OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Houston Economic Development Committee CIP Process Meeting – August 26, 2025

Committees and CommissionsTuesday, August 26, 2025
BodyHouston, Texas
SessionCommittees and Commissions
DateTuesday, August 26, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:11:48

Transcript — Verbatim
0:11

Public, I'm Mayor Pro Tim Martha Castex Tatum, the chair of our city's economic development committee.

0:16

I'd like to call this meeting to order, and like to welcome all of the council members in attendance.

0:22

Um, council uh uh council member Mario Castillo is here, uh Councilmember Sally Alcorn, Councilmember uh Joaquin Martinez, uh Vice Mayor Pro Tim Amy Peck, Councilmember uh Julian Ramirez is here, Councilmember Abby Kamen is here, and we also have staff from uh Councilmember Flickinger's office, staff from Councilmember Jackson's office, staff from Councilmember Pollard's office, and also staff from Councilmember Carter's office.

0:56

If there are any members of the public that would like to participate in public comments, there is a sign-in sheet at the front table.

1:04

Um today's agenda, uh, we will have an overview of our CIP process, um, and that will be done by our director of finance, Melissa Dobowski, uh, David Wardlow, and Richard Vela.

1:18

Um we will review our CIP amendments uh related to our CIP process, the improvements in the DDSR fund balance.

1:27

Um that was submitted by Julian Ramirez and also uh Vice Mayor Pro Tim Amy Peck, and then we'll have a discussion and a call for recommendations to improve the CIP process, and that discussion will be held by all council members.

1:45

So at this time I'll turn it over to Councilmember Sally Alcorn who will discuss our meeting rules.

1:53

Thank you, Mayor Potem and colleagues.

1:56

You know, we've been discussing this meeting for a while since the CIP.

1:59

There were some amendments offered, and those amendments kind of spurred a conversation of how we will have a more meaningful CIP process, how we can have a process where the the and projects that a CIP, a document that comes out of this that people can rely on.

2:15

I know things happen and things have to be moved around, but we're trying to make improvements to this process.

2:20

So this is just the first of what I'm seeing as being there will be some subsequent meetings.

2:25

We'll hear about these amendments today, and then we will have all council members will offer also offer their suggestions on how we might improve the process.

2:35

I think the departments will too.

2:37

And then we see subsequent meetings where we could actually take a vote on recommendations to the administration for changes to the CIP process.

2:46

So we'll be taking up some of the amendments.

2:48

The one on the DDSRF fund balance will actually be is actually moved to the to the September 2nd meeting.

2:55

But um the but the ones that were related that Councilmember Peck did about distributing quote uh equally uh dollars and the ones that council member Ramirez had about uh uh communications and and specific uh items within projects that will change and other things.

3:12

We'll talk about that at this meeting.

3:14

Um, but that's that's kind of the deal.

3:16

Um we're you know the mayor wants us to work at these committees.

3:19

He wants our committees to he's used to the state and used to the committees kind of doing the work and coming up with things, so that's how we're seeing this joint committee work that we'll actually be seeing some ideas, suggestions, recommendations turn into actual action items on the CIP process.

3:37

Okay, we will move into our first agenda item.

3:40

Uh at this time, I'd like to welcome Finance Director Melissa Davowski.

3:45

Okay, thank you.

3:46

That thank you.

3:47

Good afternoon.

3:48

Um, so many of the slides you're gonna see in my section of the presentation uh are going to remind you of the slides that we had at the time of the uh CIP uh being proposed.

4:00

So I'll just kind of go over a background of the CIP and then we'll get into all the the fund material from our public works department and general services department.

4:09

Um so to remind everyone as an overview that Capital Improvement Plan is a rolling five-year plan of projected projects.

4:16

The plan is a live document and is subject to change due to environmental factors, funding constraints, uh budgetary constraints, shifting priorities, uh scheduling, as well as citizen input.

4:28

Uh the CIP is broken into four different component sections, uh, which are roughly divided up uh based on the funding sources for each of those components.

4:37

So the first component is the public improvement program.

4:40

Uh we also have the uh build Houston Forward, which is uh formerly known as the Rebuild Houston, the Enterprise Fund Program, which is the water and wastewater uh utility system as well as the Houston Airport system, and then the component units.

4:56

And the purpose of the CIP is to be as cost effective as possible in meeting the city's goals to serve the Houstonians.

5:03

And we have all the capital improvement fund projects in one document that's proposed and adopted by city council so that we can improve on the transparency by providing visibility on citywide needs.

5:14

Historically, probably about 10 years ago, there were different capital improvement plans, some for one for facilities, one for IT, fleet was a different plan.

