October Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee Meeting - October 7, 2025
October Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee Meeting - October 7, 2025
The Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee met on October 7, 2025, to review the monthly financial report, discuss upcoming financial transactions, compare Houston's revenue sources to other major Texas cities, consider the proposed property tax rate, explore potential consolidation of the city and county health departments, and hear a feasibility study for the George R. Brown (GRB) Convention Center expansion. Multiple public comments were received on the health department and GRB items.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Laura Gallier (District C) expressed concern that public health needs are not fully met and urged that any savings from consolidation be reallocated to improve outcomes, particularly for mental health, substance abuse, air quality, and women's health. She noted that about half of maternal health providers were cut in the recent Harris County budget.
- Sarah Remann (social worker) supported the health department merger but emphasized focusing on mental health decarceration, reproductive health, and homeless services. She also argued Harris County Public Health should be led by a clinician.
- Dominique Mazok (public speaker) questioned why the GRB expansion is not put to a public vote, suggested it could be a public-private partnership, and raised concerns about Title VI implications and financial priorities.
- Lisa Hunt (People for Polk) stated the group is not against GRB expansion but opposes the current design's impact on transportation and quality of life. She criticized Houston First's spending, lack of a final budget, poor sequencing (building a garage before demolishing another), and unanswered questions about the two-way Leland Street alternative.
- Amy Erickson warned of fiscal risks, noting that hotel occupancy tax revenue is down 4.7% and that locking up funding for 30 years could starve arts, parks, and infrastructure. She argued the feasibility study is optimistic and underrates risks, and called for a unified plan with TechSt, Metro, and Public Works before proceeding.
- Roy Hirsch (People for Polk) urged fiscal caution, noting that Houston First relies on the city to issue debt, which impacts the city's bond rating and debt capacity. He asked for appraisals before any street abandonment and questioned why the feasibility study did not project profit without closing Polk Street.
Discussion Items
-
Monthly Financial Report (August 31, 2025)
- Controller's Office (Will Jones) projected a general fund ending balance of $356.7 million (14% of expenditures), $17.5 million lower than the Finance Department's projection due to lower revenue assumptions. The fund balance is $166.2 million above the 7.5% target.
- Finance Department (Melissa DeBaske) projected $374 million ending balance (14.7% of expenditures), $183.7 million above the target, based on two months of actual results and ten months of projections.
- No changes were projected for enterprise funds.
-
Upcoming Financial Transactions
- The public improvement bond series 2025 sale closed on September 15, 2025, with a true interest cost of 3.47%. Negotiations saved an additional $55,000, and total debt service savings over the life of the bonds were approximately $3 million.
- The commercial paper program series G2 ($125 million line with Barclays) is expiring in November. Due to Senate Bills 13 and 19 (prohibiting business with companies that boycott oil or firearms), Barclays cannot renew. A request for proposals resulted in a recommendation to switch to Bank of America for a three-year term at seven basis points lower pricing. The RCA goes to council for approval on October 8.
-
Revenue Comparison with Other Texas Cities
- Will Jones presented a high-level comparison of revenue sources. Key findings: Houston has the lowest property tax rate among major Texas cities, is the only large city not charging a garbage fee, and does not transfer utility revenues to the general fund. Charging fees in line with other cities (garbage fee, clean community fee, utility transfer) could free up at least $200 million annually.
- The utility transfer (e.g., San Antonio receives $504 million from its electric and water utilities) would require legal analysis due to bond covenant restrictions. The presentation noted that additional legal analysis is required to pursue this option.
