Houston Affordability Committee Meeting on 9% Tax Credit Applications - February 5, 2026
Houston Affordability Committee Meeting on 9% Tax Credit Applications
On February 5, 2026, the Houston Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department presented recommendations for the 9% tax credit process to the Affordability Committee. The meeting, chaired by Councilmember Thomas, ran from approximately 1:30 PM to 2:35 PM. Present were Councilmembers Alcorn, Ramirez, Davis, Flickinger, Evans Shabazz, and staff from multiple council offices. Deputy Director Derek Sellers and Assistant Director Ryan Bibbs led the presentation.
Discussion Items
- Scoring and Recommendations: HCD received 44 applications for 9% tax credits. Of those, 19 withdrew, leaving 25 recommended projects. The city awards resolutions of support worth 17 points in the state’s competitive scoring process. HCD uses its own scoring system (up to 25 points) considering mixed-income composition, site quality, resiliency features (e.g., generators added this year), and community engagement. An equitable dispersion policy caps the number of projects per council district (C, E, F, G capped at four; rehabs and permanent supportive housing exempt).
- Waivers for Proximity: Some projects require waivers because they are within two miles of another 2026 applicant (same year) or within one mile/three years of a prior allocation. HCD recommends waivers for projects serving different populations (e.g., family vs. senior) or tied to larger revitalization efforts (e.g., $50 million Choice Neighborhood investment at Cuney Homes/Emancipation West).
- Developer Vetting: Councilmember Flickinger asked about financial underwriting; HCD stated that TDHCA handles full financial review, and the city only underwrites if it later provides gap financing. Councilmember Alcorn inquired about developer track records; HCD confirmed they review reputation and property conditions for repeat developers.
- Community Engagement: Councilmember Thomas stressed the importance of early community outreach. Councilmember Huffman’s office noted that for the Sunstone project in District G, they were unaware of any letters of community support included in the submission. HCD agreed to provide those letters. Mayor Pro Tem Tatum noted that one developer (CSH LOF Stancliffe LTD) had not engaged the community and requested a meeting.
- Drainage Concerns: Councilmember Ramirez asked about floodplain evaluation for Sunstone. HCD explained they require projects to not be in a floodway and to mitigate if in a 100-year floodplain. The developer’s drainage plan was not yet fully vetted by the local MUD.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Patricia Redman (representing 870 homes in Lakes of Parkway, adjacent to the 1176 Highway 6 project): Opposed the project due to drainage and flood risks. She requested that the city withhold approval until updated engineering studies (compliant with post-Harvey Atlas 14 standards) are completed and that the one-mile/two-year waiver be denied. She noted the MUD had met with the developer and expressed capacity concerns.
- Nathan Kelly (representing two ETJ projects): Expressed gratitude and offered to answer questions; no questions were posed.
- Attorney Hunter (no specific project): Present to answer questions; none raised.
- Sunny Lawanium (Greenspoint resident, representing a faith-based organization): Praised the city’s efforts but highlighted ongoing flooding and infrastructure needs in Greenspoint (e.g., reliance on suction pumps). He offered 5-6 acres of land for multifamily development and requested assistance from the city.
Key Outcomes
- The committee will forward the 25 recommended projects to the full City Council for a vote on February 11, 2026, along with the required proximity waivers.
- HCD noted that an appeals process is available for developers who were not recommended, and any appeals must be resolved before the Council vote.
- Councilmembers were reminded that the 9% tax credit awards by TDHCA are expected in June 2026, and some projects may later return for gap financing using the recently approved $50 million multifamily portion of disaster recovery funds (DR24).
- The next regular Housing Affordability Committee meeting is scheduled for February 17, 2026, at 10:00 AM.
Meeting Transcript
Affordability committee meeting. In chambers, we have uh council member Alcorn, Councilmember Ramirez, and staff representing councilmember Castillo, our mayor Pro Tim Castix Tatum's office, staff representing Councilmember Kamen and Councilmember Jackson and Councilmember Twila Carter and Councilmember Martinez and Vice Mayor Pro Tem Peck is in chambers today. So we'll hear from the housing and community development department, our multifamily division, assistant director Ryan Bibbs, and our deputy director, Derek Sellers. Um, I'm gonna assume that director will join us or you'll provide closing comments. Yes, wonderful, and then we do have four uh individuals that have signed up for public comments online, and if you wish to sign up for comments, you can do so at the table, and then we will read your name and you will have a three-minute maximum for your remarks. And once your time has expired, you'll hear the bell, but we do welcome comments uh and visibility from all of our applicants at this time. So we're gonna go ahead and get started, Deputy Director. Welcome. Good afternoon. We're happy to be here to present the department's recommendations related to the nine percent tax credit process. I'll provide some basic information about what nine percent tax credits are, and then uh deputy assistant director Ryan Bibbs will walk us through our recommendations. So let's go to the next slide. So tax credits provided by the federal government through the IRS to provide equity towards the construction of affordable housing. The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs or TDHCA administers these federal tax credits and they award them through a competitive process. Uh this competitive process is outlined annually by TDHCA through its qualified allocation plan or QAP. Next slide. So what we've provided to you here is a quick visual of what can be a complex funding structure. Uh I'll go through it really quick for you. In short, the developer applies to TDHCA for the tax credits using that QAEP QAP process I mentioned, and that's what we're here for today is we're a part of that process. The city is as part of that is seeking resolutions of support. Once awarded, uh once uh the TDHCA awards uh the tax credits to the developer, then they work with private investors uh to turn to exchange the tax credits in the uh for equity. Uh the equity comes into the deal along with other sources such as conventional loans and financing, uh the developer equity or grants. Sometimes the city provides grants as well into these deals, so that's kind of the funding structure that we have here. Those tax credits are then realized for the investors over a 10-year period after the project is placed in service. So they get the allocation every year for 10 years. So let's go on to the next slide. So the QAP and this process is very highly competitive. Every single point matters. And what we're here to talk about today are those resolutions of support that constitute 17 points as a scoring item. Now, our resolutions for any development related uh that is here in the city can receive up to 17 points. If in a uh one of these deals is located in the ETJ, then they must seek a resolution of support from the city and also from the county, and with each of them constituting half of the points towards that 17. Next slide. So there are two different types of tax credits that we typically look at 9% and 4%. We're here for the 9% process. We just wanted to make that clear to y'all as we talk about this today. We routinely routinely throughout the year bring four percent deals forward to y'all. We hold a public hearing and things like that. Um that's not as competitive. Uh it does require private activity bonds, but I just wanted to make sure we're all clear we're here for the nine percent portion. So, along with our local government support that we're here for, there's also other items that are contingent items that they can receive points for. I just wanted to point it out a couple of these because this often comes up in our conversations. So, this includes community participation at four points and looking at in point input from community organizations at four points. So, those are separate scoring items beyond our 17 that we're talking about today. We also look at that when we determine a we have a scoring system for awarding that resolution, community inputs what we're looking for as well. But that 17 points, you can see it is far outpacing everything else that's in this list. If you don't get the 17 points, your deal will not go through. It is vital. Next slide. So I just want to quickly revisit the schedule for this. This schedule is based on the QAP, what TDHCA says is their deadlines within it.
openpublica.com