5:22

So about a decade ago or more, we brought those all into one plan.

5:26

And then, of course, have the public engagement process with the city council, the website, and we'll get more into the timeline and the steps with improving the transparency in the coming slides.

5:38

So on the next slide, as far as the process, we do aim to lock in the existing projects that are in the existing CIP, and we do try to prioritize funding for projects that are already in the CIP, which generally would include cost escalations to existing projects.

5:54

As we've seen over the last couple of years, COVID coming out of COVID, cost escalations have been significant at the same time that our revenue sources have been constrained.

6:05

So we are having to prioritize which projects are the most critical and put funding to those projects as we can.

6:13

So in order to prioritize the most urgent projects, the client departments at the city, which would include anything from the health department, police department, fire, any of the departments that have facility equipment or vehicle needs, put together a list of requests for their projects that they're requesting to be funded.

6:34

They then prioritize those projects based on their needs that they see as a departmental level.

6:39

Then we ask the central service area departments to do a citywide prioritization list for those specific categories.

6:46

So that would be the fleet director, the IT director, and then the general services director prioritizing what they see as a citywide need for all of the facilities projects citywide, all of the IT projects citywide, and all of the fleet needs citywide.

6:59

And then we compile all those projects together based on the available funding, both the existing projects and the new requests that we can afford to add to the plan, and we put them together to be proposed to this body for uh adoption.

7:15

On the next slide, I'll go over uh the details of the four components of the CIP, just to remind everyone in the public improvement program.

7:22

This is where the general fund departments are funded.

7:25

This includes the fire, uh, general improvements, which would cover this building and the annex, the health department, housing needs, library, parks, police, and solid waste.

7:34

The next major category is the Build Houston Forward, formerly known as Rebuild Houston, and this is where the storm drainage and street infrastructure projects are located.

7:43

The enterprise fund program, and these are enterprise funds, they're closed financial systems closed from the rest of the financing of the city, and that includes the combined utility system, water and wastewater, and the Houston Airport system.

7:55

And when we say enterprise funded, basically what we mean here is when we say, okay, well, Houston Airport system, they have their CIP.

8:02

If we want to add a new CIP project onto the book, let's say for streets and drainage, we can't necessarily cancel an airport project and use that funding on a streets and drainage project because we're governed by the airport's case, the federal government FAA guidelines as well as bond covenants and ordinances that those funding sources have to remain separate.

8:26

The last section is the component unit section of the CIP, and this kind of is um is a mixture of some of the different component units at the city, including the Houston Parks Board, Houston First Corporation, Houston Zoo, and then all of the TURS CIP projects are included in this section of the CIP.

8:46

On the next slide for funding sources, the public improvement program is primarily supported by the general fund, which goes to pay debt service through public improvement or general obligation bonds.

8:57

We also leverage community donations, contributions, and grants.

9:01

Usually there's some matching component associated with that, but we do leverage that outside funding.

9:07

Next, we have the Build Houston Forward, formerly known as Rebuild Houston, and that is supported by revenue from the drainage utility charge, developer impact fee, advalorum taxes, the 11.8 cent portion of the taxes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Engagement███████████████████████████████████████39%
Infrastructure█████████████████████21%
Capital███████████11%
Public Works██████████10%
Transparency███████7%
Technology and Innovation█████5%
Procedural███3%
Budget██2%
Transportation Planning██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Houston Economic Development Committee CIP Process Meeting – August 26, 2025

Mayor Pro Tem Martha Castex Tatum, chair of the Economic Development Committee, called the meeting to order. The purpose was to receive an overview of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process from finance, public works, and general services staff, review proposed amendments related to transparency and equitable funding, and gather suggestions from council members for improving the CIP process. Councilmembers in attendance included Mario Castillo, Sally Alcorn, Joaquin Martinez, Amy Peck, Julian Ramirez, Abby Kamen, and staff from several other offices.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Laura Gallier (community advocate): Expressed full support for the transparency ordinance, arguing that transparency is the floor, not the ceiling, for good governance. She cited examples of wasted funding (e.g., Telephone Road redesign $489,000, Montrose Boulevard redesign $400,000) and criticized Engage Houston as incomplete. She urged council not to treat transparency as optional.
  • Barbara Carroll (registered professional engineer, volunteer at BARC): Stated that the proposed status reports are basic project management tools (enhanced Excel spreadsheets) and would improve efficiency. She highlighted the lack of progress on the voter-approved $47 million BARC facility bond approved in 2022.
  • Donald Masock (resident): Supported the amendments and stressed the need for checks and balances on the strong mayor system. He suggested a task force involving city, Metro, and TIRZ representatives and criticized that meeting slides were not available to the public in advance.
  • Andrew Sneed (data engineer): Supported the infrastructure transparency amendments, arguing that codifying reporting obligations ensures accountability. He stated that providing information before changes occur is reasonable and straightforward.
  • Ruben Garza (Strong Towns Houston chapter leader): Supported the amendments, emphasizing that government should move beyond relationship-based transparency to institutionalized, testable, and repeatable reporting that includes cost data. He also urged that public input occur before project changes.
  • Doug Smith (resident): Stressed the importance of involving the public early in the CIP process (suggested September–November district meetings). He expressed frustration that the A Leaf Neighborhood Center generator project, included in the FY24 CIP, was only now in design and would not be completed this fiscal year.