- Councilmember Ramirez questioned the feasibility, noting that the fine print says
Meeting Transcript
Good morning, everyone. That's my HGAC gavel I got, so I'm all excited to use it. Welcome to the October Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee. We are going to get started right away because as you can see, we have a very lengthy agenda and a really impactful agenda today with a lot of uh interesting topics important to our city. So I want to start by welcoming my council members in in attendance. We have Mayor Pro Tem Martha Castax Tatum, Vice Mayor Pro Tem Amy Peck, Councilmember Abby Kamen is online, um Vice Chair Mario Castillo, Councilmember Joaquin Martinez is here, uh Councilmember Julian Ramirez, and Councilmember Twila Carter. So welcome all. We are going to get right into it with our first presentation, which is the monthly financial report with Will Jones representing the controller's office and Melissa DeBaske. Floor is yours. Good morning, uh Madam Chair, Councilmembers and staff. I'm here today to present the monthly financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2025. In the general fund, the controller's office is projecting an ending fund balance of 356.7 million or 14 percent of expenditures less debt service and pay as you go for FY 2026. This is 17.5 million lower than the projection of the Finance Department. The difference is due to a lower revenue projection than the Finance Department. Based on our current projections, the fund balance will be approximately 166.2 million above the city's target of holding 7.5% of total expenditures, excluding debt service and pay as you go. Also, uh, we are projecting no changes in the enterprise funds. Uh so for the commercial paper and bonds, the city's practice has been to maintain no more than 20 percent of the total outstanding debt for each type of debt and a variable rate structure, which is in line with rating agency's guidance of 25 percent. From time to time, the city's enterprise credits have exceeded this threshold on an interim basis as they have undertaken large capital improvement projects or major expansions. Thank you very much, and that concludes my report. This is the two plus ten financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2025. Fiscal year 26 projections are based on two months of actual results and ten months of projections. For the general fund, both of our revenue and expenditure uh projections remain unchanged from the adopted budget and from the prior month. Therefore, we're currently projecting the ending fund balance to be $374 million, which is about $29 million higher than the adopted budget and represents 14.7 percent of estimated expenditures, not including debt service and pay as you go. Um that fund balance is $183.7 million above the target of holding 7.5% of expenditures, not including debt service and pay as you go. Not in my next presentation, but one of the other presentations in the on the agenda today. I'll talk a little bit more about future projections for the fund balance due to the property tax rate that we're proposing. Um but these are the figures as of this monthly financial report. Um for the enterprise special revenue and other funds. We're not projecting any forecasted changes uh to those funds. And that concludes my report. Thank you very much. Any questions on the monthly financial report? I would like to welcome Councilmember Caroline Evan Shbaz, Councilmember Fred Flickinger, Councilmember Mary Nana Huffman, Councilmember Willie Davis, and staff from Councilmember Cayman's Office is in chambers, and we have staff from Councilmember Ed Pollard's office and Councilmember Letitia Plummer's office. All right. I don't see any questions, so we can go on to your next presentation on upcoming financial transactions. Yes, good morning. I'm presenting this presentation today on behalf of the finance working group. On the next slide, I'll go over our agenda for the day. The first item is the public improvement bond series 2025 sale summary that we conducted last month. I'll just give you an update about what happened with the bond sale. And then we're going to talk about an upcoming commercial paper program series G2 item. So on the next slide, just to update this body about the pension uh the public improvement bonds, sorry, nothing to do with pensions, public improvement bonds. Um we had the sale for the bonds back last month on September 15th. Um that week uh was a good week for issuers in the municipal market. Um we happened to price the day before the uh Fed cut the interest rate. Um, but I think as we've talked about in the past, the uh market largely uh anticipates those interest rate cuts and had that already priced into the rates in the market. Um that week our transaction was the largest Texas deal in the municipal market for the week, and so we were able to attract a lot of investors for the transaction. Because of that uh large interest uh that we had in the transaction, uh, we were able to uh reduce the interest rate that we have to pay to investors by up to 10 basis points um during the order period because of the number of orders that we brought in. Um we additionally um negotiated with the underwriting team to um ask for additional adjustments in the interest rate because of that demand that we saw for the uh orders that uh were put in for our for our bonds. And that uh additional negotiation saved an additional $55,000, um, which I know doesn't seem like a lot, but every bit counts as these bonds are going to be payable with um general fund resources.
openpublica.com