Sat, Jan 31, 2026·Half Moon Bay, California·City Council

Half Moon Bay City Council Budget Listening Session — January 31, 2026

Discussion Breakdown

Transportation Safety24%
Affordable Housing17%
Procedural15%
Economic Development8%
Water And Wastewater Management7%
Equity in Transportation7%
Technology and Innovation5%
Community Engagement5%
Active Transportation4%
Parks and Recreation3%
Engineering And Infrastructure2%
Public Engagement2%
Racial Equity1%

Summary

Half Moon Bay City Council Budget Listening Session — January 31, 2026

The City held a Brown Act–compliant listening session to gather community input for FY 2026–27 budget priorities. Staff explained how comments would be compiled into a report for the Council’s March 14, 2026 priority-setting session, and highlighted additional ways to submit feedback (online survey/email through March 10). Community members raised priorities around housing policy, senior services, transportation and traffic safety (including Hwy 92 and local intersections), recreation access (pool/swim programs), data privacy concerns related to license plate readers, and protecting downtown small businesses.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Unidentified speaker (housing)

    • Position: Supported keeping Measure D and disagreed that it is “outdated,” stating its original purpose (preventing infrastructure from being overwhelmed by single-family housing) remains valid.
    • Position: Urged the City to encourage/advance affordable housing, specifically referencing 555 Kelly (for retired/senior farmworkers) and the recently approved affordable housing project on/near Metzger (nominally Main Street).
    • Position: Expressed disappointment that rent stabilization was not approved, and urged continuing Legal Aid Society support for tenants facing unjust treatment/evictions.
    • Position: If rental subsidies are pursued, urged meaningful funding (stating that small amounts are a “drop in the bucket”) and suggested giving $1 million to Coastside Hope to administer assistance.
  • Anne Morrie (Coastside Aquatic Center, nonprofit) — swimming/pool access

    • Position: Supported resuming swim lessons after school district insurance requirements were revised.
    • Position: Strongly advocated opening the school pool for community use (e.g., limited weekly hours), stating the pool is maintained/heated but sits unused.
    • Position: Stated her nonprofit is willing to provide lifeguards, pay district fees, and carry insurance; requested City support (including potentially writing letters to the school district) to help get the pool opened.
  • Paul Gregoria — Flock license plate reader system/data security

    • Position: Raised concerns about “shoddy security” and easy outside access to the database; cautioned that the costs may outweigh benefits.
    • Position: Cited reports of ICE/Border Patrol building large databases and referenced multiple lawsuits by cities against Flock; urged Council to review Half Moon Bay’s contract terms (access controls/data retention) and consider actions to reduce community impact.
  • Nancy Fontana — Measure D/infrastructure, tenant policy approach, security, pool

    • Position: Requested a public-facing update on infrastructure readiness (water/sewer/related agencies) in light of housing targets and Measure D’s original infrastructure rationale.
    • Position: Expressed concern about high rents and stated she did not like the City’s approach on stabilization; advocated exploring incentives for “decent” landlords rather than “penalizing” them.
    • Position: Suggested potential incentive models (example from Idaho: upgrades in exchange for rent freezes), including reduced permit fees for landlords keeping units at reasonable rates.
    • Position: Supported evaluating security/privacy risks across City programs/contractors (including cameras and other systems) via expert review.
    • Position: Supported opening the pool and emphasized swimming access and safety.
  • Amber Stowe (Half Moon Bay resident; family owns The Paper Crane, Main Street) — small business protection & traffic

    • Position: Supported considering a formula business ordinance to help protect homegrown small businesses from rent impacts/competition as interest from larger corporations increases.
    • Position (later): Agreed traffic on Hwy 92 is a major concern; asked the City to explore operational improvements related to dump-bound truck traffic, including whether a timed/sensor light could help trucks enter safely without stopping traffic.
    • Position: Warned against “adding more lanes” as a solution (citing induced demand) and asked about options to incentivize public transportation with partners like SamTrans to reduce weekend visitor car traffic.
    • Position: Raised safety concerns about oversized vehicles parking on Main Street, describing it as an “accident waiting to happen.”
  • Sandy Winter (Executive Director, Senior Coastsiders) — aging services

    • Position: Urged continued City commitment to an age-friendly approach and an “age in all policies” lens.
    • Position: Requested stable, ongoing investment in safety-net services for older adults (meals, transportation, care coordination, social connection), citing rising needs (food insecurity, isolation, housing instability, digital exclusion, emergency preparedness amid climate change).
    • Position: Emphasized that these services are “core community infrastructure” and preventive, reducing pressure on emergency services and hospitals.
  • Harvey (surname not stated) — regional water/sewer governance