Discussion Items

  • CIP Process Overview (Finance Director Melissa Dobowski): Explained the CIP is a rolling five-year plan updated annually, broken into four components (Public Improvement Program, Build Houston Forward, Enterprise Fund Program, Component Units). Total FY26–30 CIP estimated at $16.7 billion. The process involves departments submitting prioritized requests in December–February, review by the mayor, and council adoption by end of June. She noted that after adoption, individual RCAs appropriate funds for specific projects.
  • Houston Public Works (David Wardlow): Described public engagement via Engage Houston (which was recently offline for updates), data-driven prioritization using flood risk index, pavement condition, and predictive analytics for water/wastewater. Noted the goal of 1,000 lane miles of street rehabilitation per year. Announced a new partnership where each council district will be able to select five lane miles for local street repairs.
  • General Services Department (Richard Vela): Presented the Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA): average building age 39 years, replacement value $3.5 billion, current FCI (Facility Condition Index) of 40% (double the industry target of 20%). Five-year deferred capital need is $1.4 billion; current annual funding ($52 million) is insufficient. GSD is undertaking a citywide facilities master plan (phase one Sept 2025–April 2026, phase two to March 2027) to standardize priorities, consolidate, and address ADA compliance.
  • Councilmember Q&A and Discussion: Councilmembers asked about CIP timeline alignment with fiscal year, public input timing, FCI funding gap, the stormwater master plan’s predictive capabilities, the new five-lane-mile program, and the feasibility of shifting from a five-year to a three-year CIP outlook. Directors responded with commitments to improve communication, including immediate notification of project changes.
  • Amendments Discussion: Councilmember Julian Ramirez outlined three amendments: 101—monthly reports to each council member on significant infrastructure project changes (delay, cancellation, redesign, scope alteration over 5% or $50,000, whichever greater); 102—allows three or more council members to object and place the matter on a council agenda within 10 days; 103—allows any council member to request a public hearing on a significant change. Councilmember Amy Peck proposed amendment 604 to establish a working group to evaluate a data-driven, equitable allocation of storm drainage and street funding across districts. Debate included concerns about monthly reporting burden, contractor impacts, the role of Engage Houston, and the relationship to Proposition A. The administration committed to immediate notification and improving Engage Houston. Councilmembers suggested refining thresholds, qualifying “city funds,” and ensuring district council member primacy for hearings. No votes were taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Councilmember Peck’s amendment regarding the DDSRF fund balance was formally moved to the September 2nd Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee meeting.
  • The Ramsey and Peck amendments were not voted on; a follow-up meeting to continue discussion and potentially act on recommendations will be scheduled (date TBD).
  • Next BFA meeting: Tuesday, September 2nd, 2025 at 10 a.m. (agenda includes DDSRF fund balance, financial policies, and budget stabilization fund).
  • Next Economic Development Committee meeting: Wednesday, September 17th, 2025 at 2 p.m.
  • The administration (Public Works and GSD) committed to improving transparency through immediate notification of project changes and enhancements to Engage Houston.

