Greenville City Council Workshop: Alcohol Ordinances and GUC Analysis - June 9, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Greenville City Council Workshop: Alcohol Ordinances and GUC Analysis - June 9, 2025
The Greenville City Council held a workshop on June 9, 2025, to discuss two major topics: the city's ordinances regulating alcohol establishments and the analysis of the relationship between the city and the Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC). The meeting included a staff presentation on the history and current status of alcohol regulations, followed by council deliberation on potential changes. The second item featured a presentation by Assistant City Attorney Scott Dixon on the GUC charter, which led to council discussion on transparency, accountability, and collaboration.
Discussion Item 1: Alcohol Establishment Ordinances
- Staff presented a comprehensive overview of the history of alcohol regulations in Greenville, including the 500-foot rule (bar-to-bar and bar-to-residential separation), the Bar 2022 use (limited to downtown, max 2,000 sq ft), and current definitions of bars, microbreweries, micro-distilleries, and wine/beer stores. The presentation noted that 31 alcohol establishments exist citywide, with 14 bars downtown.
- Council members expressed divergent views:
- Some members advocated maintaining the current standards, citing the 500-foot rule's success in reducing violence and fostering a diverse downtown (e.g., boutiques, restaurants, ice cream shops). They questioned the need for more bars and emphasized public safety concerns.
- Other members argued that the rules hinder economic development, prevent adult-oriented entertainment options (non-college), and restrict existing businesses like breweries (AGI, Pitt Street Breweries) from expanding their offerings (e.g., adding liquor) due to the 2,000 sq ft cap and 500-foot rule.
- Councilmember Shanté (identified by colleagues) and others noted that the Bar 2022 use has proven safe and successful, but the 2,000 sq ft footprint is too small (e.g., The Scullery is 2,600 sq ft). They suggested increasing the footprint or measuring service area instead of total building.
- Several council members supported expanding the Bar 2022 use citywide, not just downtown, to ensure equitable development across all city areas.
- Staff summarized the decision points: (1) eliminate the 500-foot rule downtown or citywide; (2) modify Bar 2022 standards (e.g., increase size, allow citywide); (3) maintain status quo. Council consensus was to not remove the 500-foot rule, but to evaluate Bar 2022 for potential changes.
Discussion Item 2: GUC/City Relationship Analysis
- Assistant City Attorney Scott Dixon presented the history and legal framework of the GUC charter (last revised 1991), outlining the roles: GUC Board has full operational control (management, rates, personnel); City Council appoints board members, hears rate appeals (up/down vote), approves sewer extensions outside ETJ, and approves the GUC budget (up/down vote). Joint responsibilities include annual meetings, joint audits, and mutual pay plans.
- Councilmember Willis expressed disappointment that a prior request for a strategic plan on transparency during a joint meeting was met with opposition, noting the charter limits the council's ability to direct GUC but emphasizing the need for collaborative communication.
- Councilmember Foreman and others criticized the tone of GUC's response as condescending and disrespectful, and highlighted that GUC meetings are held during the day, limiting public participation. They stressed that citizen trust is essential and that GUC's actions and meeting times should be more accessible.
- Councilmember (liaison to GUC) defended GUC's transparency, citing the comprehensive website, open-door policy, award history, and complaint mechanisms. He stated that the allegations of lack of transparency were baseless and that he had received no direct complaints from citizens or council members before the joint meeting.
- Councilmember (with experience on GUC board) also noted that no citizen complaints had been filed through official channels, and that the two speakers at the meeting had not followed up. He argued that the claim of insufficient transparency is an attack on GUC staff and the city manager, who sits on the GUC board.
- Councilmember Willis responded that the issue is not about baseless allegations but about a loss of trust, which requires consistent, approachable communication. She noted that meeting times matter and that average citizens may not feel comfortable contacting officials directly.
- No formal action was taken on this item; the presentation was informational, and council members agreed to continue fostering collaborative communication.
Key Outcomes
- Alcohol Ordinances: Council directed staff to evaluate the Bar 2022 use and bring back recommendations for modifications, including a potential increase in the square footage limit and expanding the use citywide. The 500-foot rule will remain in place for now. The staff will present a revised proposal at a future meeting.
- GUC Relationship: No vote or formal directive was issued. The council acknowledged the need for improved communication and trust-building between the city, GUC, and the public. The city manager will facilitate continued dialogue with GUC management on transparency and accessibility issues.
Meeting Transcript
A lot of this is Greenville centric, and I'll point those out when we get to those. So during this overview, we're going to talk about the background and the history of alcohol establishments. This includes the 500 foot rule. This also includes Bar 2022. City staff generally has categorize some uses as you know alcohol establishments, and I'll get to what we consider an alcohol establishment. We're also going to look at the definitions and standards of those alcohol establishments, the role of the ABC commission because the commission is the one who gives ABC permits. And then the current status, and we're going to ask for directions on next steps. So what is an alcohol establishment? So this is what city staff has used as a way for us to talk about an alcohol centric establishment. And it has to do with the primary activity is the sale and consumption of alcohol on site. So this includes uses as a bar throughout time. This has been called a nightclub, a public private club. And there was a change in state law. So now these are all considered a bar. We have a bar 2022 that is specifically a Greenville use. We'll talk about some specifics with it. As far as ABC is concerned, it is a bar. We have a microbrewery that is small scale, like not large warehouses. We have a micro distillery, again, liquor of various different kinds is made on site. You can also drink it there. We have a wine and beer store, so you can buy beer and wine. Oh, thank you, my friend. You can buy beer and wine, but you just can't make it. And then the very last one is we do have some retail uses that can have consumption of beer and wine, not mixed beverages, beer and wine on site. So each of these have very unique rules and regulations. Part of it's based on state law, and then where possible we have supplements or added to it for Greenville's specific needs and desires. It is, but it's very specific to I believe five retail uses right now that we have in the city. And again, it is for if you've been to the Lowe's grocery store in Winterville where you can shop and drink, it's sort of like that, but it's it's five specific uses, and again, it's just for wine and beer. And there's no liquor ancillary use. That is correct. So what is not considered an alcohol establishment? And so these are things where again the primary function is not the sale and consumption of alcohol on site. So what I mean by that is is if you're a restaurant and you sell beer, wine, or alcohol, you've got the 3070 rule that we always talk about. Um we have a bowling alley, we have movie theaters. Again, you can go there, beer, wine, mixed beverages, but you're going to the movie theater to see a movie. You're going to the bowling alley to bowl. How is alcohol regulated? So the state of North Carolina under Chapter 18B regulates alcohol beverages, and that is the sale, purchase, transport, manufacture, consumption, and possession of alcohol in North Carolina. And under I just refer to all these as ABC rules. Um, the first thing is there's a distinct difference between drinking alcohol on the premise, or if you buy it somewhere and you take it home, or you take it to a buddy's house. Very big difference. Generally, there's two kinds of permits. There's two buckets. Wine and beer is generally grouped together. Spiritus liquor is in a different bucket, and if you think about what they call alcohol by volume. So if you think about the size of a shot glass and how much alcohol, it's very much different between wine and beer and liquor. And also along those same lines, beer and wine permits generally have less scrutiny than if you have a spirit as liquor mixed beverage license. What are the legal limitations as far as Greenville and how we regulate alcohol establishments? So there are certain certain parts of the rules that we have to live with that we are preempted in changing or having a work around to it, if you will. Some of you may remember there was also a major update in state law.
openpublica.com