    • Position: Urged investigating formation of a single special district for coastside sewer and water services to reduce inter-agency conflict and improve environmental protection, with district elections and its own tax revenue.
  • Nancy Fontana (additional comment) — scope of City responsibilities

    • Position: Encouraged the City to focus on core municipal responsibilities and avoid taking on services primarily funded/managed by the County (example: mental health), suggesting better coordination/outreach to the County instead.
  • Paul (same speaker as earlier comment; last name not captured in this segment) — medical transportation

    • Position: Emphasized the importance of medically related transportation in a local “healthcare desert.”
    • Position: Described reliance on a county/federally assisted program (“Got Wheels” working with Yellow Cab) and stated federal support was cut, reducing trips from 15 per month to 1.
    • Position: Requested City advocacy with the County for more funding/support or partnering with other providers to restore services.
  • Evelyn (last name not stated) — support for senior priorities & housing discourse

    • Position: Expressed strong support for addressing the needs of a growing senior population (including digital literacy).
    • Position: Said housing discussions feel increasingly polarizing and expressed concern about resentment and division.
    • Position: Raised concerns about potential unconscious racial stereotyping in how income/poverty is discussed and defined.
  • Dave Atkinson (and Pam, last name not stated) — traffic, safety, parking, construction impacts

    • Position: Identified traffic as a major quality-of-life issue (commute to San Jose; recurring congestion at the “zipper” area; dump truck traffic).
    • Position: Raised safety concerns about motorcycles, red-light running near the high school turn, and near-accident conditions.
    • Position: Requested attention to parking at corners in neighborhoods (e.g., Spindrift area), suggesting measures like red curb markings to improve visibility.
    • Position (Pam): Requested review of construction barriers (K-rail/K-bar) and intersection sightlines affecting safe turning movements (notably from Spindrift onto Route 1).
  • Unidentified online speaker (Kirsten) — meeting accessibility

    • Position: Reported very poor audio quality on Zoom, making it difficult to hear speakers; urged better testing/technical fixes for future sessions.

Discussion Items

  • Budget priority-setting process & participation options (staff/Mayor pro tem facilitation)

    • Listening session format explained: Council would listen without deliberation due to the Brown Act; staff would compile notes into a report for the March priority-setting session.
    • Participation routes: website survey and email submission; deadline stated as Tuesday, March 10.
    • Noted an additional listening session Sunday at 2 p.m. with Spanish-language focus and interpretation available.
  • Transportation/traffic observations (Councilmember remarks at close)

    • Councilmembers acknowledged traffic, safety, parking blind spots, and construction-barrier visibility concerns; some indicated they would personally observe reported trouble spots.
    • A councilmember reiterated that adding lanes typically does not solve congestion and referenced past efforts opposing larger truck proposals.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes or formal actions (listening session only; no agenda items for deliberation).
  • Next steps/Deadlines:
    • Additional public input accepted via online survey/email through March 10, 2026.
    • Spanish-language listening session: Sunday at 2 p.m. (interpretation available).
    • Council priority-setting session: March 14, 2026; staff to publish a report summarizing listening-session input beforehand.
  • Issues flagged for potential follow-up/consideration in budget priorities: housing (Measure D, affordable housing projects, tenant legal aid, rental assistance), senior services and age-friendly funding, medical transportation advocacy, downtown small-business protection (formula business ordinance), traffic operations and safety (Hwy 92/dump truck access, Route 1/Spindrift sightlines, parking visibility, oversized vehicles on Main Street), and data privacy/security review (including license plate reader system).

