Half Moon Bay Planning Commission Meeting: January 27, 2026 – Mixed-Use Building at 540 Parisima Approved
Half Moon Bay Planning Commission Meeting: January 27, 2026 – Mixed-Use Building at 540 Parisima Approved
The Half Moon Bay Planning Commission met on January 27, 2026, at 3:00 PM to consider a coastal development permit and architectural review for a two-story mixed-use building at 540 Parisima Street. Commissioners present: Chair Gorn, Vice Chair Hernandez, Commissioner Rems, Commissioner Reddick, and Commissioner Del Nagro (via Zoom). Commissioner Del Nagro participated remotely. The meeting included approval of prior minutes, public comment, staff presentation, commissioner questions, and a vote to approve the project with conditions.
Consent Calendar
- Minutes of October 28, 2025: Approved 4-0 (Vice Chair Hernandez abstained).
- Minutes of January 13, 2026: Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Del Nagro recused as he was absent).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Dr. Robert Moody (member of the public, father of the applicant): Spoke in strong support, describing the site as historically blighted and praising the project's quality and mixed-use character. He emphasized that the building would enhance the downtown area.
- No other public comments were received.
Discussion Items
- 540 Parisima Mixed-Use Project – Staff Presentation by Scott Phillips (project planner):
- Proposed building: 5,365 sq ft, two stories, ground-floor commercial office with parking/storage, two residential units on second floor.
- No variances or exceptions required; all zoning and development standards met.
- Project submitted in 2021; three Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) meetings held. The AAC provided recommendations over three iterations, leading to addition of a second residential unit, driveway on south side, and revised massing.
- Staff recommended approval with conditions, including separate sign review and street tree requirement.
- Commissioner Questions & Discussion:
- Commissioner Rems questioned the siding change from horizontal to vertical; architect John Walter explained the transition to break up massing and distinguish commercial from residential.
- Commissioner Reddick clarified that the AAC update was not a formal meeting.
- Commissioner Del Nagro identified inaccuracies in the staff report: statement of “wrapping around an existing home” (site has been vacant 40+ years) and reference to two commercial spaces (only one office proposed). Staff confirmed corrections.
- Vice Chair Hernandez expressed concern about long horizontal planes and consistency with downtown scale policies; architect argued the gables and material shift address massing, and height is similar to nearby Mercantile Building.
- Commissioner Rems suggested possibly inverting the vertical/horizontal pattern; architect preferred current design.
- Discussion of drainage, trash enclosure location (under rear deck), and landscape tree requirement (to be added per condition).
- Applicant Robert Moody (son) estimated construction duration of 12-18 months.
Key Outcomes
- Motion to Approve: Moved by Vice Chair Hernandez, seconded by Commissioner Rems, to approve the coastal development permit and architectural review with staff’s conditions of approval.
- Vote: 5-0 in favor (all commissioners present voted yes).
- Corrections Noted: Staff to correct report to reflect single commercial office (not industrial) and no preexisting building on site.
- Strong Encouragements: Commissioners urged the applicant to consider adding a skylight, window, or texture/art on the long front plane to break up massing, and to ensure a street tree is included.
- Director’s Report: Leslie Lacko noted RFP for implementation plan update posted January 20, proposals due February 23; one coastal permit issued since last meeting (for garage/ADU at 551 Myrtle Street).
- Meeting Adjourned at approximately 4:30 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Um, um, um, bungalow. I think that was. Um Bridget, you want to go through that? I guess. Um, I just want to make sure that we're live on our end here with PC TV. Um there we go. Thank you. Um good evening, and welcome to the planning commission meeting of January twenty seventh. Uh, we do have Commissioner Del Nagro, who is out oh, this evening, but is willing to serve um in the Zoom form. So Planning Commission uh chair, let's see. You are at your home, I assume. Yes, I am. Okay. So now I will proceed in the roll call of the Planning Commission. So Commissioner Hernandez. Present. Sorry, it's vice chair. Chair Gorn. I'm here. Um Commissioner Planning Commissioner Rems. Here. And Del Negro? Here virtually. Okay. I would like to ask you a few questions. Can you hear I'm here too, Bridget? Oh, sorry, Commissioner Reddick. I apologize. My new roll call sheet is not up to date, so I apologize. Commissioner Del Nagro, can you hear me as well as your fellow commissioners? Yes, I can. Okay. You have a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Yes, I do. And let's see. Do you have anybody anybody under the age of 18 there and or anyone from the public? No, I do not. Um, so I would like to ask the planning commission, all four of you here present. If you are not able to hear the planning commissioner Del Nagro, if you can please speak up now. Seeing none, they all hear you. Um seeing that there's no comment, this reflects on the record that Commissioner Del Nagro is present and indicates that both parties, the planning commission and the commissioner online, can hear each other. Um he will represent himself. Um I would like to advise the commission that any votes taken during the teleconference portion of the meeting must be taken by a roll call. So that is all I have at this moment, and we will go forward. I'd like to start this meeting with a pledge of allegiance, please, Rice. So first on our agenda is approval of minutes. Um I just wanted to make a clarification. I noticed when I printed out the minutes that I put January 27th on the January 13th minute, so I just want to make that correction. Okay. Yeah, we have um but two sets.
openpublica.com