Meeting Transcript

Public, I'm Mayor Pro Tim Martha Castex Tatum, the chair of our city's economic development committee. I'd like to call this meeting to order, and like to welcome all of the council members in attendance. Um, council uh uh council member Mario Castillo is here, uh Councilmember Sally Alcorn, Councilmember uh Joaquin Martinez, uh Vice Mayor Pro Tim Amy Peck, Councilmember uh Julian Ramirez is here, Councilmember Abby Kamen is here, and we also have staff from uh Councilmember Flickinger's office, staff from Councilmember Jackson's office, staff from Councilmember Pollard's office, and also staff from Councilmember Carter's office. If there are any members of the public that would like to participate in public comments, there is a sign-in sheet at the front table. Um today's agenda, uh, we will have an overview of our CIP process, um, and that will be done by our director of finance, Melissa Dobowski, uh, David Wardlow, and Richard Vela. Um we will review our CIP amendments uh related to our CIP process, the improvements in the DDSR fund balance. Um that was submitted by Julian Ramirez and also uh Vice Mayor Pro Tim Amy Peck, and then we'll have a discussion and a call for recommendations to improve the CIP process, and that discussion will be held by all council members. So at this time I'll turn it over to Councilmember Sally Alcorn who will discuss our meeting rules. Thank you, Mayor Potem and colleagues. You know, we've been discussing this meeting for a while since the CIP. There were some amendments offered, and those amendments kind of spurred a conversation of how we will have a more meaningful CIP process, how we can have a process where the the and projects that a CIP, a document that comes out of this that people can rely on. I know things happen and things have to be moved around, but we're trying to make improvements to this process. So this is just the first of what I'm seeing as being there will be some subsequent meetings. We'll hear about these amendments today, and then we will have all council members will offer also offer their suggestions on how we might improve the process. I think the departments will too. And then we see subsequent meetings where we could actually take a vote on recommendations to the administration for changes to the CIP process. So we'll be taking up some of the amendments. The one on the DDSRF fund balance will actually be is actually moved to the to the September 2nd meeting. But um the but the ones that were related that Councilmember Peck did about distributing quote uh equally uh dollars and the ones that council member Ramirez had about uh uh communications and and specific uh items within projects that will change and other things. We'll talk about that at this meeting. Um, but that's that's kind of the deal. Um we're you know the mayor wants us to work at these committees. He wants our committees to he's used to the state and used to the committees kind of doing the work and coming up with things, so that's how we're seeing this joint committee work that we'll actually be seeing some ideas, suggestions, recommendations turn into actual action items on the CIP process. Okay, we will move into our first agenda item. Uh at this time, I'd like to welcome Finance Director Melissa Davowski. Okay, thank you. That thank you. Good afternoon. Um, so many of the slides you're gonna see in my section of the presentation uh are going to remind you of the slides that we had at the time of the uh CIP uh being proposed. So I'll just kind of go over a background of the CIP and then we'll get into all the the fund material from our public works department and general services department. Um so to remind everyone as an overview that Capital Improvement Plan is a rolling five-year plan of projected projects. The plan is a live document and is subject to change due to environmental factors, funding constraints, uh budgetary constraints, shifting priorities, uh scheduling, as well as citizen input. Uh the CIP is broken into four different component sections, uh, which are roughly divided up uh based on the funding sources for each of those components. So the first component is the public improvement program. Uh we also have the uh build Houston Forward, which is uh formerly known as the Rebuild Houston, the Enterprise Fund Program, which is the water and wastewater uh utility system as well as the Houston Airport system, and then the component units. And the purpose of the CIP is to be as cost effective as possible in meeting the city's goals to serve the Houstonians. And we have all the capital improvement fund projects in one document that's proposed and adopted by city council so that we can improve on the transparency by providing visibility on citywide needs. Historically, probably about 10 years ago, there were different capital improvement plans, some for one for facilities, one for IT, fleet was a different plan. So about a decade ago or more, we brought those all into one plan. And then, of course, have the public engagement process with the city council, the website, and we'll get more into the timeline and the steps with improving the transparency in the coming slides. So on the next slide, as far as the process, we do aim to lock in the existing projects that are in the existing CIP, and we do try to prioritize funding for projects that are already in the CIP, which generally would include cost escalations to existing projects. As we've seen over the last couple of years, COVID coming out of COVID, cost escalations have been significant at the same time that our revenue sources have been constrained. So we are having to prioritize which projects are the most critical and put funding to those projects as we can. So in order to prioritize the most urgent projects, the client departments at the city, which would include anything from the health department, police department, fire, any of the departments that have facility equipment or vehicle needs, put together a list of requests for their projects that they're requesting to be funded. They then prioritize those projects based on their needs that they see as a departmental level. Then we ask the central service area departments to do a citywide prioritization list for those specific categories. So that would be the fleet director, the IT director, and then the general services director prioritizing what they see as a citywide need for all of the facilities projects citywide, all of the IT projects citywide, and all of the fleet needs citywide. And then we compile all those projects together based on the available funding, both the existing projects and the new requests that we can afford to add to the plan, and we put them together to be proposed to this body for uh adoption. On the next slide, I'll go over uh the details of the four components of the CIP, just to remind everyone in the public improvement program. This is where the general fund departments are funded.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com