Meeting Transcript

Um, well, thanks everybody for coming. We'll we'll see if we can figure that out. Um listening sessions before, and um this is really an opportunity for you all to share with the council what you're thinking, what's important to you right now, and what you think that the city as it prepares its next budget should be thinking about and prioritizing over the next year plus. Um couple of things that you should know. Uh, the council will not be talking tonight, they will not be we will not be responding, and part of that is the Brown Act that we follow. Um there's no item agendized tonight other than hearing from you, so we can't have discussions. So, really, this is a chance for the council to listen and to take note of what they're hearing, and um and our staff are here taking notes, and all of this will be collected along with some other things that I'll share tonight into a report that will inform and be part of our priority setting session in March. So, okay. Um, a little bit of housekeeping here. Uh, here's today's agenda. So I've I've shared a little bit about the priority and setting process, I'll share a little bit more. We'll talk about other ways you can provide feedback, and we would hope you'd be ambassadors to your neighbors and friends to make sure they know how they can also participate if they're not here tonight. Uh we'll just introduce our council, talk about some of the goals of this evening. Uh, we'll very quickly cover some guidelines for a productive and respectful session and uh and then we'll jump into your comments. So uh we are we have scheduled two priority setting sessions. That doesn't mean we can't add more if if need be. And um, and then, of course, that all culminates in our priority setting session. So tonight's session is the first of the listening sessions, and then on Sunday, we have a listening session here at 2 p.m. And that will be provided in Spanish. Anyone is welcome, and we will provide translation and interpretation into English, but it's an opportunity for our monolingual Spanish speaking community and those that are just more comfortable speaking Spanish to share their thoughts and feelings as well. And then on Saturday, March 14th, we will hold our priority setting session with the council. There will be opportunities to provide additional feedback, but that's really the working session where the council really digs in and talks about the issues and um starts planning our priorities for the next uh fiscal year. Another way that people can provide feedback is through our online uh survey. If you go to our website at happenbay.gov slash listening sessions, uh you can submit your feedback there, or you can also send an email to communications at happenbay.gov. And all of those will be collected through Tuesday, March 10th, which just gives us enough time to compile this into the report and ready for our priority setting session. All right, very quickly. I want to introduce our city council. Um to my right is councilmember Robert Brownstone, and then we have Mayor Debbie Reddock, Vice Mayor Deborah Penrose, Councilmember Patrick Johnson, and Councilmember Paul Nagingast. And I'd encourage you to go to our website. If you don't know what district you're in, we we have uh district based elections, and so each of these council members represents a district of the city. And if you go to our website and uh on the main page, there's a a little box that says which district am I in, and you can click on it and put in your address and look at the map, or you can go to the city council web page and you can look at it there. And uh if you have concerns or ideas you want to share outside of this process, uh these are very engaged council members and they want to hear from you and you can contact them directly. So our goals for tonight uh we want to hear what matters most to you and our community. We want to learn about the needs, challenges, and ideas that the city should be thinking about for improvement, whether it's services or programs, or or ways to better serve the community, and we really want to gather your input, which will guide the city council priorities for the fiscal year 2627 budget. Um some examples, and and by no means is this an exhaustive list, but things that have been prioritized in the past include housing, public safety, transportation and mobility, circulation, and community services. That might be social services, libraries, recreation services, though types, those types of things but again if you have other things that don't fit into these categories you're welcome to share them and uh we're we're happy to hear anything from you tonight uh as far as guidelines for a productive session uh the most important thing is just be respectful and kind of each other um you know we we might have different opinions and it's okay and it's good to listen to those other opinions please speak from your own experiences not from hearsay or or things that are you know buzzing in the communities talk about what you know and what you've experienced um I have next door to tell me what's buzzing in the community so um and then please if you can keep your comments brief unlike a normal city council meeting there's no speaker cards um and there's no timer but we do want to make sure everybody who wants to speak has the opportunity to speak and that nobody's kind of hoarding the time and so I may cut you off if you're if you're going long but looking at this group I think we'll we'll have a good respectful um evening I would ask when it's your turn to speak or when you want to speak just raise your hand and these uh handsome gentlemen in the back are gonna be running the mics and they'll bring a microphone to you before you make your comment if you wouldn't mind just sharing your name so we can include it in the minutes for this meeting that would be greatly appreciated. Madam Mayor I don't know if you have anything else you want to add before we get started. If you feel you haven't had enough time tonight go online and submit your comments or or email one or more of us. We're really interested in what you have to say. Hi. Alright well with that we're gonna open up this listening session. So anybody that's interested in speaking please raise your hand and we'll we'll send a mic your way I want to talk about housing it's really important to me and the community I hesitate to call it affordable housing because housing is no longer affordable in this area unfortunately. Okay there's a lot of sentiment that says measure D is outdated. I disagree I think we should keep it I think it's original purpose of making sure that our infrastructure did not was not overwhelmed with single family housing is a good thing. If you wanted to change that that's okay but for the most part I don't think we should mess with measure D. I think it's really important that we encourage as much affordable housing as possible starting with 555 Kelly that is a project that we have advocated for for a long time we need to get our retired and senior farm workers the respect and housing that they need this project has gone on long enough and uh we need to get it done the project uh the affordable housing project on on Metzger I think it's nominally on Main Street but it's uh basically on Metzger that uh that you just approved the um measured the allocations uh for the next two years. I think that should be encouraged. That sounds like a something that it's in the right place and it will give uh an opportunity for lower income people to to stay in the city. Uh so that that's also useful. Um there was I was personally disappointed that rent stabilization was not approved.