brought forward later.
- Transit Updates: Council will consider the proposed fare structure and service changes at a future meeting; public outreach will follow council approval.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the April eighth, two thousand twenty-four workshop for the General City Council. Mayor PJ Connolly, I'll present over today's workshop. First I call uh our city clerk for the roll call. Yes, sir. Mayor Connolly. Council Member Foreman. Councilmember Blackburn. Council Member Robinson. Here. Council Member Willis. Here. All right. Mayor Connelly, you have a point. Thank you very much. Daniels. All those in favor say aye. Move right on to new business. Thank you, Mayor. The first item tonight is presentation on sports complex feasibility study. This will be picking up based off of the information that council wanted us to bring back for the uh the planning session in January. I'll now call forward our second director of recreation and parts and capital and facility planning. Um how a twelve field baseball softball complex will look. Today you'll hear about adding four fields to this, the operating margin, margin impact, economic fiscal impact, and also the cost of capital. Also, we also reviewed with uh Mr. Crowley, who's here today, uh, the operating pro forma uh that he had for baseball softball complex and took a closer look at the expenses if the city of Greenville would run that complex based on the staffing plan and uh the organizational chart for that complex. Also looked at other revenue opportunities that would exist uh for a so-called uh sports complex. Also, today we'll be um giving an update of direct uh director of financial services, Jacob Joiner. Well, would what the uh fiscal impact to the city budget would be to finance a sports complex project. So we'll kick it off uh with Mr. Brian Connolly of Victor's Advisors to run through the baseball softball complex. Thanks, good afternoon. It's good to see you all again. Uh my name is Brian Connolly from Victus Advisors. Um the first thing that that we did after the presentation I made, I guess it was probably about six weeks ago. Um, sat down with with Don and his team and walked through on the expense side what this baseball softball tournament complex could look like if it was specifically operated by the parks and recreation department. So the expenses that we put together for our feasibility study were based upon looking at benchmark regional facilities in a in a multi-state region, and the one um item that that was flagged there on the expense side is the salaries, wages, and benefits. So we made an update to that line. Basically, the the regional benchmarks um salaries and wages were were somewhat higher than the uh salary and and wage specifications for your parks and recreation department. So we made adjustments to that to lower the salaries and wages a little bit, and then we also removed uh we had in our operating expenses, we had a dedicated uh marketing staff member as as part of the the facility operating team. And in talking to Andrew, um he said we could take that out because they would take on the responsibility for for marketing the facility. So the two key improvement uh changes to the to the performance, the salaries, wages, and benefits were lower right here, so that's highlighted. Um then the second thing that we talked about with with Don and his team is what are some other revenue opportunities that could potentially get the facility from operating at a loss to at least break even. So when we put together our base models and we don't have a site identified yet, um there's kind of two things we don't typically include in that base model. One of them is a uh a naming rights partner for the facility, and I think I talked a little bit about that last time. That's an opportunity that can be worth you know 100, 150, 200,000 a year, potentially based upon comparable uh corporate naming rights deals. Not all the communities we work with decide to sell to sell a naming rights uh deal, um, or they try to sell it and they can't find a local partner that has the capacity to make sense. So we did not include that, and we're still not including that. We're just showing basic advertising on this line. Um the second opportunity for um for for potentially reducing any operating losses, potentially getting to break even is something we're working with a couple of communities on right now that are doing operational improvement plans, and that is the ability for the facility itself to charge for parking or to be able to charge some sort of ticket fee.
openpublica.com